Source: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY submitted to NRP
SORBITOL AND RIBITOL BIOSYNTHESIS AND METABOLISM DURING ABIOTIC STRESS IN TOMATO (SOLANUM LYCOPERSICUM L.)
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1020295
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jul 30, 2019
Project End Date
Feb 25, 2021
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY
500 S LIMESTONE 109 KINKEAD HALL
LEXINGTON,KY 40526-0001
Performing Department
Horticulture
Non Technical Summary
Improving crop plant tolerance to abiotic stresses has become all the more urgent in the face of an uncertain future climate due to climate change. Investigation of the novel role of SDH and ribitol metabolism in stress tolerance in crop plant species could provide a new platform upon which to improve abiotic stress tolerance. In addition, elucidating the role of SDH in a putative riboflavin regeneration cycle would add a new dimension to a broader knowledge of plant physiology and biochemistry.
Animal Health Component
(N/A)
Research Effort Categories
Basic
100%
Applied
(N/A)
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
2061460102070%
2031460104030%
Goals / Objectives
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is one of the most important crop species worldwide. Studying the novel role of sorbitol biosynthesis and metabolism in stress tolerance in tomato could have broad application for the rational breeding of stress-resistant varieties of tomato and perhaps other crops. Furthermore, a detailed, coherent picture of the source, metabolism, and fate of ribitol has not been reported for higher plants. We have hypothesized that ribitol conversion to ribulose is critical as the first step in recycling it for regeneration and maintenance of the riboflavin pool during and following drought and salt stress. This project will determine if the ribitol pathway is altered in SDH anti-sense plants of this important agricultural species.
Project Methods
Plant material. Wild-type (WT) tomato and tomato transformed with control vector (CV) and with antisense SDH (TR), kindly provided by Dr. Yoshi Kanayama, Tohoku University, Japan, will be studied. For plants grown in media, each container will contain four sections, each section bearing a single plant, one with a WT plant, one with a CV plant, and two with different TR genotypes. Two TR genotypes with very low to no detectable SDH activity have been identified in preliminary studies of several TR genotypes provided to us. Seeds of each will be germinated in MetroMix 360 (Scotts, Marysville, OH, USA) in the containers, and grown in a greenhouse with natural and supplemental light, or in a growth room under fluorescent and incandescent lighting, with periodic fertilization and pest management treatment as needed. For studies with rooted plants, stem pieces with 2-4 leaves will be excised from stock plants, grown in containers as above, on the same day and rooted in water for up to 14 d, until adventitious roots are abundant.Abiotic stress by withholding water or irrigation with NaCl solution. Plants with 3 to 5 mature leaves will be continuously watered or subjected to drought stress by withholding water, or to salt stress by subirrigation with 50 mM NaCl solution (determined in preliminary studies to elicit stress symptoms such as leaf curling but not plant death), followed by post-watering recovery experiments during which leaf samples will be collected for tissue analyses (see below). The appropriate time intervals for the stress and post-watering recovery will be determined in preliminary studies. Leaf tissues will be collected from 3 containers per sampling day (for example at 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16, if water is withheld for 14 days), from each group of plants within a container, and from each treatment group (control, stress). The tissues will be immediately frozen in liquid N2 and stored at -80 °C until analyzed. Each experiment will be performed at least twice.Drought stress using PEG. Three replicate rooted cuttings of each genotype, WT, CV, and TR plants, will be grown in the growth room for 5 d in water or in 25 mM PEG 6000 solutions (-0.15 mPa) in 50 mL tubes, chosen through preliminary studies which allows stress to develop slowly with no injury evident. These plants and controls will be sampled after 5 d. Leaves from each replicate plant will be collected, immediately frozen in liquid N2, and stored at -80? for analysis. The experiment will be performed at least twice.Tissue analysesTissue polyol content. For measurement of sorbitol and ribitol content, frozen leaf tissues will be extracted, and extracts prepared for analysis by gas chromatography using an internal standard (Wu et al., 2010). Quantitative values will be derived from peak areas relative to the 2-deoxy-D-glucose internal standard, and tissue concentrations will calculated.Tissue reactive oxygen species and flavin content. The effect of stress on leaf content of reactive oxygen species, including H2O2, ascorbic acid, and glutathione will also be measured (Deng and Dong, 2013; Galli et al, 2009; Ouyang et al., 2010). Leaf tissues will be analyzed for riboflavin, lumichrome, FAD, and FMN content by HPLC methods we have recently developed and tested, modified from Deng et al. (2011).SDH activity assays. The SDH enzyme will be assayed as described by Nosarzewski et al. (2004). The enzyme activity will be followed by the reduction of NAD+ at 340 nm, and calculated as nmol NADH per mg protein per min. AR activity assays. AR will extracted from frozen tissue by the method of Tari et al. (2010). The enzyme activity will be followed by the oxidation of NADPH at 340 nm, and calculated as nmol NADPH per mg protein per min..S6PDH activity assays. S6PDH will be assayed by the method of Negm and Loescher (1981). The enzyme activity will be followed by the oxidation of NADPH at 340 nm, and calculated as nmol NADPH per mg protein per min.RT-PCR analysis of SDH and S6PDH expression To determine the expression of SDH and S6PDH genes, procedures based on Nosarzewski et al. (2012) will be used. Sequences of primer pairs will be developed from the genes for each identified in the tomato genome database along with a primer for a control gene.Western analysesSDH and S6PDH protein in tomato leaves will detected using SDH and S6PDH purified antibody according to the protocol described in Nosarzewski et al. (2004). SDH antibody is our own, and S6PDH antibody is a gift from Dr. Yoshinori Kanayama, Tohoku University, Japan.

