Source: NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
EVALUATION OF CALF PERFORMANCE AGAINST BOVINE VIRAL DIARRHEA VIRUS WHEN COWS ARE VACCINATED WITH A MODIFIED-LIVE OR KILLED VIRAL VACCINE
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1023189
Grant No.
2020-67034-31893
Cumulative Award Amt.
$103,529.00
Proposal No.
2019-07155
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jun 15, 2020
Project End Date
Aug 14, 2022
Grant Year
2020
Program Code
[A7101]- AFRI Predoctoral Fellowships
Recipient Organization
NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY
1620 STANDLEY DR ACADEMIC RESH A RM 110
LAS CRUCES,NM 88003-1239
Performing Department
Animal & Range Sciences Dept.
Non Technical Summary
Animal health is essential to the growth and sustainability of the food system. In order to continue to provide a high-quality product to consumers, improving animal health in the face of disease is critical. Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) is a disease that can be complexed with other respiratory pathogens throughout the lifespan of cattle. Beef and dairy cattle represent one of the largest sectors of the economy, including millions of jobs from ranchers to veterinarians, ensuring the health and wellbeing of these animals is paramount. Vaccinations against these pathogens are delivered in several forms: a modified-live vaccination (MLV) contains a strain of the virus that has been attenuated, or altered, in some way to replicate in the body, but will not cause the animal to experience the disease. This vaccination type potentially allows the immune system to recognize a pathogen more readily, as it already had to develop antibodies to the virus in the vaccine. Another type of vaccination is the use of a killed viral vaccination (KV), which contains the virus that has been completely inactivated. The KV vaccination is often used more readily in production systems as it poses little threat to the animal to regain virulence or qualities that can make the animal sick. While vaccinations against these pathogens have been on the market for decades, we still see an incidence of these diseases at different stages of cattle production. These diseases can result in millions of dollars in losses throughout the combination of treatment costs, labor costs, and reduced growth, and increased costs to consumers. Thus, this proposal is aimed at examining how the use of different vaccination treatments while a cow is pregnant with her calf, can affect the calf's performance when they are directly exposed to these pathogens. Specifically, we are testing the efficacy of a MLV compared to a KV vaccination on cattle grazing native rangeland through their calves. Upon calving, both the cow and her calf will be sampled for blood titers against BVDV. Colostrum, the first milk from the cow, will be collected as well to analyze titers against BVDV. After initial day 1 sampling, ruminal contents, and blood will be collected from both cow and calf, as well as milk from the cow to examine the changes in the rumen microbiome and metabolome as the calf ages and develops a fully functional rumen. After calves are weaned, they will undergo a feed efficiency study where each calf's individual feed intake ad gain will be measured for 60 days. Improving feed efficiency is a critical part of beef production systems, to require less input for greater output. After collecting individual feed intake data, calves will be immune challenged through exposure to BVDV, and response variables will be measured, including behavioral changes, weight loss or gain, blood measurements of white blood cells, and isolation of the virus. Ultimately, through these methods, we aim to answer questions of improved immunity, feed efficiency, and growth of calves through different vaccination strategies from their dam. If this goal is met, we hope to provide improved recommendations to cow/calf producers, veterinarians, and animal health companies about the best herd health program for their cattle which manifests in better protection against diseases.
Animal Health Component
60%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
40%
Applied
60%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
3113310109070%
3073310110330%
Goals / Objectives
