Recipient Organization
AUBURN UNIVERSITY
108 M. WHITE SMITH HALL
AUBURN,AL 36849
Performing Department
Animal Sciences
Non Technical Summary
The meat industry produces over 103.3 billion pounds of beef, chicken, goat, lamb andpork annually. With over 133 billion pounds of food wasted each year in the United States, 30%of that is attributed to meat products. Consumer packaging of fresh meat today is comprised ofmultiple forms that include Poly-Vinyl Chloride (PVC), Modified Atmosphere (MAP), Vacuum-Skin (VSP), or Rollstock (RS) packaging method. Within these methods are multiple iterationsand modifications to the method but packaging is ultimately designed around the consumer andtheir purchasing intent. With excessive waste of meat and food products occurring due to shelflife deterioration, and millions of pounds of meat products produced in Alabama annually thereis need for further investigation of sustainable meat packaging. This project proposal aims toinvestigate the alternative packaging methods of fresh and cooked meat through 1) theidentification of least cost packaging methods, 2) packaging methods for extended storageduration to enhance meat tenderness and safety, and 3) packaging methods that are constructedof recyclable materials. Current packaging methods utilized in the retail sector for fresh meat arecomprised of an expanded poly-styrene tray and meat is covered with a polyvinyl chloride film.This method allows the greatest quantity of oxygen to reach the cut surface of the meat wherebychanging the meat surface color to the preferred consumer color of red. Identifying uniquepackaging methods that limit oxygen exposure, preserve the surface color and can provideenhancements to tenderness and flavor would be preferred. In addition, inclusion of newertechnology could provide consumers with friendly methods of storing meat products forextended periods. Results from these projects would be disseminated through peer-reviewedscientific journals, webinars, social media outlets and educational meetings for stakeholders.Furthermore, these results will enhance the meat production industry throughout Alabama andmore importantly the nation. It will lend to improvements of meat storage and packagingmethods that will further enhance consumer acceptance of red meat proteins, in addition tocreating a more sustainable meat packaging platform.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Goals / Objectives
The overarching goal of this Hatch Project is to create and enhance red meat packagingplatforms for greater storage, sustainability, and consumer acceptability. It is the intent throughthese pillars of work that the following will be created: 1) recommendations for use ofsustainable red meat packaging for the retail sector, 2) evaluate the implications of meat safetyand extended storage in alternative meat packaging platforms, and 3) create recommendations onthe influence of temperature and its impacts on consumer palatability, storage, block-chainmanagement and safety of red meat.
Project Methods
Beef ribeye roll (LL: IMPSNo. 112A) and top sirloin butt (TS: IMPS No. 184) will be purchased from a commercialprocessing facility. Subprimals (N = 40/muscle) will be aged and stored at 2.2? in the absenceof light for 7 days from the packaging date. After aging, subprimals (LL and TS) will beremoved from their respective individual packages and secondary muscles will be removed andsubcutaneous fat exceeding 0.64 cm's will be trimmed. Subprimals will be fabricated into 2.54-cm-thick steaks (n = 12/subprimal) and randomly allocated to packaging film treatments higherbarrier (HB), medium barrier (MB), and low barrier (LB). Steaks will be packaged using ahorizontal form/fill/seal vacuum packaging machine.Color analysis (Instrumental and Sensory) will be collected on days 0, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30and 36 of the simulated retail display periods. Using a Hunter MiniScan XE plus. In addition, a six-member, trained sensory panelwill be trained according to AMSA (1991) guidelines for fresh meat analysis.Instrumental tenderness and cooking yield will occur on day 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36.Steaks will be removed from the refrigerated display case and steaks will be blotted dry with apaper towel prior to placing on a balance for capturing raw weight. Steaks will be cooked to an internal temperature of 71? andtemperature will be monitored with a Teflon-coated copper-constantan thermocouple. Aftercooling to room temperature, steaks will be re-weighed and the cookyield will be calculated.After weighing, steaks will be cored up to six times to produce 1.27-cm diameter cores parallelto muscle fibers. Each core will be sheared one time on a texture analyzer.Steaks allocated for sensory taste panel analysis will be removed from the retail displaycases on days 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36. Sensory steaks will be cooked according to the procedures forinstrumental tenderness above. After cooking, steaks will be cut into 1 cm x 1 cm x 2.54 cmcubes, placed into individually labeled cups with lids and held in a food warmer at 70? for no more than 15 min prior to sensory evaluation. Sensory panelist (N = 8) will be selected and trained according to AMSA guidelines for meat evaluation 