Source: UNIV OF MARYLAND submitted to NRP
ELUCIDATION OF ARRESTED PUPAL ECDYSIS: A NOVEL, NEWLY DISCOVERED INSECTICIDAL MODE OF ACTION TO MANAGE A DIVERSITY OF INSECT PESTS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
ACTIVE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1031117
Grant No.
2022-67013-40742
Cumulative Award Amt.
$164,954.99
Proposal No.
2022-12145
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jul 15, 2023
Project End Date
Jul 14, 2025
Grant Year
2023
Program Code
[A1112]- Pests and Beneficial Species in Agricultural Production Systems
Recipient Organization
UNIV OF MARYLAND
(N/A)
COLLEGE PARK,MD 20742
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
The overall goal of this project is to identify novel insecticidal targets that disrupt the insect ecdysis process. Recently, we discovered that a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agonist, imidacloprid, arrested pupal ecdysis (AE) in Lepidoptera, which led to failure of larvae to complete pupation. Elucidation of this potent mode of action will advance our understanding of mechanisms regulating ecdysis behavior and potentially result in development of new insecticides to help manage pest resistance with reduced environmental footprints.Our preliminary data show six of eight Lepidoptera species exhibited AE when treated with sublethal doses of imidacloprid. Through the proposed seed grant, we aim to identify putative subunits of nAChRs mediating AE and explore differences in interspecies susceptibility by employing multiple acetylcholine receptor agonists and antagonists and conducting dosimetry studies over time in AE-sensitive and AE-insensitive larvae. We will also undertake antibody binding experiments in Lepidoptera to test our hypothesis that dysregulation of crustacean cardioactive peptide neurons leads to AE. Finally, we will investigate if Coleoptera and Diptera larvae exhibit AE when treated with imidacloprid. Results of these experiments will help explain the role of acetylcholine signaling in regulation of pupal ecdysis across three major pest orders that impact agricultural and livestock production.Based on the results obtained, a future standard grant proposal will be prepared to elucidate the toxicity pathway(s) leading to AE through in-depth mechanistic studies in these and additional insect pests. The results generated will help inform insecticide discovery, research, and development efforts in academic, government, and industrial laboratories.
Animal Health Component
20%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
80%
Applied
20%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
21152201150100%
Goals / Objectives
This seed grant will support pursuit of a new investigator's research project that has a long-term goal to identify new insecticide mechanisms that disrupt pupal ecdysis in a diverse suite of agriculturally important insect pests. Results of the overall project can lead to development of new, novel insecticides that reduce environmental loading and support insecticide resistance management. Specifically, this project will advance fundamental knowledge of insect ecdysis behavior and its regulation, which will support a future standard grant that will elucidate the mechanisms through which excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters, in concert with neuroendocrinal hormones, regulate pupal ecdysis in Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, and Diptera pests. Research described in this seed proposal is designed to characterize the role of acetylcholine signaling pathways in ecdysis and the extent to which disruption of this signaling by specific insecticides can block insect development. Disruption of acetylcholine signaling that is required for ecdysis has not been previously reported as a basis for any current insecticide modes of action. Our new, novel finding that neonicotinoids at sublethal concentrations can readily disrupt pupal ecdysis in several Lepidoptera and Coleoptera pests forms the basis of this proposal.This seed grant proposal addresses the Pests and Beneficial Species in Agricultural Production Systems program area priority through four supporting objectives that characterize a new mode of action for an insecticide:Identify putative acetylcholine receptor subtypes that mediate Lepidoptera pupal ecdysis.Understand the extent to which interspecies variability in Lepidoptera pupal ecdysis behavior is due to toxicokinetic differences.Characterize if interference of acetylcholine signaling during Lepidoptera pupal ecdysis disrupts the function of crustacean cardioactive peptide (CCAP) neurons.Document the disruption of acetylcholine signaling leading to arrested pupal ecdysis in Coleoptera and Diptera pest species.Meeting these objectives will provide preliminary data to support a new investigator standard grant that will undertake a detailed study on insecticidal modes of action that elicit arrested pupal ecdysis across multiple insect orders.