Bovine viral diarrhea virus is considered one of the major reproductive pathogens affecting the beef and dairy industries. Currently, two types of vaccination programs are widely used in the livestock industry for bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV): modified-live viral (MLV) vaccinations, killed viral (KV) vaccinations, or a combination of KV and MLV. Generally, MLV vaccines stimulate a longer duration of protection and a greater level of BVDV protection than KV vaccinations, however, KV vaccinations are considered safer for pregnant cattle to reduce transmission of BVDV to the fetus. This proposal is designed to address the relationship between dam vaccination type and progeny performance. Our long-term goal is to increase our understanding of the effects of vaccination type on progeny performance in an effort to provide better information to producers when making health management decisions for their cow/calf operations and ultimately once their animals reach the feedlot. Our short-term goal is to examine how antibodies in colostrum from different vaccination types influence antibody development, rumen microbial populations, feed efficiency and immune response in calves post-weaning. Our overall hypothesis is that cows that have only received modified-live viral vaccinations throughout their life will produce progeny that outperform progeny of cows that have received only the killed virus vaccination with respect to growth performance and immunocompetence against BVDV. This will be determined through three objectives: (1) determine the influence of the dam's vaccination status on antibodies found in colostrum on calf immune status, (2) evaluate the growth performance, immune function, and ruminal function of dams and calves born to dams that have received only one vaccination type against BVDV, and (3) determine immunocompetency of the animals against BVDV following the feeding trial.
Project Methods
Efforts: This project will be conducted utilizing 3 objectives. To answer objective one, methods include colostrum and milk collection, ruminal content collection through orogastric tubing from both calves and cows, and blood collection through coccygeal or jugular venipuncture at days 1, 7, 35 and 63 postpartum, and again at weaning. To answer objective two, calves will be fed individually for 60 days post-weaning. Biweekly weights, ruminal content, and blood samples will be collected to analyze ruminal microbiome, growth, and associated blood metabolites. To answer objective three, calves will receive surgical implantation of a data logger to record body temperatures every 5 minutes throughout the immune challenge period. Calves will be monitored visually at least three times per day for signs of lethargy, poor appetite, and mucosal petechia. Additionally, every other day for 21 days a blood sample will be collected via jugular venipuncture and nasal swabs will be collected to conduct virus isolation, and alterations in blood metabolites contributing to the biological response to BVDV. Ruminal data from objective one and objective two will be analyzed for microbial populations through isolation of microbial DNA and further quantified for 16S rRNA through sequencing, as well as ruminal pH, volatile fatty acid concentrations, and ruminal ammonia concentrations. Blood metabolites from objective one, two, and three will be analyzed for BVDV titer, concentrations of glucose, insulin, serum urea nitrogen, non-esterified fatty acids, and insulin-like growth factor-1. Nasal swab samples will be collected for virus isolation at the same interval and frozen until processing.Evaluation: All outputs from each objective will be used to examine if differences in vaccination programs affect the performance of calves challenged with bovine viral diarrhea virus. Outputs will be evaluated through each objective for applicability to cattle producers, the animal health industry, and the academic field. Results will be reported in scientific research papers and will be submitted to leading journals in each appropriate field, as research concludes. Outputs will be presented at minimum at two scientific meetings, as well as departmental events including seminars, field days, and extension presentations, as applicable.

