Source: NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIV submitted to NRP
MANAGE AND EDUCATE FARMERS ON DIAPORTHE FUNGICIDE RESISTANCE IN SUNFLOWER
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
ACTIVE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1032246
Grant No.
2024-69008-42655
Cumulative Award Amt.
$300,000.00
Proposal No.
2023-09610
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jul 1, 2024
Project End Date
Jun 30, 2027
Grant Year
2024
Program Code
[A1701]- Critical Agricultural Research and Extension: CARE
Recipient Organization
NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIV
1310 BOLLEY DR
FARGO,ND 58105-5750
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
Phomopsis stem canker is a disease that decreases sunflower (Helianthus annuus) yields in Minnesota (MN), Nebraska (NE), North Dakota (ND), and South Dakota (SD), which together account for over 80% of sunflower production in the U.S. Currently, we recommend applying a single dose of Quinone outside Inhibitor (QoI) fungicide during the miniature floral head growth stage of sunflowers to manage this disease. This treatment can significantly reduce the severity of Phomopsis stem canker (up to 30% reduction) and increase yield (by 5%). However, in 2022, we discovered that Diaporthe helianthi, one of the main fungi responsible for Phomopsis stem canker, has developed complete resistance to QoIs due to a G143A mutation (a substitution of glycine (G) with alanine (A) at amino acid position 143). Our long-term research objective is to enhance in-season management of Phomopsis stem canker by adopting an integrated approach and improving farmers' return on investment (ROI). Our project aims to: (1) Determine the prevalence of QoI-resistant strains of D. helianthi and D. gulyae, the fungi causing Phomopsis stem canker, in MN, ND, NE, and SD; (2) Evaluate the effectiveness of foliar fungicides containing Succinate Dehydrogenase Inhibitor (SDHI) as an alternative to QoIs on hybrids resistant to Diaporthe; and (3) Enhance farmers' and agricultural professionals' confidence in managing Phomopsis stem canker by developing and providing Extension tools. The expected outcomes of this project are increased yields and ROI for farmers through the integration of foliar fungicides and Diaporthe-resistant hybrids, while also raising awareness of the possible presence of QoI-resistant strains capable of causing Phomopsis stem canker in their fields.?
Animal Health Component
60%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
40%
Applied
60%
Developmental
0%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
21218991160100%
Goals / Objectives
Phomopsis stem canker is a significant disease of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in Minnesota (MN), North Dakota (ND), and South Dakota (SD), which are the major sunflower-producing states in the United States, accounting for over 80% of production (Mathew et al. 2022, 2015). Currently, the recommended management strategy for Phomopsis stem canker is to apply a foliar fungicide that contains pyraclostrobin, a Quinone outside Inhibitor (QoI) class of fungicides, during the miniature floral head growth stage of sunflower (Kashyap et al. 2023). However, Mohan et al. (2023a) reported the first case of QoI resistance in Diaporthe helianthi, one of the fungi responsible for causing Phomopsis stem canker in sunflower in the United States. Therefore, it is crucial to monitor the occurrence of Phomopsis stem canker and potential fungicide resistance in the causal pathogens. This will help inform sunflower farmers about the most effective disease management strategies and reduce yield loss in the future. Additionally, it is important to conduct further research into integrated pest management (IPM) approaches, such as planting Diaporthe-resistant hybrids and alternating the use of fungicides with different chemistry groups. These approaches are crucial for sustaining sunflower production in the United States. The long-term goal of this project is to manage fungicide resistance in Diaporthe, educate farmers on using integrated approaches that combine host resistance and foliar fungicides with multiple modes of action, and develop Extension tools to increase confidence in the management of Phomopsis stem canker. The specific objectives of this project are as follows: (1) Determine the prevalence of QoI-resistant strains of D. helianthi and D. gulyae causing Phomopsis stem canker in MN, ND, NE, and SD; (2) Evaluate the effectiveness of foliar fungicides containing Succinate Dehydrogenase Inhibitor (SDHI), which is an alternative to QoIs, on Diaporthe-resistant sunflower hybrids; and (3) Enhance the knowledge and skills of farmers and agricultural professionals in managing Phomopsis stem canker through the development and dissemination of Extension tools.