Project Methods
Objective a: To identify putative acetylcholine receptor subtypes that mediate Lepidoptera pupal ecdysis, topical applications of nicotine (non-selective agonist to insect nAChRs), nitenpyram (agonist to insect nAChR subtypes α1, β1, β2), sulfoxaflor (agonist to insect nAChR subtype β1), pilocarpine (non-selective agonist to muscarinic acetylcholine receptors [mAChRs]), and mecamylamine (non-selective antagonist to nAChRs) will be carried out in final-instar corn earworm and fall armyworm larvae. The compounds will be dissolved in acetone or DMF depending on their solubility limits; 1.0µL of the agonist/antagonist-solvent solutions will be applied on the dorsal prothorax of the larvae using a 50µL microapplicator syringe. Following preliminary range-finding and timing of application experiments, a minimum of five concentrations (excluding acetone or DMF control) will be selected to generate dose-response curves; 30 larvae (three biological replicates of 10 larvae each) will be treated per concentration. Daily observations will be taken through adult eclosion and symptoms of poisoning, days to pupal and adult ecdysis, and developmental time to pupation and adult eclosion will be determined.Depending on an insect's life stage there are different acetylcholine receptor subtypes and subunit combinations, indicating unique combinations of receptor subtypes can arise during different developmental stages. In corn earworm larvae, imidacloprid exposure has consistently led to AE. Treatments with nitenpyram, which targets similar nAChR subunits as imidacloprid (an agonist to insect nAChR subtypes α1, α2, β1, β2) and sulfoxaflor and nicotine, which target different and more nAChR subtypes, respectively, will help determine the putative nAChR subunits associated with AE. Application of mecamylamine will establish if desensitization of receptors leads to AE. Treatment with pilocarpine will help inform the extent to which disruption of mAChR signaling causes AE. Application of the same suite of agonists and antagonists on fall armyworm larvae, which is recalcitrant to AE following treatment with imidacloprid, will help elucidate the extent to which differences in AE susceptibility may be related to variability in receptor and/or receptor subtype sensitivity.Objective b: To understand the extent to which differences in AE susceptibility across species is due to differences in agonist/antagonist uptake and metabolism (i.e., toxicokinetic factors), experiments will be conducted with corn earworms and fall armyworms since these species demonstrate different susceptibility to AE though they belong to the same family (Noctuidae). One hundred and twenty final larval instars from each species will be treated topically (1.0µL of the insecticide-carrier solvent solution on dorsal prothorax) and through their diet (known volumes of insecticide-acetone solution will be applied to known weights of diets) with imidacloprid, nitenpyram, or sulfoxaflor. A single concentration, corresponding to a concentration that causes 100% AE in corn earworms (or else the highest concentration that does not cause outright larval mortality), will be selected for each route of exposure. Larvae will be collected at 0-, 6-, and 24-hours following treatment and after pupation or expression of AE. Larval samples will be stored in -80° C. Concentrations of parent compounds, as well as metabolites of imidacloprid (5-hydroxy imidacloprid and imidacloprid olefin), in larvae will be analyzed by LC-MS/MS using published methods.Objective c: To characterize if interference of acetylcholine signaling during Lepidoptera pupal ecdysis disrupts the function of CCAP neurons, we will identify CCAP neurons and their associated GABA neurons (that likely regulate CCAP neuronal function through the release of GABA) in fifth- and sixth-instar corn earworm larvae. We will employ CCAP and GABA antibodies to follow signaling before, during, and after ecdysis. Changes in the expression pattern of CCAP neurons and associated varicosities will be analyzed. Following method development, 50 fifth and sixth-instar larvae (25 each) will be topically exposed to 20 µg imidacloprid-acetone solution; 50 more will be exposed to acetone alone. The quantity and timing of release of CCAP peptides and GABA molecules will be noted a) immediately following treatment, b) 12 hours before apolysis, c) during initiation of apolysis, d) 12 hours following apolysis, and e) during sixth-instar or pupal ecdysis. In control larvae, identification of CCAP neurons during larval to larval and larval to pupal ecdysis will help determine if different subsets are 'activated' at different developmental times, consistent with what is observed in Drosophila larvae. Reduced GABA release may occur close to ecdysis to ensure disinhibition of CCAP neurons. Comparison of these control results to results obtained from imidacloprid-treated larvae will help determine if there is reduced and/or delayed CCAP peptide release in a subset of CCAP neurons at a key developmental point, and