Progress 06/15/20 to 08/15/22

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audience of this project is the scientific community and agricultural producers. Data obtained through this project have been presented at the American Society of Animal Science annual meetings in 2020, and 2022, and at the Western Section of the American Society of Animal Science in 2021 at the general and Ph.D. competition poster sessions and during a Young Scholar Awardee talk. Additionally, the project director presented this data to producers during the Corona Range and Livestock Research Center Advisory Council Meeting in 2021 and 2022, and to students at the NMSU Agricultural Experiment Staton Corona Range and Livestock Research Center Field Day in November 2021 and US Beef Academy in May 2022. Changes/Problems:The major adjustment in the project was largely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The initial opportunity to conduct the immune challenge over multiple years as stated in the objective could not be met due to constraints with conducting research, transportation of biological materials, and limiting personnel interactions during the pandemic. Thus, only one year of the immune challenge was able to be completed as opposed to the initial proposal. Additionally, the animal numbers initially included per year in the project proposal per treatment could not be met due to the reduction in herd size due to the drought in New Mexico and the southwestern United States in 2020. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The project director traveled to Auburn University in the College of Veterinary Medicine to live and work intensively for 3 months in the spring of 2022 alongside top scientists in the field to learn cell culture and virology techniques in the completion of sample analysis for the research project. This required additional budget management and coordination of efforts from personnel at the host university and the project director's home university for the completion of the analysis. The project director has engaged in professional development by serving as the national graduate student director for the American Society of Animal Science from 2019-2021, presenting data at the American Society of Animal Science virtual annual meeting in July 2020, the Western Section of the American Society of Animal Science in October 2021, and most recently at the American Society of Animal Science meeting in June 2022. The project has provided the opportunity to interact with different groups, including presenting information to a scientific audience, stakeholders, and students over the last three years. Additionally, the project director has mentored three undergraduate students who assisted with this research in the past year. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?This research has been presented orally at regional and national scientific meetings, to regional stakeholder groups within New Mexico, and at the U.S. Beef Academy which hosts students and industry members from across the country annually at the Corona Range and Livestock Research Center. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Objective 1: Colostrum samples were collected and analyzed over 3 years (N=50) from cows receiving a KV and MLV vaccination annually at roughly 4-6 months of gestation. Quantitative IgG was assessed for antibody analysis. Colostrum IgG was significantly higher (P = 0.02) in cows receiving a KV vaccination compared to cows receiving a MLV vaccination. Additionally, cow serum antibody titers against BVDV-1 and BVDV-2 were significantly higher for cows receiving a KV vaccination (P < 0.0001), however, both vaccination groups had higher titers during the first 63 d postpartum before antibody decay prior to annual revaccination (P ≤ 0.002). Colostrum antibody likely contributed to calf serum antibody titers against BVDV-1 (P = 0.0037) and BVDV-2 (P = 0.0004), which were significantly higher in calves born to KV cows than those born to MLV cows during the first 63 d of age but were similar by weaning. These results indicate that vaccination of cows with a KV vaccine against BVDV provides greater humoral immunity in their calves during the first 63 d of life, however, this potential advantage wanes by weaning. Future research should be conducted to elucidate specific antibodies against viral pathogens that are part of reproductive and respiratory diseases. The goal to determine the influence of vaccination status on antibody in colostrum was accomplished. Objective 2: During the preweaning period with measurements taken over a 3-year period, rumen and blood samples were collected from cows and calves. Cow and calf serum nutritional metabolites of glucose, urea nitrogen, and non-esterified fatty acids were assessed on d 1, d 7, d 35 d 63, and d 205. Metabolites were unaffected by vaccination type of the dam (P ≥ 0.11). Ruminal fermentation metrics, including pH, ammonia, and volatile fatty acids were assessed in both cows and calves. Ruminal fermentation (P ≥ 0.06) and rumen bacterial populations (P = 0.98) were not significantly affected by vaccination of the cow. Birth weights, weaning weights and overall preweaning average daily gain of calves were similar across cow vaccine treatments (P ≥ 0.39). Cow body condition score at calving and at weaning was similar across treatments (P ≥ 0.17). Calves born in 2019 and 2020 (N=33) underwent a 56-d feed efficiency study to evaluate growth and ruminal function postweaning. Postweaning average daily gain, average dry matter intake, and feed conversion ratio were similar between treatments (P ≥ 0.42). Calf ruminal fermentation metrics were unaltered by vaccination treatment (P ≥ 0.33). Serum metabolites were similar between vaccination treatments (P ≥ 0.32). Heifer progeny achieved a similar percent of mature body weight (P = 0.84), and puberty (P = 0.62), prior to the first breeding season. Overall, no differences were determined by vaccination type on preweaning or postweaning growth or rumen characteristics. The goal to assess growth performance, immune function, and ruminal function of cows and calves was accomplished. Objective 3: In year 3 of the study, calves (N=16) remained unvaccinated against viral pathogens and were early weaned at approximately 140 d of age, and were subjected to an intranasal immune challenge with BVDV. Throughout a 28-d period, rectal temperatures, clinical scores, and blood samples were collected to evaluate responses to the viral challenge. Serum antibody titers were evaluated against BVDV-1 and BVDV-2 prior to the study and after completion. Calves born to cows receiving a MLV vaccination had a tendency for higher clinical scorers (P = 0.08), and lower circulating lymphocyte and leukocyte populations than calves born to KV cows (P ≤ 0.03). This indicates that these animals may have been better prepared for an immune response and suggests white blood cell populations were directed toward fighting a viral infection at specific tissues rather than remaining in circulation. Haptoglobin concentrations as a marker of the acute phase response of calves were most pronounced at d 10 post-challenge when viral replication was highest (P < 0.001) but were similar between treatments (P = 0.93). Calves born to KV cows had significantly higher titers against BVDV-1 (P = 0.02) but similar titers against BVDV-2 (P = 0.50) to calves born to MLV cows. All calves had significantly higher titers to BVDV-2 post-challenge (P < 0.0001). Calves had similar initial and final body weights and average daily gain (P ≥ 0.16) between treatments. However, the COVID-19 pandemic limited replication of the viral challenge across all sampling years from previous objectives, and as such the limited sample size and lack of control (calves from unvaccinated cows) may not be sufficient to establish differences in populations The goal to determine immunocompetency of animals against BVDV was partially accomplished but should be explored further.

