Source: NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
PIPELINE HYDRO-TRANSPORT OF BIOMASS FEEDSTOCK FOR BIOFUEL PRODUCTION PURPOSES
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
ACTIVE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1030500
Grant No.
2023-67021-39606
Cumulative Award Amt.
$648,581.00
Proposal No.
2022-10846
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
May 1, 2023
Project End Date
Apr 30, 2027
Grant Year
2023
Program Code
[A1531]- Biorefining and Biomanufacturing
Recipient Organization
NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY
1425 W LINCOLN HWY
DE KALB,IL 601152828
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
Trucks are used as the main mode of transporting biomass, and biomass feedstock come with low bulk and energy density compared to fossil fuels. These factors result in high delivered cost of biomass, traffic congestions and subsequent environmental and social concerns. Consequently, the desire for short distance truck delivery with fewer congestion issues favores small-scale biobased facilities. This project introduces pipeline hydro-transport of biomass (i.e., transporting biomass-water mixtures in pipes) as an alternative mode of delivery which can significantly reduce the cost of biomass transportation (up to 60% based on our priliminary studies) also minimizes the traffic congestion and environmental issues of overland transportation. Here we propose to experimentally study technical and economic feasibility of pipeline hydro-transport of agricultural and forest residue biomass, including the effect of pipeline specifications, also biomass and mixture properties and operating conditions, on mixture flow behaviour and economy of long-distance large-scale biomass pipelines. The research will be conducted using a laboratory-scale closed-circuit pipeline facility at Northern illinois Univeristy in collaboration with Biofine Developments Northeast Inc. and University of Illinois at Chicago. In consultation with Construction Management Institute of Maine and support of the Maine Port Authority, we will study construction of a10-mile woodchips pipeline with 350,000 Mt/yr capacity from Perry to Eastwood in Maine. This application is submitted under priority area No. 5: Agriculture Systems and Technology (program area priority b: Biorefining and Biomanufacturing) with the goal to improve the capacity of biofuel and bioenergy products and refine the long-term sustainability of agricultural systems.
Animal Health Component
25%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
50%
Applied
25%
Developmental
25%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
4015399202070%
6036110301010%
1230699202020%
Goals / Objectives
The proposed research objectives are: (1) studying the effect of pipeline specifications, biomass and slurry properties, and operating conditions on mechanical behavior of the slurry throughout the pipeline, (2) using advanced flow visualization techniques to investigate the mechanisms behind mechanical phenomena in pipeline hydro-transport of biomass particles, (3) proposing empirical correlations based on experimental measurements, (4) developing a data-intensive techno-economic model to estimate the capital and operating costs associated with construction and operation of commercial biomass pipelines, and (5) conducting a case study to construct a 10 miles long woodchips pipeline to supply a commercial port in Eastport, Maine. We anticipate this novel work will introduce pipeline as a technically feasible and economically viable mode of delivery to transport biomass feedstock in large scales and over long distances at costs noticeably lower than other modes of delivery such as truck, train and ship. This will make biomass-based energy facilities scale- and economy-wise competitive with fossil fuel-based plants.