Project Methods
Objective 1. Determine the prevalence of QoI-resistant strains of D. helianthi and D. gulyae causing Phomopsis stem canker in MN, ND, NE, and SD.To obtain isolates of D. helianthi and D. gulyae, a survey of commercial sunflower fields will be conducted in MN, ND, NE, and SD. Farmers, crop consultants, and NSA surveyors will assist with the survey. The number of fields surveyed will vary by state depending on sunflower production. For example, the Dakotas have more sunflower fields than MN or NE. The goal is to survey at least 50 fields each in 2024, 2025, and 2026. These fields must be at least three miles away from any previously selected field.Sampling will occur during the sunflower production months from August to October when disease symptoms are present. 10 to 20 symptomatic plants will be collected along 0.03-mile (50m) transects within each field. The transects will be randomly chosen to cover approximately 1 acre in each field. Each sample collected will be considered unique. The plants will be placed in paper bags and kept dry until pathogen isolation, which will occur within one week.To confirm the fungal identity, the diseased stems will be chopped into small pieces (2 inches or 5 cm per piece, 10 to 12 pieces). These small pieces will be disinfected with 0.5% sodium hypochlorite and 70% ethanol for one minute each. Then, they will be rinsed with autoclaved distilled water for 30 seconds and dried on autoclaved paper towels. The small stem pieces will be plated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) and incubated at 22±2°C for 10 days under 12 hours of light and dark conditions.The cultures will be examined for the presence of Diaporthe species using morphological characteristics (Mathew et al. 2015). DNA extraction will be performed on the suspected isolates, and qPCR assays specific for D. helianthi and D. gulyae (developed by Elverson et al. 2020) will be used for fungal identification.Weather data will be collected at the survey locations, including air temperature, relative humidity, and rainfall, from NDAWN (NDSU) and Mesonet (SDSU and UNL). Correlation coefficients will be calculated to determine the relationship between disease incidence and/or severity (Y) and weather variables (X), monitoring how weather variables may be linked to the increasing incidence of Phomopsis stem canker in the surveyed production areas.Objective 2: Evaluate the use of fungicides containing Succinate Dehydrogenase Inhibitor, SDHI (as an alternative to QoIs) on Diaporthe-resistant sunflower hybrids.A total of 8 to 10 locations will be established across four states over a three-year period (2024, 2025, 2026). The study design will be a randomized complete block (RCBD) with multiple fungicide treatments in at least four replicate blocks. The experimental plots will be planted with 4 rows, spaced 30 inches apart and 20 to 30 feet long, using a four-row planter at a rate of 20,000 to 22,000 seeds per acre. These trials will use sunflower varieties (partially resistant and susceptible) as the whole plot and fungicide treatments as the subplot. All trials will include the following treatments for each hybrid type: non-treated control (NTC), pyraclostrobin (R1) sprayed at 6 fluid ounces per acre, pyraclostrobin (R1) at 6 fluid ounces per acre + tebuconazole + fluopyram (R6) at 9 fluid ounces per acre, pyraclostrobin (R6) at 6 fluid ounces per acre + tebuconazole + fluopyram (R1) at 9 fluid ounces per acre. The decision to limit the fungicide treatments to four on each of the four hybrids (1 susceptible, 3 resistant) was based on the greater yield compared to the non-treated control in the Mathew et al. (2023) study (Figure 6). Weather variables will be monitored at all locations using NDAWN and Mesonet. Yield data will be collected at the end of the season at all locations.After flowering (R5 growth stage) at each location, a total of 10 plants will be used to assess disease incidence (the number of plants with stem lesions produced by the Diaporthe species, Figure 8) and disease severity in each plot. Disease severity will be assessed using a 0 to 5 disease rating scale, where 0 represents no lesions and 5 represents dead plants (Mathew et al. 2015).In addition to disease data, we will calculate the risk analyses associated with foliar fungicide application using the methodology described by Dangal et al. (2023). While keeping all production costs constant (excluding fungicide cost and sunflower seeds), we will estimate the break-even yield (the yield increase needed to cover the cost of fungicide use) for various fungicide costs and sunflower grain prices. The probability of the yield response to foliar fungicides will