Source: PURDUE UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
MAXIMIZING THE IMPACT OF NUTRITION EDUCATION TO MEET THE DIETARY QUALITY AND FOOD SECURITY NEEDS OF CHILDREN AND PARENTS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
ACTIVE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1027912
Grant No.
2022-68015-36279
Cumulative Award Amt.
$969,996.00
Proposal No.
2021-08227
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jan 15, 2022
Project End Date
Jan 14, 2027
Grant Year
2022
Program Code
[A1344]- Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Disease
Recipient Organization
PURDUE UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
WEST LAFAYETTE,IN 47907
Performing Department
Nutrition Science
Non Technical Summary
Food insecurity and low diet quality are persistent problems linked with chronic disease and poor health among limited-resource children and adults using Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). We have shown nutrition education via adult-focused, direct SNAP-Education (SNAP-Ed) improved household food security by 25% but not adult dietary quality among SNAP-eligible households using a randomized, controlled, longitudinal SNAP-Ed intervention in Indiana. Households experiencing food insecurity often reserve food considered "healthful" for children, so child dietary quality improvement may precede that observed among adults when household food security improves. This study will determine the effect of adult-focused direct SNAP-Ed on child dietary quality and household food security using a longitudinal randomized, controlled SNAP-Ed intervention. Assessment will include repeated 24-hour dietary recalls to determine usual intake, the U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module, and behavior data from before and after the 10-week "intervention period," and 1 year later, after which the control group will receive the intervention. Low-income participants (n=275) from Indiana will be recruited following SNAP-Ed protocol. Results of the study will inform the creation of supplementary on-demand SNAP-Ed educational material focused on improving healthful dietary intake for children and adults in situations of food insecurity in households with children. Education on modeling healthy attitudes and behaviors, planning and preparing family meals, and dietary shortfalls as informed by the results and previous evidence will be included and evaluated. The study aligns with the goals of USDA to increase food security and this RFP to improve healthful behaviors, food quality and nutrition.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
7036020101050%
7046020117050%
Goals / Objectives
Long-Term Goal: Determine the long-term (1-year) effect of direct, adult-focused SNAP-Ed on dietary quality and household food security among children (5-18 years) of adult (≥18 years), low-income Indiana SNAP-Ed participants and create and evaluate supplementary SNAP-Ed materials to improve food security and dietary intake in food insecure households with children.< > Determine the 1-year effect of direct, adult-focused SNAP-Ed on: (a) dietary quality (using the HEI), usual dietary intake, among children of adult SNAP-Ed participants and the adult participants themselves, compared with a control group receiving a delayed intervention and (b) food security among the household, adults and children (using the U.S. HFSSM (17)) in intervention compared with control group, and (c) coping mechanisms, needs, behaviors, and attitudes among adult SNAP-Ed participants compared with controls.Extension: Create supplemental on-demand SNAP-Ed material tailored for food insecure households with children based on the study results and needs assessed to improve healthful dietary intake for children and adults. Determine changes in coping mechanisms, behavior and needs related to healthful dietary intake and household food security before and after receiving the new educational content.
Project Methods
Methods:a. Stakeholders involvement in problem identification, planning, implementation, and evaluation (Goals 1 and 2): At the start of the project a stakeholder advisory council will be assembled and will include the SNAP-Ed director, key administrative staff (n=3), NEPAs (n=3), and previous participants of SNAP-Ed (n=3). The advisory council will meet before the research starts and annually to provide input on each phase of the project from problem identification to study planning (year 1), implementation (years 2 & 3), and creation and evaluation of the nutrition education (years 4 & 5).b. Proposed project activities, listed sequentially (Goals 1 and 2): Within the first month of the study the first stakeholder advisory council meeting will be held to gather input on the research protocols and plans. Following this meeting, study procedures will be refined, next the study recruiter will be trained in SNAP-Ed protocols, study recruitment of SNAP-qualifying adult-child pairs will then begin within the first 2 months of the study. All study recruitment procedures and materials will be approved through the Purdue University Institutional Review Board (IRB).Goal 1:Research Study Participants and RecruitmentRecruitment will occur at a rate of n=10 per week for 9 months in the 4 regions of the state (northwest, northeast, southwest, southeast) over the course of the school year so that each region is visited roughly once per month to avoid a seasonal effect. Dates included in summer recess will be avoided as dietary quality among children may vary considerably from the months of majority of the year spent in school (81). Approved SNAP-Ed sites within regions will serve as recruitment sites including community centers; SNAP, WIC, county Extension offices; food pantries and banks, and other locations. An informational flyer will be posted at the site on study recruitment days. A full-time study recruiter, trained through SNAP-Ed, will coordinate