Progress 10/01/11 to 09/30/15
Outputs Target Audience:The target audience reached during this project consisted in wastewater treatment plant directors, policy makers and operators and those with specialized interest in nutrient recovery through the Water Environment Research Foundation at the national and regional (Central States Water Environment Association) level. Also those involved in soil fertility, fertilizers and crops research and practice at ASA-CSSA-SSSA annual meetings. Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?This project has provided the scientific material for graduate research assistant Tyler Anderson to conduct master's level research at the UW-Madison, culminating in a master's thesis and a Master of Science degree from the UW-Madison in August 2015. Anderson also was afforded opportunities to present his research at the 2014 annual meetings of ASA-CSSA-SSSA and the 2015 annual meeting of the Central States Water and Environment Assoc. Additionally, this project provide Tyler Anderson, undergraduate Carolyn Barker, and research scientist Christy Davidson the opportunity to participate in a National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Association, NCIIA, (now VentureWell) workshop to develop entrepreneurial skills to market this idea to industry. An undergraduate student, Connor Todd, used the research data as the subject of an undergraduate research project, culminating in a Poster presented in partial fulfillment of Biology 152 at the UW-Madison. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Two distinct communities of interest were identified: the water and wastewater treatment industry and the soil fertility/fertilizers community, as well as the local academic unit. Presentations were made by Barak to the director and senior staff of the wastewater treatment plants of Milwaukee (11 Mar 2015), Madison, WI, and Woodridge, IL (24 Jul 2014). Presentations were made at annual meetings of the Central States Water and Environment Assoc. on 16 May 2013 ('Nutrient Recovery and Upcycling: Finding Value in Wastewater', Madison, WI), 13 May 2014 ('Nutrient Recovery and Upcycling: Phosphorus recovery in the form of brushite from municipal wastewater', St. Paul, MN) and 19 May 2015 ('A Greenhouse Study Comparing Brushite and Struvite, both Wastewater Recoverable Fertilizers, to standard Phosphorus fertilizers' and 'Phosphate Fertilizer Recovery from Anaerobic Acid Digesters in Sewage Treatment Plants: From Batch Process to Continuous Pilot', 19 May 2015, Oakbrook Terrace, IL). Results were disseminated to the soil fertility/fertilizer community through presentations at ASA-CSSA-SSSA meetings as a poster presentation ('A Greenhouse Study Comparing Brushite, MAP, DAP, TSP, and Struvite Using a Phosphorus Deficient Prairie Soil', 3 Nov 2014, Long Beach CA) and an oral presentation ('Recycling Post-consumer NPK Back into Agriculture', 16 Nov 2015, Minneapolis, MN). Results were disseminated to the academic unit by Tyler Anderson as a public thesis defense ('Production and Evaluation of Wastewater-Derived Brushite as Fertilizer', Dept of Soil Science, UW-Madison) on 13 Aug 2015 and by Barak as a public seminar ('The Public and Private Sides of Nutrient Recovery from Wastewater in the Barak lab', Dept of Soil Science, UW-Madison, 1 Oct 2014). What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?
Nothing Reported
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
Five runs to produce calcium phosphate at Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District's Nine Spring treatment plant from the organic acid digest were performed. We learned that successful operating conditions required addition of a flocculating polymer and use of a centrifuge to produce centrate suitable for recovering brushite. Chemical analysis of the initial and final digest for soluble phosphorus showed that 60 to 99% of soluble P was precipitated. The second goal, determining the environmental and operating conditions that precipitate the greatest amount of calcium phosphate, revealed the requirement of near-colloidal calcium hydroxide to have maximum effect; in the alternative, a mixture of struvite and unreactive granules of calcium hydroxide was found to be present together with brushite in the recovered product. A greenhouse experiment conducted with synthetic brushite found that brushite performance was nearly identical to those of mono- and di-ammonium phosphate (MAP and DAP). Greenhouse experiments showed that the MMSD product performed like MAP and DAP at low and moderate rates but underperformed compared to synthetic brushite at higher dosages, likely due to the presence of the small amount of unreacted calcium hydroxide present. Nonetheless, the MMSD product were very low in heavy metals and easily met the California standards for heavy metals in P fertilizers. In the course of this work, we observed the very high concentrations of ammoniacal nitrogen in the anaerobic digests, which is largely regarded as a nuisance since it must be removed before discharge, often removed by nitrification and denitrification. We experimented with removal of ammonium nitrogen by electrodialysis, filed an invention disclosure report with WARF, the intellectual property holder for the UW-Madison, which chose not to pursue patent protection; the PI petitioned return of title to the invention from the USDA, which was granted. The PI filed for preliminary US patent protection and then patent protection, which is currently pending.
