Source: Hansen Energy and Environmental, LLC submitted to NRP
PRODUCTION OF HYDROGEN FROM AGRICULTURAL WASTE
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0210191
Grant No.
2007-33610-18012
Cumulative Award Amt.
$79,994.00
Proposal No.
2007-00496
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jun 15, 2007
Project End Date
Feb 14, 2008
Grant Year
2007
Program Code
[8.11]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
Hansen Energy and Environmental, LLC
15600 N 4005 W
Garland,UT 84312-9542
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
Hydrogen is considered a promising alternative clean energy source, which produces no green house gases. However, despite its clean and green nature when utilized in fuel cells and other devices, most hydrogen is currently produced primarily from non-renewable sources, such as natural gas, oil, and coal. Hydrogen can be produced through electrolysis and thermal decomposition of water, but the cost of production by these methods is even higher than those based on fossil fuels. Biological production of hydrogen, using microorganisms, is an exciting new area of technology development that offers the potential to produce usable hydrogen from a variety of renewable resource. Using anaerobic fermentation to produce hydrogen is actually a more cost-effective process and has considerable potential as an environmentally friendly practice because the process can utilize waste material or wastestreams with a negative value. The Andigen IBR anaerobic digester has the potential to be the first flow-through system for the biological production of hydrogen. The purpose of this project is to examine the biological production of hydrogen using anaerobic digestion of food and agricultural waste when the methane forming bacteria are suppressed by pH.
Animal Health Component
20%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
80%
Applied
20%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
4035370100050%
4035370202050%
Goals / Objectives
The overall objective of this proposed Phase 1 project is to further develop technology for economical production of hydrogen from agricultural production and processing wastes. .The hydrogen will be produced by controlling the pH to suppress the methane forming bacteria. The pH will be controlled by using low pH food waste instead of chemicals, thus making the production of hydrogen more economical. A second objective will be to utilize the byproduct from hydrogen production, which is a liquid with a high concentration of volatile fatty acids (VFA), to produce methane in a pilot scale Induced Blanket Reactor (IBR). The 179 L (45 gallon) Pilot scale IBR was used in the development of high rate flow through digestion and is located at the USU Cane Dairy. Synthetic wastewater (manure) will be used for the initial lab scale trials. We will then conduct trials using real manure and food waste. Towards the end of the project period (5-6) months into project), we will add the effluent from the hydrogen production into a pilot scale IBR commingling it with real manure to produce methane in order to obtain preliminary results for phase II of the SBIR. Because the research for phase I is in small scale all experiments will be batch digestion rather than flow-through digestion except for the final month when the effluent from the batch hydrogen production will be run through the pilot scale flow-through IBR. The objectives and sub objectives are: 1. Conduct hydrogen production fermentations using synthetic manure in lab scale and then real manure and cheese processing waste (lactose) in lab scale. The cheese whey will produce a biologically stressed mixed bacterial culture by lowering the pH to inhibit the production of methane. 2. Demonstrate quantity and quality of hydrogen that can be produced from these materials. 3. Commingle the effluent from the hydrogen production (high in volatile fatty acids) with dairy manure in a 179 L (45 gallon) pilot scale IBR digester in order to extract more energy (methane) from the mixture. In other words this will be a two stage process producing two forms of gas 4. Obtain a goal of 50% digestion of the volatile solids when using real manure and lactose in the final two stage digestion process 5. Another goal would be to obtain a net energy gain by producing both hydrogen and methane from the same amount of substrate when compared to producing only methane 6. Complete a preliminary investigation of commercial and economic viability of using the IBR system for hydrogen production.
Project Methods
Most of the research will be conducted in the bio-engineering lab at Utah State University (USU) and/ or a pilot scale bioreactor facility at the USU Caine Dairy. Mark Greenwood will be hired by HEE to be the P. I. on the project. However, Dr. Carl Hansen (HEE vice president for research) will still oversee the entire project. Synthetic manure will be prepared according to work done previously. The synthetic manure will be of the same consistency as real manure but will be easier to work with during the preliminary research. Later in the project manure samples will be collected from the USU Caine Dairy or from other local dairies. Cheese processing waste can be obtained from Gossner Foods in Logan, Utah (a local cheese plant). A subaward has been made to Utah State University for the use of the facility(s), for equipment and supplies and for students who can sample bioreactor influent and effluent contents. Students will also perform analysis on the biogas containing hydrogen and methane. Measurements will include chemical oxygen demand (COD), solids including volatile suspended (VSS) and total (TS), pH, biogas volume, hydrogen and methane content, Biogas hydrogen and methane content and VOA concentration will be measured using a gas chromatograph (GC) ((Hewlett-Packard, Wilmington, DE, Model 6890) equipped with a split inlet, thermal conductivity and flame ionization detectors) located at USU. COD, pH, and solids measurements will be done using standard methods. Analyses including, COD, VOA, biogas volume, and solids concentrations will be taken at least twice weekly unless the data shows more or less frequent sampling is appropriate. In order to determine the hydraulic retention time (HRT), COD, and/or VSS removal efficiency, influent flow rate will be measured volumetrically. The key bioreactor parameters, including hydraulic retention time, temperature and pH; will each be controlled and recorded. Because Phase I will still be in lab scale during hydrogen production and then in small pilot scale during methane production the project will be carried out in batches in order to replicate the optimum gas producing conditions especially when moving from synthetic products to naturally occurring animal and food waste products. After progressing to the animal and food waste products optimum volumes and mixtures will be researched to prepare for an SBIR phase II project that will be a larger pilot scale continuous flow process for both hydrogen and methane production. The IBR is currently used successfully as a flow through system for methane production and can be accurately controlled by a computer. During phase I, each batch with different parameters will be replicated two or three times. Performance data including COD, VSS, and TS, pH, hydrogen production and methane production will be collected and analyzed to see which parameters will produce the most hydrogen. It is expected that at least six different experiments or batches can be run in the six months of the project duration (three with synthetic manure and three with natural manure).