to recruit alongside the NEPAs in the 4 state regions who will be present to similarly recruit for SNAP-Ed programming and deliver the lessons. For example, at the recruitment sites, the NEPA will first ask whether individuals are interested in SNAP-Ed, if yes, the NEPA will inform them of the study and direct them to the study recruiter. The recruiter will explain the study procedures, assessments, and time necessary to complete the assessments. The consent form, randomization, and study assessments will follow if the individual desires to participate, if not they will be referred to the NEPA and engage in SNAP-Ed as usual without differential treatment through the program. Assent for children 5-17 years and consent for children 18 years and assessments will be scheduled with the recruiter within the following 24 hours by phone or by email when the participant desires. Treatment group (control or SNAP-Ed intervention) will be assigned 1:1 using data collection spreadsheets prepared by PD Eicher-Miller and Co-PD Craig that will include the subject ID and randomized assignment. Participants recruited simultaneously will be assigned to the same study group to prevent knowledge of differential treatment. Subject ID will be assigned to each assessment the participant completes; names will not be associated with any assessments, and the list of names and numbers will be kept separately and securely. Study recruiters will use portable internet hot spots and paper forms in rare situations of no internet. A password protected metadata file on an encrypted hard drive or REDCap or Box will securely store all information.Research Study Protocols: Adult participants will complete assessments following recruitment. The participant screener, characteristics and additional behavioral, coping mechanisms, needs, self-efficacy, and food security questionnaires will be completed online or interview assisted in Qualtrics or REDCap. Child participants will complete the child-specific questions of the U.S. HFSSM, and a brief set of behavioral, and coping mechanisms questionnaires online (with interview and parent assistance for ages 6-11 years and with interview and option to self-complete for ages 12-18 years (24)). Study assessments for the intervention group will be provided alongside the SNAP-Ed program evaluation before the first lesson. The 24-hour dietary recall will be self-completed online or via interview for adults using the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour (ASA-24) Dietary Recall (82) and by interview with parent assistance ages 6-11 years and by interview or self-completed for ages 12-18 years through a secure data management system. The same sequence of assessments will be completed at each time point, with the exception of the participant screener completed at baseline.After baseline study assessments are completed, participants randomized and recruited to the intervention group will be referred to the SNAP-Ed NEPA and receive the first SNAP-Ed lesson. The remaining 3 lessons will be received at the rate of 1 lesson per week during the 10 week intervention period, following normal protocol. Control group participants will not receive lessons during the intervention period and will be requested to wait 1 year to receive lessons. Both groups will be encouraged to stay in touch with study staff. All recruited participants (control and intervention groups) will be contacted at least once per month via communication of their choice to reduce attrition and maintain correct contact information until completion of the final survey. SNAP-Ed lessons will be delivered either one-on-one or in a group setting at a community location, following normal protocolThe study recruiter will follow-up with NEPAs delivering lessons to intervention participants to track lesson attendance, location, NEPA delivering the lessons, delivery to individual or group, contacts with the NEPA, and presence and type of county-level indirect SNAP-Ed for each participant using a spreadsheet in Qualtrics or RedCAP. After 1-year, participants will complete 1-year assessments and the control-group referred to SNAP-Ed.Goal 2: Extension Education Materials: After the research study completion, beginning in year 4, supplementary SNAP-Ed educational materials aimed to improve self-efficacy, and behavior change among household members will be created. The stakeholder advisory council will meet to initiate informing the educational materials. The results of the Goal 1,will be used to inform the creation of the supplemental nutrition education content. A literature review on background literature specific to the goal of creating educational content to improve dietary quality and food security in households with children will also inform the educational materials (using these studies 30-34, 58-61, 72-78 and additional studies). Co-PD Mayfield will use the social ecological model (65), the social cognitive theory (66), and other child and adult learning theories to create engaging supplemental SNAP-Ed material directed at parents and children in food insecure households. Content will be interactive and include hands-on activities where participants can practice decision making to build self-efficacy. The materials will be reviewed by the advisory council and revised based on feedback. Next, the Envision Center at Purdue, will transform the educational material to on-demand web-based content. Stakeholders will again critically review the pilot version of the material as well as least 3 NEPAs who will also test the content with new SNAP-Ed clients, in order to revise and improve the content. Evaluation of the material will be seamlessly integrated as pre-and post-questions that will be captured within the online platform. After educational content is developed, pilot tested, and refined, the material will be deployed throughout the state and delivered by NEPAs alongside direct adult-focused SNAP-Ed.

