Source: UNIV OF CONNECTICUT submitted to NRP
A COMPREHENSIVE PROBIOTIC-BASED APPROACH TO PROMOTE LAYER PERFORMANCE, LAYER HEALTH AND EGG SAFETY FOR SMALL AND MIDSIZE FARMS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
ACTIVE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1025415
Grant No.
2021-68006-33881
Cumulative Award Amt.
$500,000.00
Proposal No.
2020-05129
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Sep 1, 2021
Project End Date
Aug 31, 2026
Grant Year
2021
Program Code
[A1601]- Agriculture Economics and Rural Communities: Small and Medium-Sized Farms
Recipient Organization
UNIV OF CONNECTICUT
438 WHITNEY RD EXTENSION UNIT 1133
STORRS,CT 06269
Performing Department
Animal Science
Non Technical Summary
Small and midsized poultry farms contribute significantly to US poultry output and provide new opportunities for American agriculture across the country. They manage diversified operations and cater to the growing demand for locally sourced foods including specialty eggs. Hence it is critical to promote their sustainability. Towards this, the proposed project is based on feedback and input received from small and midsize farms on the challenges faced and the associated needs to promote their enterprise. Based on the stakeholder inputs, our goal in this project is to assist small and midsize farmers with improving the sustainability of their enterprise. Improving the sustainability of small and midsize layer operations involves a focus not only on bird health and welfare but also reducing costs and maximizing productivity. Thus, the study aims to provide farmers with effective, economical and user-friendly interventions that can be applied along the production pipeline to promote egg production and safety. Specifically, by supplementing probiotics we aim to i) improve feed efficiency, egg production, hen health and reduce mortality ii) reduce egg-borne transmission of Salmonella (pre-harvest) and iii) control Salmonella contamination on shell eggs (post-harvest). In addition, we will perform cost-benefit analysis and develop comprehensive extension/outreach programs to meet farmers needs and provide them with efficient tools for sustainable poultry farming. Ultimately, we expect to help promote the sustainability, viability and competitiveness of small and midsize egg producers.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
7123210110020%
7123270110020%
3023210101020%
6013210301010%
6013270301010%
9033210303010%
9033270303010%
Goals / Objectives
Based on stakeholder inputs, our goal in this proposed project is to assist small and midsize farmers with improving the sustainability of their enterprise. Our overall goal is the development of a probiotic-based comprehensive, feasible, user-friendly and cost-effective strategy to promote layer performance, health and egg safety. This in turn, is expected to help promote the sustainability, viability, competitiveness and economic efficiency of small and midsize egg producers. Specifically, by supplementing probiotics we aim to i) improve feed efficiency, egg production, hen health and reduce mortality ii) reduce Salmonella colonization in chickens and reduce pathogen transmission to eggs (pre-harvest) iii) reduce Salmonella contamination on shell eggs (post-harvest) as a means to reduce the variable costs associated with production. Additionally, we will perform a cost-benefit analysis to evaluate the economic feasibility of the proposed interventions. We aim to achieve this by actively engaging farmers as key participants in the development and evaluation of the proposed approaches.
Project Methods
Objective 1: To promote layer performance and health by in-feed probiotic supplementation Probiotics and experimental diets: Probiotic strains [Lactobacillus rhamnosus NRRL-B-442 (LR) and L. paracasei DUP 13076 (LP)] will be cultured separately in de Mann Rogosa Sharpe broth (MRS) and washed twice with PBS. Equal portions from the two strains will be combined to make the probiotic cocktail (PC). Probiotic preparations will be incorporated into the different treatment diets to obtain 8 log CFU/kg of feed. Dietary treatments will include control (no probiotic), diet + LR, diet + LP or diet + PC.Experimental design: A total of 384, fifteen-week-old Lohmann Lite pullets will be housed in floor pens and provided with the basal diet (pre-lay diet) for a 3-week adjustment period. At the end of this period, laying hens will be randomly allotted to one of the four dietary treatments for the duration of the study period (19 to 48 wk of age). At the beginning of week-19, hens will be individually weighed and housed in floor pens provided with nest boxes. Each treatment will include 4 replicate pens (8 birds/pen) per trial and the study will be repeated three times.Laying performance and egg quality: Health condition, mortality, feed intake, egg production, egg weights, laying rate and FCR will be determined throughout the experimental period. Egg numbers will be recorded on a pen basis. All eggs obtained on the third day of each collection period in the first and second phase of laying will be used for quality analysis. Haugh unit, yolk color, shell strength, and shape index will be determined.Immunity and gut microflora: At the end of each trial, two laying hens will be selected from each group replicate for a total of 24 birds/treatment and sacrificed. Blood samples will be collected to harvest plasma for antibody analysis. Cecal contents (1g) from each bird will be sampled to determine fecal coliforms, E. coli and Lactobacilli populations.Objective 2: To reduce egg-borne transmission of Salmonella by in-feed probiotic supplementation to layers (pre-harvest intervention).Probiotics, experimental diets and SE strains: Probiotic cultures