Source: CONNECTICUT AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION submitted to NRP
IMPROVING FRUIT SAFETY OF BLOSSOM PROTECT FOR ORGANIC FIRE BLIGHT MANAGEMENT IN THE EAST
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
ACTIVE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1032849
Grant No.
2024-51106-43407
Cumulative Award Amt.
$463,303.00
Proposal No.
2024-03995
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Sep 1, 2024
Project End Date
Aug 31, 2027
Grant Year
2024
Program Code
[112.E]- Organic Transitions
Recipient Organization
CONNECTICUT AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION
PO BOX 1106
NEW HAVEN,CT 06504
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
Fire blight, caused by the bacterium Erwinia amylovora, is a devastating disease of apple and pear. It not only reduces yield but also kills trees therefore is a major concern to apple and pear growers. Blossom Protect, a biological control comprised of the yeast Aureobasidium pullulans, is the most effective biocontrol material of fire blight. Organically approved, integrated disease management program centered around Blossom Protect has been developed and successfully used in the Pacific Northwest. However, Blossom Protect can cause fruit russeting, a disorder of the cuticle of developing fruitlets that compromises quality, especially in humid climates. Consequently, in the more humid eastern U.S., the risk of fruit russeting from Blossom Protect has slowed development of effective organic management of fire blight.Therefore, this risk is a critical barrier for organic transition within the region, and development of methods that maintain fruit quality by mitigating russeting risk from Blossom Protect is an important research priority.In this project, we aim to test three russeting management strategies: 1. the "Protection and Clearing" strategy to remove A. pullulans after protection is finished, 2. the "Remedy" strategy to improve fruit finish using plant growth regulators / micronutrients, and 3. the "Adjust" strategy to fine tune the timing / dosage of Blossom Protect.Ultimately, we aim to develop an integrated program that maximize both the fire blight suppression and russeting mitigation. Our extension activities include disseminating knowledge on russeting mitigation to the organic tree fruit community and promoting organic practices in eastern U.S.
Animal Health Component
60%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
20%
Applied
60%
Developmental
20%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
2051110107020%
2151110106030%
2041110110230%
2151115110020%
Goals / Objectives
Fire blight is one of the most difficult diseases to control in organic apple and pear production due to its devastating damage and the lack of effective control measures. Blossom Protect, a biological control comprised of the yeast-like fungiAureobasidium pullulansas the active ingredient, is the most effective biocontrol control material of fire blight and is now considered 'foundational' for effective fire blight control in organic apple orchards in western United States. Blossom Protect, however, has a drawback in that it is a cause of fruit russeting, a disorder of the cuticle of developing fruitlets that compromises quality, especially in humid climates. Consequently, in the more humid eastern U.S., the risk of fruit russeting from Blossom Protect has slowed the development of effective organic management of fire blight.Therefore, this risk is a critical barrier for organic transition within the region, and the development of methods that maintain fruit quality by mitigating russeting risk from Blossom Protect is an important research priority.In this project, we aim to test three russeting management strategies, with the following specific objectives:Objective. 1.Test the susceptibility ofA. pullulansto different OMRI-listed fungicides.Objective. 2.Determine the russeting mitigation effect of using OMRI-listed fungicides to remove/reduceA. pullulanspopulation at petal fall, when russeting risk increases. The "Protection and Clearing" strategy.Objective. 3.Determine the effect of OMRI-listed plant growth regulators and micronutrients in improving fruit finish.The "Remedy" strategyObjective. 4.Balance fire blight disease suppression and russeting risk by fine-tuning the application dosage, frequency and timing of Blossom Protect. The "Adjust" strategyObjective. 5.Develop an integrated, multi-channel program for fire blight suppression and russeting mitigation.Objective. 6.Disseminate the knowledge on russeting mitigation practices to the organic tree fruit community.The long-term goalis to provide organic growers in the east with effective management tools for fire blight while maintaining the high quality of fruits.