if this occurs in conjunction with increased GABA release close to pupal ecdysis. These experiments will test our hypothesis of CCAP involvement in AE and elucidate the mechanisms through which CCAP is regulated in Lepidoptera.Objective d: The goal of this objective is to determine if disruption of acetylcholine signaling leads to AE in Coleoptera and Diptera pest species. Imidacloprid will be dissolved in acetone and 0.2µL of the solution will be applied with a 10 µL microapplicator on the dorsal prothorax of final-instar larvae of red flour beetle, which showed incomplete adult ecdysis, Colorado potato beetle, and house fly. Dietary imidacloprid exposure studies will be undertaken with larvae of fruit flies (chronic exposure), Colorado potato beetle (acute exposure to final instar until pupation), and corn earworm (serving as a positive control; acute exposure to final instar until pupation). Known volumes of imidacloprid-acetone solution will be applied on known weights of artificial diets and potato leaves, respectively. Subsamples of diets/leaves will be analyzed via LC-MS/MS to verify concentrations. For both the topical and dietary studies, five imidacloprid concentrations (excluding acetone control) will be selected and dose-response curves will be generated for each species. Thirty larvae (three biological replicates of 10 larvae each) will be treated per concentration. Cessation of pupal ecdysis during shedding of the trachea and failure in extension of pupal and adult appendages will be noted. Pupal development in the higher Diptera species may require removal of the puparium to observe the degree of pupation and adult development. These experiments will ascertain the extent to which pupal ecdysis, and presumably CCAP regulation, is conserved across Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, and Diptera.Evaluation - For objectives a and d, dose-response curves for mortality and/or pupal development (with 95% confidence intervals) will be derived using a log-logistic regression model. Control mortalities lower than 20% will be corrected using Abbott's formula (experiments yielding greater control mortalities will be excluded). RStudio 1.2.5042 will be used for all analyses. Calculated toxicity values will be based on nominal exposure levels if they are within 80%-120% of the measured values for topical and dietary studies; if outside this range, measured concentrations will be employed. Under objective b, which will quantify elimination of nAChR agonists in corn earworm and fall armyworm larvae over time, we will determine first-order elimination rate constants and employ a t-test to determine statistical differences.

Progress 07/15/23 to 07/14/24

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audience of our research are scientists working in the fields of agriculture, pesticide development, neurobiology, entomology, risk assessment, and conservation biology. The research findings are useful to people working in multiple sectors, including academia, government, private companies, and NGOs. The target audiences were reached through presentations at scientific conferences and university departments and will soon be reached through journal publications. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The PD has trained a half-time faculty assistant on the project. The faculty assistant will be an author on the Lepidoptera paper being submitted. Additionally, two undergraduate students gained research experience by working on parts of the project. At Iowa State University, the co-PD trained a graduate student in entomology on the project. This work will be part of the graduate student's masters thesis. The following presentations on this project were made in the last one year: Jurenka RA, Adeyanju O, Bradbury SP, Gorman CL, Krishnan N. 2023 Neonicotinoids and pyrethroids can cause arrested ecdysis in Coleoptera. Entomological Society of America, National Harbor, MD. Stewart J, Bradbury S, Jurenka R, Krishnan N. 2-24 Evaluating the effect of neonicotinoid insecticides on insect ecdysis movements. Eastern Branch Entomological Society of America, Morgantown, WV. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The presentations made by the project personnel at symposiums in national conferences were attended by people working in state and federal agencies, pesticide manufacturing companies, and academia. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?By the next and final reporting period, we plan to finish undertaking Objective c (the only remaining objective). Specifically, we will undertake more immunostaining of lepidopteran and coleopteran nerve cords so we can obtain definitive results. We will also finetune our hypothesis, including generating new adverse outcome pathways, based on obtained and new results. We will be submitting the Lepidoptera paper, which encompasses Objectives a and b, in the next two weeks. We will be submitting a Coleoptera paper (Objective d) by the end of this year. We will continue making presentations at different venues.