Source: UNIV OF MINNESOTA submitted to NRP
INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF NECTAR GLUCOSINOLATES IN POLLINATOR ATTRACTION IN BRASSICA CROPS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1026027
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Feb 23, 2021
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2021
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
UNIV OF MINNESOTA
(N/A)
ST PAUL,MN 55108
Performing Department
Plant Biology
Non Technical Summary
Over 100 crops in the US are dependent on animal-mediated pollination, with honey bees providing more than $15 billion in value annually. For the pollinator, nectar is the primary reward essential for growth and development. Aside from its sugar content, roughly 10% of nectar dry weight contains non-carbohydrates, such as proteins, amino acids, lipids, and specialized metabolites that greatly impact pollinator health. Glucosinolates (GLSs) are sulfur-rich specialized metabolites found in the Brassicaceae, a plant family that includes several vegetable and oilseed crops such as canola. GLSs are known for their defensive properties against herbivory, but their recent identification in nectar suggests they may impact plant-pollinator relationships. Species within the genus Brassica vary in their GLS leaf tissue profiles in terms of type, quantity and time of day abundances. It is unclear whether these dynamic changes occur in nectar and what effect GLSs in nectar have on pollinator visitation. The proposed work will quantify differences in GLS in nectar and leaf tissue across Brassica morphotypes and assess their pollinator visitation patterns. Sampling will occur at three times of day in order to detect diel variation in GLS accumulation that may uncover additional associations with pollinator preference. Results from this work will provide the first temporal analysis of GLSs in paired leaf and nectar of Brassica spp. along with associated pollinator visitation. This will inform future work into identifying breeding targets for crop improvement and the conservation of pollinator biodiversity.
Animal Health Component
0%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
100%
Applied
0%
Developmental
0%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
2061440101050%
2063010101050%
Knowledge Area
206 - Basic Plant Biology;

Subject Of Investigation
1440 - Cole crops; 3010 - Honey bees;

Field Of Science
1010 - Nutrition and metabolism;
Goals / Objectives
The goals of the proposed project are to quantify differences in glucosinolates in nectar and leaf tissue across Brassica morphotypes and assess their pollination visitation patterns. To achieve these goals we will pursue two main objectives:(1)Quantify differences in glucosinolate diversity and accumulation in nectar and leaves ofBrassicamorphotypes. The "byproduct hypothesis" suggests that nectar specialized metabolites are derived from synthesis in other tissues and delivered to nectar by the vasculature. We will quantify glucosinolates in leaves and nectar to determine how the vasculature might contribute to the glucosinolate nectar composition. Samples will be collected at three time points throughout the day to understand at what stage glucosinolates are produced and whether their chemical diversity changes in nectar throughout the day.(2)Assess pollinator abundance and diversity visitingBrassicamorphotypes. We predict thatBrassicamorphotypes will have variable GLS concentration and diversity, which may correlate to patterns of pollinator visitation. Previous research suggests that both the diversity and behavior of pollinators on Brassica rapa differs in high and low glucosinolate lines. While hybrid varieties of canola dominate the market, the response of these strains to pollinators remains unexplored yet we know that pollinator visitation can make a significant impact on crop yield. In this objective we will assess the diversity of pollinators on Brassica morphotypes as well as the patterns of visitation throughout the day.
Project Methods
The methods for Objective 1:B. rapa and B. napus morphotypes will be germinated in the greenhouse, lines requiring vernalization will be put in a 4°C cold room for 30 days prior to transplanting into test plots. Plant growth will be staggered and randomized to have enough samples for analysis and prevent positional effects. Once flowering, nectar from flowers (bagged plants in test plots) and leaf tissue will be collected at three time points, one in the morning (secretory), one in the afternoon (post-secretory #1) and one in theevening (post-secretory #2), with 3 replicates per time point. Samples will be ground into a fine powder in a bead mill homogenizer. To extract glucosinolates, nectar and leaf extracts will be loaded onto a packed DEAE Sephadex A-25 column for anion-exchange chromatography. After binding and washes, an on-column sulfatase treatment will be performed to release the GLSs from the column. Once eluted, desulfo-glucosinolates will be separated by HPLC and detected by UV absorption at 229 nm. Authentic GLS standard compounds and HPLC-high resolution mass spectrometry will be used to confirm the compound identities and the quantitative performance for this analysis. The nectar will also be evaluated for total volume, sugar type, and concentration, which will be normalized on a per flower and per plant basis. This will also provide an additional normalization for the GLS quantification. Morphotype and time point specific glucosinolate measurements will be analyzed using principle component analysis to evaluate the signatures of variation.Objective 2:Brassica morphotypes will be grown on test field plots at the University of Minnesota, Saint Paul campus, and St. Catherine's University in St. Paul. We will grow morphotypes of B. rapa and B. napus under greenhouse conditions. After vernalization, they will be moved into a field site and randomly arranged. Neighboring growth of other crops will be recorded to ensure that the effect of these crops on bee communities across the site is considered.At each of the plots bee species abundance will be measured by, on-the-wing identification and netting all individual bees observed visiting crop flowers at standard times of day. Netted specimens will be identified to species. For specimens identified on the wing, we will combine morphologically similar species groups when necessary. Data will be collected only on days that are favorable for bee activity (above 14°C by 10:00h and above 17°C by 12:00h, clear to partly cloudy skies). Sampling will involve walking along the plots at a standard pace for 20 minutes and recording insect identities. After this, a second walk will involve netting pollinators that are visiting the morphotypes. Data from the visual identification and netting will be combined for a total abundance of morphotype-visiting bees. Floral bloom density will also be recorded by counting the number of open flowers (secretory vs post-secretory #1) and buds (pre-secretory) on multiple plants from each morphotype randomly selected. In addition to tracking pollinator visitation, we will record the number of days after first flower opening, mean petal size, number of flowers and plant height to give us a proxy of the flowering stage of the plant. Nectar chemistry (GSLs, sugars, volatiles) from Aim 1 and pollinator visitation profiles in Aim 2 will be evaluated using analyses such as generalized linear models that account for rates of visitation, GLS levels, and other aspects of floral morphology.

