Source: UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI submitted to
UNDERSTANDING AND OVERCOMING BARRIERS TO ADOPTION OF ORGANIC AGRICULTURE IN THE MID-SOUTH
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
ACTIVE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1023608
Grant No.
2020-51106-32359
Cumulative Award Amt.
$422,307.00
Proposal No.
2020-02285
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Sep 1, 2020
Project End Date
Aug 31, 2025
Grant Year
2020
Program Code
[112.E]- Organic Transitions
Recipient Organization
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI
(N/A)
COLUMBIA,MO 65211
Performing Department
Applied Social Science
Non Technical Summary
Disproportionate adoption of USDA Certified Organic Production has left certified producer numbers lower in the Lower Midwest and Mid-South than in other regions of the country such as the Upper Midwest, West Coast, or Northeastern US. These clusters suggest regional characteristics impact adoption of organic agriculture. An interdisciplinary team proposes an integrated project to examine the following: the biophysical, market and cultural barriers to organic production in the Mid-South; the region-specific opportunities and farmer-led innovations present, and what support is needed; and state-level policies to increase the region's number of organic farmers and expand production. The project will also identify region-specific barriers and opportunities to organic production, and examine the effects of policy supports for organic farming. Findings will inform outreach that builds educator skills to support organic producers and strengthen emerging organic farmer networks. Specific objectives include: 1) identifying region-specific barriers to organic adoption; 2) identifying region-specific opportunities and farmer-led innovations to increase organic operations and acreage; 3) analysing impacts of potential state-level public policy; 4) implementing an outreach program for farmers and educators addressing specific challenges and opportunities; and 5) supporting networks of organic producers in peer-to-peer learning, collectively securing inputs, and pursuing new markets. In-person interviews of 75 current and former certified organic farmers will identify barriers and opportunities. Results will inform educator training to prepare them to support organic farmers and farmer networks. Policy analysis will quantify the impacts of potential regional policies. Research results will be presented at regional extension/farmer meetings as well as academic conferences. Expected outcomes of increased understanding of barriers to organic adoption, expanded membership in organic producer networks, and better understanding of needed policy and market interventions will lead to agricultural sustainability and profitability in the region.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
6046230301050%
6106050308050%
Goals / Objectives
The goal of this research is to identify adoption challenges specific to the Mid-South, and to offer insights about specific policy supports, agricultural research, organic processing infrastructure development, and market development needed in the region. By identifying and better understanding these challenges, extension, university, and governmental agencies will be better equipped to serve producers in the region. The specific objectives of this project are:Research Objectives:To identify region-specific economic, social and biophysical barriers to USDA Certified Organic adoption in the Mid-South, a region including parts of Missouri, Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Tennessee;To identify region-specific opportunities and farmer-led innovations that could increase USDA Certified Organic farm numbers and acreage;To identify public policy measures that have impacted organic adoption in other regions and explore their feasibility for the Mid-SouthExtension Objectives:To develop and implement an outreach program for farmers and educators addressing specific challenges and opportunities identified by this research;To support new, and strengthen emerging, networks of producers that can support peer-to-peer learning, develop collective methods to secure inputs, and pursue marketing opportunities.
Project Methods
Approach and Methods:Objective 1: To identify region-specific economic, social and biophysical barriers to USDA Certified Organic adoption in the Mid-South, a region including parts of Missouri, Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Tennessee;Objective 2: To identify region-specific opportunities and farmer-led innovations that could increase USDA Certified Organic farm numbers and acreage;We will conduct 75 semi-structured interviews with current and lapsed certified organic producers who are located within southern MO, western TN, northern AR and eastern OK. Using the list of currently certified and formerly certified organic growers in the online USDA database of organically certified growers, we will draw a sample that will include a variety of farm sizes, locations and products produced. We will try to pair interviews of lapsed and currently certified farmers in locations, sizes and products produced. The interview protocol will include questions regarding a) biophysical barriers to producing organically; b) perceptions of regional access to markets and infrastructure; c) perception of cultural attitudes about organic production; d) sources of information and support for organic farming; and e) new opportunities that are emerging for their farm operation. Lapsed organic growers will provide a contrasting perspective about the value of certification and of organic production. Face-to-face interviews will be transcribed and qualitatively analyzed using NVivo software, coding first for emergent themes, and recoding by theoretical category.Objective 3: To identify public policy measures that have impacted organic adoption in other regions and explore their feasibility for the Mid-SouthTo meet Objective 3, we will compile state-level