Source: OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
IMPROVING HONEY BEE NUTRITION BY UNDERSTANDING NUTRITIONAL COMPOSITION OF POLLENS AND MICRONUTRIENT REQUIREMENTS OF HONEY BEES
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1024896
Grant No.
2021-67013-33562
Cumulative Award Amt.
$499,369.00
Proposal No.
2020-05380
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jan 1, 2021
Project End Date
Dec 31, 2023
Grant Year
2021
Program Code
[A1113]- Pollinator Health: Research and Application
Recipient Organization
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
CORVALLIS,OR 97331
Performing Department
Horticulture
Non Technical Summary
Poor nutrition has been cited as one of the major factors involved in both honey bee and native bee declines reported over the last decade. Nutrition plays a vital role in mitigating effects of biotic and abiotic stressors on bees. Since reports of significant bee declines began, much effort has been dedicated to researching the causes of such declines, but only a few studies have addressed the underlying, fundamental problems, particularly with regard to nutrition. As honey bee nutrition plays a vital role in mitigating the effects of biotic and abiotic stressors on bees, efforts to improve bee nutrition are critical.The long-term goal of this proposal is to improve bee nutrition by building a database of the pollen nutritional compositions (especially phytosterols), understanding phytosterol requirements and their impact on colony health and performance, and investigating impacts of sterol biosynthesis inhibitor fungicides on plant pollen sterol availability and bee health.Objective 1. Analyze phytosterol profiles, amino acids and metabolites in pollens from 100 major bee pollinated crops, predominant natural forage and commonly used ornamental plants available to bees in North America.Objective 2. Investigate the effects of 24-methylenecholesterol on (a) honey bee colony growth and survival and (b) honey bee physiology - across all stages of the life cycle (egg, larva, pupa and adult).Objective 3. Examine potential effects of SBI fungicides on pollens and bees by (a) examining the impacts of SBI fungicides on pollen phytosterol composition (b) investigating indirect effects of two major SBI fungicides (propiconazole and metconazole) on honey bee physiology and (c) determining if sterol supplementation can mitigate effects of SBI fungicides, if any.
Animal Health Component
50%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
50%
Applied
50%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
21130101010100%
Goals / Objectives
The long-term goal of this proposal is to improve bee nutrition by building a database of the pollen nutritional compositions (especially phytosterols), understanding phytosterol requirements and their impact on colony health and performance, and investigating impacts of sterol biosynthesis inhibitor fungicides on plant pollen sterol availability and bee health.Objective 1. Analyze phytosterol profiles, amino acids and metabolites in pollens from 100 major bee pollinated crops, predominant natural forage and commonly used ornamental plants available to bees in North America.Objective 2. Investigate the effects of 24-methylenecholesterol on (a) honey bee colony growth and survival and (b) honey bee physiology - across all stages of the life cycle (egg, larva, pupa and adult).Objective 3. Examine potential effects of SBI fungicides on pollens and bees by (a) examining the impacts of SBI fungicides on pollen phytosterol composition (b) investigating indirect effects of two major SBI fungicides (propiconazole and metconazole) on honey bee physiology and (c) determining if sterol supplementation can mitigate effects of SBI fungicides, if any.
Project Methods
Objective 1: Analyze phytosterol profiles, amino acids and metabolites in pollens from 100 major bee pollinated crops, predominant natural forage and commonly used ornamental plants available to bees in North America.We will collect pollen samples from 100 bee visiting flowering plants including major bee pollinated crops (almond, apple, blueberry, cherry, cranberry, pear, canola, sunflower, alfalfa, cucurbits, and vegetable seed crops such as radish, onion, carrot) predominant natural forage and commonly used ornamental plants. We will collaborate with stakeholders (beekeepers and growers) in finding appropriate fields for collecting pollen from the target crops. Flowers will be collected from each target crop / species to extract desired amount of pollen manually for sterol analysis as per established methods (Roulston et al. 2000; Costa and Yang 2009; Villette et al. 2015; Vaudo et al. 2020).(i) Mass spectrometry for assessing sterol profiles of plant pollensWe will use our previously established methods (Chakrabarti et al. 2019a).(ii) Mass spectrometry for quantifying amino acids in plant pollensThe OSUMSC is well equipped to conduct such analysis and already has methods established to quantify amino acids. Amino acid profiles: Briefly, 25 mg of the tissue samples are to be homogenized in a 50:50 solution of methanol and separated on an Inertsil Phenyl-3 stationary phase (GL Sciences) coupled to a quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Triple TOF 5600, AB SCIEX) with MS/MS spectra recorded using Information Dependent Acquisition-Mass Spectrometry (IDA-MS). Amino acids are identified using the OSU-IROA in-house library covering 420+ measured standards based on accurate mass, fragmentation pattern, isotope distribution and retention time. For constructing the calibration curves, authentic amino acid standards will be used (Millipore Sigma, USA).