Progress 07/01/23 to 06/30/24
Outputs Target Audience:Scientists working in reproductive physiology,and graduate students in animal science. In addition, international stakeholders (veterinarians, and relevant industry enterprises) working with both beef and dairy cattle. Changes/Problems:When conducting experiment 2 of Objective 1 we encountered some unexpected obstacles related to the dose of flunixin meglumine as reported in the previous period. As a result, we utilized a lower dose and a different route of aministration (i.e., intrauterine). This approach was succesful in the inhibition ofprostaglandin F2 alpha secretion and resulted in corpus luteum maintenance.However, replacement of prostaglandin F2 alphaat a 0.25 mg dosage was not efficacious to induce luteolysis which negated our ablation and replacement approach.As a result we will evaluate the effect of different prostaglandin F2 alpha dosages after induced pregnancy loss and their ability to induce luteal regression. The additional experiments conducted under Objective 1 have resulted in a significant delay. Objective 3 of the proposed research hinges primarily on our ability to modulate (increase or decrease) uterine blood flow in order to determine the role of utero-ovarian perfusion in maintenance of the CL. During the previous reporting period we identified ana dequate dosage of sildenafil citrate that induces a detectable increase in utrine artery perfusion, however, thsi effect is short lived (2-3h)which negates our original experimental approach of repeated administrations. In the next reproting period we will evaluate the sue of intravaginal pressaries and/or osmotic pumps to allow prolonged delivery which is necesary for our objectives. Lastly, the pharmacological approach originally selected to reduce uterine blood flow was the useof ergotamine tartrate, surprisingly we have been unsuccesful in our attempts to source this compound. Multiple vendors have this product listed, however, they have been unable to deliver it to us, as a result we have decided to utilize an alternative product (L-NAME) as a vasoconstrictor and dose determination experiments will be conducted in the upcoming reproting period. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?One graduate student completed their PhD degree, and their dissertation was based on the experiments proposed under Objetive1 of this project. In completion of the dissertation the student developed critical research skills, data analysis proficiencyas well as oral/written presentation skills.Another graduate student continues progressing towards her PhD degree which is primarily focused on this project. This student conducted the redesigned experiments required for Objective 2, and those reported for Objective 3. The studentdeveloped critical research skills as well as oral/written presentation skills.Durign this period the student was trainned in blood flow determination through ultrasonography and enzyme-linked immunoassays development and troubleshooting.In addition, 1 other graduate studentand 1 undergraduate student contributed towards the development of the work reported during this period and thus acquired valuable investigative skills. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Results have been disseminated to different audiences through presentations at scientific meetings (NIFA/AFRI Project Director Meeting and NE-2227 USDA multistate project meetings), veterinary conferences(XXVI International Congress of the National Association of Spanish Specialists in Bovine Medicine)and through teaching to both undergraduate and graduate students. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?The plans for the next reporting period are tocomplete data analysis of experiment 2 (Objective 1) and conduct an additional experiment to evaluate the effect of different dosages of PGF2α on CL maintenance after induced pregnancy loss. Objetive 4 hinges on the ability to modulate uterine artery blood flow, prelimianry findings durign the current reporting period indicate that use of sildenafil citrate to increase uterine artery blood flow is effective albeit shortlibed. Therefore, in the next reporting period we will evaluate alternative administration strategies (intravaginal pressaries and/or osmotic pumps)that couldallow for a sustained increase in uterinartery blood flow. Based on this results we will be able to address Experiment 4 (Objective 3) to determine whether increasing uterine perfusion after induced pregnancy losscan resultin CL maintenance. In addition, we will determine the dosage and route of administration of L-NAME that results in a sustain reduction of uterine blood flow. This dtermination will provide the opportunity to complete experiment 5 (Objective 3).
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
Experiment 2 (Objective 1) was designed to test the hypothesis that inhibition of PGF2α secretion will delay luteolysis after induced pregnancy loss while replacement of intrauterine PGF2α will result in luteolysis. Resultsrevealed thatsystemic administration of flunixin meglumine at a 1.65mg/kg dose was not sufficient to completelyinhibit uterinePGF2αsecretion, however, use of greater dosages was accompanied by severe toxicity. As a result, we evaluated the use of intrauterine administrationof flunixin meglumine as an alternative approach. We conducted a preliminary trial in cyclic cows to test the most appropriate dosage and observed that intrauterine administrationof 240 mgof flunixin meglumine was effective in inhibiting PGF secretion and preventing CL regression without adverse effects. Next, we proceededto conduct experiment 2 again using the intrauterine dosage of240 mgof flunixin meglumine. Pregnant beef cows had pregnancy loss induced at day 35 of gestation and were assigned to receive flunixin meglumine (240 mg intrauterine/8h), flunixin meglumine + PGF2α (0.25 mg/8 h four intrauterine administrations) or remain untreated (Control). Sample collection has been completed and data analysis is currently underway. Preliminary dataindicates that inhibition of PGF2α effectively prevents CL regression, albeit PGF replacement at a 0.25mg dosage appears insufficient to induce luteolysis after induced pregnancy loss. Experiments designed to address objective 3, were initiated. Preliminary experiments were conducted in cyclic cows to determine the most appropriate dosage and route of administration (subcutaneous or intrauterine) for sildenafil citrate. We observed that 100 mg of sildenafil citrate produced an increase of nearly 50% in uterine artery perfusion, however, the effect was short-lived (2-3 h). This finding represents a challenge for the completion of Experiment 4 (see Problems).
