Progress 06/01/22 to 05/31/24
Outputs Target Audience: Dairy farmers, nutritionists, dairy science students, animal nutrition companies, dairy scientists, and the general public. Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?This project allowed onegraduate student to carry out novel research, analyze data, and present findings at national and international conferences. In addition, two undergraduate students gained experience in lab analysis, including colorimetric assays, gene expression, and flow cytometry. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?During this project, 4 oral and poster presentations at 4 scientific meetings have provided the opportunity for hundreds of animal and dairy scientists, nutritionists, and veterinarians to learn from our findings. Additionally, we have presented two abstracts at local conferences with a more applied nutrition background. A popular press article was published in the Virginia Dairyman magazine where we highlighted the main findings from this research. Other avenues to dessiminate our findings were through several invited presentations at dairy nutrition and management conferences. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?
Nothing Reported
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
In this final year of the project, we focused on completing lab analysis, interpretation, and reporting on our goals for this project. Four abstracts have been presented at national and international conferences and a manuscript from this work is undergoing final edits before journal submission. One of the main goals of this project was to further provide evidence of liver glutathione as a promoter of better postpartal lactation performance. We observed clear improvements in milk production in cows with high prepartal liver glutathione concentrations. This was further verified by a linear increase in energy-corrected (ECM) milk from cows with low to high prepartal liver GSH. Similarly to ECM, milk protein yield increased linearly from cows with low to high prepartal liver GSH. Regarding mechanisms that control liver GSH synthesis and storage, we observed a distinctive association between liver GSH concentration and energy metabolism. Overall, prepartal glucose and insulin were positively correlated with prepartal liver GSH. Similarly, prepartal energy balance and net energy intake were positively correlated with prepartal liver GSH. This evidence led us to believe there is an indispensable energy requirement for liver GSH accumulation beyond the three amino acids required to synthesize GSH. This is supported from a biochemical standpoint, where the two steps for GSH synthesis require ATP. Additionally, those correlations between energy-related parameters and liver GSH were translated in cows with high prepartal liver GSH having higher BCS before and after calving. Interestingly, this effect was not conducive to higher blood NEFA or BHB levels postpartum or increased ROM due to higher fatty acid beta-oxidation in the liver. Additionally, no effects on liver triglycerides were observed. This suggests that liver GSH may protect transition dairy cows against fatty liver or ketosis. At the molecular level, we observed a transcriptional regulation of key genes related to GSH metabolism, including GGT (gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase) and GCLC (gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase), where GGT is in charge of catabolism of GSH, while GCLC is the rate-limiting step in GSH synthesis. Both of these genes were linearly upregulated across cows with low to high liver GSH prepartum. This suggests that mRNA transcription may respond to liver GSH accumulation, but liver GSH accumulation is not necessarily regulated at the gene level. Taken together, we first observed that prepartal liver GSH does improve lactation performances, and it may be partially regulated by energy status.
Publications
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2023
Citation:
Souza, A. F., G. G. Begalli, M. H. Oliveira, R. C. B. Grazziotin, J. Halfen, E. Trevisi, and J. S. Osorio. 2023. The impact of prepartal liver glutathione on milk performance parameters and welfare of peripartal dairy cows. The First International Conference on Antioxidants: Sources, Methods, Health Benefits and Industrial Applications. May 10-12. Barcelona, Spain.
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2023
Citation:
Souza, A. F., G. G. Begalli, M. H. Oliveira, R. C. B. Grazziotin, J. Halfen, E. Trevisi, and J. S. Osorio. 2023. The impact of prepartal liver glutathione on milk performance parameters and welfare of peripartal dairy cows. American Dairy Science Association Annual Meeting. June 25-28. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2024
Citation:
Souza, A. F., G. G. Begalli, M. H. Oliveira, R. C. B. Grazziotin, J. Halfen, E. Trevisi, and J. S. Osorio. 2024. Prepartal liver glutathione improves liver function, and it may be regulated by prepartal energy status in transition dairy cows. American Dairy Science Association Annual Meeting. June 16-19. Palm Beach, Florida.