Project Methods
Objective 1: Organic certified fungicides to be tested in this objective include hydrogen peroxide-based contact sterilants, sulfur, lime sulfur, oils, bicarbonates, and copper (Table 2). To test the susceptibility of A. pullulans to these OMRI-listed fungicides, A. pullulans strains DSM14940 and DSM14941 will be isolated from Blossom Protect and cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA) media. A. pullulans cells will be collected from the PDA surface, resuspended in sterile H2O, adjusted to 106 CFU/ml, before being sprayed to the flowers of 3-year-old potted crabapple trees maintained in a greenhouse. We routinely perform flower induction using both cold induction method or chemical (Perlan) induction method, which yield 50-80 flowers on each tree. 24 hours after inoculation, A. pullulans inoculated crabapple flowers will be sprayed with fungicides to be tested. Water treatment and Captan, a phthalimide fungicide with a known fungicidal effect against A. pullulans, will be included as negative and positive controls. Each fungicide treatment will be applied to 3 trees (approximately 150 flowers). Two days post fungicide treatment, 30 flowers will be collected from each tree to be used for quantification of A. pullulans population. A. pullulans population will be determined using a plating method: each collected flower sample will be placed in a centrifuge tube containing 25 ml of sterile phosphate buffer. The solution will be vortexed for 30 seconds and sonicated for 3 minutes to release yeast cells. After sonication, flower wash solution will be used to prepare 1X, 100X, and 1000X dilutions and all cell suspension will be spread on potato dextrose agar (PDA) amended with streptomycin sulfate (50 µg/liter), chloramphenicol (50 µg/liter), and tetracycline (50 µg/liter) to ensure growth on PDA represent the A. pullulans population. Flowers without A. pullulans inoculation will also be included as a negative control to determine the presence of baseline level of A. pullulans on crab apple flowers. A. pullulans population will be log10-transformed and subjected to the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in the 'stats' package in R. Objective 2: Organically grown apple cultivars "Gala", "Golden Delicious" (representing low and high susceptibility to russeting) and organically grown pear cultivar "Bartlett" will be used in this experiment. Blossom Protect will be tank mixed with Buffer Protect NT and applied at the following rate: 3.17 grams of Blossom Protect and 8.8 grams of Buffer Protect NT per litter of water in concentration, for 0.6 kg of Blossom Protect, and 1.7 kg of Buffer Protect NT per acre. Blossom Protect will be applied to open flowers twice, once at 60% and again at 80% bloom. The three most effective OMRI-listed fungicides selected from Objective 1 will be sprayed on flowers at petal fall approximately 3 days after the last application of Blossom Protect. One group of trees will receive one application of the OMRI-listed fungicides, while another group will receive two applications, with one day apart between applications. Trees without Blossom Protect treatment, trees treated with Blossom Protect but do not receive any fungicides, trees with only the biofungicide treatment, as well as trees treated with Blossom Protect followed by a conventional fungicide (captan) treatment will be included as controls (captan control will not be included in organic orchards as determined by the certification rules). Each treatment will be sprayed to four trees as biological replicates. All treatments will be arranged in a complete randomized block design. Objective 3: Materials to be tested belong to several categories: 1. plant growth regulators such as gibberellic acid GA3, GA4, and GA7, the application of which results in more uniform and smaller epidermal cells and improved fruit finish; 2. boron, a micronutrient that enhances cuticle formation; and 3. kaolin clay, which improves fruit finish by reflecting UV radiation and reducing fruit surface temperatures. Trees to be tested include organically grown apple cultivars "Gala", "Golden Delicious" and pear cultivar "Bartlett". Blossom Protect and Buffer Protect NT will be sprayed on the apple and pear flowers twice (0.6 kg of Blossom Protect per acre), at 60% and at 80% bloom. Objectiver 4: Our preliminary results identified that the labeled rate Blossom Protect and 20% rate of Blossom Protect induced similar levels of host immunity. Therefore, we hypothesize that the labeled rate of Blossom Protect uses an excessive amount of A. pullulans to suppress fire blight. From our preliminary data, we also learned that the A. pullulans amount on apple flowers positively correlates to the russeting severity on fruits at harvest. Therefore, by strategically reducing the application dosage and adjusting the timing, we may reduce russeting severity without compromising the disease suppression efficacy. Objective 5: Blossom Protect and YSY will be applied according to the dosage, frequency, and timing (determined in Objective 4); flowers will be inoculated with E. amylovora at full bloom, the most effective OMRI-listed fungicide in clearing off A. pullulans (determined in Objective 2) will be applied at petal fall to eliminate A. pullulans; the most effective growth regulator/micronutrient that helps to improve fruit finish will be applied at the most appropriate frequency after petal fall (determined in Objective 3). Fire blight disease infection will be evaluated 2 weeks after petal fall, and russeting will be evaluated 1 week before harvest. Three trees will be used in each treatment. Water treatment and streptomycin treatment will be used as negative and positive controls. Data analysis will be performed as described previously.