(iii) Total soluble protein and lipid content analyses of pollen samplesTotal soluble proteins in pollens will be estimated based on the protocols by Corby-Harris et al. 2018.Objective 2 (a) investigate the effects of 24-methylenecholesterol on honey bee colony growth and survivalNucleus honey bee colonies, each containing approximately 5,000 bees and a sister queen will be installed in flight cages at the Oregon State University apiary in Corvallis, OR, and supplemented with artificial diets. Diets for the experimental treatment group colonies will contain 0.1%, 0.5% and 1.0% (dry diet weight) of 13C labeled 24-methylenecholesterol (concentrations proposed here are derived from lab study using caged bees, published in Chakrabarti et al. 2019b). Colonies in a positive control treatment group will be fed diets made from mixed natural pollens (Mixed Floral Pollen, CA, USA). Each treatment will be replicated five times, hence there will be a total of 20 nucleus colonies (4 treatments and five replications). The study will be conducted for 8 weeks, inside flight cages.Formulation of artificial diets and measuring consumptionBased on the modified protocols of Herbert et al. 1980, the artificial diets will be formulated similar to the diets used in our lab study described earlier (Chakrabarti et al. 2019b, 2020).Colony evaluationBrood production in the nucleus hives will be measured, using a combination of imaging (Delaplane et al. 2013) and acetate sheet methods (Human et al. 2013).Survival in the treatment groupsSurvival probability of each hive, across the various treatment groups, will be calculated based on previous studies (Khoury et al. 2013; Russell et al. 2013). Using generalized linear models (McCullagh and Nelder 1989), we will analyze the production rates of eggs and the conversion rates of eggs to larvae and larvae to pupae. Both treatment effects and time effects (e.g., trend) will be examined.Objective 2 (b) assess the effects of 24-methylenecholesterol on honey bee physiology - across all stages of the life cycleThe samples for this objective will be collected periodically from all the experimental colonies described above in objective 2a, immediately frozen and stored in -80°C freezers for further molecular analyses.(i) ProteomicsProtocols for proteomic sample preparations and analyses have been established at the OSUMSC based on previously published studies (Troyer et al. 2017).(ii) Sterol analysesPhytosterol profiles of honey bee tissues will be analyzed using LC-Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization-Multiple Reaction Monitoring (LC-APCI-MRM) methods at the OSUMSC as described before. A standard for 13C-24-methylenecholesterol (Avanti Polar Lipids, USA) will be used in addition to the other sterol standards to quantify the labeled sterol in the honey bee tissues, eggs and brood food.Objective 3. (a) Examine the impacts of SBI fungicides on plant pollen phytosterol compositions.We propose to study the impacts of two major, commonly used SBI fungicides - metconazole (MTZ) and propiconazole (PPZ). The Dept. of Horticulture, Oregon State University, will provide the access to the experimental farms and greenhouses for testing the effects of PPZ and MTZ on plant pollen sterol composition. Blueberry plants will be used for this experiment similar to our preliminary study, as we have designed a robust protocol for pollen collection from blueberry flowers. This study will be carried on for three years. Fifty potted blueberry plants will be sprayed each year with field spray doses (as per label) of each of the following fungicides - PPZ, MTZ and a mixture of PPZ and MTZ. A control set of potted plants will also be included in the experiment. Pollen samples will be collected from 2,000 flowers from each treatment and control groups during the blooming season for all three years, and tested for the sterol compositions. We will use the same methods described earlier for sterol analysis.Objective 3. (b) Investigate the indirect effects of two major SBI fungicides (propiconazole and metconazole) on honey bee physiology; and (c) Determine if sterol supplementation can mitigate effects of SBI fungicides, if any.We will test the same SBI fungicides (PPZ and MTZ) mentioned in objective 3a to investigate their indirect impacts on the physiology of honey bees. One hundred newly emerged adult honey bees from sister-queen colonies (to minimize genetic variation) will be released in to each of the three hardware cloth cages for each of the seven treatment groups. We will use the following fungicide concentrations based on LD50 values (propiconazole oral LD50 1,000,000 ppb and metconazole oral LD50 850,000 ppb), to assess the worst-case scenario effects. The study will be conducted for three weeks.(i) Formulation of dietsFor appropriate treatment groups, diets will contain propiconazole (Millipore Sigma, USA) and metconazole (Millipore Sigma, USA) - dissolved in acetone - to obtain the fungicide concentrations noted above. Fungicides will be added to diets as an acetone solution mixed into the dry sugar powder and evaporated. Honey bees will be provided with 2 g of dry sugar powder mixed with acetone only (for controls) and fungicides in acetone solution (for treatment groups) and water for one day to ensure complete consumption of the sugar powder. After 24 hours, only sugar syrup and water will be provided to all groups. After one week, based on the treatment groups, some will receive pollen diets (mixed floral pollen to provide additional sterol supplementation) with sugar syrup and water, while others will continue to receive only sugar syrup and water (no additional sterol supplementation) for the remaining two weeks of the experiments.(ii) Parameters to be measuredSurvival of adult honey bees, consumption of diets, sterol profiles in honey bee tissues (LC-MRM and MS) and vitellogenin gene expression (as a measure of fat body functioning) will be measured across all the experimental groups. Sterol profiles will be measured using methods described earlier.