organic policies, certification processes, and other state support programs through policy searches conducted through the Thomson Reuters Westlaw legal research database, complimented by phone interviews with state agriculture personnel responsible for alternative markets, state extension specialists supporting local, sustainable and organic production, and leaders in organic grower and land stewardship organizations. We will focus on at least 4-5 states with larger grower numbers as well as our target states. We will qualitatively analyze the information collected in this phase to examine nuances in state policies, how the organic certification process is implemented in the state, availability of support programs to educate producers or to provide cost-shares, and other issues that emerge in terms of how they affect organic farm revenues and expenses.In the quantitative phase of this project, the policies and processes will be translated into their economic impacts on organic farm revenues and expenses for each state. Based on USDA data of organic prices, costs of production, crop area involved in production and yields cross-checked with our participating farmers, organic farm enterprise budgets will be constructed to illustrate how different policies, processes, and support programs impact revenues, expenses, and net farm income by state. These budgets will be compared with actual reported organic farm enterprise budgets from the FINBIN database (maintained by the University of Minnesota https://finbin.umn.edu/). In addition, organic prices will be compiled from USDA's Agricultural Marketing Service database. Comparing organic prices across states will provide insight about the demand for organic production in each state. The results obtained from the quantitative analysis will provide insight into how policies, certification processes, and other support programs can be modified in the Mid-South to be more conducive to organic production.Objective 4: To develop and implement an outreach program for farmers and educators addressing specific challenges and opportunities identified by this research;Two distinct kinds of activities will be used to achieve Objective 4; targeted training for extension and other educators, and incorporation of research results into on-going training in the University of Missouri's Organic outreach program and Kerr Center's on-going outreach. First, using results from the interviews and the policy analysis, we will plan a 1.5-day training opportunity in the second half of Year 2 for 30 regional Extension educators, non-profit personnel and organic producers. The training will be modular with half-day programming sessions oriented to horticultural crops, grain crops and livestock to allow for greater participation from educators with limited time.The goal of this training is to build the capacities of educators and farmer leaders to understand barriers to adoption of organic in the Mid-South in order to better assist producers and communities both in identifying potential organic opportunities as well as strategies for organic management in a changing climate. In addition, the preliminary results of the policy analysis will be presented so that educators and farmer leaders can inform policy makers of potential impacts of state level organic policy. This workshop will help educators develop programming that can provide ongoing support for emerging organic networks. A second set of activities will be conducted through the Kerr Center's existing outreach program, MU's Organic outreach program, as well as through Missouri's Agriculture Business and Policy extension program. This will include:Research results presented at annual MU Organic Field Days held at farms of research collaborators and farmer network members.Research results incorporated into existing Kerr Center and MU workshops/conferences/meetings.Research results fed into the MU Twitter feed, which reaches thousands in the state.A presentation on identifying barriers and opportunities at the Mid-America Organic Association (MOA) and SSAWG conferences.Quantitative policy analysis results including organic production budgets, the costs of converting to organic production, as well as other organic production issues will be added as module to the "value added" program in Missouri's Agricultural Business and Policy Extension outreach. Objective 5: To support new, and strengthen emerging, networks of producers that can support peer-to-peer learning, develop collective methods to secure inputs, and pursue marketing opportunities.We will use a small mini-grant program to support the development or expansion of networks of organic producers in the region (eastern OK, southern MO, western TN, northern AR) which will be coordinated by the Kerr Center. As coordinator of the southern region SARE PDP, Kerr Center has experience in managing a grant program, with the ability to facilitate paperwork for farmer groups who wish to apply. We plan to provide $7,500/year in Years 2 and 3 to between 3-5 producer groups to allow them to engage in peer-to-peer learning opportunities (e.g. informal field days, online collaboration and training, mentoring, social activities oriented to learning new organic techniques), OR to collaborate in collectively acquiring inputs or pursuing marketing opportunities. During the first three months of the project, the project team will agree upon criteria for the grant program, using regional SARE producer grant criteria to guide the process, as well as establish the application protocol. Grants will be capped at $3,000 per group per year. Grants will be publicized through extension and existing organic producer networks, as well as to eligible producers at the at the 2021 and 2022 SSAWG and MOA winter meetings. Grants will be awarded in the first month of Years 1 and 2 (September) for completion within the year. A network representative of each grantee will be encouraged to discuss the results of their mini-grant activities at field days and/or MOA/SSAWG conferences.