be estimated as p = × 100; where φ (•) is calculated as the cumulative standard-normal function, C is a constant calculated when the estimated yield and the fungicide costs are the same, is determined by calculating the yield differences between fungicide-treated and non-treated control plots, and is the standard deviation.Objective 3: Improve the confidence of farmers and agricultural professionals in managing Phomopsis stem canker by developing and educating them with Extension tools.We will develop Extension educational materials for farmers and other professionals as we complete each year's research objectives and film diagnostic materials (such as videos). Our focus will be on four main areas. First, we will look at the prevalence of QoI-resistant fungal strains in MN, ND, NE, and SD. Second, we will examine when and why foliar fungicides should be applied, specifically at field sites with a history of Phomopsis stem canker and conditions that promote disease development, to minimize unnecessary and repeated fungicide applications. Third, we will provide information on what to expect when applying a fungicide, including efficacy and economic expectations, as well as tips on preventing, mitigating, and slowing fungicide resistance by alternating the use of QoIs with fungicide products containing SDHI. Finally, we will focus on increasing farmers' and other sunflower professionals' confidence in identifying sunflower stem diseases.To achieve these goals, we plan to create at least two 3-minute videos that showcase areas where Phomopsis stem canker is occurring and being managed. We will work closely with the NSA to host these videos in their growers' section and leverage their marketing power (e-newsletter, magazine, website) to drive traffic to the new diagnostic videos. We will also collaborate with other partners/entities such as SDOC, MOC, and university Extension mechanisms to disseminate the information to growers through email alerts, links, winter meetings, state-specific Crop Pest Alerts, and more.Additionally, we will develop and distribute print materials that are either multi-state or state-specific. These materials will be developed in collaboration with our universities and stakeholders such as the NSA, agrochemical companies, and seed companies. We also plan to seek feedback and advice from stakeholders at least once a year, although our target is twice a year, to ensure that the materials we develop best meet their needs. We will specifically seek feedback from stakeholders at the NSA Research Forum held every January, and whenever possible, we will make visits to the NSA stakeholders at their annual Summer Seminar in June (location varies).

Progress 07/01/24 to 06/30/25

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audience for this proposed research includes researchers, students, crop consultants, Extension specialists, farmers, stakeholders, industry professionals, USDA-ARS (sunflower unit) researchers, and the broader community. This research is particularly important given the critical role that sunflowers play in U.S. agriculture. Approximately 80% of sunflower production occurs in the U.S. states of Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota, making it a vital crop in these regions. While fungicides are essential tools in managing Phomopsis stem canker in sunflower, it is crucial to address the potential risks associated with their overuse. Excessive application of fungicides can lead to selection pressure on fungal pathogens, potentially resulting in the emergence of resistant strains of D. helianthi and D. gulyae--the causal agents of Phomopsis stem canker. These resistant strains may continue to cause disease, undermining the effectiveness of fungicides and posing a long-term threat to sunflower production. To effectively communicate our findings related to fungicide resistance, we presented our research at the Sunflower Annual Forum, a key event organized by the National Sunflower Association, which brings together farmers, industry professionals, and researchers from the university and the USDA-ARS. The forum, which attracted more than 100 attendees from across the U.S., provided an excellent platform for sharing our insights with the farming community and stakeholders. In addition, webinars and field days were conducted in Minnesota, North Dakota, and Nebraska (a total of over 200 attendees), as well as one-on-one meetings with farmers in South Dakota to help crop consultants and agriculture professionals identify Phomopsis stem canker. Additionally, the research was published in the Sunflower Magazine, a widely circulated publication from the National Sunflower Association, further extending the reach of our findings to a broader audience. By disseminating this information through these channels, we aim to raise awareness and promote sustainable practices in the management of sunflower diseases, ultimately benefiting both agricultural professionals and the agricultural community as a whole. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?As part of the project, one graduate student received specialized training in conducting and interpreting fungicide resistance assays, including the use of PCR techniques to detect resistance mutations in fungal pathogens such as Diaporthe. This hands-on experience not only contributed to the student's academic development but also built NDSU's capacity for ongoing diagnostics and fungicide resistance monitoring in Diaporthe species. In addition, we shared findings from this research and provided guidance on how to identify Phomopsis stem canker in the field, along with other common sunflower diseases. This information was disseminated to farmers, researchers, and industry professionals--including agronomists and crop consultants--through a variety of Extension and outreach activities such as webinars, field days, trade magazine articles, the National Sunflower Association Board of Directors meeting, and one-on-one engagement with farmers. These outreach and Extension efforts not only raised awareness but also encouraged stakeholders to take a more proactive role inadoptingIPM practices which includes the use of disease-tolerant hybrids. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The results of the project were widely disseminated through multiple channels to ensure that the results reached both the scientific community and the broader agricultural industry. These included presentations at the Sunflower Forum organized by the National Sunflower Association (sunflower commodity group), webinar oranized by the North Central IPM Center, field days organized by Nuseed and University of Nebraska (Scottsbluff, NE),where key findings were shared with farmers, researchers, and industry professionals. Additionally, the results were communicated during a meeting with the National Sunflower Association Board of Directors in Fargo, ND. Further, the findings were published in The Sunflower, the official trade magazine of the National Sunflower Association, which is widely read by farmers, agronomists, and other stakeholders in the cropindustry. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?For the next reporting period, we plan to establish field trials in North Dakota and Nebraska to evaluate the efficacy of fungicides containing Succinate Dehydrogenase Inhibitors (SDHIs) as an alternative to QoI fungicides, specifically targeting Diaporthe-resistant sunflower hybrids. In addition to the field trials, we will conduct to survey for Diaporthe-resistant strains, and field training sessions focused on the identification of Phomopsis stem canker and other common sunflower diseases. These training sessions will also cover the importance of understanding and managing fungicide resistance. During these sessions, we will emphasize Integrated Pest Management (IPM) practices that can be adopted when fungicide-resistant strains of Diaporthe are identified.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Issue or Problem Addressed: The study aims to identify and understand the occurrence of Diaporthe species causing Phomopsis stem canker in sunflower fields, particularly their resistance to quinone outside inhibitor (QoI) fungicides, to inform better management practices for sunflower growers in the U.S. states of Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Nebraska. Major activities completed as part of Objective 1 (Determine the prevalence of QoI-resistant strains ofD. helianthiandD. gulyaecausing Phomopsis stem canker in MN, ND, NE, and SD): The primary audience for this research includes researchers, farmers, crop protection professionals, and the broader community. The survey provided insights into the prevalence of Diaporthe species and their potential resistance to QoI fungicides. In 2024, a total of 48 sunflower fields were surveyed across North Dakota (n = 31, from 12 counties) and South Dakota (n = 17, from 5 counties). Additionally, sunflower stalks from one field each in Minnesota and Nebraska were included in the study. A total of 113 Diaporthe isolates were recovered through direct isolation from sunflower plants exhibiting symptoms of Phomopsis stem canker, characterized by dark brown stem lesions ranging from 15 to 20 cm in length. Commercial sunflower fields were randomly selected, ensuring that they were at least five kilometers apart within each state. Four to