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2024
Citation:
Souza, A. F., G. Begalli, M. H., Oliveira, R.C.B., Grazziotin, J. Halfen, E. Trevisi, and J. S. Osorio. 2024. Connecting prepartal liver GSH with postpartal performance parameters, blood biomarkers, and gene expression in transition dairy cows. International Symposium on Ruminant Physiology. August 26-29. Chicago, Illinois.
|
Progress 06/01/22 to 05/31/23
Outputs Target Audience:
Nothing Reported
Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?One postdoc, two graduate students, and two visiting scholars were trained during this evaluation period. Jessica Halfen, Postdoctorate, entire reporting period. Provided support to this NIFA-funded research project at the farm and in the lab. Helped organize research materials and sampling activities. Helped to mentor and guide the graduate student in charge of this project as well as troubleshooting lab assays. Ana Souza Lima, Ph.D. student, entire reporting period. Responsible for conducting this transition cow research project. During this experiment, she learned basic experimental design, blood and milk sampling, surgical procedures to collect sample specimens, and molecular biology techniques, including real-time qPCR. She has already presented some of the results of this research project at The First International Conference on Antioxidants in Barcelona, Spain. Gustavo Begalli, Ph.D. student, entire reporting period. During this experiment, Gustavo learned basic experimental design, blood and milk sampling, surgical procedures to collect sample specimens, and molecular biology techniques, including flow cytometry. Rodrigo Grazziotin, visiting scholar, 09/28/22 - 03/28/23. Rodrigo assisted and provided support to the main graduate student in charge of this research experiment. He learned the basics of animal husbandry, experimental design, and sampling various biological fluids and tissues. Maria Helena Oliveira, visiting scholar, 09/28/22 - 01/15/23. Mariaassisted and provided support to the main graduate student in charge of this research experiment. He learned the basics of animal husbandry, experimental design, and sampling various biological fluids and tissues. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?
Nothing Reported
What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Our upcoming plans are twofold: research and dissemination. On the research front, we aim to complete benchwork analyses that encompass several key areas. These include profiling blood biomarkers related to metabolism, oxidative stress, inflammation, and liver function. We'll also conduct gene expression studies focusing on the GSH metabolism/cycle in prepartal liver samples, utilizing RT-qPCR techniques. Furthermore, we'll perform RNAseq analyses on prepartal liver samples from both HGSH and LGSH cow groups. As for dissemination, we're committed to sharing our findings far and wide. We'll be presenting our research at both national and international conferences, targeting a broad audience that includes dairy farmers, dairy nutritionists, and researchers in dairy-related fields. Beyond presentations, we plan to publish our results in two forms: a popular press article for wider public engagement and a peer-reviewed scientific paper for the academic community.
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
During this reporting period, significant progress was made toward the main objective of this project. We completed a transition cow experiment during this objective. Sixty-three multiparous Holstein dairy cows were enrolled at -21 d relative to calving and remained on trial until 30 days in milk (DIM). All cows received the same close-up diet from -21 DIM until calving (1.59 Mcal/kg of DM and 14.6% CP) and a lactation diet from calving until 30 DIM (1.82 Mcal/kg of DM and 18.4% CP). Before calving, cows were housed in a compost-bedded pack barn, and after calving, cows were moved to a free-stall barn. Throughout the trial, cows were fed once a day with an individual Calan gate feeding system. After calving, cows were milked twice a day at 0100 and 1200 h. Blood samples were collected at -21, -10, 2, 7, 14, and 21 d relative to parturition. These blood samples were used to analyze biomarkers of oxidative stress, metabolism, inflammation, and liver function. Liver biopsies were performed at -10, 7, and 21 d relative to calving. The liver biopsy at -10 d relative to calvingwas used to perform a retrospective analysis based on total glutathione (GSH) and assign cows to high GSH(HGSH; n = 14, 2.4 mM), medium-high GSH (MHGSH; n = 15, 1.63 mM), medium-low GSH (MLGSH; n = 16, 1.13 mM), and low GSH (LGSH; n = 15, 0.47 mM). Overall, liver GSH at -10 d relative to parturition ranged from 0.01 to 3.38 mM concentration. This prepartal liver GSH concentration across cows was skewed to the low end of the GSH concentration. This suggests that most cows normally calved with a low liver GSH concentration. The milk production was affected (P = 0.04) by prepartal liver GSH concentration, where there was an evident increase in milk production in HGSH cows compared to MHGSH and LGSH cows. Although milk production in HGSH cows was 2.5 kg/d greater than MLGSH, this effect did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.21). Additionally, we observed a strong effect on milk protein yield, where HGSH cows had a greater (P < 0.04) milk protein yield than the other groups from week 2 to 4 postpartum. There was an interesting effect on body condition score (BCS), where there was a noticeable increase in BCS in HGSH cows before calving. This higherBCS (P = 0.03) was maintained by HGSH after calving when compared to other groups. These effects observed in BCS were accompanied by a positive correlation between total GSH and energy balance prepartum (r = 0.35; P < 0.01) and a trend for a positive correlation between total GSH and net energy intake prepartum (r = 0.23; P 0.07). Among the health outcomes recorded during this trial, a trend (P = 0.07) in mastitis events was observed, where LGSH cows had more mastitis events than other groups.
Publications
|