will be prepared and incorporated in the feed as in objective 2. A four-strain mix of SE will be used to inoculate the birds. Each strain will be grown separately in 10 ml of tryptic soy broth (TSB) containing 50µg/ml of NA (TSB-NA) and washed twice in PBS. Equal volumes from each strain will be combined to obtain the four-strain inoculum (~10 log CFU/ml).Experimental procedure: A total of 480 nineteen-week and 40-week old Salmonella-free layer hens will be used in the study. Two separate experiments will be conducted, wherein 19-week-old (experiment 1) and 40-week old (experiment 2) layers will be randomly allocated to 4 treatments (20 birds/treatment group). The dietary treatments will include a control (SE challenge, no probiotic in diet), LR (SE challenge and LR in diet), LP (SE challenge and LP in diet) or PC (SE challenge and PC in diet). Birds will be put on the different treatment diets for 60 days. On day 14, the birds will be challenged with SE (10 log CFU/bird) by crop gavage. After 7 days of challenge, eggs will be collected daily from each treatment group and tested for presence or absence of SE until day 60. Then, all birds will be euthanized and tissue samples will be collected for SE detection.Detection of SE on eggs and in organs: Starting on day 7 post challenge, eggs from each treatment group will be collected daily and checked for the presence or absence of Salmonella. Tissue samples will be processed to determine Salmonella and lactobacilli populations.Objective 3: To reduce Salmonella on shell eggs by application of probiotics as an on-farm post-harvest treatment. Salmonella and Probiotic cultures: Salmonella cultures will be grown and washed as described in objective 2. Equal volumes of the washed bacterial culture will be combined to obtain the four-strain cocktail (inoculum; ~6 log CFU/ml). The probiotic cultures (LR, LP and PC) will be prepared as described in objective 1. The probiotic preparations will be reconstituted in sterile potable water (8 log CFU/ml) to be used in egg washing.Egg inoculation, treatment and storage: Fresh eggs will be spot inoculated with 200 µl of the SE cocktail (~ 6 log CFU/ml). The different treatments will consist of control (just water, no probiotic), Chlorine (wash water with 200 ppm chlorine), LR (wash water with LR), LP (wash water with LP) and PC (wash water with PC).Dipping: In each trial, batches of 25 inoculated eggs will be placed in 2L sterile plastic containers containing 500 ml of sterile water with or without the different treatments and washed in a shaker water bath held at 32°C for 15 min. Water containing 200 ppm chlorine will be included as an industry control. Following wash, eggs per treatment will be sampled and processed to enumerate surviving Salmonella and probiotic populations. The remaining washed eggs will be placed in egg cartons, held in the refrigerator for 3 weeks and sampled during storage for bacterial enumeration.Spray application: Briefly, eggs will be inoculated, and treatments will be prepared as previously described. A total of 405 eggs will be used for the spray application experiments. In each trial, batches of 25 eggs will be placed on an egg tray and sprayed with the different treatments (control, chlorine, LR, LP and PC) using a manual sprayer. The eggs will be allowed to dry for 15 min prior to microbiological analysis and/or storage et 4°C. Salmonella and probiotic populations will be enumerated at different times during the study.Microbiological and egg quality analysis: Each egg will be individually transferred to a sterile stomacher bag containing 30 ml of neutralizing buffer, hand rubbed for 1 min and processed for Salmonella enumeration. Additionally, samples will be plated on MRS agar to enumerate surviving probiotic populations on the eggs. The egg wash solution will also be processed to enumerate surviving Salmonella and probiotic populations. For the egg contents, the eggs will be disinfected, cracked open aseptically and the shell and egg contents will be collected into separate stomacher bags and processed for Salmonella detection. Uninoculated eggs subjected to the different wash/spray treatments will be used for the egg quality testing as described in objective 1.Objective 4: To conduct a cost/benefit analysis to evaluate the financial feasibility of the proposed approaches to small and medium farms.Approach: To measure the benefit of the approach we will closely monitor changes in the survival rates of layers as well as their performance and SE control on eggs. Using these benefits, we will estimate the total increase in revenue for producers that can come from this approach. These benefits must be weighed against the expected costs of the approach. Specifically, we will estimate the cost to producers for incorporating the proposed interventions. The poultry trails to be run at the UConn poultry research unit will serve as a pilot run for cost calculations. Then we will calculate the costs associated with a scaled-up version of the program, including extension and outreach components.Objective 5: To disseminate results of the study to small and medium egg producers through workshops, conferences, electronic and printed materials.The extension team will work with all members of the project to determine how data from the outreach and research teams will be used to develop educational materials to help inform the egg producers in the region. Outreach education programs, such as workshops and webinars for producers, extension educators, and other stakeholders will be developed. This will include integrating the use of probiotics as feed ingredients on farms, general management practices and methods to enhance egg safety and bird health under antibiotic free/restricted rearing.