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Under Objective a, we topically tested additional compounds on corn earworms and fall armyworms (previously we had tested imidacloprid, nicotine, nitenpyram, sulfoxaflor, acetamiprid, thiacloprid, pilocarpine, and mecamylamine): chlorpyrifos (oxon organophosphate), naled (thionate organophosphate), beta-cyfluthrin (type II pyrethroid), cypermethrin (type II pyrethroid), and permethrin (type I pyrethroid). Results with nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agonists suggest that pupal ecdysis is likely mediated by the putative α1 and β1 subunits of nAChRs. The reason we undertook studies with organophosphates is because pilocarpine, a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) agonist, has very low solubility in acetone/DMF, which precluded testing of sufficiently high doses. Other mAChR agonists had similarly low solubility. Thus, to rule out mAChR involvement in arrested ecdysis (AE), we undertook studies with organophosphate compounds that act on both mAChR and nAChR. The organophosphates showed intermediate to low rates of AE, which supports the hypothesis that only nAChRs are involved in eliciting AE. Additionally, we tested pyrethroids because papers published in literature indicated that inhibitory neurotransmitters are also involved in pupal regulation, and GABA, one target of pyrethroid insecticides, is a major inhibitory neurotransmitter in insects. Studies have shown that type II pyrethroids can serve as antagonists of GABA receptors at lower doses than type I pyrethroids. Our findings supported this: type II pyrethroids elicited AE at higher doses than type I pyrethroids. This suggests that GABA is also involved in regulation of insect pupal ecdysis. Objective b work was undertaken previously (see 2023 annual report). Under Objective c, we have obtained a CCAP antibody that is able to identify the neurons of the central nervous system that contain CCAP. We are currently using the antibody to identify CCAP containing neurons of the last instar larvae of the corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea, and the pupal stage of the yellow mealworm, Tenebrio molitor. The identified neurons are similar to what has been published with other Lepidoptera and Coleoptera. We are currently trying to determine the intensity of the immunostaining in comparisons between acetone-treated and neonicotinoid-treated larvae and pupae. So far it appears that the staining intensity decreases post ecdysis in the mealworm, as expected due to the CCAP being released and degraded. In mealworms, it also appears that the neonicotinoid treatment does not reduce the CCAP levels in the nervous system, indicating that the insecticide treatment interferes with the release of CCAP thus causing AE. We have also utilized an antibody that detects a peptide that starts the ecdysis process, ecdysis triggering hormone, and have shown that it is being released to start ecdysis in both acetone and insecticide treatments. An antibody targeting GABA has also been utilized to identify the GABA producing neurons. So far this has shown that many neurons produce GABA, making it difficult to pinpoint specific neurons that could potentially be involved in AE. We have undertaken preliminary tests with bursicon antibody (burscion peptides are also released by CCAP neurons) in corn earworms. Results indicate bursicon release is significantly different between control and neonicotinoid-treated larvae; however, more data are needed to validate these findings. Under Objective d, we have topically treated all three beetle species with additional compounds outside of imidacloprid. These include sulfoxaflor, acetamiprid, thiacloprid, beta-cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, and permethrin. Acetamiprid was the most effective at causing AE. Type II pyrethroids (beta-cyfluthrin and cypermethrin) are more effective at causing AE than type I pyrethroids (permethrin). Thus, our hypothesis has been modified to include both acetylcholine and GABA as potential regulators of CCAP neurons.Results for Drosophila and housefly (imidacloprid treatments) were obtained previously.

Publications

  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2023 Citation: Jurenka RA, Adeyanju O, Bradbury SP, Gorman CL, Krishnan N. Neonicotinoids and pyrethroids can cause arrested ecdysis in Coleoptera. Entomological Society of America, National Harbor, MD.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2024 Citation: Stewart J, Bradbury S, Jurenka R, Krishnan N. Evaluating the effect of neonicotinoid insecticides on insect ecdysis movements. Eastern Branch Entomological Society of America, Morgantown, WV.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Other Year Published: 2024 Citation: (About to be submitted within two weeks) Krishnan N, Gorman C#, Stewart J#, Bradbury SP, Jurenka RA. Using insecticidal compounds to elucidate the potential roles of acetylcholine and gamma-aminobutyric acid in Lepidoptera pupal ecdysis. Scientific Reports.