Progress 01/15/24 to 01/14/25

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audience reached by our efforts during this reporting period were the Supplemental Nutirtion Assistance Program-Education (SNAP-Ed) educators and the Indiana SNAP-Ed program as these individuals were important to collaborate withas we carry out the protocols for the study and continue to harmonizethe study with the administration of the SNAP-Ed program. We also continuously needto recruit newly hiredSNAP-Ed educators and educate them on our study in order to further allow them to publicize our study to the target audience, the potential participants of the SNAP-Ed program. Additionally this reporting period we have recruited specifically Spanish speaking SNAP-Ed educators as we have translated all of our mateirals to Spanish and expanded our recruitment to Spanish speakers. Furthermore, our target audience included potentialparticipants of the SNAP-Ed program in Indiana, or those households with incomes that qualify for food assistance throughSNAP and speak English or Spanish. Thetarget audience also need to have a child of school age (5-18 years) living in the household. Changes/Problems:We continue to experience challenges in recruiting to our expected and necessary sample size. We continue to problem solve this situation. One change we have made, as previously described, to deal with this barrier is to expand our potential recruitment pool to Spanish speakers and well as English speakers. We have translated all of our materials to Spanish and recruited SNAP-Ed nutrition educators to help us in this effort. We also continue to look for and identify new in-person recruitment sites to advertise our study and to recruit participants from. This challenge has caused us to extend our recruitment period. However, we still plan at this point to recruit our full sample and to accomodate the additional time spent on recruitment we will compress the time of the analysis. We still plan to carry out all of the analysis that was originally intended and we do not anticipate or plan any changes in the scope, goals, or aims of the project.. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Several opportunities for training and professional development have been provided in this reporting period. One graduate student has been trained to be a SNAP-Ed Nutrition Education Professional so that she can now deliver the educational lessons to the participants of our study who have been randomized to the intervention group. Additionally we have trained two undergraduate research assistants in how to communicate with our participants and track their data records as they complet the study surveys and protocols. We continue to train the SNAP-Ed nutrition education professionals in the study procedures and in research methods as new educators join the SNAP-Ed and as we add new protocols (e.g. recruiting Spanish speaking individuals). All of the current graduate and undergraduates currently working on the project have also learned data management and cleaning skills. The graduate students working on the project are learning analytical and statistical skills as we do some basic analysis on the project and also use the data for pilot studies, for example one such study was completed on comparing dietary quality between parents and children and presented at the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior Conference and the American Society for Nutrition Conference last year. Finally, one of the graduate students is starting a new scoping literature review to determine all of the coping strategies that households with children use to maintain food security and dietary quality. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?We provide a monthly training to all of the Indiana SNAP-Ed nutrition education professionals who are interested in the study. In addition, the advertisement of the study to recruitpotential participants expanded to English and Spanish speakers during this reporting period. All Indiana SNAP-Ed educators who deliver adult-focused nturition education have been infomed about the study and flyers have been distributed to them to sharewith potential clients. The educators have been instructed to take the flyers with them when they are recruiting newparticipants for SNAP-Ed and to pass them out to interested individuals. We also request that they post the flyers at in-person community locations where they seek new clients from. The flyers have a QR code that potential participantsmay use to link to a survey that will determine their eligibility for the study. These procedures disseminate the news of thestudy to communities of interest. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?During the next reporting period we hope to achieve our participant baseline recruitment goals for the study and also have all participants complete baseline surveys, food security and dietary assessments. We plan to try to increase our recruitment to attain the sample size needed by doing the following: 1. recruiting Spanish speakers since we have had to turn away many Spanish speakers in the past and now that we have translated all of our materials we believe we can increase our potential participant pool for enrolement. 2. identify and recruit at a few very large food pantries in the Indianapolis area and potential Fort Wayne area. We are looking for large grocery story-type food pantries that have large numbers of clients visit their facilities on weekends where we could plan a day trip with a large study team with laptops so that we may recruit several participant on-site at one event. We also hope to continue to collectfollow-up study data and complete participants who have been in the study for 1-year and finished all of the required surveys. Once we attain our baseline sample we willanalyzethe baseline data to determine the characteristics of the sample and compare them with the characteristics of the poputation taking SNAP-Ed in Indiana. We will also compare the characteristics of the experiemental (taking SNAP-Ed lessons) group with the control group to determine if the randomization was effective. Finally, we will clean, prepare, and analyzethe food security and dietary intake data to determine the food seurity and dietary quality of the sample.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? This year has focused intently on recruitment as we continued to recruit our sample of parent-child pairs who are interested in the SNAP-Ed program. We currently have recruited approximately 110 pairs and our goal is 275 pairs. Our recruitment continues to go slower than we would like so we have tried many things over the past year to increase recruitment. For example, we have worked with our Indiana Clinical and Translational Research Institute services to develope an online social media ad and recruiting strategy that we used in Sept-Dec 2024. This strategy did yeild some participants but also yeilded even more individuals who did not fit our criteria but developed ways to pass through with intent to receive the study compensation (internationally located scamming). Identifying these individuals took considerable time and effort, checking IP addresses, triangulating information, etc. Therefore, we have ended these social media campaigns and focused on in-person recruitment. We currently recruit through weekly and bi-weekly visits to a local food pantry and through requesting that thenutrition education professionals share and post our flyers at the community locations that they visit. We continue to seek more in-person locations for recruiting and additional ways and locations to advertise the study. In attempt to increase recruitment, we have also translated all of our materials to Spanish as we have one undergrad and one graduate student who can speak Spanish with participants and we also have 2 nutrition education professionals who can offer the SNAP-E lessons in Spanish. Furthermore, one additional way that we have adapted our protocols this year is through training one of the graduate students to also be a nutrition education professional. This student can now provide the SNAP-Ed lessons to participants to avoid the difficulty that we were previously facing when we would facilitate the connection of participants in the intervention group to the nutrition education professionals and sometimes communication with the participant would be lost in the process.

