Source: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY submitted to NRP
ALTERNATIVE MANAGEMENT METHODS TO ENHANCE SUSTAINABILITY OF KENTUCKY VEGETABLE PRODUCTION SYSTEMS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1021069
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Nov 21, 2019
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2024
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY
500 S LIMESTONE 109 KINKEAD HALL
LEXINGTON,KY 40526-0001
Performing Department
Horticulture
Non Technical Summary
Since the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) was enacted in 1998, many Kentucky growers have turned to vegetable production as an alternative to tobacco. Vegetable crops are considered specialty crops as they are produced by people for food. They are also special in that skilled management and labor are required for their production, harvest, and proper storage. The learning curve has been high for many Kentucky growers as they transitioned from cropping systems that they knew well, such as tobacco or grain crops. However, in the 21 years since the MSA became effective there are many successful vegetable producers across the state. Like the skill level of the growers, the size and scale of the operations vary greatly. All producers, regardless of their skill level or size of operation, struggle with similar issues--pest and pathogen pressure, soil quality, and challenging weather. Regardless of the crop, production systems must continuously evolve in order to stay resilient and sustainable in an ever-changing environment, whether that environment be economic, social, or natural.One tool has been introduced to Kentucky in order to help increase farm resiliency. In 2012, the inception of the High Tunnel System Initiative within the Natural Resource Conservation Service Environmental Quality Incentives Program (NRCS EQIP) took place. High tunnels are passively heated and cooled temporary structures used to extend the growing season for high value specialty crops. They provide protection from the weather and serve as a moderately controlled environment. High tunnels have the potential to provide the grower with the ability to extend the growing season and moderate the environment with respect to precipitation and temperature. This can translate to increased income from increased marketable yields and improved produce quality. The high tunnel system has been around well before the 2012 EQIP, but in part because of the support from this program, nearly 900 high tunnels have been installed in Kentucky (Figure 1; USDA-NRCS, 2018). It is unknown how many total high tunnels exist in the state as there are many growers who purchased high tunnels with the assistance of other grants or programs, or purchased them using their own private funds.The funding available through NRCS has opened high tunnel ownership to a wider social and economic stratum; it has included people that may not normally be able to afford a high tunnel or who are not experienced growers. Many growers are unfamiliar with how to most effectively use their high tunnels and make the most out of the potential season extension. The Kentucky Horticulture Council (KHC) is a group of key industry horticulture leaders in the state. It is comprised of specialty crop growers and horticulture-related business owners. It has stated that high tunnels are one of its priority areas and that it would like to see more high tunnel resource development and training (Cindy Finneseth, KHC Executive Director, personal communication).High tunnel production is nuanced and growers face unique production challenges, including managing soil quality appropriately. There is the risk of increased soil salinity in high tunnels from over-application of fertilizer and the lack of weathering and precipitation compared to open field production. Excessive soil phosphorus (P) is also a concern. Growers often rely on animal manures for a crop nutrient source, which can be an affordable and accessible fertilizer. However, repeated use can lead to increased soil P and soil salinity, which can complicate crop production and have negative environmental impacts (Edmeades, 2003; Hao and Chang, 2003).High tunnel vegetable production does not have less pressure from pests and diseases compared to open field, but different pressure from pests and diseases. One of those particular challenges is plant-parasitic nematodes, specifically the root knot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.). Plant-parasitic nematodes are estimated to cause 14% crop loss worldwide (Mitkowski and Abawi, 2011). Root knot nematodes (RKN) are the most common and most destructive plant-parasitic nematodes. This genus of