Progress 01/01/21 to 12/31/23

Outputs
Target Audience:We have reached a large network of stakeholders that include beekeepers, farmers,citizen scientists and researchers. We advertised extensively in various scientific and stakeholder meetings to enhancecitizen science participations and collaborations with other research teams for pollen collection to help build the bee nutrition database. We also participated in various press releases to further encourage participation. We currently have 60volunteers across USA and Canda who have signed up to assist with this project. In April 2022, we trained USGS Maryland Bee Lab volunteers in pollen hand collection methods. We extensively partnered with them for one year to expand our pollen collections and samples. We repeated our pollen collection training in 2023 at USGS Maryland Bee Lab and trained North Dakota 4H students, USDA, NRCS and other non-profit organizations. The events were well attended and we have received positive feedback from all the participants. The PI and co-PI have actively soughtcitizen science volunteers for this project and have discussed the impact and findings from this project at various national and international stakeholder and scientificmeetings. Changes/Problems:The major challenge so far has been to establish customized methods for different floral types for effective hand collections. Some methods, for example the hand-vacuum method, work well for some types of flowers with open petals, while it does not work well for closed flowers. Also some flowers yield far less pollen than others. This is a continuous learning process and we are collecting all of this information as metadata to share with our citizen scientists, collaborators and stakeholders. We are also going to include all of this information in amanuscript currently under preparation. We hope to continue building on the pollen nutrition database as more volunteers are submitting pollen samples beyond the duration of the project. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?We trained4H students from North Dakota, USDA and USGS researchers, NRCS staff and university extension faculty on pollen collection by conducting two workshops at USGS facility in Maryland. We conducted two Zoom training sessions on pollen collection methods for citizen scientists across the USA. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?We gave 12 presentations (at stakeolder meetings and scientific meetings) to dissimnate information pertaining to this project. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Objective 1 : We currently have collected pollen samples from over 100 plant species and and have started phytosterol, lipid, amino acid, metabolite and protein analysis. In addition to refining existing pollen hand collection methods, we have also established a hand-vacuum pollen collection method which is effective for a number of open floral species. We have created a network of collaborators and citizen scientists across North America with a strategic sample collection method and timeline. We have also finalized the protocol for amino acid analysis of pollen samples. In addition, we have conducted a Zoom training session with all volunteers, created a factsheet for the project methods and have shared these with the citizen scientists who are interested in collecting pollen for this project. We recruited two graduate students (one each at Oregon State University and Mississippi State University) to assist with the project goals and objectives. Objective 2: We have completed this study pertaining to the investigation of the effects of 24-methylenecholesterol on honey colony growth, physiology and survival. We are currently in the process of analyzing this data. Objective 3: We have completed both parts of this objective to investigate the impacts of SBI fungicides on honey bees without/without additional supplementation of pollen in 2021 summer and the impacts of SBI fungicides on blueberry pollen nutritional quality vis-à-vis phytosterols. We are currently analyzing the phytosterols concentration data as well as data pertaining to diet consumptions and survival in the laboratory experimental groups. We also completed vitellogenin gene expression analysis from these laboratory cage experiments. We are currently preparing a manuscript with the data generated. In addition, to meet the second part of this objective, blueberry plants in our experimental farm have been sprayed with fungicides and we have completed the pollen collection and mass spectrometry sample runs for phytosterols. We are currently analyzing the data and preparing a manuscript.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Submitted Year Published: 2024 Citation: Methods of pollen collection: Manual and via bees
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Submitted Year Published: 2024 Citation: Impacts of SBI fungicides on blueberry pollen sterols


