Source: NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV submitted to
SPECIALTY CROPS AND FOOD SYSTEMS: EXPLORING MARKETS, SUPPLY CHAINS AND POLICY DIMENSIONS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
ACTIVE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1024654
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
S-1088
Project Start Date
Oct 1, 2020
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2025
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Project Director
Boys, KA.
Recipient Organization
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV
(N/A)
RALEIGH,NC 27695
Performing Department
Agricultural and Resource Economics
Non Technical Summary
Fresh fruit and vegetable consumption has an important role in the efforts to protect individuals against serious and costly chronic diseases such as obesity, heart disease, type 2 diabetes (Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2018), and conditions that have been identified by the CDC as some of the underlying conditions that put individuals at a higher risk for severe illness due to COVID-19 (CDC, 2020). Demand for fresh produce has been increasing in the US and growth is expected to continue due to governmental efforts to increase produce consumption per capita, as well as an increased number of marketing and promotional messages focusing on the benefits of eating fresh fruits and vegetables (USDA, ERS, 2020; Food and Nutrition Service, USDA, 2019; Minor and Perez, 2018; Cook, 2011).Even though currently US individuals are eating more fresh fruits and vegetables per capita than in 1970, the average US diet is still not aligned with the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans for fruit and vegetable consumption (Stewart and Hyman, 2019; USDA, ERS, 2020; CDC, 2018). Therefore, we anticipate government efforts to increase fruit and vegetable consumption will continue.Over the past five years, a large percentage of retailers have consistently identified the produce department as one of the top three most successful in generating sales and driving traffic (Progressive Grocer, 2019). The popularity of fresh produce offers considerable potential for enhanced marketing revenues if producers can recognize and harness opportunities emerging from changes in food purchases. The produce industry is already taking advantage of the increased popularity of fresh produce among consumers by finding ways to better address consumer needs. For example, a collaboration between Washington State University researchers, tree fruit growers, and industry representatives resulted in a new apple variety (Cosmic Crisp) designed to make "consumers happy" (Hollenbeck, 2019).Meanwhile, producers and consumers need to be informed about the emergence of new business strategies, regulations, and policies that may influence their confidence in (consumers) or competitiveness within (producers) this quickly innovating food marketing sector. An example of these regulations is the 2018 Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), which implicates new quality assurance and safety measures across the entire food supply chain (USFDA, 2020). Food safety incidents reduce produce demand and increase the costs of farms supplying fresh produce in the US; the FSMA is expected to reduce such incidents (Bovay, Ferrier, and Zhen, 2018). Another example is the Farm Workforce Modernization Act that passed in the House of Representatives on December 11, 2019. This act proposes meaningful reforms to the H-2A agricultural guest worker program to better fit the needs of the agricultural sector (US Congress, 2019). Because the produce industry depends heavily on labor, this act has the potential to improve the viability of the produce industry and its capacity to meet the increasing demand for fruits and vegetables (Kroger, 2019). One more example of these regulations is the recently launched (January 2020) GMO labels regulations in the US. This is an important market development for all food categories, including fruits and vegetables, that needs to be studied more closely.Demand trends and implications for the fresh produce supply chain:Consumers continue showing interest in foods produced in unique ways, including organic, local, pesticide-free, free of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), environmentally sustainable (Bir et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2018; Govindasamy et al., 2018; McFadden and Huffman, 2017; Rana and Paul, 2017). These individuals and households keep fueling changes in the food system as they seek to purchase produce through diverse channels ranging from direct markets (e.g., on-farm markets, farmers' markets, community supported agriculture, pick-your-own, and roadside stands), to more traditional supermarkets, warehouse clubs, and big box stores (Low and Vogel, 2011), with expectations as broad as picking their own produce to highly branded products with 3rd party certifications. This evolution has led to a higher number of farmers considering new ways of producing and marketing their produce.The COVID-19 pandemic is an example of how rapid changes in the food systems where consumers changed where and how they consume foods, caused for farmers to be forced to change production and marketing practices to satisfy consumer needs. In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, producers have lost substantial sales to foodservice outlets, including restaurants, schools, and hotels, and also adjusted to changes in consumer demands based on various states' "stay-at-home" orders.The supply-side:On the supply side, producers are considering production practices, technologies, and technology innovations that target consumer preferences and needs, and align with their profitability and risk preferences. For example, plastic mulches are extensively used in specialty crop production to suppress weeds and conserve water, among other benefits, but as consumers increase their awareness of the risks associated with plastic pollution, they demand or become interested in production practices that reduce plastic pollution (Chen et al., 2019). Producers are using or considering using biodegradable mulches to not only reduce plastic pollution but also to reduce labor associated with end-of-season activities. This addresses consumer preferences, reduces farm risk associated with labor access, and improves farm financial viability and long-term sustainability (Velandia et al., 2020b). Other production practices and technologies addressing these three goals (e.g., consumer preferences, farm business financial viability, and risk) include gene-editing technologies, mechanical aids, among others.The objectives of this project (described below) will evaluate factors affecting supply and demand for specialty crops and policies which affect specialty crop supply chains and markets. Appropriate qualitative and quantitative research methods will be used collect data and to conduct this analyses. Outputs from this project will include generating new market information and insights regarding factors that augment and constrain specialty crop marketing, food safety management, and issues at the intersection of these topics. It is anticipated that these outputs will be of use to private sector firms (agribusiness owners, managers), organizations which support these agribusinesses (including non-government organizations), government officials and policymakers.