Project Methods
1. Effect of pipe diameter and material: In this research, using a closed-circuit pipeline facility, the effect of pipe diameter and material on mechanical behavior of the flow of biomass slurries will be experimentally evaluated. Several test sections, 1.0 m long with 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 inch diameters made from schedule 40 stainless steel, carbon steel, PVC, and cast iron will be alternatively installed on the pipeline circuit. Pumping the slurry through pipeline, the pressure drop throughout every test section will be measured using four flush-diaphragm pressure transmitters.Data will be collected using data-acquisition program, and later analyzed to understand how changing the pipe material and diameter change the longitudinal pressure drop of the slurry throughout the pipeline.2. Studying the effect of slurry temperature: Using a cooling unit, we will be able to accurately control the slurry temperature over a range from 8 to 60°C. The slurry temperature throughout the pipeline when buried underground is about 8°C, and the temperature in open-circuit overland pipelines reaches 20°C. The upper range of 60°C will be used to experiment Phytosanitizing woodchips during pipeline hydro-transportation. A resistance temperature detector is connected to the data acquisition system to measure the slurry temperature. The data will be later analyzed and correlated with other slurry and flow specifications.3. Investigating the effect of pipe geometry (bending): A series of flush diaphragm pressure transmitters on the elbow will be used to monitor pressure changes along the bend. In addition, a clear acrylic elbow will be used together with the PIV system (see method No. 5) to visually observe the formation and dissipation of secondary flows within and downstream the bend section.4. Developing empirical correlations: Using EViews econometric software and nonlinear least square regression models (NLS), the experimentally measured data will be statistically analyzed to develop correlations for the longitudinal pressure drops of the biomass slurry flows, also the performance of the pumps handling those slurries, as a functions of all the biomass and slurry specifications and operating conditions. These universal correlations are essential to specify slurry pumps, determine the number of booster stations, and estimate the capital and operational costs of biomass pipeline hydro-transport system.5. Slurry flow visualization: To investigatethe biomass slurries flow behavior, particularly plug flow formation, two 1.0 m long clear acrylic sections with 25.4 and 38.1 mm diameter are used to visually observe the flow containing nylon fibers of 20 microns in diameter and 2 cm in length (replacements for biomass fibers in flow visualization studies). The PIV setup include: A Laser device to illuminate the field in the desired region of the tube. To capture the image of the slurry flow, a high-speed camera will be also used. A set of cylindrical lenses and mirrors will be used as well to illuminate the flow field and shape the light beam into a planar sheet. The nylon fibers velocity and distribution willbe measured using our high-rate laser passing over the flow specific field of view and ahigh-speed camera. The fibers volume fractions range from 2% to 12%. The fibers and flow velocity profiles will be analyzed using in-house codes generated in Mirbod's Lab that has been performed in our previous works. The captured images will be later processed using MATLAB image processing module to investigate the parameters of velocity field along with the distribution of fibers and plug formation. The specifications of the plug will be correlated to slurry specifications and operational parameters to understand how the plug size and the drag reduction intensity can be adjusted and optimized.6. Selecting the optimum pump design: In this research, the efficiency, head ratio and power consumption of the pump will be measured while handling biomass slurries at various concentrations and average particle sizes using two distinct pumps: centrifugal recessed-impeller pump at Northern Illinois University and progressive cavity pump in the Biofine facility at the University of Maine Forest Bioproducts Research Institute. To measure the pump's power consumption and head loss, a watt transducer and two pressure transmitters, mounted on the suction and discharge sections of the pump, will be used. The pump efficiency would be afterwards calculated to make a fair comparison of pump performances at similar working conditions.7. Studying optimum pumping velocity and slurry concentration: The high-frequency impedancemetry technique/device in measuring the deposition velocities developed by Dr. Vaezi will be moved to the Biofine facility at the University of Maine Forest Bioproducts Research Institute in Orono, ME. The device will be installed on the B2P2 Biofine pilot plant to study the effect of change in sawdust slurry concentration from 10 to 25% (dry mater, wt%) and pumping velocity over a range of 0.05 to 0.25 m/s on the slurry deposition velocity.8. Techno-economic analysis: The techno-economic model will be based on economic principles as well as empirical correlations obtained through previous course of experimental