Source: UNIV OF WISCONSIN submitted to NRP
FOOD SAFETY TRAINING FOR SMALL BUSINESSES ENGAGED IN CANNING
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1028816
Grant No.
2022-70020-37663
Cumulative Award Amt.
$400,000.00
Proposal No.
2022-01741
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jul 1, 2022
Project End Date
Jun 30, 2025
Grant Year
2022
Program Code
[A4182]- Regional FSMA Center
Recipient Organization
UNIV OF WISCONSIN
21 N PARK ST STE 6401
MADISON,WI 53715-1218
Performing Department
FOOD SCIENCE-GEN
Non Technical Summary
Food Safety by Design: Adding Value, Ensuring Safety of Food Products Produced by Small Processors is an education, training, and outreach project that will support small-scale food processors in producing safe food products. The project team will develop and implement a robust education, training, and outreach program for small-scale food processors operating primarily through direct-to-consumer (retail) sales. Small, value-added food processors with direct sales are important contributors to the food system of many communities and may be farmers looking to add value to their crops; small bakeries selling at local farmers' markets; or ethnic restaurants with a vision to diversify by producing sauces and dips.Food Safety by Design will provide small-scale food processors with education and training founded upon the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). While retail operators are exempt from FSMA, the food safety principles under FSMA support quality food production and are important in protecting public health. The project team will design, implement and evaluate education and training efforts.Education and training will be combined with outreach efforts that support adoption of positive food safety behaviors in the production environment. Outreach efforts will include one-on-one office hours, web-based modules, seminars, and print materials and video case studies that highlight and extend key food safety concepts included in FSMA.Overall, the goals of the Food Safety by Design project are to:Develop, implement, and evaluate a comprehensive FSMA-based food safety education and training program for small, value-added food processors selling primarily direct-to-consumer.Develop, implement, and evaluate an outreach program that delivers ongoing support and reinforces key food safety messages included in FSMA.Communicate project results to stakeholders across the North Central region, to USDA and national partner networks.This project builds on existing high-impact programs and joins together a team of experienced food safety educators, suggesting a high likelihood of program success.
Animal Health Component
(N/A)
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
(N/A)
Developmental
100%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
7125010106050%
5025010106050%
Goals / Objectives
This multi-state collaborative food safety education and training project, Food Safety by Design: Adding Value, Ensuring Safety of Food Products Produced by Small Processors, will develop and implement a robust education and outreach program for small-scale food processors operating primarily through direct-to-consumer (retail) sales. Small, value-added food processors with direct sales are important contributors to the food system of many communities such as farmers looking to add value to their crops; small bakeries selling at local farmers' markets; or ethnic restaurants with a vision to diversify by producing sauces and dips. Food Safety by Design will provide small-scale food processors with education and training founded upon the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) that is adapted to small-scale operations. The project will support implementation of food safety concepts by providing access to ongoing support that will set a foundation for business success while protecting public health. Outreach efforts: one-on-one office hours, web-based modules, seminars, and print materials and video case studies will highlight and extend key food safety concepts included in FSMA. Evaluation is imbedded in project efforts and will ensure that project impacts can be effectively communicated.Objectives of Food Safety by Design are to:Develop, implement, and evaluate a comprehensive FSMA-based food safety education and training program for small, value-added food processors selling primarily direct-to-consumer (retail).Develop, implement, and evaluate an outreach program that delivers ongoing support and reinforces key food safety messages included in FSMA.Communicate project results to stakeholders across the North Central region, to USDA and national partner networks.This project builds on existing high-impact programs and joins together a team of experienced food safety educators, suggesting a high likelihood of program success.
Project Methods
Methods for Education and Training. Development, implementation and evaluation of a comprehensive food safety education and training program under FSMA for small, value-added food processors selling primarily at retail (direct to consumer). The food safety education and training program that is developed will: a) outline the basic steps for manufacture of safe food products; b) introduce the concept of risk assessment and management (preventive controls); c) define record-keeping systems for small businesses - including lot coding and recall plan management; d) detail the significance of environmental monitoring and product testing; e) support safe packaging and accurate product labeling, especially in relation to food allergens; and f) ensure food product integrity (and safety) through the supply chain.Project team will collaboratively develop training materials, using a successful small-business food safety training in use in Wisconsin as the starting point. An evaluation specialist engaged food processors, extension educators and state and local regulators will inform program design. Once a comprehensive food safety education and training program is developed, team members will pilot materials and edit as dictated by formative evaluation.Methods for Outreach. Team members will develop outreach programming that includes one-on-one consults with a food safety specialist (office hours), the development and deployment of web-based educational modules, topical food safety seminars (via Zoom), and development/collection of web-based print materials and video case studies. Team member expertise will be harnessed to develop this programming. Interactions with food processors in 'office hours' will provide scenarios out of which video case-studies can be developed. Video case studies will be patterned after successful efforts in the business realm to explain complex topics using direct examples from business (see Harvard Business education: https://educatoraccess.hpsp.harvard.edu/cases/). Case studies will highlight successful small-scale food processors implementing best practices under FSMA into their food processing operations. Web-based food safety modules and Zoom seminars will similarly support adaptation of food safety behaviors by providing step-by-step guidelines and best practice examples of key topics under FSMA. Print materials that support key food safety messages in FSMA will be developed and shared to the North Central regional FSMA Center at Iowa State University.