2011.Sensory taste panel evaluation will be conductedunder color neutralizing lights with portioned booths to isolate panelists.A second study using Beef ribeye roll (LL: IMPS No. 112A), top sirloin butt (TS: IMPS No. 184), and bottom round flat (BF: IMPS No. 170) willbe purchased from a commercial processing facility. Subprimals (N = 40/muscle) will be agedand stored at 2.2? in the absence of light for 7, 21, 35, 42, 49, and 56 days from the packagingdate. After aging, subprimals (LL, TS, and BF) will be removed from their respectiveindividual packages, secondary muscles will be removed and subcutaneous fat exceeding 0.64cm's will be trimmed. Subprimals will be fabricated into 2.54-cm-thick steaks (n =12/subprimal) and randomly allocated to packaging film treatments higher barrier (HB), mediumbarrier (MB), and low barrier (LB). Steaks will be packaged using a horizontal form/fill/sealvacuum packaging machine. At the conclusion of thedistribution simulation, packaged steaks will be placed into a tiered refrigerated display caseoperating at 3.3? for 7 days. Packages will be stacked three-deep to simulate a current retailsetting.Color analysiswill be collected on days 0, 3, 5, and 7 of thesimulated retail display periods. The L*, a*, b* and spectral data will be measured from the mean ofthree readings on the package surface. In addition, a six-member, trained sensory panel will betrained according to AMSA (1991) guidelines for fresh meat analysis.Packages allocated to lipid oxidation and myoglobin quantity will be removed from therefrigerated display cases on days 0, 3, 5, and 7.Instrumental tenderness and cooking yield will occur on day 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36.Steaks will be removed from the refrigerated display case and steaks will be blotted dry with apaper towel prior to placing on a balance for capturing raw weight. After weighing, steaks willbe cooked on a commercial electric clam-shell griddle pre-heated to 177?.After weighing, steaks will be cored up to six times to produce 1.27-cm diameter cores parallelto muscle fibers. Each core will be sheared one time on a texture analyzer with a crosshead speed of 10 mm.s and 0.1N of contact force.The last study will use Beef ribeye roll (LL: IMPS No. 112A), top sirloin butt (TS: IMPS No. 184), pork center cut loins (PL: IMPS No. 410) andpork sirloin (PB: IMPS No. 413) will be purchased from a commercial processing facility.After aging, subprimals (LL, TS, PL, and PB) will be removed from their respectiveindividual packages, secondary muscles will be removed and subcutaneous fat exceeding 0.64cm's will be trimmed. Subprimals will be fabricated into 2.54-cm-thick steaks (n = 12/subprimal) and randomly allocated to packaging film treatments higher barrier (HB), mediumbarrier (MB), and low barrier (LB). Steaks will be packaged using a horizontal form/fill/sealvacuum packaging machine.At the conclusion of the distribution simulation, packaged steaks will be placed intoeither a tiered (OT) or a closed system refrigerated display case (DC) operating at 3.3?.?Color analysis (Instrumental and Sensory) will be collected on days 0, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30and 36 of the simulated retail display periods. The L*, a*, b* and spectral data will be measured from themean of three readings on the package surface. In addition, a six-member, trained sensory panelwill be trained according to AMSA (1991) guidelines for fresh meat analysis.Instrumental tenderness and cooking yield will occur on day 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36.Steaks will be removed from the refrigerated display case and steaks will be blotted dry with apaper towel prior to placing on a balance for capturing raw weight. After weighing, steaks willbe cooked on a commercial electric clam-shell griddle (Garland Manufacturing, Mississauga,ON) pre-heated to 177?. Steaks will be cooked to an internal temperature of 71? andtemperature will be monitored with a Teflon-coated copper-constantan thermocouple. Aftercooling to room temperature, steaks will be re-weighed and the cookyield will be calculated.After weighing, steaks will be cored up to six times to produce 1.27-cm diameter cores parallelto muscle fibers. Each core will be sheared one time on a texture analyzer (TA-XT2i; TextureTechnologies, Scarsdale NY) with a crosshead speed of 10 mm.s and 0.1N of contact force.Steaks allocated for sensory taste panel analysis will be removed from the retail displaycases on days 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36. Steaks will be frozen at -62.2? until all samples from theproject can be analyzed. Sensory steaks will be cooked according to the procedures forinstrumental tenderness above. After cooking, steaks will be cut into 1 cm x 1 cm x 2.54 cmcubes, placed into individually labeled cups with lids and held in a food warmer (Vulcan,Baltimore MD) at 70? for no more than 15 min prior to sensory evaluation. Sensory panelist (N= 8) will be selected and trained according to AMSA guidelines for meat evaluation 2011.Panelists will evaluate each sample for overall tenderness, connective tissue, juiciness, and beefflavor using an eight-point scale ? Sensory taste panel evaluation will be conductedunder color neutralizing lights with portioned booths to isolate panelists.