Source: UNIV OF WISCONSIN submitted to
PARTNERSHIP: NANOPARTICLE VACCINES AGAINST EMERGING POULTRY INFECTIONS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
ACTIVE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1030179
Grant No.
2023-67015-39884
Cumulative Award Amt.
$800,000.00
Proposal No.
2022-11233
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jul 1, 2023
Project End Date
Jun 30, 2026
Grant Year
2023
Program Code
[A1181]- Tactical Sciences for Agricultural Biosecurity
Project Director
Talaat, A. M.
Recipient Organization
UNIV OF WISCONSIN
21 N PARK ST STE 6401
MADISON,WI 53715-1218
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
According to the 2021 US agriculture statistics, the combined value of production and sales from broilers, eggs, turkeys, and chicks was $46.1 billion. Unfortunately, available vaccines do not provide sufficient protection against emerging and transboundary infections such as Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) that impacted the poultry industry earlier in 2022. We hypothesize that DNA-based nanoparticle vaccines (nanovaccines) will improve efficiency and delivery of antigens for robust induction of protective immunity against poultry pathogens. Recently, reports from our group indicated that a novel nanoadjuvant system (termed QAC for Quil-A-treated Chitosan) combined with plasmid DNA constructs were able to deliver viral antigens and mount a strong, protective immunity in chickens against Infectious Bronchitis Virus (IBV). In this project, we will capitalize on our experience in developing mosaic nanovaccines that can represent thousands of circulating viral isolates. Specifically, we plan to: First, examine the delivery and stability of avian influenza-hemagglutinin (HA) antigen. We will utilize vaccine constructs to characterize mosaic antigen release kinetics and infectivity to chicken cells following different temperature conditions that mimic field application. Second, we will analyze the immunogenicity of several vaccine constructs in chickens using intranasal and oral routes. Finally, we will analyze the overal vaccine protection by following challenge with LPAI and HPAI. Overall, developing effective, safe, and easy to administer nanovaccines will significantly improve our preparation to control emerging and re-emerging infections in poultry and other animals.
Animal Health Component
50%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
25%
Applied
50%
Developmental
25%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
31132991090100%
Knowledge Area
311 - Animal Diseases;

Subject Of Investigation
3299 - Poultry, general/other;

Field Of Science
1090 - Immunology;
Goals / Objectives
The major goal of this project is to develop effective, safe and easy to administer broad-spectrum vaccines against avian influenza. Those vaccines will significantly improve our preparation to control emerging and re-emerging infections, a goal that is supported by the Agricultural Biosecurity Program. In addition, gained knowledge will help in designing better vaccines against all animal respiraotry infections, aiming to provide a sustained food supply in the USA and worldwide, an important aim shared with NIFA-USDA.
Project Methods
In the first objctive (Obj) of the project, fluorescent labeling of the plasmid vaccines will further enhance our ability to track their persistence and distribution in tissues. We will evaluate the in vitro prolonged release of plasmid DNA from QAC for up to 28 days, a suitable time frame to elicit robust immune responses following immunization in broiler (sent to market around 35-42 days of age). Released plasmids will be further tested for their ability to express mosaic HA proteins once transfected to Chicken Embryo Fibroblasts (CEF), as a test for their ability to express protein following immunization. Further, the shelf-life stability of the QAC nanovaccine will be evaluated at different storage temperatures including -20°C, 4°C and various administration temperatures including 25°C and 37°C to mimic field conditions. We will also begin our safety analysis by examining their toxicity in chicken cells (e.g., lung and epithelial cells) that will most likely meet the vaccine during immunization.In Obj. 2 of this project, vaccines will be administered via the oculo-nasal route to ensure individual animal immunizations that yield itself for further translation to mass application via spray or oral routes under field conditions. Our analysis of the generated immune responses will include the evaluation of both humoral and cellular immunity responsible for protection against AI infection.In Obj. 3 of this project, will further decipher the protective immunity of our novel vaccine constructs following immunization and challenge of birds, a key parameter measured before considering any vaccine for further development. For the challenge with HPAI and LPAI, we selected widely prevalent H5Nx genotypes (clade 2.3.4.4.) homologous to the viruses present US and worldwide (e.g. H5N8, H5N1 and H5N2, H5N3, respectively).