Publications
- Type:
Theses/Dissertations
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2015
Citation:
Anderson, T.J., Production and Evaluation of Wastewater-Derived Brushite as Fertilizer. Masters thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison. 2015.
|
Progress 10/01/13 to 09/30/14
Outputs Target Audience: Target audiences include wastewater treatment plant operators who may use this process for removing phosphate from wastewater treatment plants and agronomists/soil scientists who may recommend the use the derived brushite as a phosphorus fertilizer to agricultural producers. Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Valuable graduate training opportunities have been provided to Mr. Tyler Anderson, in pursuit of his MSc in Soil Science from the Univ of Wisconsin-Madison. Undergraduate research opportunities have been provided to three undergraduates. An undergraduate mentored research opportunity was provided to a student of Bio 152 in the Barak lab. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Results have been disseminated as oral presentations (Madison Metropolitan Sewage District, 24 Jun 2014; DuPage Co. Sewerage District, 24 Jul 2014; Strand Associates, Inc.; 13 Aug 2014) and posters (CSWEA, 12 May 2014; WARF Discovery Challenge, 21 May 2014). What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Remaining work is to improve the value of the recovered brushite by identifying the limiting component that interfered with plant P uptake, perhaps residual base occluded in the product, and removing it by altering the recovery process or post-recovery processing. Also, beginning in the spring of 2015, a pilot plant using this technology will be set up by Nutrient Recovery and Upcycling, LLC, a spin-off company from this lab funded by USDA SBIR Phase II grant, at the DuPage County (IL) wastewater treatment plant, with the goal of capturing 5-10% of their organic acid digest on a continuous basis. Additional tweaking of methodology to add both calcium salts and calcium hydroxide will be considered.
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
Maximum soluble phosphorus at MMSD was to be found in the organic acid digest, ranging from 1000 to 1600 mg P/L. Maximum phosphorus precipitation was at pH 6.5 and reduced soluble P to between 2 to 200 mg P/L, amounting to phosphate reduction from 61 to 99%. The nutrient availability of the recovered phosphate products contained from 20 to 38% P2O5 by wt, of which 68 to 87% was 'available P' as judged by citrate-solubility. A separate greenhouse study agreed that brushite was very nearly as available as monoammonium phosphate and diammonium phosphate; the recovered phosphate products underperformed at higher P rates. The recovered phosphate products were analyzed for arsenic, cadmium, cobalt, copper, lead, mercury, molybdenum, nickel, selenium and zinc and were far below AAPFCO limits (set as ppm per %P2O5).
Publications
|
Progress 01/01/13 to 09/30/13
Outputs Target Audience: The target audience reached during this reporting period consisted in wastewater treatment plant operators and those with specialized interest in nutrient recovery through the Water Environment Research Foundation at the national and regional level. Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? This project has provided the scientific material for graduate research assistant Tyler Anderson, undergraduate Carolyn Barker, and research scientist Christy Davidson to participate in a National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Association, NCIIA, workshop to develop entrepeneurial skills to market this idea to industry. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Oral presentation to Central States Water Environment Association, 86th Annual meeting, Madison, WI, 16 May 2013, "Bringing Modern Water Treatment to the Developing World through Resource Recovery from Wastewater" What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Plan to report to Central States Water Environment Association annual meeting and perhaps to national Water Environment Research Federation conference.