Progress 09/01/24 to 08/31/25

Outputs
Target Audience:Apple growers, extension educators, scientsts in plant pathology, horticulture, and plant science. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?This grant provided training opportunities for fourgraduate students. Three students are from the Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, and one student is from the Department of Molecular and Cellular Biologyat the University of Connecticut. The students were trained in experimental design and implementation, data analysis, and scientific presentation.Knowledge acquired includes areas such as plant disease biology, integrated disease management, and statistics. Training activities include wet lab bench experiments, disease inoculation and evaluation at the farm, and weekly lab meetings and journal club presentations. One student participated in the New Hampshire Apple Grower Association meeting held in Manchester, NH in March 2025. Two studeents presented poster presentations at a regional symposium. Two students participated an international conference (International fire blight symposium) in Washington, July 2025. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Findings of this grant were disseminated to growers through extension presentations at regional grower meetings such as the CT Pomological Society Meeting (2024), Maine Apple Grower Association meeting (2024) at the Northeastern Tree Fruit Management Working Group meetings (2024), the New England Vegetable and Fruit Conference (2024), and one-on-one consulting with growers will be used to further reach fruit growers in New England. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Objective 1:Test the susceptibility ofA. pullulansof Blossom Protect to different OMRI-listed fungicides. One russeting mitigation strategy is to clear offA. pullulansusing OMRI-listed fungicides at petal fall. In Year 1, we tested a comprehensive list of OMRI-listed fungicides and compared to its efficacy in killingA. pullulansto conventional fungicides. The susceptibility was represented as the normalized colony counts of each of the two strains after mixing with different fungicides compared to the water-treated control. Among fungicides used for organic production, DSM14940 and DSM14941 are highly susceptible to oxidizing contact sterilant (Oxidate and JetAg) and sulfur (Microthiol Disperss), and moderately susceptible to a Bacillus-based biological control Stargus. All other OMRI-listed mate-rials, including copper, oil, potassium bicarbonate, aluminum sulfate, did not significantly affect the growth of DSM14940 and DSM14941 under the in vitro conditions. Among fungicides used for conventional production (Fig. 1), fungicides within the FRAC M (multi-site contact fungicides), FRAC 11 (quinone outside inhibitors) and premixes that contain FRAC 11 (such as FRAC 7&11) all significantly inhibited the growth of both DSM14940 and DSM14941. Fungicides within FRAC 9 (anilinopyrimidines), FRAC 3 (sterol demethylation inhibitors) or premixes containing the two showed low level to no inhibition against DSM14940 and DSM14941 (Fig. XA). Most FRAC 7 fungicides (succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors) showed low to no inhibition against DSM14940 and DSM14941, except Aprovia (Fig. 1). We also observed differences between DSM14940 and DSM14941 in their susceptibility to the fungicides, in that DSM1940 is more sensitive to most fungicides tested than DSM1941. Summary of Year 1's findings and future perspectives. In Year 1, we identified contact sterilants and sulfur as two categories within the OMRI-listed biofungicides, that significantly inhibit the Blossom Protect yeast growth. Notably, the two strains ofA. pullulansyeasts (DSM14940 and DSM14941) also displayed different levels of susceptibility to the fungicides. Determining the compatibility of fungicides and biofungicides with Blossom Protect yeasts lays the foundation for developing mitigation strategies against fruit russeting. Since flowers no longer need to be protected by the Blossom Protect yeasts against fire blight after petal fall, and the extended pres-ence