nematode is a sedentary endoparasite that invades plant roots and causes root galling. Root knot nematode possess a stylet, as do all plant-parasitic nematodes, which they use pierce the plant cuticle, consume nutrients from the plant cells, as well as inject secretions into the plant (Mitkowski and Abawi, 2011; Figure 2). This impairs root function which causes reduced water and nutrient uptake. The above ground portion of the plant may look wilted or stunted. This is because the galled roots have less ability to absorb water and nutrients from the soil and transport them to the rest of the plant. For growers who are unfamiliar with this plant parasite, they may not think to pull the plant up and observe the root system for galling. Their first assumption may be to irrigate or fertilize more. However, this is likely to have alter the infection rate or the plant's ability to resist RKN.Root knot nematode is also common in open field production. However, growers usually have the option to rotate into other land or fumigate the soil. High tunnel growers are not able to employ either of those management methods. Soil fumigation is not permitted in high tunnel environments in Kentucky. For the purposes of pesticide applications in Kentucky, high tunnels are considered greenhouses and, therefore, all the rules pertaining to greenhouses apply to high tunnels. Even so, soil fumigation is costly and would be difficult for a grower to justify on such a small area of land as what is covered by a high tunnel. Soil fumigation also is a broad spectrum approach which can negatively impact beneficial soil microorganisms (Collins et al., 2006; Gamliel et al., 2000).Meloidogyne incognita has a host range of over 1,700 plant species (Sasser et al., 1983) while M. hapla has a host range of over 550 plant species (UC-Davis Nemabase). Tomato (Lypersicon esculentum) and nearly all other vegetable crops are suitable hosts for both species of RKN making it extremely challenging for high tunnel producers to rotate to a non-host crop. Therefore, the increase in root knot nematode population density is highly probable. Tomatoes are the most high-value vegetable crop grown in high tunnels in Kentucky and the most common high tunnel crop. Growers state that they cannot afford to rotate with a lesser-value crop.Infection of nematodes into plant roots also opens up wounds in the roots that increase the likelihood of infections by soilborne pathogens, such as Verticillium or Phytophthora (Mitkowski and Abawi, 2011). This can be devastating for a tomato crop. Several Kentucky high tunnel growers have observed issues with root knot nematodes. There are nematicides labeled for use on tomatoes. However, they are either extremely costly for growers or are only moderately effective against root knot nematodes. Additionally, nematicides are not an option for certified organic growers or grower who are transitioning to become certified organic. There is a need for other management techniques that are both affordable, effective, and can be used across different types of production systems.
Animal Health Component
70%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
15%
Applied
70%
Developmental
15%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
21614991120100%
Knowledge Area
216 - Integrated Pest Management Systems;

Subject Of Investigation
1499 - Vegetables, general/other;

Field Of Science
1120 - Nematology;
Goals / Objectives
Objective 1: Determine the level of pressure that plant-parasitic nematodes exert on vegetable cropping systems across the state.Hypothesis 1: Plant-parasitic nematodes, specifically root-knot nematodes, will be present in high densities across the state, particularly in sandy soils that has experienced continuous vegetable cropping with little non-host rotation.Objective 2: Evaluate various non-chemical methods for management of soilborne pathogens and nematodes as well as insect pests in both open field and high tunnel systems and compare those methods to viable chemical approaches.Hypothesis 2: The non-chemical methods will be as effective as the chemical methods of management and will be more widely accepted by growers because of the lower cost and the broader potential for use across open fields and high tunnels as well as their applications in conventional and organic production systems.Objective 3: Evaluate the P threshold in vegetable crops and the effects of incremental P application on their development and yield.Hypothesis 3: Excessive applications of P will not show detrimental effects to vegetable crops, but a benefit will not be observed beyond a certain rate. A threshold will be reached where P applications are no longer beneficial to the crop.