Publications

  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Other Year Published: 2024 Citation: Morales-Juarez A, Uwashimimana MA, Bailey R, Craig B, Tooze J, Connolly B, Stevens W, Eicher-Miller HA. Is parent diet quality related to child diet quality? A cross-sectional pilot study among low-income families from Indiana. Presentation at: Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, July 29-Aug 1, 2024; Lexington, KY, USA.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Other Year Published: 2024 Citation: Eicher-Miller HA, Bailey RL, Craig BA, Abbott AR, Tooze J, Mayfield B. A research/engagement study maximizing nutrition education to meet child and parent dietary quality and food security needs. Presentation at: Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, July 29-Aug 1, 2024; Lexington, KY, USA.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Other Year Published: 2024 Citation: Morales LA, Uwashimimana MA, Bailey R, Craig B, Tooze J, Connolly B, Stevens W, Eicher-Miller HA. Is parent diet quality related to child diet quality? A cross-sectional pilot study among low-income families from Indiana. Presentation at: American Society of Nutrition Conference, June 29-July 2, 2024; Chicago, IL, USA.


Progress 01/15/23 to 01/14/24

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audience reached by our efforts during this reporting period were the Supplemental Nutirtion Assistance ProgramEducation (SNAP-Ed) educators and the Indiana SNAP-Ed program as these individuals were important to collaborate with as we worked to carry out the protocols for the study and harmonized the study recruitment with the SNAP-Ed program. We also worked with the SNAP-Ed educators to inform them of ourstudy and the progress of the recruitment in order to further allow them to publicize our study to the target audience and problem solve our slow recruitment. Furthermore, our target audience included potential participants of the SNAP-Ed program in Indiana, or those households with incomes that qualify for food assistance through SNAP. Furthermore, the target audience needed to have a child of school age (5-18 years) living in the household. This audience was reached through the SNAP-Ed educators, flyers at community organizations and events targeted to low income households and parents. We also recruited participants in person at a local food pantry. Changes/Problems:During this period, as mentioned earlier, we have struggled to fulfill our recruitment goals. We believe that these problems were experienced because of several reasons, first, studies throughout the US have struggled with recruitment lately including large surveys like the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and this general trend is likely effecting us as well; second, the SNAP-Ed program in Indiana currently has less educators offering the direct nutrition education and the program experiences more influx and outflux of educators now compared to when we planned the study; third, the families that we are trying to recruit and have complete the lessons may have many demands on their time and so not offering compensation to complete the intervention was likely a barrier to many. We are correcting this by offering compensation to these participants and we have continually tried new solutions to solve the problem of recruitment and intervention completion. Despite the setbacks in the timeline, we do not expect that the delay will hinder the overall completion of the goals within the full time period of the project. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Several opportunities for training and professional development have been provided in this reporting period. Two graduate students have received training in various activities such as one-on-one work with a mentor to problem solve our recruitment difficulties, expand the recruitment, and to work with the SNAP-Ed program to generate new ideas and ways to recruit. Two undergraduate students have been trained to help communicate with our participants and to track their progress through the study. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The results of the project activities for this report have been disseminated to the SNAP-Ed program and educators through a series of monthly meetings with those stakeholders. In addition, the advertisement of the study to recruit potential participants has also been disseminated widely during this reporting period. Furthermore, with regard to our efforts to learn more about the dietary intake in food insecure households through our secondary data analysis, we have disseminated our results through a conference presentation at the American Society of Nutrition Nutrition 2023 conference and through a thesis project. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We have many plans for the next year to solve our recruitment problems. First, as mentioned earlier, we will deploy a new social media campaign to inform interested individuals of the study among low-income family households in Indiana. We believe that this will greatly add to our efforts and help us reach our goal of 300 pairs in the next reporting year. Secondly, we have requested through our IRB to be able to compensate participants who are randomized to the intervention program to take the SNAP-Ed at a rate of $100 for the 4 required lessons. We believe that this will also greatly enhance the intervention group to complete the intervention which we have also struggled with in this past reporting year. Through these efforts we believe we will be able to complete our baseline recruitment and intervention group completion of the intervention in the upcoming reporting year. Furthermore, we are ramping up our dissemination of results. We are planning several studies using the baseline data from the participants including one on the relationship of dietary intake in children and parents/caregivers that we plan to show at the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior conference and the American Society for Nutrition conference in 2024. Once we have our entire baseline sample we will be able to generate additional evaluation of the food and purchasing behaviors among parent and child participants and food insecurity in our study. Finally, we have two papers currently drafted regarding our secondary analyses of the relationship between dietary behavior and food insecurity that we plan to publish in 2024.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? This project is designed to evaluate the effect of nutrition education through the SNAP-Ed program on the diet quality and food security of low-income households with children and then create and evaluate new educational materials to improve food security and dietary intake. The major activities completed under these goals for this reporting period were related to the recruitment of the current 60 pairs of parent/caregiver with a child towards our recruitment goal of 300 pairs. We have had a very difficult time recruiting participants and have continualy adjusted our strategies to try to improve our recruitment over the past year. We started the study by recruiting through spreading the news of the research study through the SNAP-Ed program educators, both through physical flyers, the SNAP-Ed educators, and Indiana Nutrition Education Program social media and social media of the SNAP-Ed educators. This yeilded a very slow recuritment so we increased our presence to recruiting in person at a local food pantry which ended up doubling the recruitment. However, even this is too slow to meet timelines. Therefore we will create a separate social media campaign targeted at low-income households with children in Indiana. Other progress has been in learning more about the dietary intake of those in food insecure households with children through secondary analyses of our formerly collected data on households with children and through NHANES. We will use this information ulitmately in the development of the nutrition education outputs from this study.

Publications

  • Type: Theses/Dissertations Status: Published Year Published: 2023 Citation: Byrne D. Exploring measures for nutrition security: The relationship of responses to questions of the U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module to dietary quality using the Healthy Eating Index from NHANES 2007-2018, Dublin Institute of Technology, (Spring 2023).
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2023 Citation: Eicher-Miller HA, Bailey RL, Craig BA, Abbott AR, Tooze J, Mayfield B. A research/engagement study maximizing nutrition education to meet child and parent dietary quality and food security needs. Presentation at: the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior Conference; July 20-23, 2023; Washington DC.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2023 Citation: Eicher-Miller HA, Uwashimimana Ag, Tooze JA, Bailey R. Exploring measures for nutrition security: The relationship of responses to questions of the U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module with dietary quality. Presentation at: American Society for Nutrition Conference; July 22-25, 2023; Boston, MA.