of these yeasts on fruitlets past petal fall may aggravate russeting, killing the Blossom Protect yeasts using certain fungicides (e.g. Oxidate or lime sulfur) after petal fall may reduce the severity of russeting. The continuation of this grant willenable us to further evaluate the efficacy of this strategy in reducing russeting under field conditions (Objective 2 in Year 2 and Year 3). Objective 2 and 3.Determine the russeting mitigation effect of using OMRI-listed fungicides and plant growth regulators to clear off theA. pullulanspopulation at petal fall and to enhance plant epidermis growth. In Year 1, we have prepared orchards for the field testing of the OMRI-listed biofungicides at Lockwood Farm, CT and at Penn State University research farm. We developed a research protocol for the field study. Organically grown apple cultivars "Gala", "Golden Delicious" (representing low and high susceptibility to russeting) and organically grown pear cultivar "Bartlett" were used in this experiment. Blossom Protect was tank mixed with Buffer Protect NT and applied at the following rate: 3.17 grams of Blossom Protect and 8.8 grams of Buffer Protect NT per litter of water in concentration, for 0.6 kg of Blossom Protect, and 1.7 kg of Buffer Protect NT per acre. Blossom Protect was applied to open flowers twice, once at 60% and again at 80% bloom. The three most effective OMRI-listed fungicides (Microthiol Disperss, Oxidate, and Lime Sulfur) selected from Objective were sprayed on flowers at petal fall, 3 days after the last application of Blossom Protect. One group of trees received one application of the OMRI-listed fungicides, while another group received two applications, with one day apart between applications. Trees without Blossom Protect treatment, trees treated with Blossom Protect but do not receive any fungicides, trees with only the biofungicide treatment, as well as trees treated with Blossom Protect followed by a conventional fungicide (captan) treatment were included as controls. Each treatment was sprayed on four trees as biological replicates. All treatments were arranged in a complete randomized block design. Rating of the fruit russeting will occur in July 2025. Summary of Year 1's findings and future perspectives. We have started the first year of field study using selected OMRI-listed biofungicides. The experiment has been implemented and will be rated in the next couple months. Continuing funding will allow repeating this field study for 2 more years and provide more robust results and a working protocol that we can confidently deliver to growers to use in their orchard for russeting management. Objective. 5.Disseminate the knowledge on russeting mitigation practices to the organic tree fruit community. Activities in Year 1: A grower-basedadvisory boardhas been formed. Additionally, we are working with 12 apple growers in the Northeastern states (CT, NY, NH, MA, RI) and have set up demonstration plots in their orchard.We alsocollaborated with BioSafe Inc (Collaborator: Vijay ) and San Group Inc (Collaborator: Dr. Jared Jensen). In this collaboration, control materials were donated by the two companies, and growers signed a letter of collaboration, which has enabled them to use a protocol provided by Dr. Quan Zeng. Dr. Zeng also serves as the contact for technical support and provides guidance to growers for implementing the management protocol. Currently the control materials have been distributed to the growers and applied to their orchards.Growers will collect the disease and russeting data later in the season. A webinar is scheduled in November 2025 to discuss the results. Summary of Year 1's findings and future perspectives. We formed a grower-based advisory board for this grant and have been working with 12 growers in setting up demonstration plots.The goal is to let growers testify and promote the organic fire blight control protocols among growers. We plan to organize a panel of the participating growers at the New England Vegetable and Fruit Conference in December 2026 to discuss their experience of using OMRI approved protocols to control apple diseases.

Publications