Progress 09/01/23 to 08/31/24

Outputs
Target Audience:The main target audience is the organic sector in the Mid-South, which includes farm-level production and supply chain actors such as input suppliers, processors, buyers and aggregators. The most important audience is farmers and agricultural educators such as extension educators, federal and state agency personnel, non-profit staff and land-grant extension administrators. Changes/Problems: Policy Research: We had difficulty securing interviews with policy decision-makers in state agencies or with agricultural gropus with policy agendas in the Mid-South given the dearth of existing state-level organic policies in these states. We finally secured two interviews with each state after patiently explaining that we were interested in talking with agency officials even if these did not have any organic-specific policies. Because of the absence of state-level policies, we were unable to secure enough information for a quantiative policy analysis where we could compare organic farm enterprise budgets. We have changed this to focus on developing these budgets for the Mid-South and comparing with other available budgets. Primary Producer Research: Given the emerging themes of gendered perspectives in organic agriculture, we have re-interviewed five initial participants and added two more organic women producers. This sheds light on unique challenges that women face in organic production in this area. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Graduate Student Education: During this year of the project, GRA Srivastava further improved her qualitative coding and analysis skills as well as project management skills. In addition, she completed her comprehensive examinations where she proposed re-analysing the data from this project with a gendered perspective, as well as including additional interviews with women organic farmers and organic adjacent farming styles. This interest grew out of analyzing project findings which showed interesting gendered perspectives in our data. The project supported her additional interviews with organic farmers in summer 2024. Post-Doctoral Training: Stephen Mukembo, post-doc in Division of Appied Social Sciences interested in innovatino and entrperneurship worked with our project data and became lead author on a manuscript (accepted in early summer 2024) for Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems and Community Development. In addition, he co-mentored Srivastava on developing and writing manuscripts with Hendrickson. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The preliminary results of our project have been presented at the Rural Sociological Society annual meetings. In addition, we developed a poster specifically for presentation at the Missouri Organi Association (MOA) annual meeting. It was prominently displayed by the registration and receoption area. Hendrickson met with key MOA personnel who are organizing aspects of the TOPP program in Missouri. We supplied key contact information for extension educators and worked to collaboratively develop our extension series with them. Disseminating the results of our projects to edcators and other interested audiences began in earnest with our webinar series that kicked off on August 22, 2024. In addition to participants, the video recording was distributed through the Kerr Center newsletter, the Center for Arkansas Food and Farms at U of Arkansas, and the food systems network with U of Missouri extension. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Research Objectives: Draft organic egg layer and grain budgets will be refined through representative producer panels who judge the accuracy of the budget and suggest changes. These budgets will then be used for policy and education outreach. Finish final analysis of research data and prepare additional manuscripts. Report of the state of organic in the Mid-South and findings from our research and their implications will be finalized in December 2024 for distribution to extension administrators and state agency personnel. (It will also be avialable generally with a DOI specific identifier.) Additional manuscripts (~2) will be drafted and submitted. Extension Objectives: Finish the extension educator series. Webinars are scheduled for October 2024 (What is TOPP?), December 2024 (What can federal agencies offer your organic producers), early February (Tips for Working with organic producers from those who do); March 2025 (Organic budgets for the Mid-South); and early April 2025 (two in-person field trips organized for extension educators to see their organic work in action). All webinars have been or will be recorded and when the series if finalized will be publicly available through a University of Missouri extension website.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? RESEARCH OBJECTIVES: Important Findings from the project include: Farmers motivations for organic production differ according to types of operations, for grain producers the main motivation is markets, for egg producers health concerns and operations that fit with their lifestyle motivated them to organic, while environmental concerns topped the list for diversified vegetable/small livestock producers. Biophysical barriers are important: 80% of vegetable producers, 75% of grain producers and 50% of egg producers specified at least one biophysical barrier, where weather was more severe issues with vegetable growers, soil fertility with grain growers, and predators with egg layer operations. Still these barriers are perceived to be manageable. Markets, certification and infrastructure are perceived as more difficult challenges than biophysical barriers across operation types. Fertilizer was a big issue in 2022 as conventional farmers substituted poultry litter for conventional fertilizer. Demand is important for diversfied vegetable producers. Our Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems and Community Development article explored how farmers in this area navigated these challenges and innovated to solve them. Some producers feel like the culture of their rural areas does not support organic, and many feel that they receive little support among federal and state agency personnel and extension educators. Results from our initial policy analysis shows there is little awareness of organic agricuture in these states or support for organic agriculture compared to other states in the Upper Midwest. MAIN FINDING: To increase organic production in this area we need to build on the innovative approaches that farmers are taking while building an ecosystem of support for organic producers. This ecosystem would include: Building human capital through training and collaborations; expanding and improving market access; encouraging asupportive policy environment; providing better access to financing, and helping to increase community support for organic. On-going research in policy: we developed a draft organic budget template for organic egg laying operations and organic corn and soybean operations in the Mid-South. This will be further refined and tested in the final year of the project. EXTENSION OBJECTIVES: We developed and initiated a extension and professional agricutlural educator webinar series starting August, 2024. The series consists of 5 webinars and 1 in-person field trip (two opportunities for field trips). The first series was delivered on August 22, 2024 and showcased the research findings of the project in addition to providing information about the state of organic in the Mid-South. Between August 22, 2024 and April 30, 2025, an additional 4 webinars and 1 field trip will be held. In addition we have distributed more mini-grants to producers in Missouri, Oklahoma and Arkansas. Besides publicizing the availability of mini-grants through organizations such as the Missouri Organic Association, Kerr Center and extension services for MO, AR and OK, we mailed a flyer with information about the grants to nearly 500 organic producers in our target area. We have generated interest and have been able to support farmer-led organic field days, farmer-led and identified education, and farmer-ed networking.