measurements. Construction Management Institute of Maine with years of experience in international business, market analysis, supply chain management and sustainability will help provide data and information to build the techno-economic model. The technical model includes parameters associated with all the unit operations at inlet, receiving, and booster station facilities involved in pipeline hydro-transport of biomass feedstock. It also characterized operating conditions, process equipment, and unit operations' inputs. The economic parameters in the model are comprised of capital, operating, and maintenance costs of pipeline and unit operations. The techno-economic model is capable of estimating the total cost of pipeline hydro-transport as well as the cost per unit input of feedstock as a function of biomass particle type and size, distance of transport, capacity of pipeline, slurry concentration, and pumping velocity. The cost of pipeline hydro-transport of biomass will be compared with truck, train and ship transportation in short to long distances to demonstrate the economic feasibility of the proposed project.9. Woodchips pipeline in Eastport, Maine; A case study: Construction Management Institute of Maine will help conduct the feasibility study to construct a 10-mile pipeline to transport 350,000 Mt woodchips per year from Perry to Eastport in Maine. This study will includes the following steps: (1) identify the land that can be utilized for this pipeline to be constructed and be operated upon, (2) conduct constructability and feasibility studies, (3) development of preconstruction estimates for site development, (4) construct a timeframe with critical path budgeting for cost and time to construct the pipeline, (5) conduct comprehensive cost benefit analysis of operating a pipeline versus trucking, (6) validate the market potential for biomass from Maine to the EU should this facility be activated, (7) validate local fiber supply for export from the general region, (8) include study analysis of installing phytosanitation system of woodchips at the port facility, (9) conduct alternate analysis of heating woodchips at slurry stations or during the pipeline transfer, (10) conduct heating analysis of pipeline system to determine if pipeline can be a heating station and a pipeline - pumping stations in one system, and (11) investigate sources of grant funding and State - local and federal subsidies to support construction of the pipeline.

Progress 05/01/23 to 04/30/24

Outputs
Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems:We are working with theAwards Management Division in theOffice of Grants and Financial Management toremoveBiofine as a subrecipient to Award # 2023-67021-39606 without compromising the funding or deliverables for the award. Dr. Fitzpatrick and Biofine will not be able to complete their scope of work as proposed. Dr. Fitzpatrick has repeatedly acknowledged that he does not have the time nor desire to work on this project and would instead have the University of Maine conduct his portion of the research. It was also established that the University of Maine will not be conducting the testing as it was originally proposed to USDA. With this said we areasking to reallocate the $74,594 originally budgeted to Biofine, back to NIU to allow NIUto conduct the testing in house. NIU has provided USDA with an updated scope of work, budget and budget justification. ? What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?There have been three articles published in media as listed below: $650K USDA award to NIU could lead to world's first biomass pipeline USDA Awards NIU $650K For Biomass Pipeline Feasibility Study Also I presented this project in 17th Annual International Biomass conference in Richmond, VA, in March 2024: Vaezi, M.; Pipeline Hydro-Transport Of Biomass Feedstock For Biofuel Production Purposes; 17th Annual International Biomass conference; Richmond, VA; 04-06 Mar, 2024 What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?With the completion of the pipeline facility equipping and instrumentation, I am planning to start the experiments by testing the woodchips provided by the consultant in Maine. These are the same woodchips will be pumped in the actual pipeline to be built in Eastport, ME, in near future. Collecting mechanical properties, as well as power consumptions, will help complete the techno-economic analysis of the woodchips pipeline in Maine.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Created a 3D SolidWorks drawing with all joints exploded. There was no way to add flexible hosing to the drawing, so we constructed 3D hollow pipes to substitute for the hoses. Made a SmartDraw 2D drawing that showed the locations of sensors and provided a simple visualization of the pipeline. The tanks depicted are not the exact same tanks used in the project but are similar to what we have. Created an inventory in Excel and labeled lab shelving to better locate parts. Updated the inventory occasionally to adjust part count. It is assumed that every 1 to 3 months of work required more parts, which were ordered and picked up from an office or a building. When creating the inventory, shelving was needed, so unused shelving was retrieved from another location and installed. Some shelving was also ordered