Progress 02/23/21 to 09/30/21

Outputs
Target Audience:We expect the following groups to be main target audiences for our project: (1) Canola breeders: Many canola industry groups including the US Canola Association and the Canola Council in Canada, recognize the important role of pollinators in increasing canola yield and reducing bloom time. We feel that the results from this study may influence choices and lead to selection for some traits which may maximize pollinator attraction. (2) Honey Producers: Canola is an important forage resource for the honey industry. Between 2008-2013, a third of all U.S. honey-producing bee colonies were in Minnesota and the Dakotas. USDA-ERS recognizes the Upper Midwest as the top honey production region and the success of this industry is depending more and more on canola cultivation. Maximizing pollinator visitation in canola is of interest to honey produces. (3) Conservation: Mazimizing pollinator visitation in canola will also benefit native pollinator species and support the conservation of pollinator biodiversity. Changes/Problems:(1) We switched from doing two sets of daily observation to doing one set in the morning. Based on communication with the Cariveau Lab (with expertise in native MN bee behavior), we felt that having a larger number of observers in the morning when pollinators are most active would give us a better preliminary dataset. While doing two daily observations would be ideal, we could not support the manpower needed to do a second set of pollinator observations. The extremely warm summer temperatures and drought conditions meant that the bees were not as active later in the day which also favored a morning observation. (2) Because of the amount of time it takes to collect nectar from individual flowers, we reduced the sampling from three to two time points. This also allowed us to gather larger amounts of nectar in the morning and afternoon, which will allow for better glucosinolate screening and carbohydrate assays. Using this data, we will be able to identify morphotypes with distinct glucosinolate profiles that we can follow up on with more resolved time sampling. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Two undergraduate students received training and assisted in this project andwere instrumental in the success of the field experiment. The undergraduates and a postdoctoral researcher in the Greenham labreceived training in pollinator identification and performing visitation experiments by Zachary Portman, a bee taxonomist in Co-PI Dan Cariveau's lab. Bothundergraduate students were mentored by a senior Research Scientist in the Greenham lab and have acquired data analysis skills and statistical analysis.One of these students is continuing to work on this project in the lab by performing the time course nectar quantification and morphological characterization of flowers across morphotypes. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?When the research is completed, the research will be presented at scientific conferences and used to put together a larger, multi-year grant. We are planningonpublishing our findings from this preliminary study. We will work with the bee lab on outreach projects for the general public on native Minnesota bees; we are also considering canola-specific outreach tools that will be presented through the UMN Market Science outreach program. We will focus more on outreach once we have completed the chemical analyses. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? (1) We have collected samples of nectar and leaf tissue from five Brassica rapa and three Brassica napus morphotypes, respectively. We are currently working to optimize glucosinolate quantification and identification in leaf tissue before we try assessing nectar samples. Because of the extremely low nectar volume produced per flower and the time taken to collect samples, wereduced the number of time points of our readings from three to two. During the sampling, we noticed that the volume of nectar produced varied across time points both within and across lines. For example, the vegetable turnip B. rapa morphotype had very little nectar production in the dawn time point but by mid-afternoon produced amounts equal to what the other morphotypes produced in the morning. This observation has not been well documented in the literature and has led us to design a more controlled greenhouse experiment to quantify these differences. Pollinator activity varies throughout the day and the availability of nectar at that time will influence the visitation. Time of nectar production might be an important trait for breeders to consider when optimizing crop performance. (2) We have assessed the pollinator composition across multiple strains using both visual observation across several weeks and by collecting and identifying species to the genus or species level.For instance, almost 80% of visits to the canola strain 'Zamboni' are from honeybees, whereas honeybee visits only account for 50-60% of visits across all B. rapa strains. Initial results from studies of floral morphology also suggest that B. napus morphotypes have significantly larger flowers, longer floral tubes, and more flowers on an inflorescence than B. rapa morphotypes. We have also identified many bee visitors to the genus and species level. This will provide a useful comparison for a new trial under more favorable climatic conditions, and allow us to compare results from this trial to bee diversity in agricultural canola fields. We are designing a follow up field study for next spring where we will compare pollinator visitation across two field plots that have altered sulfur fertilizer application to be able to assess the within genotype variation when sulfur availability fluctuates. A comparison within genotype will eliminate the confounding effects of flower morphology and number that we see across genotypes and instead focus directly on whether sulfur availability, the main nutrient in glucosinolates, affects pollinator attraction.

Publications