Publications
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2024
Citation:
A. Garcia Guerra, B. Duran, J. C. L. Motta, R. V. Sala, M. C. Wiltbank. Perdidas gestacionales: bases fisiologicas y estrategias para reducirlas. (Translation: Pregnancy loss: physiological bases and mitigating strategies). Proceedings of the XXVI Congreso Internacional Anembe de Medicina Bovina (XXVI International Congress of Bovine Medicine Anembe) 2024, April 24 - 26, C�rdoba, Spain, Pages 184-199.
- Type:
Theses/Dissertations
Status:
Accepted
Year Published:
2024
Citation:
Duran B. D. Development of an Induced Pregnancy Loss Model to Assess the Mechanism of Corpus Luteum Maintenance After Maternal Recognition of Pregnancy in Cattle. 2024. Ohio State University, Doctoral Dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
|
Progress 07/01/22 to 06/30/23
Outputs Target Audience:Scientists working inreproductive physiology, undergraduate and graduate students in animal science and veterinary medicine. In addition, local, regional and international stakeholders (veterinarians, producers, and relevant industry enterprises) working withboth beef and dairy cattle. Changes/Problems:When conducting experiment 2 of Objective 1 we encountered some unexpected obstacles related to the dose of flunixin meglumineas reported in the previous period. As a result, we utilized a lower dose, however, this was not sufficient to inhibit prostaglandin secretion and thus prevent corpus luteum regression. Through collaborative efforts with a colleague at anotehr institution, we have determined that intrauterine administration will allow us to achieve the desired inhibitory effect, and as a result, we are planning to repeat experiment 2 (Objective 1) in the upcoming reporting period.In addition, we encountered some difficulties with the in-house assay to determine prostaglandin F2 alpha metabolite related to the primary antibody provided by a collaborating institution. We have now identified the issue and proceed to correct it which has allowed us to resume sample analysis of samples collected for objective 1 and 2. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?One graduate student developed critical research skills as well as oral/written presentation skills as a result of this project. He is currently preparing the outcomes of Objective 1 for publication and completing the dissertation for completion of the PhD degree. Anothergraduate studentcontinues progressing towards her PhD degree which is primarily focused on this project. This student conducted the experiments required for Objective 2. In addition, 3 other graduate students and 1 post-doc contributed towards the development of the work reported during this period and thus acquired valuable investigative skills. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Results have been disseminated to different audiences through presentations at scientific meetings (Society for the Study of Reproduction, NIFA/AFRI Director Meeting), USDA multistate project meetings (NE-2227) and through teaching to both undergraduate and graduate students. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?The plans for the next reporting period are to: 1) complete the sample analysis for Experiment 1 (Objective 1) and write a manuscript for publication, 2) repeat Experiment 2 (Objective 1) based on the challenges encountered (see Problems); 3) complete sample analysis for Objective 2, and 3) initiate experiments required to completeObjective 3.
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
Sample analysis for experiment 2 of Objective 1 was completed, and final statistical analysis is currently underway. Experiment 2 was designed to test the hypothesis that inhibition of PGF2α secretion will delay luteolysis after induced pregnancy loss while replacement of intrauterine PGF2α will result in luteolysis. Preliminary sample analysis revealed that systemic administration of flunixin meglumine at a 1.65mg/kg dose was not sufficient to inhibit uterine prostaglandin f2alpha secretion. Data collection for the experimentdesigned to address Objective 2 wascompleted, sample and statistical analyses are underway. The experiment conducted was designed to test the hypothesisthat induction of endometritis would prevent luteolysis and extend the CL lifespan in cows undergoing induced pregnancy loss. Preliminary results indicate thatthe occurrence of endometritis after induced pregnancy loss did not affect the lifespan of the CL after pregnancy loss during the second month of pregnancy in cattle.