Project Methods
In order to thoroughly assess each method, each experiment will be conducted in both high tunnels and open fields. This will expand the utility of these methods to all vegetable growers, regardless of operation scale or system preference. The majority of the trials will be conducted on growers' farms across the state. Nematode identification and quantification will occur in Dr. Rudolph's lab on the main campus in Lexington.Soil and root survey of plant-parasitic nematodesA survey of soil and tomato plants around the state needs to be conducted in order to ascertain the extent of the issue (how many plant-parasitic nematodes are present and where) and identify the most abundant, problematic species in vegetables. Grower education and outreach should also be conducted in order to make growers aware of the existence of plant parasitic nematodes as well as the damage they can have on a vegetable crop. Growers should be educated regarding their management options, including preventative methods. Trainings on tomato grafting should be provided for both growers and extension agents.Soil and plant roots will be sampled from high tunnels across the state. All regions of the state will be represented and sampled. The optimal time for sampling is during the summer or early fall. This is when nematode populations are typically the highest. This will provide the most accurate evaluation of the potential damage plant-parasitic nematodes can cause. Samples will be processed by extracting nematodes from both soil and roots in my lab at UK. The population densities will be determined by quantifying the number of root knot nematodes present per gram of root or per 100 cc of soil (Ayoub, 1980). At least 100 high tunnels will be sampled across the state.Based on the data produced from this state-wide survey, I can assess which regions of the state are at the highest risk and what common factors the areas with the higher plant-parasitic nematode pressure have in common--soil type, soil moisture, cropping history, etc. This will form the information used to educate growers and extension agents in order to prevent the spread of plant-parasitic nematodes from one location to another as well as properly manage those sites that are already dealing with high plant-parasitic nematode populations.Grafting trialsOn-farm trials will be conducted with different high tunnel tomato growers who are currently dealing with root knot nematode issues in their high tunnels. Two growers have already been identified and are willing to participate with the research trials. Different rootstocks will be evaluated using the scion of the growers' choice. Rootstocks will be evaluated based on their resistance to root knot nematode (populations in both plant roots and soil will be evaluated), plant vigor, stem diameter, foliar nutrient analysis, and marketable fruit yield. The population densities will be determined by quantifying the number of root knot nematodes present per gram of root and per 100 cc of soil (Ayoub, 1980). A non-grafted control will be used in all trials for comparison. The results of the high tunnel experiments will be compared for efficacy, likelihood of adoption, and cost.Trials for evaluating other non-chemical methods for managing RKN On-farm trials will be conducted with high tunnel vegetable growers to assess other non-chemical methods for managing RKN. Different vegetable cultivars will be evaluated for their host suitability for RKN. Cultivars will be evaluated in greenhouse host assays with soil that has been inoculated with RKN eggs. Cultivars determined to be non-hosts in the greenhouse host assays will be subjected to on-farm trials with endemic RKN populations.The duration, timing, and soil temperatures reached during soil solarization will also be evaluated for efficacy in managing RKN. Data loggers to collect and record soil temperatures will be placed a 5 and 15 cm soil depth. The application of BSM to high tunnel soil will also be evaluated, including different application rates, timing, and efficacy when combined with grafting and/or solarization. The RKN population density will be monitored and quantified following the treatment applications as well as during the growing season of a vegetable crop, and at the end of the season. The RKN population densities will be determined by quantifying the number of root knot nematodes present per gram of root and per 100 cc of soil (Ayoub, 1980).Soil P threshold trialsGreenhouse studies will be conducted using field soil that is naturally low in P mixed with peat moss that is also naturally low in P. This mixture will allow for proper drainage and aeration in a greenhouse system with plants in pots. Different rates of P will be applied to the soil, starting with 0 lbs/acre and increasing up to 240 lbs/acre. Plants will be treated the same with respect to all other macro and micro nutrients. This experiment will be replicated with different crops and scaled up to field conditions depending on the results of the first greenhouse experiment.