and bought. A table was rebuilt with a shelving unit on it and moved to an appropriate space within the lab. Inadequate shelving was removed from the lab, and glass tubes and large measuring equipment were put into storage elsewhere. Some smaller equipment was removed from storage and brought to the lab. As the pipeline project was being constructed, an operational procedures page was made for all equipment used. Safety meetings and paperwork were attended for the lab and the machine. Later, an operation procedures page was started for the pipeline itself. Some lab materials needed to be used by NIU's electrical team to verify the installation of wiring and control panels. VFDs and emergency stop buttons were placed around the lab, and electrical outlets, air hose outlets, and water outlets were installed. The lab door was readjusted, and a lock was placed. The floor was swept and cleaned to install a silicon plastic-based waterproof barrier around the lab's edges. This was measured, cut, and installed with silicon sealant to reinforce it. The barrier was tested, removed, cleaned, remeasured, and reinstalled due to initial inadequacies. Sanded down and painted the base frame and mismatched bracing red to ensure visibility and prevent rust. Most pipe bracing was cut using a measuring tape and a band saw on square tubing, round tubing, and angle iron. The base framing, bracing, and angle iron requiring welding were welded as follows: structural base framing (stick welded), structural bracing (MIG and TIG welded), and angle iron (TIG welded). Two types of band saws were used: a heavy-duty one and a small Milwaukee one. A Piranha II iron worker was used to fabricate some structural bracing. A jack was used to lift the base frame and attach feet. The mix tank was modeled in CAD, reassembled, and structurally braced to prevent excess vibration. The bottom structure was welded to hold the pipes allowing the mix tank to empty into the pump. The top was rebuilt, and a brace was added. Motor, shaft, and propellers were measured and aligned. Later, the motor was replaced, and the top bracing was rebuilt and realigned. An order was placed to replace the shaft and propellers. The bottom of the mixing tank had piping installed, initially braced with wood and later with angle iron MIG welded to the structure. The piping was connected to the tank via a plastic connection and gasket, which was later replaced with a superior metal connection and gasket. The filtration tank was modeled in CAD and revised three times. It was built using four wire tubes for the filters, with waterjet-cut top lips MIG welded onto the filters. A 100-gallon tank was used, with the top cut off and the bottom dremeled out. PVC piping was constructed to connect to the holes in the bottom, sealed with PVC concrete primer and sealant. The tank was sealed with a cam and groove male end, with polycarbonate used to hold the filters. A sheet of wood was cut, tested, and adjusted. Polycarbonate rods were turned on a lathe and fitted with adjustable bolts. The structure was disassembled and reassembled twice for fitting. The top of the tank was fitted with clamps and rivets and sealed with silicon. All threaded pipe ends were sealed using a combination of thread tape and Loctite thread sealant. After the initial assembly, the thread tape was replaced with Loctite. Pipes were rebuilt multiple times to ensure proper fitment and sealing. Before testing, an emergency shutoff button was wired into the system. Additional wiring included testing the VFD and adding a flow meter to control water distribution. A closed-loop systems test was conducted twice. The mix tank was filled with 50 gallons of water, and hoses were connected to the pump. The system was tested for leaks and ran successfully after adjustments. Gaskets were added between all bolted flanges. High-pressure pipe flanges and gaskets were bolted to stainless steel pipes and connected to the pump via hose. Additional supports and strut channels were installed to prevent sagging and leaks. A second pipeline, parallel to the first, was constructed using similar methods. The motor for the propeller was relocated and centered with the mixing tank. A wye pipe fitting was added to distribute flow between pipelines. All connections and supports were secured using appropriate bolts, nuts, and sealants. Floor mounts and strut channels were installed to support the pipelines. The full pipeline was tested again, running up to 1000 rpm without leaks after adjustments. A Productivity 2000 PLC was ordered from Automation Direct and built, and a screen was wired to it. The program was loaded onto a laptop, and the PLC systems were connected. Some learning was required to understand this PLC type. A basic ladder program was run, which showed that the PLC accepted the given program. Further research was done to determine how to create a custom screen for the PLC program and the tools needed to control the sensors in the project. A basic functional control panel was programmed into the screen. The control panel controlled the PLC unit and, in turn, sent signals to each other. A program is being developed to wire the PLC to specific sensors and pressure transducers that will be placed around the pipeline and into the pipes themselves.

Publications