Publications
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2023
Citation:
N. P. Folchini, B. J. Duran, C. Rykaczewski, A. E. Crist, M. Saad, A. C. Carranza-Martin, J. C. L. Motta, D. F. Mollenkopf, M. L. Mussard, A. Garcia-Guerra. Induction of endometritis after pregnancy loss during the second month of gestation in cattle and its effect on the fate of the corpus luteum Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study of Reproduction 2023, July 11th 14th, Ottawa, Canada, Page 386.
|
Progress 07/01/21 to 06/30/22
Outputs Target Audience:Scientists working in similar areas of reproductive physiology, undergraduate and graduate students in animal science and veterinary medicine. In addition,local, regional and international stakeholders (veterinarians, producers, and relevant industry enterprises) working in both beef and dairy cattle. Changes/Problems:When conducting experiment 2 of Objective 1 we encountered some unexpected obstacles. This experiment hinges on the use of flunixin meglumine to inhibitPGF2αsecretion. We initially utilized a dose that was reported as effective in several peer-reviewed publications. However, we encountered that the use of this dose for a prolonged period of time as needed for this experiment resulted in toxicity. As a result, the experiment was suspended. We then utilized a reduced dose of flunixin meglumine (75% of that reported in the literature), this allowed us to complete the experiment and avoid toxicity. However, we have yet to verify whetherPGF2αsecretion inhibition was in fact accomplished. This will be accomplished in the next reporting period and based on the results we will assess the direction for the remaining experiments or the need to repeat this critical experiment using a different inhibition strategy. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?One graduate student (Ben Duran) has developed critical research skills (sample collection, hormonal determination)as well as oral/written presentation skills as a result of this project. He completed his candidacy examination during this last reporting period and is currently completing sample analysis of the project completed and writing the corresponding manuscripts. One other graduate student (Natalia Picoli) began working towards her PhD degree which will be primarily focused on this project. In addition, 3 other graduate students and 1 post-doc contributed towards the development of the work reported during this period and thus acquired valuable investigative skills. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Results have been disseminated to differentaudiences through presentation at scientific meetings (Society for the Study of Reproduction, NIFA/AFRI Director Meeting), USDA multistate project meetings (NE-1727) and through teaching to both undergraduate and graduate students. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?The plans for the next reporting period are to: 1) complete experiments included in Objective 2; and 2) address some challenged encountered during Experiment 2 of Objective 1 to better define the role ofPGF2αsecretion (see Problems).
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
Experiments designed to address Objective 1 were completed. In experiment 1, wetested the hypothesis that luteolysis after pregnancy lossis temporally associated with a decrease in ipsilateral uterine artery vascular perfusion. Pregnant beef cows wereassigned to undergo induced pregnancy loss (PIL) at day 35 of gestationor remain untreated.Subsequently,blood samples were collected for quantification of plasma progesterone (P4)until luteolysis was identified and ipsilateral uterine artery resistance index (RI) was evaluated daily using spectral-doppler ultrasonography and vascular perfusion index was calculated. In addition, cows were fitted with indwelling jugular catheters and samples were collected bihourly to determinecirculating concentrations of PGFM. Field work and samples collection has been completedand vascular perfusion data and P4 data has been analyzed. Preliminary analysis indicate that vascular perfusion index is reduced by24% in cows undergoing pregnancy loss and this reduction is temporally associated with luteolysis. In experiment 2 we tested thehypothesis that inhibition of PGF2αsecretion will delay luteolysis after induced pregnancy loss while replacement of intrauterine PGF2α will result in luteolysis. Pregnant beef cows had pregnancy loss induced at day 35 of gestation and wereassigned to receive flunixin meglumine (FM, to inhibit PGF2αsecretion), flunixin meglumine + PGF2α or remain untreated(Control).Blood samples were collected twice daily for P4quantification and determination of the onset of luteolysis, and bihourly samples for PGFM determination were collected during a 24 h period.Field work and samplecollection has been completedand P4 data has been analyzed. This experiment was conducted twice using different conditions due to some difficulties encountered (see Problems).Preliminary analysis indicates that inhibition ofPGF2αsecretion did not preventluteolysis, however, luteolysis was delayed after administration of flunixin meglumine.
Publications
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2021
Citation:
B. J. Duran, F. L. V. Pinaffi, J. C. L. Motta, C. Hayden, A. E. Crist, C. Rykaczewski, S. Wellert, E. Rojas-Canadas, M. L. Mussard, A. Garc�a-Guerra. 2021. Corpus luteum regression after induced pregnancy loss in cattle is preceded by a reduction in uterine artery vascular perfusion. Abstract P136. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study of Reproduction 2021
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2022
Citation:
B. J. Duran, A. E. Crist, J. C. L. Motta, C. Rykaczewski, C. Hayden, M. Saad, A. Carranza-Martin, M. L. Mussard, A. Garc�a-Guerra. 2021. Role of prostaglandin F2? in corpus luteum regression after conceptus demise in cattle. Abstract P121. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study of Reproduction 2022, July 26-29, Spokane, WA.
|
|