Progress 06/15/07 to 08/14/08

Outputs
OUTPUTS: The scope of this research was to investigate a system to produce hydrogen using anaerobic fermentation. The overall objectives of this research were to investigate methods of producing hydrogen from agricultural and foods wastes in a cost effective and efficient manner, determine if additional energy as methane could be generated from the first phase effluent, and perform waste treatment of animal and food processing wastes. Cheese whey being readily available was the model used for food processing wastes in these experiments. Accomplishing these goals is a key step in commercialization of a two stage anaerobic digestion system ideally setup to deal with agricultural and food processing waste while providing a renewable alternative fuel source. Several questions had to be identified and explored in order to accomplish this research, such as if the anaerobic process could be divided into two separate phases successfully. It was also necessary to determine if each of the phases could be operated independently while constantly producing renewable energy as either hydrogen or methane. Previous research indicated that the process might be divided, but further investigation was needed to verify preliminary findings and then determine the optimal conditions for each anaerobic phase. The first goal of the research was to isolate the first phase, referred to as the acidogenic phase where hydrogen production occurs. Isolation of the acidogenic phase required experiments to determine the optimal pH range, seed inoculum preparation, and hydrogen yields from synthetic wastewater, dairy manure, and cheese whey (obtained from Gossner Foods, Logan, UT). Dairy manure was collected fresh from the Blaine Wade Dairy, Ogden, UT and kept at <4 C until used within four weeks. The next goal was to examine if the effluent from the acidogenic phase would further produce energy in the form of methane. When it was shown that both phases of the anaerobic process could be operated, a comparison of the two phase system against the single phase system was performed. The information obtained from all of these experiments was then analyzed to determine whether the system could efficiently and effectively produce hydrogen and whether the system was an improvement on current anaerobic digestion of agricultural production and processing wastes. Significant amounts of hydrogen were produced during the first phase trials along with high removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total solids. Bacterial seed preparation and pH control successfully separated out the acidogenic phase from the other phases of anaerobic digestion. The largest amounts of hydrogen were produced using cheese whey and animal manure at optimal operating conditions. It was shown that the 45% pretreated cheese whey mixed with animal manure produced an average of 15.95 kilojoules per liter substrate of energy, which is a considerable amount of energy. The data and knowledge gained through this research has been vital in the successful operation of the two phase system and is essential for large scale production of biohydrogen. PARTICIPANTS: Reese Thompson, Carl Hansen, Conly Hansen, Blaine Wade Dairy and Gossner Foods, Logan, Utah TARGET AUDIENCES: Farmers and food processors PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Not relevant to this project.

Impacts
CONCLUSIONS Solids tests were performed to determine the amount of solid destruction during each stage. The total solids and volatile solids data is shown in. The experiments using the IBR systems had high removal rates for both trials. The single phase anaerobic digestion (SPAD) had a total solids removal of 38.72% and a volatile solids removal of 53.15%. The two phase anaerobic digestion (TPAD) trials reported less removal of volatile solids than the SPAD system, but were still significant. The TPAD trials removed 24.50% of the total solids and 44.16% of the volatile solids. Although these experiments are investigating the use of a two phase anaerobic digestion system for energy production, the high removal rates reported for the COD, total solids, and volatile solids is a significant additional benefit for the treatment of these waste streams using anaerobic digestion. ENERGY PRODUCTION: The 45% cheese whey concentration produced 2.01 liters of hydrogen per liter substrate. The hydrogen concentration within the biogas ranged between 27.9 - 39.02%. The 45% pretreated cheese whey mixed with manure produced 1.57 liters of hydrogen per liter substrate. The average hydrogen content of the biogas at this concentration was 35.88 %. The single phase anaerobic digestion (SPAD) trials average methane production rate was calculated to be 68.46 mL/min. The two phase anaerobic digestion (TPAD) trials averaged 76.3 mL/min of methane. Therefore, an average methane production rate per liter of substrate was approximately 1.22 mL/min for the SPAD and 1.36 mL/min for the TPAD. The total energy produced was 58.51/kJ per day and 64.99/kJ per day from the single phase and two phase trials respectively. From these results it can be concluded that there was not a decrease in methane production when digesting effluent from the hydrogen producing phase and synthetic wastewater. In fact, there was an increase in methane production when utilizing this effluent commingled with synthetic wastewater. The second phase or methanogenic phase operated under stable conditions using 50% effluent from the acidogenic phase. An average of 1.96 liters of methane per day per liter substrate was produced in the methanogenic phase reactor. This was better than the single phase reactor production rate of 1.76 liters of methane per day per liter substrate. The two phase anaerobic digestion trials produced an average of 11% more energy than the single phase trials. The IBR technology being utilized within this research has been commercialized for pollution control and for animal and food waste management. With an additional step for hydrogen production, increased net energy of higher value can be produced. This in turn will produce more income for farmers and food processors.

Publications

  • Thompson R., Hansen C.L., Hansen C.S. 2008. Anaerobic Hydrogen Production using Agricultural and Food Processing Waste. Presentation at the 2008 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Providence, Rhode Island. July 1, 2008