Progress 11/21/19 to 09/30/20

Outputs
Target Audience:Kentucky vegetable growers make up the target audience. Growers were reached by various efforts including presentations at the annual Kentucky Fruit and Vegetable Conference in January 2020, county meetings, farm visits, and on-farm trials. I estimate approximately 50 growers were reached over the course of the year through these efforts. County extension agents were also reached. Agents were also present during the meetings, presentations, and visits. There were also agent-specific trainings throughout the year. These included hands-on workshops and online trainings/webinars as. There were approximately 80 agents reached during this reporting period. There were three growers and two county agents who collaborated on the on-farm trials for this project. They are included in the overall counts above. Changes/Problems:Because of the global pandemic and the concern over COVID-19, travel was reduced which was the reason for less soil surveying across the state. Additionally, a graduate student was prevented from acquiring a visa and therefore was not here to assist with the grafting study. The lack of assistance lead to slower data collection and analysis. Field days and agents trainings were scheduled for 20202, but because of the global pandemic all in-person gatherings were indefinitely postponed. All of this has affected the rate of expenditure. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The results of the experiments have not been disseminated yet. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Soil surveying will continue. The goal is to collect at least one soil sample from each county in the state by the end of the project. There are 120 counties. A second year of the tomato grafting trial will begin in late February 2021. The trials will be conducted in Knox County and Boyle County. Data collection will be similar to the 2019-2020 reporting period. A second year of the spring broccoli plantind date experiment will begin spring 2021. Data collection will be similar to year 1. The year 1 results of both studies will be shared with communities of interest--growers, agents, and fellow horticulturists.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Since the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) was enacted in 1998, many Kentucky growers have turned to vegetable production as an alternative to tobacco. Vegetable crops are considered specialty crops as they are produced by people for food. They are also special in that skilled management and labor are required for their production, harvest, and proper storage. The learning curve has been high for many Kentucky growers as they transitioned from cropping systems that they knew well, such as tobacco or grain crops. However, in the 21 years since the MSA became effective there are many successful vegetable producers across the state. Like the skill level of the growers, the size and scale of the operations vary greatly. All producers, regardless of their skill level or size of operation, struggle with similar issues--pest and pathogen pressure, soil quality, and challenging weather. Regardless of the crop, production systems must continuously evolve in order to stay resilient and sustainable in an ever-changing environment, whether that environment be economic, social, or natural. One tool has been introduced to Kentucky in order to help increase farm resiliency. In 2012, the inception of the High Tunnel System Initiative within the Natural Resource Conservation Service Environmental Quality Incentives Program (NRCS EQIP) took place. High tunnels are passively heated and cooled temporary structures used to extend the growing season for high value specialty crops. They provide protection from the weather and serve as a moderately controlled environment. High tunnels have the potential to provide the grower with the ability to extend the growing season and moderate the environment with respect to precipitation and temperature. This can translate to increased income from increased marketable yields and improved produce quality. However, high tunnel production is nuanced and growers face unique production challenges, including managing soil quality appropriately. A few of the challenges that Kentucky high tunnel growers are beginning to recognize and seek assist with are soil nutrient imbalances, root knot nematode pressure, and dealing with pests and diseases that they often don't encounter in open field production. Objective 1 This objective is still in progress. Several soil samples from across the state have been collected and analyzed for plant-parasitic nematodes. Root knot nematode has been identified and the DNA has been sequenced to confirm the species in five counties in the state. Objective 2 1. Experiments conducted include: two on-farm experiments (in Knox and Metcalfe County) evaluating the use of grafting for root-knot nematode management