Performing Department
Population Health and Pathobiology
Non Technical Summary
Porcine Respiratory Disease Complex (PRDC) is a multifactorial disease affecting ~30- 70% of pigs upon break-out on a unit. Outbreaks usually occur at 14-20 weeks of age and severity of disease highly depends on management, environmental stressors and pathogen evolution (1). Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) and swine influenza virus (SwIV) are key players in PRDC, impairing the normal function of the respiratory immune system. The combination with other viral and bacterial secondary infections can lead to reduced performance, increased medication costs and mortality (2-4).Alternative methods such as natural compounds with antiviral properties could be used to reduce infection and boost immunity as a complementary measure to current vaccination due to their lower secondary effects when compared to synthetic drugs (5).Platelets play an important role in innate immunity, since they degranulate and release antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) when activated (6). Platelet rich plasma (PRP) is an autologous compound obtained from an individual's blood that has recently showed to present potent antimicrobial properties and positive immunological effects (7-9). Dr. Gilbertie has recently described a processing method that isolates the AMPs within PRP and has provided extensive in vitro and in vivo data supporting its antibacterial activity (U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 62/908,318).Our hypothesis is that treating infected cells with PRP can significantly reduce viral load and boost the immune response.As a preliminary exploration to ensure the feasibility of this project, we collected porcine PRP from whole blood following the processing methods described by Dr. Gilbertie to isolate AMP-rich PRP in horses (10-11).To assess the antiviral effects of PRP, we measured the viral load after infection with SwIV and PRRSV in PRP-treated and untreated cells. The expression of mRNA after infection was tested via RT-qPCR (for both viruses) and flow cytometry (for SwIV). We assessed the antiviral effects of PRP with multiplicity of infection (MOI) ranging from 0.05 to 1, and two different treatments: i) PRP post-infection (virus-PRP) and ii) PRP during and post-infection (virus-PRP+PRP). Preliminary data showed antiviral activity in all tested conditions, for all MOIs and for two time points.Due to the promising results obtained, we have already submitted an invention disclosure (No. 20186) for the porcine BIOPLY and its antiviral activity.Based on these preliminary data, the aim of this project is to assess whether PRP can efficiently decrease viral load in vitro and increase immune response in primary lung immune cells.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
50%
Applied
25%
Developmental
25%
Goals / Objectives
The aim of this project is to assess whether PRP can efficiently decrease viral load in vitro and increase immune response in primary lung immune cells.
Project Methods
As a preliminary exploration to ensure the feasibility of this project, we collected porcine PRP from whole blood following the processing methods described by Dr. Gilbertie to isolate AMP-rich PRP in horses (10-11).To assess the antiviral effects of PRP, we measured the viral load after infection with SwIV and PRRSV in PRP-treated and untreated cells. The expression of mRNA after infection was tested via RT-qPCR (for both viruses) and flow cytometry (for SwIV).To accomplish the proposed goals, we will perform the same procedures (preliminary data) in different IV subtypes and PRRSV strains and in immortalized porcine tracheal cell line (NPTr, for IVs) (12-13). Then we will use primary cells isolated from porcine respiratory tissues, which will better simulate in vivo conditions, for both viruses.The antiviral effects of PRP will be assessed by measuring viral gene expression (RT-qPCR), viral protein (flow cytometry) and viral progenies (TCID50 method) in uninfected versus infected (PRP-treated and non-treated) cells (14). Finally, we will evaluate the variations in cellular immune responses by measuring cytokine gene expression via RT-qPCR.