Progress 01/01/22 to 12/31/22

Outputs
Target Audience:We reached out to a large network of stakeholders, citizen scientists and researchers. We advertised our projective objectives extensively at various scientific and stakeholder meetings to encourage citizen science participation and collaboration with other research teams that could contribute pollen samples to help build the pollen nutrition database. We also did press releases to further encourage stakeholder participation. We currently have 54 volunteers who have signed up for assisting this project across the US and Canada. In April 2022, we trained USGS Maryland Bee Lab volunteers in pollen hand collection methods. We have extensively partnered with them to expand our pollen collections and samples. Changes/Problems:The major challenge so far has been to establishing effective methods for manual collection of pollen for different floral types. Some methods, for example the hand-vacuum method, work well for some types of flowers with open petals, while it does not work well for bell shaped/closed flowers. Also some flowers yield far less pollen than others. This is a continuous learning process and we are collecting all of this information as metadata to share with our citizen scientists, collaborators and stakeholders. Also, COVID-19 has delayed initiation of objective 2. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The PI (Sagili) participated in the Entomological Society of Americas's annual conference in Vancouver, BC. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Objective 1: We have collected over 50 pollen samples and have started phytosterol, lipid and protein analysis. In addition to refining existing pollen hand collection methods, we have also established a hand-vacuum pollen collection method which is effective for a number of open floral species. We have created a network of collaborators and citizen scientists across North America with a strategic sample collection method and timeline. We have also finalized the protocol for amino acid analysis of pollen samples. In addition, we conducted a Zoom training session with all volunteers, created a factsheet for the project methods and shared those with the citizen scientists interested in collecting pollen for this project. We have recruited two graduate students (one at MSU and one at OSU) to assist with the project goals and objectives. We are currently finalizing planting guidelines for NRCS and USGS to be able to hand collect pollen from more floral resources in their plots. We trained USGS Maryland Bee Lab volunteers in pollen hand collection methods and have partnered with them to expand our pollen collections and samples. Objective 2: We have finalized the flight cage study design and established the flight cages and required colonies for the experiment. The study is to be conducted in summer of 2023. Objective 3: We have completed both parts of this objective to investigate the impacts of SBI fungicides on honey bees without/without additional supplementation of pollen in 2021 summer and the impacts of SBI fungicides on blueberry pollen nutritional quality vis-à-vis phytosterols. We are currently analyzing the phytosterols concentration data as well as data pertaining to diet consumptions and survival in the laboratory experimental groups. We also completed vitellogenin gene expression analysis from these laboratory cage experiments. We are currently preparing a manuscript with the data generated. In addition, to meet the second part of this objective, blueberry plants in our experimental farm have been sprayed with fungicides and we have completed the pollen collection and mass spectrometry sample runs for phytosterols. We are currently analyzing the data and preparing a manuscript.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Submitted Year Published: 2023 Citation: A Review of Pollen Collection Methods: Manual Collection and via Foraging Honey Bees


Progress 01/01/21 to 12/31/21

Outputs
Target Audience:We have reached out to a large network of stakeholders that include beekeepers, growers, citizen scientists and researchers. We advertised extensively (in various scientific and stakeholder meetings) regarding our project, to encourage citizen science participation and collaborations with other research teams who could contribute pollen samples to help build the pollen nutrition composition database. We also participated in several press releases to further encourage participation. We currently have 60 volunteers across the USA who have signed up for assisting with pollen collection for our project. We also have partnered with USGS And USDA NRCS Plant Materials Center for planting floral species for our project to collect pollen. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Objective 1 : We have collected ten pollen samples and have started phytosterol, lipid and protein analysis. We have created a network of collaborators and citizen scientists across USA with a strategic sample collection method and timeline. We have also finalized the protocol for amino acid analysis of pollen samples. In addition, we have conducted a Zoom training session with all volunteers, created a brochure for the pollen collection methods and have shared these with the citizen scientists interested in collecting pollen for this project. We have recruited two graduate students (one at each University, OSU and MSU) to assist with the project goals and objectives. We are currently finalizing planting guidelines for NRCS and USGS to collect pollen from target plant species. Objective 2 : We have finalized the study design for the 24-methylenecholesterol study and established the flight cages and required honey bee nucleus colonies for the experiment. The study will be conducted in summer of 2022. Objective 3 : We have completed one part of this objective i.e. investigating the impacts of SBI fungicides on honey bees with/without additional supplementation of pollen in 2021 summer. We are currently analyzing the phytosterols concentration data as well as data pertaining to diet consumptions and survival in the experimental groups. In addition, to meet the second part of this objective, blueberry plants in our experimental farm have been sprayed with fungicides in 2021. We hand-collected blueberry pollen and analyzed the phytosterol concentrations across treatment groups.

Publications