Progress 09/01/24 to 08/31/25

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audience reached through this project includes small and medium egg producers, extension educators, poultry associations, other stakeholders, the scientific community, students, and the poultry industry. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?During this reporting period, graduate students were engaged in conducting egg safety trials using postbiotics. In addition to the wet lab experiments, the graduate student also performed statistical analysis on the data. Also, the student had the opportunity to present their research to producers at extension workshops and the larger poultry community at IPPE How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Results have been disseminated via peer reviewed publications, conference presentations and extension workshops. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?In continuation of the proposed research activities, tissue samples collected from the performance trials will be processed for immune and gene expression assays as outlined in the project. Further, additional studies are currently underway to develop different delivery mechanisms for the probiotic including emulsification and lyophilization

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? SalmonellaEnteritidis (SE) contaminated eggs are the leading cause of foodborne outbreaks. Egg contamination occurs from environmental sources and SE-colonized hens. Consumption of these contaminated eggs results in salmonellosis in humans. Hence, there is a need for effective post-harvest solutions to control SE on eggs. Here we evaluated the efficacy of two novel postbiotics extracted from probiotics,Lactobacillus rhamnosusNRRL-B-442 (LR) andLactobacillus paracaseiDUP 13076 (LP), as post-harvest wash treatments to reduce egg contamination. For this study, fresh table eggs were randomly assigned to treatments including control (water), MRS control (MRSC - water with 40% v/v MRS), 200ppm chlorine (industry control), water with 40% v/v LP postbiotic (LPP) and water with 40% v/v LR postbiotic (LRP). Inoculated eggs (SE ∼8 log CFU/egg) were either dip or electrospray (ES) washed using different treatments. Immediately following wash and at different times during 21-day refrigerated storage, outer surface, inner shell surface and internal contents of eggs were sampled to enumerate surviving SE populations. The ES application of LRP and LPP reduced SE populations on outer surface to below detection limits by day 7 of storage with <11% of internal contents testing SE positive. With dip wash, postbiotic treatment reduced SE populations by>5 log CFU/egg. Overall, postbiotic application by ES or dipping significantly reduced SE populations on eggs (P≤0.05) throughout the storage without impacting egg quality (P>0.05). Overall, postbiotics can serve as a safe, effective, and organic friendly approach to enhance post-harvest egg safety.

Publications

  • Type: Peer Reviewed Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2025 Citation: Reddyvari, R., Lu, S., Kosuri, P. and Amalaradjou, M.A., 2025. Incorporation of probiotics in post-harvest wash treatments reduces Salmonella contamination and improves egg safety. Poultry Science, 104(6), p.105146.
  • Type: Peer Reviewed Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2025 Citation: Reddyvari, R. and Amalaradjou, M.A., 2025. Postbiotic wash treatments: A novel post-harvest approach to reduce Salmonella and enhance egg safety. Food Control, p.111398.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Other Year Published: 2025 Citation: 1. Ragini R, Kosuri P, Ren Y, Kanike E, Muttathukonam SH, Amalaradjou MA. 2025. Supplementation of novel probiotics improves layer performance while reducing egg-borne Salmonella transmission. 2025 PSA Annual Meeting, Raleigh, NC.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2025 Citation: 9. Ragini R, Kosuri P, Ren Y, Kanike E, Muttathukonam SH, Amalaradjou MA. 2025. A farm-to-fork approach for controlling Salmonella Enteritidis in shell eggs using probiotics and postbiotics. International Production & Processing Expo 2025, Atlanta, GA.