Publications

  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2024 Citation: Srivastava, G., M. Hendrickson and K. Wilson. 2024. "Gender Perspectives in Organic Farming in the Mid-South Region:Motivation, Challenges and Opportunities." Annual meeting of the Rural Sociological Society. July 24-28. Madison, WI.
  • Type: Other Status: Published Year Published: 2024 Citation: Hendrickson, M. D. Redhage, G.Srivastava and K. Clark. 2024. Understanding and Overcoming Barriers to Adoption of Organic Agriculture in the Mid-South. Poster presentation at Missouri Organic Association annual meeting. Hartsburg, MO. February.


Progress 09/01/22 to 08/31/23

Outputs
Target Audience:University of Missouri Extension educators interested in alternative food networks - sharing research information with them to prepare them to best serve organic farmers in the state. Undergraduate students at the University of Missouri interested in alternative agriculture - sharing research information with them to help them understand the challenges and motivations of organic farmers in this area. Changes/Problems: Interviews have been exceeding difficult to secure with relevant policy personnel in MO, AR and TN. We are trying to finish those interviews as soon as possible. We had to ask an external consultant to check code some of our data analysis to validate our findings. We have been unable to distribute as many mini-grants as budgeted and are hoping to do another round of networking with farmers to make them aware of the possibility for funds. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Provided information on organic farming and presented research findings from our project to 25 extension educators through the University of Missouri Extension Food Systems Network monthly webinars on December 7, 2022. In addition, the graduate student supported by the project has attended 2 Rural Sociological Society meetings, and a Southern Rural Sociological Association meeting which has provided additional professional development opportunities. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Prelminary results have been presented through research posters and conference presentations to the academic community of rural sociologists at two academic conferences, and have been presented through a poster for approximately 100 students and faculty at the MU College of Agriculture, Food & Natural Resources. David Redhage, Co-PI, attended PI meeting in April, 2023. During this time he made connections with Patrick Baur at University of Rhode Island to whom we've reached out and shared information and ideas for further research. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?For Research Objectives 1-3: Finish data analysis of farmer interviews and work on three manuscripts for peer-reviewed journals, including: Submission of a manuscript toJournal of Agriculture, Food Systems and Community Developmenton innovation in response to identified challenges. Submission planned for December, 2023. Development of manuscript examining the challenges and opportunities of this particular region, paying particular attention to how the challenges are udnerstood by farmers and shape opportunities. Development of manuscript focused primarily on those who surrendered certificaiton on all or part of thier operations. Finish coding and analysis of policy interviews and conduct2 more interviews with state agency personnel (MO & AR) For Extension Objectives 1&2: Distribute mini-grants to farmer groups in Winter 2023-2024 Prepare and conduct hybrid extension training including webinars and regional field trips (SW MO, SE MO/TN, AR/OK) Compile report and recommendations for Extension administrators on the needs for extension training and technical assistance in the region.