Progress 07/01/22 to 02/06/24

Outputs
Target Audience:Small and very-small value-added food processors in the upper Midwest, with a focus on education and training for food processors in Kansas, Missouri, and Wisconsin. Processors involved in direct-to-consumer sales (retail establishments) were the main focus of the work. Efforts: Extension educators and researchers in Kansas, Missouri, and Wisconsin delivered science-based training and one-on-one support to small value-added processors in the North Central region of the United States. Educators and researchers at Kansas State University provided product testing or training services to 55 food companies, issued 78 process authority letters, 62 nutritional facts labels and conducted 2 shelf-life studies in 2023. Kansas State University also provided training to 16 small acidified food processors. Extension specialists at the University of Missouri supported Kansas State University in offering the Better Process Control School - Acidified workshop, and offered the Better Process Control School (low-acid foods) to an additional 33 participants. Specialists also offered HACCP training to 24 registrants, provided food testing and nutritional facts labeling services to more than 20 food processing companies and authored 7 processing authority letters. The Extension food safety specialist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison offered training to 70 individuals processing low-acid or acidified foods through the FDA Better Process Control School. Through training and one-on-one follow-up support, the specialist worked with 863 small and emerging food businesses in Wisconsin and the upper Midwest in food safety plan review, in support of food business licensing, and in establishing good food manufacturing practices. As a processing authority, the specialist authored 321 process reviews for small, value-added food processors. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Training offered: Training of small, value-added food processors is a key component to the work accomplished. Educators working on this grant provided FDA Better Process Control School - Acidified and Low-Acid to over 100 key personnel in the upper Midwest. Educators in Missouri also offered HACCP training to the target audience. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Extension educators and researchers associated with Food Safety by Design worked with stakeholders in their respective states, i.e. state Departments of Agriculture or Department of Health/Human Services, industry trade groups, regulatory programs, and through Extension networks to promote food safety education and follow-up support for small, value-added food processors. Each of the three primary project directors: Ingham, Channaiah, and Getty - are processing authorities for their respective states and work within the scientific network to promote food safety education and food business support systems in the upper Midwest. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? University of Wisconsin: Barbara Ingham, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Professor of Food Science and Food Safety Specialist, Division of Extension. The University of Wisconsin-Madison has provided food safety training to food entrepreneurs engaged in canning. Training is tailored to the size and scope of the food business, from highly mechanized food business operations to non-electrified, homestyle canning operations, and ranges from 12 to 24 contact hours per person per training. Seventy individuals attended training in the first year of the FSOP grant, and 30 completed an end of session evaluation. Retrospective post-pre evaluation results indicated that 100% of program participants (n=30) increased their understanding of the science and practice of safe food processing as a result of the training. Prior to training, 50% of respondents (n=15) were 'a little' or 'somewhat' confident in their knowledge of food safety practices, and 50% were 'confident.' After the training, all respondents indicated increased confidence; 100% reporting that they were 'confident' or 'very confident' as a result of the training. As a result of the training, all respondents expressed increased confidence in their ability to formulate safe food. Prior to training, 60% of respondents were 'not at all' or 'somewhat' confident in their ability to formulate safe food; after the training 100% were 'confident' or 'very confident' that they understood how to formulate safe food for manufacturing. Participant confidence in their understanding of the rules and requirements for processing safe canned food for sale increased from 24% to 93% as a result of the training. Finally, whereas prior to the training, 15% of participants were confident of their ability to access help they may need to process safe food for sale prior, after the training, 100% of respondents were 'very confident' in their ability to find help to support them in manufacturing safe food for sale. Additional workshops in Wisconsin the first year of the FSOP grant focused on food safety for