Progress 09/01/23 to 08/31/24

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audience reached through this project includes small and medium egg producers, extension educators, poultry associations, other stakeholders, the scientific community, students, and the poultry industry. In particular, we organized a poultry outreach seminar for producers focused on improving poultry egg safety using natural interventions. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?During this reporting period, graduate students were engaged in conducting the performance trials including feeding and management of layers, daily egg collection, weighing and egg quality analysis. In addition to the wet lab experiments, the graduate student also performed statistical analysis on the data. Currently the student is processing tissue samples for histomorphometric analysis. Also, the student had the opportunity to present their research to producers at extension workshops and the larger poultry community at IPPE How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Results of the study were shared with the producers and SAC via extension workshops, discussions and presentations at IPPE. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?In continuation of the proposed research activities, tissue samples collected from the performance trials will be processed for histology and immune assays as outlined in the project. Further, additional studies are currently underway to evaluate probiotic application as a pre-harvest intervention to improve egg safety.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? During the current reporting period, performance trials were conducted to evaluate the effect of in-feed probiotics supplementation on layer growth, performance, health and egg quality. Two novel probiotics namely Lactobacillus rhamnosus NRRL-B-442 (LR) and Lactobacillus paracasei DUP 13076 (LP) recently identified to promote pullet growth were employed in this study. The experiment was set out as a completely randomized design. A total of 300 19-week-old Lohmann lite laying hens were randomly allocated into 4 treatments with 5 replicates of 15 birds each for 48 weeks of age. The experimental treatments included a corn-soybean meal-based diet without probiotics (Control) and the feed supplemented with 9 log CFU/kg of LP, LR, and a probiotic cocktail of LP and LR (PR). Data were analyzed using GraphPad (Version 9.3.1), and P<0.05 was considered significant. The results showed that the feed conversion ratio (FCR) was significantly improved (P<0.05) in the LP group (2.94) when compared to control (3.22), LR (3.20), and PR (3.47). Specifically, the feed intake was significantly lower in the LP group (117g/bird) when compared to the control (128g/bird), LR (128g/bird) and PR (140g/bird). In terms of egg production, the cocktail and LP group significantly increased production by 5 and 3%, respectively, when compared to control. Further, we also observed higher cecal Lactobacilli counts and reduced E. coli counts in LP, LR and PR when compared to control. Overall, supplementing probiotics LP and LR in layer diets improved layer performance while modulating cecal microbial populations. Further, as part of the outreach component, poultry producers in PA were surveyed to identify production size and current management practices. Also, two extension workshops were organized at UConn to facilitate discussion on the project results and obtain feedback from small and medium producers in the region.

Publications


    Progress 09/01/22 to 08/31/23

    Outputs
    Target Audience:The target audience reached through this project includes small and medium egg producers, extension educators, poultry associations,other stakeholders, the scientific community, students, and the poultry industry. In particular, we organized a poultry outreach seminar for producers focused on improving poultry production using natural interventions. Changes/Problems:We experienced significant delay in procuring pullets for the performance trials (Objective 1) due to COVID restrictions and the Avian Influenza outbreaks. Hence, to overcome the difficulty with obtaining pullets, we have modified our protocol to raise the hatchlings ourselves and start the treatments on week 14 as outlined in the project. Beyond this, the postponement of the performance trials is also expected to delay the start of the pre-harvest interventions trial. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?During this reporting period, graduatestudents were engaged in conducting the performance trials including feeding and management of layers, daily egg collection, weighing and egg quality analysis. In addition to the wet lab experiments, the graduate student also performed statistical analysis on the data. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?In continuation of the proposed research activities, we will continue with the performance trial to evaluate the efficacy of probiotic supplementation on layer growth, performance and egg quality. Additionally, tissue samples will be processed for further analysis as outlined in the project narrative. Further, we also expect to publish the results from the egg wash experiments in a peer-revised journal and present results from the performance trial at professional meetings.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? Efforts in the current reporting period were focused on evaluating the effect of probiotic supplementation on layer performance. Briefly, Lohman Lite chicks were obtained from a commercial vendor and raised on floor pens with in-feed supplementation of probiotics starting from 15 weeks of age. Following the start of lay, eggs from each pen and treatment were collected once daily to record egg numbers and weight. In addition, every two weeks, all eggs obtained from each pen and treatment were subject to egg quality analysis. Further, individual bird weights were recorded once every two months and feed consumption was recorded every day on a per pen basis. This study is currently underway and expected to completed by the end of the year.