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Accomplishments 22-23 on Research Objectives 1-2: We added 5more farmer interviews, so that we have now conducted a total of 40 interviews with 49 participants who are organic farmers or processors across the regions included in the project. These included 9 intervews where the organic farmers have surrendered their certification on all or parts of their operations. During this project period we finished transcribing interviews that were conducted, and began qualitative coding of the transcriptions. We provided 20 de-identified transcriptions to an external coder familiar with organic farming in the region to check our coding. We then developed themes from these codes and wrote research memos. These served as the basis for the three presentations at academic conferences showcasing preliminary findings. Themes and findings that have emerged in preliminary analysis include: Biophysical barriers such as pests, soil fertility, weeds, and weather are important challenges to organic farmers in this region but are considered manageable. In other words, while they are significant challenges and require innovation and experimentation to overcome, they do not seem to block adoption. Organic farmers face increased competition from conventional farmers for inputs, particularly for those such as poultry litter. Farmers desribe lack of availabity, increased prices for liter, and lack of transport for this product which in prior times had been relatively abundant and inexpensive. Some direct-market farmers or farmers oriented to sales of value-added products described a lack of education among the region's consumers about what organic is, and perceived that consumers do not always trust the label.Farmers described that the lack of proper infrastructure and inputs to support organic production has led to higher production costs, resulting in higher prices for organic products, which many rural consumers cannot afford. While access to markets and infrastructure is an important challenge, it can also provide new opportunities to diversify operations or establish new entities such as feed mills or input supply stores. Producers evolved innovations that addressed some of their challenges, but it is important to note that innovations require ecosystems in which to embed Policy barriers for organic farmers include accessing FSA loans and opportunities, as well as difficulty in dealing with drift (especially in Mississippi Delta area of our study region) For over half of the farmers surrendering certification on all or part of the operation, it was involuntary due to contamination from neighboring farms (spray drift) or lack of access to markets (dairy producers). Only a couple of farmer surrendered certification on their entire operation. Accomplishments 22-23 on Research Objectives 3: We have conducted 6 interviews concerned with public policy in MO, OK, MN (2) and GA. These interviews have been hard to nail down. We are currently transcribing and analyzing these interviews. Accomplishments 22-23 on Extension Objectives 1-2: We provided our preliminary research findings and information on organic policies to the University of Missouri Extension Food Systems Networking team at their December, 2022 meeting. Utilizing feedback and connections from that presentation, we have developed an outline and plan for extension trainings to take place in a hybrid fashion in the Spring and Summer of 2024. This will consist of online seminars and field trips to existing farms and infrastructure during the summer. Kerr Center has networked organic farmers in northern Arkansas and eastern Oklahoma together as well as provided resource and information.

Publications

  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2023 Citation: Srivastava, Garima, Stephen C. Mukembo, Mary Hendrickson, David Redhage, and Kerry Clark.2023. "Increasing Resilient Organic Production in the Mid-South Region." Paper presented at the Southern Rural Sociological Association Annual Meeting. Oklahoma City, OK.February.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2023 Citation: Srivastava, Garima, Mary Hendrickson and Stephen Mukembo. 2023. A Phenomenological Inquiry into Organic Producers' Experiences in Surrendering Certification in the Mid-South. Paper presented at the Rural Sociological Societys annual meeting. Burlington, VT. August 2-6.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2022 Citation: Srivastava, Garima, Mary Hendrickson, David Redhage and Kerry Clark. 2022."Why is there an Organic Cold Spot in the Mid-South? Opportunities and Challenges for Organic Farmers in this Region." Poster presented at University of Missouri College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources Research Symposium. Columbia, MO. October 12.