Progress 01/15/22 to 01/14/23

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audience reached by our efforts during this reporting period were the Supplemental Nutirtion Assistance Program-Education (SNAP-Ed) educators and the Indiana SNAP-Ed program as these individuals were important to collaborate with as we created the protocols for the study and harmonized the study with the SNAP-Ed program. We also needed to recruit SNAP-Ed educators and educate them on our study in order to further allow them to publicize our study to the target audience, the potential participants of the SNAP-Ed program. Furthermore, our target audience included potential participants of the SNAP-Ed program in Indiana, or those households with incomes that qualify for food assistance through SNAP. Furthermore, the target audience needed to have a child of school age (5-18 years) living in the household. Changes/Problems:During this period we have been somewhat delayed in our initiation of recruitment which was plenned to start at the beginning of fall 2022 but actually started at the end of fall 2022. This occured for two main reasons, first a graduate student left the program and a new student needed to be trained and onboarded, this delay pushed the new start date to fall around the holiday season when several of the SNAP-Ed educators were taking vacation and potential clients were not as easy to recruit. The delay is not expected to hinder the overall completion of the goals within the full time period of the project. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Several opportunities for training and professional development have been provided in this reporting period. Four graduate students have received training in various activities such as one-on-one work with a mentor to carry out a narrative literature review and to develop protocols for the project and data collection systems. Additionally, students worked collaboratively with the SNAP-Ed program and were trained in SNAP-Ed protocols and curriculum. A training was carried out for all SNAP-Ed educators to learn about the study and how and where and when to publicize the study and the study goals and protocols. Finally, SNAP-Ed administrators involved in the project were made aware of reducing bias and the importance of study design, randomization, and data fidelity regarding the study. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The results of the project activities for this report have been disseminated to the SNAP-Ed program and educators through trainings that have been carried out online and in-person meetings. In addition, the advertisement of the study to recruit potential participants has also been disseminated widely during this reporting period. All Indiana SNAP-Ed educators who deliver adult-focused nturition education have been infomed about the study and flyers have been distributed to them to share with potential clients. The educators have been instructed to take the flyers with them when they are recruiting new participants for SNAP-Ed and to pass them out to interested individuals. The flyers have a QR code that potential participants may use to link to a survey that will determine their eligibility for the study. These procedures disseminate the news of the study to communities of interest. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?During the next reporting period we hope to achieve our participant recruitment goals for the study and also have all participants complete baseline surveys, food security and dietary assessments. The participants randomized to the intervention group should also take the core 4 lessons that comprise SNAP-Ed while the participants randomized to the control group will not take these lessons. At the end of the year, we will also begin collecting the follow-up study data. Furthermore, we plan to begin analyzing the baseline data to determine the characteristics of the sample and compare them with the characteristics of the poputation taking SNAP-Ed in Indiana. We will also compare the characteristics of the experiemental (taking SNAP-Ed lessons) group with the control group to determine if the randomization was effective. Finally, we will begin cleaning, preparing, and analyzing the food security and dietary intake data to determine the food seurity and dietary quality of the sample.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? This project is designed to evaluate the effect of nutrition education through the SNAP-Ed program on the diet quality and food security of low-income households with children and then create and evaluate new educational materials to improve food security and dietary intake. The major activities completed under these goals for this reporting period included 3 main activities. First, we worked with stakeholders and the SNAP-Ed program to devise how the study would be carried out in harmony with the SNAP-Ed program. In completing this, we devised recruitment strategies, developed surveys, data collection systems, and protocols for participants to complete our study. We also refined these strategies after meeting and receiving feedback from stakeholders including participants of SNAP-Ed, educators, and administrators of SNAP-Ed, and created final versions that were approved by the Institutional Review Board. A second accomplishment was the actual deployment of the study and the initiation of recruiting participants in the study throughout Indiana. The third accomplishment was the completion of a literature review to learn about the known household factofs that contribute to dietary quality and food security among low-income households with school-aged children in the U.S. This literature review is currently under review at a journal.

Publications

  • Type: Theses/Dissertations Status: Published Year Published: 2022 Citation: McKeown D, Graves L, McGowan B, Eicher-Miller HA. Contributing factors to dietary quality and food security in low-income households with children in the United States: A scoping review. medRxiv 2022.09.06.22279548; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.06.22279548.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Under Review Year Published: 2022 Citation: Eicher-Miller HA, Graves Lg, McGowan B, Mayfield BJ, Connolly BA, Stevens W, Abbott A. A scoping review of household factors contributing to dietary quality and food security in low-income households with school-age children in the U.S. Submitted to Advances in Nutrition, Dec 2022.