Source: AUBURN UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
MICROBIOME TARGETED INTERVENTION STRATEGIES AGAINST POST WEANING DIARRHEA IN PIGLETS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
ACTIVE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1031135
Grant No.
2022-67015-40720
Cumulative Award Amt.
$770,000.00
Proposal No.
2023-05362
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jul 15, 2023
Project End Date
May 31, 2026
Grant Year
2023
Program Code
[A1221]- Animal Health and Production and Animal Products: Animal Health and Disease
Recipient Organization
AUBURN UNIVERSITY
108 M. WHITE SMITH HALL
AUBURN,AL 36849
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
Post-weaning diarrhea (PWD) caused by the bacterium 'enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli' (ETEC) is an economically important disease in weaned piglets. Currently, antibiotics are used in the swine industry to control intestinal infections, including PWD in piglets. Recent studies have confirmed that disruption of the normal gut bacterial communities (gut microbiome) induced during weaning transition is a critical factor involved in the development of PWD. Disruption of the normal gut microbiome (gut dysbiosis) has been found to be invariably implicated in both initiation and clinical manifestation of PWD. Therefore, stabilizing the gut microbiome during the weaning transition could be an effective strategy for controlling PWD. Recently, fecal microbiome transplantation (FMT) has been shown to prevent gut-dysbiosis and control serious intestinal illnesses in humans. However, the application of these strategies is minimally explored in the swine industry. This proposal seeks to optimize FMT in swine and to understand the mechanisms by which it control gut dysbiosis and ETEC infection in weaning piglets. In this project, we will test our central hypothesis that gut microbiome dysbiosis and PWD in piglets could be prevented by the transplantation of adult pig gut microbiota of varying complexity. In the long term, our results will help to improve the rational design of defined gut bacteria mix as an alternative to antibiotics treatment in pigs. In summary, this project seeks to develop a gut microbiota based intervention as a non-antibiotic alternative to control PWD -a significant challenge is commercial swine production.
Animal Health Component
90%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
10%
Applied
90%
Developmental
0%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
31135101160100%
Knowledge Area
311 - Animal Diseases;

Subject Of Investigation
3510 - Swine, live animal;

Field Of Science
1160 - Pathology;
Goals / Objectives
Microbiome transplantation to prevent gut-dysbiosis and post-weaning diarrhea PWD in pigletsHusbandry practices associated with dietary and environmental changes and piglet weaning age are parameters that are not practical and not economical to change in commercial swine production. However, it is possible to control the post-weaning dysbiosis based on current microbiome research knowledge. fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been widely used in human and veterinary medicine to treat a number of enteric diseases. These include diseases such as C. difficile infection (CDI), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), ulcerative colitis, and Crohn's disease. Management of CDI in humans is the most notable example of the successful use of FMT as a radical therapeutic strategy against dysbiosis and enteric infections. PWD in piglets has similar pathogenesis as CDI in terms of gut-dysbiosis and subsequent pathogen colonization. Thus, stabilizing the gut microbiome by transplanting mature and healthy gut-microflora to weaning piglets could potentially prevent gut-dysbiosis and PWD. In this project, we will test our central hypothesis that gut microbiome dysbiosis and PWD in piglets could be ameliorated by the transplantation of adult pig gut microbiota of varying complexity. The following three objectives are designed to test this hypothesis.Objective 1: Determine the efficacy of fecal microbiome transplantation in preventing gut dysbiosis and PWD in piglets. In this objective, we will transplant fresh fecal suspension from 3-4-month-old pigs at early post-weaning stage. The fresh feces generally consist of several hundred species and represent highest microbiome complexity. We anticipate that this will have high efficiency in controlling PWD.Objective 2: Determine the efficacy of a bioreactor cultured microbiota preparation in preventing gut dysbiosis and PWD in piglets. The bioreactor cultured microbiome mix consists of about 100 species and represent medium microbiome complexity. We anticipate that this will have high to moderate efficiency in controlling PWD.Objective 3: Determine the efficacy of a defined microbiota mix in preventing gut dysbiosis and PWD in piglets.?Here, we will determine whether a defined mix of 20 - 30 pig gut-derived bacteria can control PWD. The source of this mix is a well-characterized pig microbiota culture library developed by our group. When compared to previous objectives, this mix is of lower complexity and may have moderate efficiency in controlling PWD.
Project Methods
Determine the effect of fecal microbiome transplantation in preventing gut dysbiosis and PWD in piglets.Sixty-four suckling piglets weaned and weighed at three weeks of age will be randomly divided into four experimental groups(n=16 per group), which will be housed in individual pens with ad-libitum access to starter diet and drinking water. The treatmentgroups include: Control group, FMT control group (FMT), ETEC challenge control group (EC), and FMT+ETEC challenge group(FMT+EC). All ETEC challenged pigs will be confirmed to be genetically susceptible to F18 ETEC by genotype sequencing ofthe α (1,2) fucosyltransferase-1 gene according to previously published protocol at our collaborator and swine geneticist Dr.Tuggle's lab at ISU. FMT and FMT+EC group will be provided with a fecal microbiome mix (5 mL solution orally) on the 1st and3rd day of the experiment (1st and 3rd day of weaning) by direct oral gavage. On approximately day 10th of the study (10th daypostweaning), animals in EC and FMT+EC groups will be inoculated with approximately 1010 CFU of bacteria (F18 positiveETEC clinical isolate). Control groups will be orally gavaged with PBS. Animals will be weighed and observed for diarrhea foreight days, and fecal samples will be collected at different time points (0, 2, 4, and 7-dpi). The number of pigs showing diarrheawill be recorded daily throughout the duration of the study. Six piglets each will be sacrificed on 4th and 8th day post-infection andthe serum sample, intestinal tissue, and fecal material (from jejunum, ileum and colon) will be collected for histopathology,microbiome analysis, serology, SCFA analysis and ETEC quantitiation as per standard protocol.Determine the efficacy of a bioreactor cultured microbiota preparation in preventing gut dysbiosis and PWD in pigletsWe will use the following four experimental groups in this objective: Group 1 - Untreated control, Group 2- Standardizedmicrobiota inoculation, Group 3- Standardized microbiota inoculation and ETEC challenge, Group 4- ETEC challenge. Theoverall sampling and analysis scheme will be the same asin objective 1. The difference in this experiment will be that insteadof fresh fecal microbiota transplantation, groups 2 and 3 will receive the same CFU of bioreactor cultivated fecal microbiotapreparation. Since the experimental parameters are similar, we will use the same number of animals/group as per the poweranalysis described in objective 1. We will collect samples for ETEC enumeration, histopathological evaluation, molecularbiology evaluation, and microbiome analysis using the same protocols described in objective 1.Determine the efficacy of a defined microbiota transplantation in preventing gut dysbiosis and PWD in piglets.Here, we will use the same pig experiment outline used in objectives 1 and 2. The following four experimental groups will beused: Group 1 - Untreated control, Group 2- Defined bacteria inoculation, Group 3- Defined bacteria inoculation and ETECchallenge, and Group 4- ETEC challenge. The overall sampling and analysis scheme will be the same as in objective 1. Sincethe experimental parameters are similar, we will use the same number of animals/group as per the power analysis described inobjective 1. We will collect samples for ETEC enumeration, histopathological evaluation, molecular biology evaluation, andmicrobiome analysis using the same protocols described in objective 1.