value-added food production across other commodities important to the state, the manufacture of maple syrup (n=38), value-added farm market vendors (n=35) and home-based food businesses (n=78). During 2023, Dr. Ingham worked one-on-one with 863 small and emerging food businesses in Wisconsin and the upper Midwest in food safety plan review, in support for food business licensing, and in establishing good food manufacturing practices. As a Process Authority, Dr. Ingham supported the development of 321 food safety plans for product manufacture. University of Missouri: Dr. Lakshmikantha Channaiah, Assistant Professor of Food Science and State Extension Food Processing Specialist, University of Missouri The University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri (co-partner for this project) has provided food safety training cum workshops and services to food entrepreneurs engaged in manufacturing value added food products. In 2023, the MU provided food safety testing and/or training services to 94 companies in total. The Specialist averages ~15 one-on-one contacts with food processors each month. The services include, testing pH, water activity, testing for Listeria, Salmonella, E. coli/ coliforms, yeast/mold, aerobic lactobacillus, nutritional facts labeling, better process control school (BPCS) for acid, acidified, and low acid canned foods) BPCS (acidified foods), Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) training, and process authority letter services for various small and medium scale food processors in Missouri and beyond. Specifically, the University of Missouri provided BPCS trainings to 49 registrants, HACCP training to 24 registrants, food testing & nutritional facts labeling services to more than 20 food processing companies and 7 process authority letter services for various acid and acidified food products. Pre and post evaluation results indicated that 100% of participants (trainees) increased their understanding of the science and practice of safe food processing as a result of the training and workshop. The audience for each of these programs was primarily food businesses based in Missouri, with some participation from Kansas. For the year 2024, the University of Missouri is offering applied food safety microbiology (seminar), environmental monitoring program (workshop) BPCS (acidified and low acid canned foods), BPCS (acidified foods), HACCP, safe home canning workshops in addition to developing food safety extension factsheets. Kansas State University: Kelly Getty, Kansas State University Londa Nwadike, Kansas State University and University of Missouri Karen Blakeslee, Kansas State University In 2023, Kansas State University (KSU), Manhattan, Kansas provided food safety testing or training services to 55 companies in total. Additionally, the KSU has issued 78 process authority letters, 62 nutritional facts labels, 2 shelf-life studies and provided 54 analytical services such as pH, water activity, gluten testing for products etc. Last but not the least, KSU in collaboration with University of Missouri (MU) provided Better Process Control School (for Acidified Foods) - online training on November 2-3, 2023. This training was attended by 16 food processors in Kansas, and all participants provided positive feedback at the end of the training.

Publications


    Progress 07/01/22 to 06/30/23

    Outputs
    Target Audience:Small, value-added food producers operating primarily at retail. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?To achieve project goals in year 1, our collaborative team has been conducting a series of training and/or workshops on cottage foods law, Better Process Control School (BPCS)-acidified foods, BPCS-acidified & low acid canned foods, HACCP training, environmental monitoring program, process validation & verification, hands on workshops on food preservation, and food labeling through in-person and online platforms. In addition, the project team has worked within the North Central food safety extension network (NCFSEN) to support a regional approach to food safety education and processor support. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Pilot training is ongoing in key areas: GMPs, risk assessment and management, HACCP, environmental monitoring, Better Process Control School (Acidified/LACF), process validation. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Our focus in Year 2 will be to continue with collaborative training program while establishing an outreach program that delivers ongoing support of key food safety messages.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? The project team has collaborated on building and piloting food safety educational programs for small, value-added food businesses operating in the upper Midwest and selling primarily at retail.The training team has adapted standard food safety industry training materials to address the needs of retail audiences operating under varied regulatory systems from cottage food (home-based) food manufacturers to small canning operations and robust retail manufacturers.

    Publications