one experiment at the UK Horticulture Research Farm evaluating different planting dates for management of common pests of spring broccoli 2. Data collected include: root-knot nematode in soil and tomato roots tomato yield tomato plant biomass soil temperature broccoli plant biomass insect pest counts broccoli yield 3. Results and Discussion Knox County tomato grafting experiment Mean yield of non-grafted and grafted tomato plants grown in a high tunnel in Knox County, KY in 2020. Mean yield (lb) Standard error Arnold 319.38 14.10 a Estamino 319.90 8.73 a Maxifort 325.95 7.60 a Shin Geong Chang 266.71 13.26 b Non-grafted control 230.85 12.27 b P < 0.0001 Values within the same column followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05. Mean root-knot nematode (RKN) population densities in soil of non-grafted and grafted plants grown in a high tunnel in Knox County, Kentucky from March to August 2020. Mean RKN/100 g of dry soil March April May June July August Arnold 33 33 14 9 8 7 Estamino 76 26 14 24 4 7 Maxifort 40 36 22 71 67 340 Non-grafted control 41 12 75 356 506 1253 Shin Geong Chang 114 46 44 7 2 4 Mean root-knot nematode (RKN) population densities in roots of non-grafted and grafted plants grown in a high tunnel in Knox County, Kentucky in 2020. Roots were destructively sampled in August 2020. RKN/ g of dry root Std. Error Arnold 128 32 Estamino 288 112 Maxifort 23079 18708 Shin Geong Chang 91 21 Non-grafted control 150451 43286 Tomato yield was significantly higher in three of the grafted tomato treatments which included Primo Red grafted onto Arnold rootstock, Primo Red grafted onto Estamino rootstock, and Primo Red grafted onto Maxifort rootstock. The yield of Primo Red grafted onto Shin Geong Chang was not significantly different from the non-grafted Primo Red. Non-grafted Primo Red were infected with the most RKN eggs. The next closest RKN egg density was 15% of the egg density in the non-grafted control. There were also more RKN in soil surrounding non-grafted roots compared to grafted roots. The RKN population density in soil surrounding non-grafted roots increased throughout the season whereas in soil surrounding grafted roots the RKN population density decreased with the exception of Maxifort. Overall, grafted tomato plants performed better compared to the non-grafted control in the presence of root-knot nematode. Metcalfe County grafting experiment Meann yield of non-grafted and grafted tomato plants grown in a high tunnel in Metcalfe County, KY in 2020. Treatment Marketable yield (lb) Standard Error Arnold 83.83 14.75 b Estamino 128.25 12.60 a Maxifort 105.21 10.40 ab Shin Geong Chang 68.92 9.57 bc P = 0.0003 Values within the same column followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05. Mean root-knot nematode (RKN) population densities in soil of non-grafted and grafted plants grown in a high tunnel in Metcalfe County, Kentucky from April to September 2020. Mean RKN/100 g of dry soil April SE May SE June SE July SE Aug SE Sept SE Arnold 100 35 69 29 58 24a 27 10 129 87a 137 26 Estamino 103 8 17 3 126 61a 42 18 156 82a 314 55 Maxifort 80 27 42 19 667 265ab 208 74 799 246b 1730 833 Shin Geong 65 48 8 2 25 11a 23 13 62 55a 292 199 Chang Non-grafted 78 19 23 8 1596 465b 575 155 1010 103b control Values within the same column followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05. Mean root knot nematode (RKN) population densities in roots of non-grafted and grafted plants grown in a high tunnel in Metcalfe County, Kentucky in 2020. Non-grafted and grafted roots were destructively sampled in August and September 2020, respectively. RKN/ g of dry root Std. Err. Arnold 2223 1199 Estamino 5927 1961 Maxifort 33019 5177 Shin Geong Chang 480 235 Non-grafted control 223704 22334 Although the yield was much less compared to the KNnox County trial, the Metcalfe County trial displayed a similar pattern. Primo Red grafted onto Arnold, Estamino, and Maxifort had the highest yield. Significantly higher compared to Primo grafted onto Shin Geong Chang and non-grafted Primo. Non-grafted Primo had the highest infection of RKN eggs in the roots. It was nearly seven times more eggs than the next greatest population density of eggs which was in Maxifort. Overall, the grafted plants performed better, yielded more and had smaller RKN population densities compared to the non-grafted control. Impact The grower-collaborators in both counties were impressed with the results of the studies. Both growers plan to permanently adopt grafting as part of their vegetable production operation. The data from the broccoli planted data has not yet been analyzed. Objective 3 The experiment included one greenhouse study conducted at the UK Horticulture Research Farm. Data collection included tomato yield, tomato biomass, soil sampling and soil analysis for P and Mn, tomato analysis for P and Mg. Soil and fruit analysis is underway. Data analysis has not yet occurred.

Publications