Progress 07/15/23 to 07/14/24

Outputs
Target Audience:Our target audience was the scientific community focusing on microbiota-based therapeutics for swine enteric diseases, the swine industry, farm educators, veterinarians,and farm educators. Changes/Problems:Nomajor changes/problemsreported. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?A graduate student-veterinarian was trained on microbiota-based therapeutics, multi-omics-based data processing, and analysis during this project period. Several post-doctoral veterinarians participated in animal experiments, and learning opportunities were provided on the application ofmicrobiota-based therapeutics in swine production systems. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?A manuscript including the results from the FMT experiment was submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and is currently under review. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?The ongoing and upcoming experiments will test the effect of more defined microbial communities on swine intestinal health and PWD. These experiments are expected to provide insights into applying precision-microbiota-based preparations as a control strategy against PWD in piglets. These experiments will also provide composition and methods to develop microbiota-based products for the use of the swine industry.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? The experiments listed under objective 1 have been completed.The efficacy of fecal microbiome transplantation in preventing gut dysbiosis and PWD in piglets was tested. In this objective, we transplanted fresh fecal suspension from 3-4-month-old pigs at the early post-weaning stage.The jejunal microbiota showed a significant increase in alpha diversity in the third week post-FMT compared to the ileum and colon. FMT significantly enriched the jejunal microbiota composition, while multiple bacterial genera were specifically lacking in control weanling piglets. FMT was strongly associated with the enrichment of the genusPseudoscardoviaof theBifidobacteriaceaefamily, which was found lacking in the jejunum of weanling control piglets and inversely associated with the abundance of the genusBifidobacteriumwithin the same family. Other genera associated with FMT includedSolobacterium,Shuttleworthia, andPseudoraminibacter, whereas bacteria such asErysipelotrichaceaeandAcidaminococcuswere identified as most abundant in the control piglets. Metabolomic analysis revealed a significant modulatory effect of FMT on carbohydrate, amino acid, nucleotide, vitamin, and xenobiotic metabolisms, suggesting improved nutrient utilization. Transcriptomic analyses further confirmed the regulatory effects of FMT on gene expression associated with immune, metabolic, barrier, and neuroendocrine functions. Prior FMT treatment in the context of ETEC infection indicated a potential protective role, as evidenced by a significant shift in microbial diversity and metabolomic compositions and decreased diarrhea severity, even though no effect on pathogen shedding was evident.?The results from these experiments underscore the promise of FMT in enhancing jejunal health.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Submitted Year Published: 2024 Citation: Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Modulates Jejunal Host-Microbiota Interface in Weanling Piglets (2024); Shankumar Mooyottu1, Muhammed Shafeekh Muyyarikkandy, Farnaz Yousefi1, Ganwu Li, Orhan Sahin, Eric Burrough, Joy Scaria, Brett Sponseller, and Alejandro Ramirez2. Under review: BMC Microbiome