Publications

  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Lujan, L. A., Melchior, E. A., Rosasco, S. L., Dunlap, R. L., Cox, S. H., Scholljegerdes, E. J., ... & Lodge-Ivey, S. L. (2020). PSI-33 Evaluation of calf performance when cows grazing native rangeland are vaccinated for bovine viral diarrhea virus and infectious bovine rhinotracheitis using either a modified live or killed vaccine. Journal of Animal Science, 98(Supplement_4), 473-474
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Awaiting Publication Year Published: 2021 Citation: Melchior, E. A., L. A. Luan Zavala, S. L. Rosasco, A. B. Selman, A. F. Summers, E. J. Scholljegerdes, and S. L. Lodge-Ivey. 2021. PSIII-9. Evaluation of progeny effect of maternal vaccination type for bovine viral diarrhea virus and infectious bovine rhinotracheitis when grazing native rangeland. Western Section Annual Meeting.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Awaiting Publication Year Published: 2022 Citation: Melchior-Tiffany, E. A., C. Anderson, S. H. Cox, R. L. Dunlap, S. L. Lodge-Ivey, J. C. Wenzel, and E. J. Scholljegerdes. Evaluation of immune performance of calves born to cows vaccinated with a lifetime regimen of a modified-live or killed viral vaccine when challenged with bovine viral diarrhea virus. 2022. PSV-A-2. American Society of Animal Science Annual Meeting.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Awaiting Publication Year Published: 2022 Citation: Melchior, E. A. Young Scholar Award Talk: Influence of a lifetime regiment of a modified live viral or killed viral vaccination against bovine viral diarrhea virus on beef cattle performance. 2022. 398. American Society of Animal Science Annual Meeting.


Progress 06/15/20 to 06/14/21

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audience of this project is the scientific community and agricultural producers. Data obtained from this project thus far have been presented at one scientific meeting during the reporting period. The American Society of Animal Science had a virtual scientific meeting in July 2020 and is in a hybrid format this coming July 2021 to accommodate scientists and students unable to travel. Data from this had been presented at the virtual scientific meeting in July 2020 during the Ph.D. student poster competition. Due to COVID-19, there has been a delay in obtaining results that can be disseminated to the entire target audience. As the pandemic begins to wane, results will be appropriately disseminated in the coming reporting year. The project director was able to discuss this research with two different undergraduate student groups in the form of webinars presented during the spring 2021 semester. Changes/Problems:Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, efforts to complete the immune challenge as listed in objective 3 of this proposal have been delayed. In order to ship a viral pathogen from one state to another state and begin the immune challenge, additional documentation from each state and the USDA must be completed and this has been delayed due to personnel unable to complete the paperwork. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The project director has engaged in professional development through presenting data at the American Society of Animal Science virtual annual meeting in July 2020. Due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on university education, the project director has assisted professors at their home institution with moving coursework to an online format. Additionally, the project director has mentored one undergraduate student who assisted with this research and presented at two undergraduate student webinars discussing research and graduate school. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The research, as a multi-year project, has been disseminated partially through abstracts and poster presentations at scientific meetings. The project director has presented one abstract at the national level and as a co-author of an undergraduate mentee at the national and regional levels. In order to provide opportunities for research to undergraduate students, the project director acted in a mentor role and was a co-author on an undergraduate poster competition in 2020 and will be a co-author for an undergraduate poster competition later in 2021 at regional scientific meetings. As the communities of interest are primarily scientists and beef cattle producers, when a complete data set is available, it will be presented in subsequent meetings. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?To accomplish the goals set forth, this coming reporting period will have the completion of objectives 1, 2, and 3 from the proposal. Final sample analyses from the multiple years of collections will be conducted no later than the end of 2021, and data will be analyzed and in spring and summer 2022 for dissemination to the communities of interest.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? At present, objective two has been evaluated. Upon weaning, calves underwent a 45-d post-weaning period before being subsequently moved to the campus research facility to undergo a feed efficiency trial. Calves born to dams of differing vaccination types showed no differences in ruminal function (as determined through ruminal ammonia and volatile fatty acid concentrations), feed efficiency, or growth performance, indicating that dam vaccination type does not alter progeny growth postweaning. Objectives 1 and 3 will be analyzed this fall through coordination with project mentors at Auburn University.

Publications

  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Melchior, E. A., Rosasco, S. L., Lodge-Ivey, S. L., Cox, S. H., Dunlap, R. L., Wenzel, J. C., ... & Scholljegerdes, E. J. (2020). PSIV-12 Evaluation of reproductive performance and herd longevity when heifers grazing native range are vaccinated with a lifetime regimen of a killed viral or modified live viral vaccine. Journal of Animal Science, 98(Supplement_4), 287-287.