Animal Health Component
25%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
75%
Applied
25%
Developmental
0%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
6045010310030%
6106110301015%
6076010301025%
6045010301030%
Goals / Objectives
Analyze the relative benefits and costs for fruit, vegetable, and other specialty crop farmers of: a) the adoption of production and processing practices (e.g., organic, biodynamic farming, adaptation to climate-extremes) and novel technologies at the field level (i.e., mechanical harvesting, biodegradable plastics, gene-edited varieties) that address both the changing production environment and the consumer preferences and needs that will be explored in Objective 2; and b) government and industry-led programs aiming to address consumer preferences and needs while guaranteeing the viability of farm businesses (e.g., certifications, plastic pollution regulations, Farm Workforce Modernization Act). Investigate the policy and market factors that affect the demand for fresh and value-added specialty crop products, including consumer understanding, perceptions, and behavioral response to non-conventional systems of agri-food production (e.g., organic, biodynamic, hydroponics, vertical growing), and the production and processing practices, and some of the novel technologies explored in Objective 1; commodity and regional marketing programs; voluntary labeling schemes (e.g., Fair Trade, Bee Friendly Farming, SIP Certified, geo-identified, integrated or ⿿stacked⿝ labels); product country of origin; international trade, food safety incidents and food safety risk-reducing practices (e.g., traceability systems), among others. Identify drivers and implications related to the use of various specialty crop marketing channels at the local, regional, national and international scales, including profitability of participation by farmers and intermediaries; benefits and costs for consumers and communities to participate; impacts of various sources of risk and uncertainty; the role of institutional marketing innovations; presence and impacts of market power; implications of supply chain management practices; resiliency of supply chains to shocks; and costs and benefits of policies that impact specialty crop marketing channels.
Project Methods
A variety of research approaches will be used to accomplish these research objectives. Firm and farm level studies frequently require primary data collection from business owners, buyers, and other industry stakeholders. This data will typically be gathered using a two-stage process. Qualitative research methods (i.e. in-depth interviews, focus groups), will be used to get a general understanding of the issue in question. Information collected through this first research phase will be used as an input into qualitative research instruments (i.e. surveys) which will be used to gather information from a broader number of participants. Studies which consider the impact of policies, regulations, standards, certifications and labeling schemes, will make use ofdatabases specifically developed for the project in question. In all cases, data will be assessed using appropriate analytical techniques to address research questions stemming from the research objectives.

Progress 10/01/20 to 09/30/21

Outputs
Target Audience:Target audiences include: *Agribusiness owners and managers (farms and other industry stakeholders) * Individuals and organizations that support these agribusinesses (including University cooperative extension, NGOs) * Government officials, policymakers, economists. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Key findings from this project were presented at a major academic conference. (See products discussion.) What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Work on the project highlighted above will continue during the next reporting period.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Examining Impacts of North Carolina's Statewide Healthy Food Small Retailer Policy on Diet Related Outcomes: Work continued on this collaboration to evaluate the impact of the North CarolinaHealthy Food Small Retailer Policy on healthy food availability in food deserts, consumer purchases, consumer health, andstoreowner financial and otheroutcomes. This effort is being coordinated by colleagues in Eastern Carolina's Dept. of Public Health, and involves colorationbetween faculty at NCSU, UNC, UNC-Greensboro and other partnerships. In this reporting period work continued on two manuscripts which were publishes late in the reporting period.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2021 Citation: Boys KA, Haynes-Maslow L, McGuirt JT, Ammerman AS, Van Fleet EE, Johnson NS, Kelley CJ, Edwards V, Fleischhacker SE, Truesdale KP, Bell RA, Jilcott Pitts SB. 2021. Perceived barriers and facilitators to participating in the North Carolina Healthy Food Small Retailer Program: A mixed-methods examination considering investment effectiveness. Public Health Nutr. 24(18): 6555-6565. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021003955
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2021 Citation: 4. Haynes-Maslow, L., S.B. Jilcott Pitts, K.A. Boys, J.T. McGuirt, S. Fleishhacker, A.S. Ammerman, N. Johnson, C. Kelley, V.E. Donadio, R.A. Bell, M.N. Laska. 2021. Qualitative perspectives of the North Carolina healthy food small retailer program among customers n participating stores located in food deserts. BMC Public Health. 21,1459. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11509-x
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2021 Citation: 2. Boys, K.A., L. Haynes-Maslow, J.T. McGuirt, A.S. Ammerman, E.E van Fleet, N.S. Johnson, C.J. Kelley, V. Edwards, S.E. Fleischhacker, K. Parker Truesdale, R.A. Bell, S.B. Jilcott Pitts. 2021. Track session presented at the 2021 Agricultural & Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting, Austin, TX, August 1  August 3, 2021. (Virtual).