Progress 07/01/23 to 06/30/24

Outputs
Target Audience:Researchers, veterinarians and vaccine-interested scientists. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?A graduate student, a research scientist and a post-doctoral fellow was trained throughout activities of this project. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?We participated in the PI annual meeting for the Biosecurity Program earlier this year (May 28th) and presented project findings. Also, the PI participated and presented the project findings in the second WPVA (World Poultry Veterinary Association) in Africa and the Middle East, September 2-6, 2024. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Our plan for the next phase is to complete analysis of samples collected from the second vaccine trial. In addition, plan to grow Low Pathogenicity Avian Influenza (LPAI) in the lab to allow for challenging of vaccinated birds with LPAI with multiple genotypes. We are also in communication with the project Co-PI to run more analysis on sera collected from vaccinated birds but using HPAI antigens that need handling under Agriculture BSL3 environment.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? The economic success of the poultry industry in the USA hinges on the use of appropriate biosecurity measures and the extensive use of vaccines to control bacterial and viral infections. Unfortunately, available vaccines do not provide sufficient protection against emerging and transboundary infections such as Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI). We hypothesize that DNA-based nanoparticle vaccines (nanovaccines) will improve efficiency and delivery of antigens for robust induction of protective immunity against poultry pathogens. In this project, we capitalize on our expertise in developing nanovaccines, to develop a rapid response platform technology directed against emerging and transboundary poultry infections. With a partnership between the University of Wisconsin-Madison (UW) and The Pirbright Institute (TPI, UK), we plan to: a) characterize the safety of DNA nanovaccines encoding mosaic H5 antigen (mHA); b) analyze the immunogenicity of pQAC-mHA nanovaccines in chickens. And finally, c) characterize the protective immunity of pQAC-mHA nanovaccines following challenge with LPAI and HPAI. Key readout parameters for all of the vaccine constructs include the generation of a robust immune responses before any challenge to vaccinated birds. Overall, developing effective, safe and easy to administer broad spectrum vaccines will significantly improve our preparation to control emerging and re-emerging infections, a goal that is supported by the Agricultural Biosecurity Program. In Year 1 of this project, we were able to generate several mosaic vaccine constructs against thousands of H5 sequences targeting the hemagglutinin (HA) antigen. All sequences were codon optimized to fit expression in chicken cells. The sequences were chemically synthesized and cloned onto a mammalian expression vector with pCAG plasmid that contain the chicken B-actin promoter. The expression of the HA antigens were confirmed by using Western blot with the help of anti-his tag in one analysis and a commercial HA antibodies in another Western blot. Constructs with verified HA expression were advanced for animal testing. In the first trial, chicken groups (N=10) were immunized with 100 ug plasmid DNA with QAC (Quil-A treated Chitosan) and QTAP (QuilA-DOTAP) nano-adjuvants. All groups received immunization at Day 1 and Day 14 of age and blood samples collected on Day 14 (following first dose), Day 21 (following 2 doses) and Day 28 (2 weeks post second immunization). The average increase of body weight for chicks were estimated weekly as a measure for overall vaccine safety. As expected, body weight for all vaccinated birds progressed normally similar to the control (unvaccinated) group, a strong indication of the overall safety of the used vaccine constructs. In addition, when we used hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay, the QTAP vaccine group gave a strong titer (1/32) at 14 days of age (after 1st dose) while the other vaccine groups reached similar levels or even higher (1/64) at 21 and 28 days of age, an indication for the generation of a robust immune responses following immunization with DNA plasmids adjuvanted with QAC and QTAP. The control (unvaccinated) group didn't see any HI titers. Another outcome of this trial is the superiority of the subcutaneous/oculonasal (Sc/ON) vaccine administration routes compared to the oculonasal/oculonasal (ON/ON) routes in eliciting strong immune responses. In a second trial, we focused immunization of chicken groups on the Sc/ON route. However, we are still analyzing samples from the latest trial.

Publications