Progress 09/01/21 to 08/31/22

Outputs
Target Audience:During this year's work, we reached the following audiences: 45 organic and transitioning row crop farmers attended a day long workshop on weed management and control in row crops 20 graduate students and researchers attended a session where we reported preliminary results from our interviews with organic farmers. Changes/Problems:In general the interviews have been much slower to happen, first because of Covid (in first project period) and we are trying to play catch-up. It has been more difficult than anticipated to find and schedule interviews, particularly with farmers who are doing egg production. In addition, we are planning to do some more surrendered certification farmers to find out what challenges they encountered. (To date, dairy has been an extermely touchy subject with Missouri farmers, with some farmers surrending their certificaiton on their dairy cows but keeping it with their grain crops.) In the next project period, we are considering finding additional research help for data analysis and contributions to research publications. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?In our next reporting period we will be finishing analysis of interviews with farmers and with policy advocates and agency personnel so we will be able to share our analysis with extension educators and farmer organizations. In addition, we are currently planning outreach to extension services in our four state region that should begin next project period.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Goal 1: To identify region-specific economic, social and biophysical barriers to USDA Certified Organic adoption in the Mid-South, a region including parts of Missouri, Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Tennessee; Goal 2: To identify region-specific opportunities and farmer-led innovations that could increase USDA Certified Organic farm numbers and acreage; For these first two goals we have identified and interviewed 37 farmers and processors scattered across all states included in the project. During this project period we transcribed the interviews that were conducted, and are beginning qualitative analysis of the interviews. Themes that have emerged in preliminary analysis include: biophysical barriers such as pests, soil fertility, weeds, and weather are important challenges to organic farmers in this region. They vary across sectors (e.g. weather was more severe issues with vegetable growers, soil fertility with grain growers, predators with egg layers), but they are often considered manageable by the farmers. soil fertility has often been managed in this region by acquiring poultry litter from widespread conventional poultry operations. In fall 2021 and early 2022, farmers complained of the difficulty and expense of obtaining this valuable input given the competition from conventional farmers. The latter had switched to poultry litter given the high prices of conventional fertilizer. infrastructure challenges such as finding inputs and finding markets remains a key issue in this area. Vegetable growers selling directly emphasized the difficulty of saturated markets for organic produce, while grain growers emphasized need for inputs and more accessible organic mills or elevators. Across the board farmers are facing labor challenges (both on farm and for transportation) and access to organic inputs. This however can be considered opportunity as well. certification process can be intimidating, and availability is uneven (accessing certifiers seemed to be more of an issue in northern Arkansas). Howeveer, farmers found that record-keeping was helpful for their farm management too. We also interviewed farmers who had found new opportunities such as the growth of egg layers as a important business for farmers in this region, as well as for processors and input suppliers. Many farmers entering organic production in this area, especially in grain growing, are motivated by better prices for crops or better profits per acre for farms that are constrained by land availabiligy (such as in certain areas wtih many Plain People). Goal 3: To identify public policy measures that have impacted organic adoption in other regions and explore their feasibility for the Mid-South We identified the key states we wanted to compare by searching for organic policies and statues. The states identified are Minnesota, Georgia, Wisconsin, Texas and possibly North Carolina. Extension objectives have not yet been undertaken.

Publications

  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2022 Citation: Srivastava, Garima, Mary K. Hendrickson, David Redhage and Kerry Clark. 2022. Why is there an organic Cold spot in the Mid-South? Opportunities and Challenges for organic farmers in this region. Paper presented at the Rural Sociological Societys annual meeting. Denver, CO. August 4-7.


Progress 09/01/20 to 08/31/21

Outputs
Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems:No major changes in approach, but some timeline changes. Covid restrictions on travel did not loosen until March 2021 at our University and delayed our ability to interview farmers during the winter season. We have conducted some virtual interviews but the on-farm visits are superior. We are busy catching up with the interviews. Based on a few initial intervies, we are expanding how we will give small grants to groups of farmers. We are likely to work with specific individuals who will be able to coordinate activities for farmers given time constraints of farmers. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Research Objectives: Finish interviews with organic farmers and analyze results. We also will finish coding the policies we have collected and initiate interviews with selected state level non-profit and government officials. Extension Objectives: Roll out small grants program for farmers.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Research Objectives: We are in the research phase where we are conducting interviews with identified organic farmers in our region. We have begun collection of organic policies from state considered organic hotspots. Extenion Objectives: We have initiated contacts with non-profit organizations in our region. We have developed criteria for our small grant program based on a few initial interviews.

Publications