five plant samples were collected from each field, and Diaporthe species were isolated from the stems and leaves using standard isolation procedures. First, the plant tissues were rinsed with tap water and then cut into 10-mm segments. These segments were surface sterilized with 0.05% sodium hypochlorite and 70% ethanol for one minute each, followed by three rinses with sterile distilled water (30 seconds per rinse), and dried on autoclaved paper towels. Afterward, the segments were plated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) supplemented with 0.03% streptomycin sulfate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) to reduce bacterial contamination. The plates were incubated at 22°C for 7 to 10 days under alternating 12-hour light and dark cycles. Hyphal-tipped Diaporthe colonies were sub-cultured onto fresh PDA plates. A Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assay was performed to detect QoI-resistant isolates of D. gulyae and D. helianthi based on mutations in the cyt b gene region. Since cyt b gene sequences for these species were unavailable, primers were designed through primer walking based on the cyt b sequences of D. longicolla, a related fungus. The primers used were: Dan1L - 5'- CAC GCT AAC ACT GCT TCA GC-3' (forward) and Dan1R - 5'-TGG AGC CAT AGG GAT TCT ATC A-3' (reverse). Forty-four isolates of D. helianthi (Minnesota [n = 1], Nebraska [n = 3], North Dakota [n = 35], South Dakota [n = 5]) and 14 isolates of D. gulyae (North Dakota [n = 3], South Dakota [n = 11]) were randomly selected from the various counties surveyed. These isolates were cultured in potato dextrose broth. The genomic DNA of these isolates was extracted using the CTAB method, and molecular identities were confirmed using quantitative PCR assays (Elverson et al. 2020) before further analysis. The cyt b gene of each confirmed isolate was amplified using the primers mentioned above. The PCR reaction was carried out on at least 100 ng/µL of genomic DNA from D. gulyae and D. helianthi. The 25-µL reaction mixture was prepared, containing 2 µL of fungal DNA (10 ng/µL), 0.75 µL of each primer (forward and reverse, 10 µM), 12.5 µL of 2× Taq PCR Master Mix (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), and 9 µL of sterile nuclease-free water. The PCR cycling conditions were: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 minutes, followed by 30 cycles of 95°C for 30 seconds, 54.8°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 1 minute, with a final extension at 72°C for 10 minutes. A water control was included in each PCR run. PCR products were visualized under UV light on 1.0% agarose gels stained with GelRed® Nucleic Acid Gel Stain (Biotium Inc., Fremont, CA, USA). The amplified products were sent for sequencing at a commercial sequencing facility (Functional Biosciences, Madison, WI). The obtained nucleotide sequences were translated into amino acid sequences using the bioinformatics tool "Translate" (https://www.bioinformatics.org/sms2/translate.html). The sequences were aligned with reference protein sequences from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database to analyze the presence of amino acid substitutions (G143A, F129L, or G137R). Sequencing of the 550-bp coding region of the cyt b gene was performed on 58 isolates to detect mutations associated with QoI fungicide resistance. No target site point mutations associated with amino acid substitutions (G143A, F129L, or G137R) in the cyt b gene were found in any D. gulyae or D. helianthi isolates. Key Outcomes or Accomplishments: During this reporting period, the project revealed a high prevalence of D. helianthi in North Dakota and D. gulyae in South Dakota, suggesting regional differences in the species composition of Diaporthe. Furthermore, the absence of QoI resistance mutations in the Diaportheisolates suggests that current fungicide resistance is not widespread in the fields surveyed. This work contributes to improving pest management by providing critical information on pathogen distribution and QoI fungicide resistance patterns.

Publications

  • Type: Other Status: Published Year Published: 2025 Citation: Mathew, F., Markell, S., Harveson, R., McCaghey, M., Kovacs, P., and Mohan, K. 2025. Phomopsis Continues to Challenge Dakotas: Fungicide Strategies Show Promise. The Sunflower. February 2025.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2025 Citation: Mohan, K., Markell, S., Scherer, J., Hansen, B., Mathew, F., McCaghey, M., Aspholm, P., Kovacs, P., Passone, N., Harveson, R., and Rickey, A. 2025. Fungicides against Phomopsis in sunflowers. 47th National Sunflower Association Research Forum, Fargo, ND. January 8-9, 2025.