    Publications


      Progress 09/01/21 to 08/31/22

      Outputs
      Target Audience:The target audience reached through this project includes small and medium egg producers, extension educators, poultry associations, other stakeholders, the scientific community, students, and the poultry industry. Changes/Problems:We experienced significant delay in procuring pullets for the performance trials (Objective 1) due to COVID restrictions and the Avian Influenza outbreaks. Hence, we focused on Obj 3 in Year 1. Further, to overcome the difficulty with obtaining pullets, we have modified our protocol to raise the hatchlings ourselves and start the treatments on week 14 as outlined in the project. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?During this reporting period, graduate and undergraduate students were engaged in conducting the egg trials, sample collection and microbial enumeration. In addition to the wet lab experiments, the graduate student also performed statistical analysis on the data. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The results of the study have been disseminated to target audience and stakeholders through conference presentation and Co-PIs (extension educators). What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?In continuation of the proposed research activities, live bird trials will be set up to evaluate the efficacy of probiotic supplementation on layer growth, performance and egg quality. Additionally, tissue samples will be processed for further analysis as outlined in the project narrative.

      Impacts
      What was accomplished under these goals? Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) is a prevalent foodborne pathogen that is commonly transmitted through contaminated eggs. Once the egg is laid, SE can contaminate the eggs from various environmental sources including contaminated litter and fecal droppings. Therefore, decontamination of eggs is critical to food safety. Hence, we evaluated the efficacy of incorporating probiotics in wash water as an on-farm strategy to promote egg safety. We hypothesized that incorporation of probiotics in wash water will help reduce SE population on eggs. Further, since they occupy the same ecological niche as SE, probiotics can serve as a protective buffer against subsequent contamination and provide sustained antimicrobial effect. Freshly laid eggs (n= 45/trial) inoculated with a five-strain mix of SE (~8 log CFU/ml) were subjected to the different wash treatments including sterile water containing [no treatments (control), Lactobacillus rhamnosus (LR; 8 log CFU/ml), L. paracasei (LP) or Hafnia alvei (HA)] or chlorine (200 ppm). Eggs wash was performed either as a dip (32 or 42°C for 3 min) or spray application using a conventional air spray gun. Eggs were sampled for Salmonella and probiotic populations after wash and over 14 days of refrigerated storage. The experiments were set out as a completely randomized design and three independent trials were performed. Data were analyzed using GraphPad (Version 9.3.1)and p < 0.05 was considered significant. Immediately after probiotic spray application, ~ 6 and 5.4 log CFU/ml of SE was recovered from the control and treated eggs, respectively. Beyond this initial reduction, probiotic sprays exerted a sustained antimicrobial effect against SE populations on eggs during refrigerated storage. For instance, SE was reduced by > 3 log CFU/ml and to below detection limits by day 7 and 14 of storage, respectively, while ~ 4 log CFU/ml was still recovered from the control and chlorine treated samples. With dipping, at the end of the 3 min wash period at 42°, ~ 4 log CFU/ml of SE was recovered from the control and chlorine treated samples, with no further reduction observed during storage. On the other hand, washing with LR and LP reduced SE populations to below detection limits by day 7. Further, significant numbers of the probiotic were recovered from the eggs throughout storage. Overall, probiotic application by spraying or dipping significantly reduced SE populations on eggs (P<0.05). Therefore, incorporation of probiotics in wash water could potentially serve as a safe and organic-friendly antimicrobial strategy to promote egg safety.

      Publications

      • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2022 Citation: Reddyvari R, Lu S, Kosuri PR, Amalaradjou MA. 2022. Incorporation of probiotics in wash water to helps control Salmonella Enteritidis on shell eggs. 2022 PSA Annual Meeting, July 10-15, 2022.