Source: CLEMSON UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
GERM CELL AND EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT AND MANIPULATION FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF LIVESTOCK
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1020938
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
W-4171
Project Start Date
Oct 1, 2019
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2024
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
CLEMSON,SC 29634
Performing Department
Animal & Veterinary Sciences
Non Technical Summary
Successful reproduction of livestock is critical for the economic livelihood of farmers and affects the consumer cost of meat and other animal products [1]. In vitro-production of embryos is one of many assisted reproductive technologies having a positive impact on cattle production systems. In vitro-production of embryos has several advantages over the recovery of in vivo-derived embryos, but in vitro maturation (IVM), in vitro fertilization (IVF) and in vitro culture (IVC) procedures still have room for improvement. In the cattle system, in vitro production of blastocyst (the embryonic developmental stage that is commonly transferred into a recipient cow to obtain a pregnancy) has plateaued at around 40%; however, the in vivo embryonic development rate is in the range of 85 to 95%. Among the many steps for in vitro embryo production, oocyte cytoplasmic maturation is a critical factor determining the success of subsequent embryo development (oocyte is the ovum or "egg") [2-5]. In this project, we propose to use light stimulation to enhance oocyte cytoplasmic maturation. Based on reports in other cells and tissues [6], the light wavelength, time, and frequency of exposure may have different effects on cells, ranging from null, to stimulating, to detrimental. We will test different light protocols during oocyte maturation, and measure the subsequent changes in blastocyst production. A significant increase in blastocyst production will make the in vitro production system more efficient, reducing costs for cattle producers and their customers. In the process, we will also increase our understanding of the basic physiology of the oocyte, the maturation process and the effects of photostimulation in general.1. USDA/NIFA Animal Reproduction Program home page: https://nifa.usda.gov/program/animal-reproduction2. Farin PW, Slenning BD, Britt JH. Estimates of pregnancy outcomes based on selection of bovine embryos produced in vivo or in vitro. Theriogenology 1999; 52:659-670.3. Pomar FJ, Teerds KJ, Kidson A, Colenbrander B, Tharasanit T, Aguilar B, Roelen BA. Differences in the incidence of apoptosis between in vivo and in vitro produced blastocysts of farm animal species: a comparative study. Theriogenology 2005; 63:2254-2268.4. Rizos D, Clemente M, Bermejo-Alvarez P, de La Fuente J, Lonergan P, Gutierrez-Adan A. Consequences of in vitro culture conditions on embryo development and quality. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 2008; 43 Suppl 4:44-50.5. Rizos D, Fair T, Papadopoulos S, Boland MP, Lonergan P. Developmental, qualitative, and ultrastructural differences between ovine and bovine embryos produced in vivo or in vitro. Molecular Reproduction and Development 2002; 62:320-327.6. Karu, TI, Mitochondrial signaling in mammalian cells activated by red and near-IR radiation. Photochemistry and Photobiology 2008; 84:1091-1099
Animal Health Component
50%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
50%
Applied
50%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
3013999105050%
3053999102050%
Goals / Objectives
Understand the biology of gamete development, fertilization and embryogenesis including the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms. Refine methods to produce animals by genetic engineering or genome editing for the improvement of livestock production efficiency and development of human biomedical models.
Project Methods
Abattoir-derived ovaries will be used. Follicles 2-6 mm in diameter will be aspirated. Oocytes with compact cumulus and homogeneous cytoplasm will be selected; oocytes/well will be placed in in vitro maturation medium (IVM) and incubated at 38.5 ÂșC in 5% CO2 in air with high humidity. Different photostimulation regimes will be used to affect the oocyte metabolic state, aiming to enhance cytoplasmic maturation rates and subsequent embryonic development. Control (no light exposure) and treatment oocytes will be fertilized with different bulls to address sire to sire variability. Standard in vitro embryo production techniques will follow (separation of cumulus cells and in vitro culture for up to 8 days, changing media every 48 h). Each experiment will be repeated 4 to 6 times. Evaluation: Cleavage and blastocyst rates will be compared between control and treatment groups. Possible bull interactions will be included in the statistical analysis.

Progress 10/01/19 to 09/30/20

Outputs
Target Audience:There was an immediate impact on the undergraduate research education of the students involved in the development and execution of the projects. The results reached the scientific community, professionals, and companies involved in bovine in vitro productions systems through the publication of scientific abstracts. Changes/Problems:Problems: A major problem for the current reporting year was the COVID-19 pandemic. We had limited access to the laboratory, there were restrictions on student participation, and access to the slaughterhouse materials were problematic. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Undergraduate students learned laboratory techniques and how to conduct research in an IVF setting. A different group of undergraduate students learned about sheep pregnancy, ultrasonography in general, and Doppler ultrasound in particular. In both cases, the students actively participated in experimental design, data collection, analysis, and preparation of the publications (abstracts). The collaborative nature of the project exposed the students to different research settings and approaches. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The results of our experiments have been published as abstracts and poster presentations. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Goal 1: We will modify the end point of the experiments to increase the probability for detecting aresponse to the photobiomodulation treatment during oocyte maturation and at different points of zygote and embryo development.Metabolic responses related to cellular respirationand mitochondrial activity will be used in conjunction with the standard embryonic development check points (cleavage, 8-cell, morula, and blastocyst development rates). The role of mitochondria in developmental programming will also be studied in a sheep pregnancy model.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? (1) Photobiomodulation of bovine oocytes during in vitro maturation was tested using a defined wavelength and different times of exposure. Photobiomodulation was also tested during in vitro fertilization with untreated vs. modified semen samples. There were no measurable effects of the photobiomodulation protocols on blastocyst rates. After those initial studies, and for most of the year, the IVF laboratory was closed due to COVID-19 restrictions at the University and/or the slaughterhouse. Whenever possible, mitochondria detection and activity techniques were validated using different animal tissues. (2) Considering a long-term goal of understanding the mitochondrial role in fetal programming; a study of placental blood flow and mitochondria activity in pregnant sheep is ongoing.

Publications

  • Type: Other Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Checura CM, Pratt SL, Campbell LV, Farmer K, Loughlin G, Mitchell M, Sanford A, Treske A, Malter H. 197 - The use of photostimulation to enhance oocyte cytoplasmic maturation. Reproduction, Fertility and Development. 2020;32(2):227.
  • Type: Other Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Goldberg M, Mitchell M, Pratt SL, Malter H, Checura CM. The Use of Photostimulation to Improve In Vitro Fertilization. HSC Showcase 2020; Health Sciences Center at Prisma Health; Greenville, SC, USA: 2020; 57.
  • Type: Other Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Checura CM, Atkinson K, Boulos N, Crowfoot E, Friend H, Jackson S, Lubowicki S, Silva C, Walker E. 124 - Utilization of Doppler Ultrasonography for the Study of Fetal Development in Sheep. FOCI meeting; Clemson University; 2020, 55.