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
Five runs to produce calcium phosphate from the organic acid digest have been performed. Chemical analysis of the initial and final digest for soluble phosphorus is pending, but is expected to address the second goal, environmental and operating conditions that will precipitate the greatest amount of calcium phosphate. A greenhouse experiment has been conducted with brushite to determine the available phosphate from product, and the recovery five brushite samples are on their way for analysis of citrate-soluble ("available") P2O5; chemical analysis will also show whether the materials meet the California standards for heavy metals in fertilizers. We have observed the very high concentrations of ammoniacal nitrogen in the wastewater, which is largely regarded as a nuisance since it must be removed before discharge, often removed by nitrification and denitrification. We have begun experimentation with removal of ammonium nitrogen by electrodialysis
Publications
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Accepted
Year Published:
2013
Citation:
"Bringing Modern Water Treatment to the Developing World through Resource Recovery from Wastewater", Carolyn Barker, Menachem Tabanpour and Phillip Barak. Oral Presentation. Central States Water Environment Association 86th Annual Meeting, 16 May 2013, Madison, WI.
|
Progress 01/01/12 to 12/31/12
Outputs OUTPUTS: In the past year, a graduate research assistant, Mr. Tyler Anderson, a BS (major: chemistry) from Arizona State University, was engaged for this project, beginning in September 2012. The digester for the project is 55-gal in capacity, has stainless-steel walls, aluminum internal heating coils, and variable speed direct drive motor with propeller for mixing the digest. The digester was tested in a 10-day run at Madison Metropolitan Sewage District Nine Springs waste water treatment plant; pH, percent solids, and other run parameters were monitored. The resulting digest was sent for testing to determine rheological properties and to confirm suspicions that this digest behaved as a non-Newtonian fluid. Field trips were taken to other waste water treatment plants not related to municipal sewage, including the Dane County manure digester in Vienna, WI, in partnership with Clear Horizons, and the Montchevre cheese waste digester designed and operated by Procorp. Grab samples were taken and analyzed at both of these facilities, as well as from the manure lagoon at the Swine Research Facility at the UW-Madison Agricultural Research Station in Arlington, WI. PARTICIPANTS: Ms. Christy Davidson, research scientist, BSc in Soil Science; Mr. Menachem Tabanapour, research scientist, BSc UW-Madison; Mr. Tyler Anderson, graduate research assistant, BSc (Chemistry) Arizona State University; Professor Phillip Barak, PI. TARGET AUDIENCES: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.
Impacts The motor for mixing in the digester was found to be underpowered at 1 amp and mixing was continued on a temporary basis by pumping the digest continuously from out-port to in-port for the duration of the run. Rheological measurements showed that the digest had properties of non-Newtonian solutions, with shear-thinning at low sheer rates and sheer-thickening at higher rates. These results will permit better selection of a motor to drive the mixing shaft and guide the separation techniques for removal of solids when producing phosphates from the digest. Analysis and chemical modeling revealed that slurries were saturated with struvite at the cow manure digester and the swine facility, whereas at the cheese waste digester, three-quarters of soluble phosphate dropped out of solution as brushite and the digest was significantly undersaturated with regard to struvite.
Publications
- No publications reported this period
|
Progress 01/01/11 to 12/31/11
Outputs OUTPUTS: In the first three months of this project, there are no outputs to report and no results have been disseminated. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals working on this project are the PI, Dr. Phillip Barak, and Research Specialist Menachem Tabanpour. Cooperating organization is Madison Metropolitan Sewage District, with Mr. Steve Reusser as liaison. TARGET AUDIENCES: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.
Impacts In the first three months of this project, there are no outcomes to report.
Publications
- No publications reported this period
|
|