Progress 07/30/19 to 02/25/21

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audience is fellow scientists. Changes/Problems:Project ended earlier than expected due to the retirement of the PD. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Result have been shared through publication of a peer reviewed journal article. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? We found that during inducedndrought and salt stress in Solanum lycopersicum L., the level of sorbitol accumulation was considerably lower than that of the common sugars glucose and fructose so was notenough to have a significant impact on tissue osmotic potential but could provide other important osmoprotective effects. Aldose 6 phosphate reductase (A6PR), characterized for the first time in this work, and aldose reductase (AR) both exhibitedincreased activity correlated with sorbitol accumulation during the stress treatments, with SDH also increasing in wild type(WT) and control vector line TR22 to metabolize sorbitol, reducing the content to control levels within 3 d after re-watering. The results highlighted a role for both A6PR and AR in biosynthesis of sorbitol in tomato where the high activity of both enzymes was associated with sorbitol accumulation. This information will hlep inform future improvement of stress tolerance in tomato.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2021 Citation: Almaghamsi, Afaf; ; Nosarzewski, Marta; ; Kanayama, Yoshinori; ; Archbold, Douglas D. 2021. Effects of abiotic stresses on sorbitol biosynthesis and metabolism in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY. 48(3):286-297. doi: 10.1071/FP20065


Progress 10/01/19 to 09/30/20

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audience for this work is fellow scientists. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Results have been presernted primarily through punlication of a peer-reviewed journal article. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Polyols such as sorbitol and ribitol are a class of compatible solutes in plants that may play roles intolerance to abiotic stresses. We investigated the effects of water stress on sorbitol biosynthesis and metabolism and sorbitol and ribitol accumulation in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Water stress induced by withholding water and by using polyethylene glycol as a root incubation solution to mimic water stress, and NaCl stress were applied to wild-type (WT) and three genetically-modified lines of tomato (cv. Ailsa Craig), a control vector line TR22, and 2 sorbitol dehydrogenase (sdh) antisense lines TR45 and TR49. Sorbitol and ribitol content, as well as the enzymatic activities, protein accumulation, and gene expression patterns of the key sorbitol cycle enzymes aldose-6-phosphate reductase (A6PR), aldose reductase (AR), and sorbitol dehydrogenase (SDH), were measured in mature leaves. In response to the stresses, both sorbitol and ribitol accumulated in leaf tissue, most significantly in the sdh antisense lines. A6PR, characterised for the first time in this work, and AR both exhibited increased enzymatic activity correlated with sorbitol accumulation during the stress treatments, with SDH also increasing in WT and TR22 to metabolise sorbitol, reducing the content to control levels within 3 days after re-watering. In the sdh antisense lines, the lack of significant SDH activity resulted in the increased sorbitol and ribitol content above WT levels. The results highlighted a role for both A6PR and AR in biosynthesis of sorbitol in tomato where the high activity of both enzymes was associated with sorbitol accumulation. Although both A6PR and AR are aldo-keto reductases and use NADPH as a co-factor, the AR-specific inhibitor sorbinil inhibited AR only indicating that they are different enzymes. The determination that sorbitol, and perhaps ribitol as well, plays a role in abiotic responses in tomato provides a cornerstone for future studies examining how they impact tomato tolerance to abiotic stresses, and if their alteration could improve stress tolerance.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Awaiting Publication Year Published: 2021 Citation: Almaghamsi, Afaf; ; Nosarzewski, Marta; ; Kanayama, Yoshinori; ; Archbold, Douglas D. 2021. Effects of abiotic stresses on sorbitol biosynthesis and metabolism in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY


Progress 07/30/19 to 09/30/19

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audience for this work is fellow scientists. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?A PhD student completed her degree working on the project. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Follow up studies on effectof polyols on drought and salt stress in tomato.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? The level of sorbitol accumulation was considerably lower than that of the common sugars glucose and fructose so was not enough to have a significant impact on tissue osmotic potential but could provide other important osmoprotective effects. Aldose 6 phosphate reductase (A6PR), characterized for the first time in this work, and aldose reductase (AR) both exhibited increased activity correlated with sorbitol accumulation during the stress treatments, with SDH also increasing in wild type (WT) and control vector line TR22 to metabolize sorbitol, reducing the content to control levels within 3 d after re-watering. In the sdh anti-sense lines, the lack of significant SDH activity resulted in increased sorbitol and ribitol content above WT levels. The results highlighted a role for both A6PR and AR in biosynthesis of sorbitol in tomato where the high activity of both enzymes was associated with sorbitol accumulation. A6PR activity increased in response to incubation with sorbitol and ribitol but AR activity increased only in response to ribitol. Although both A6PR and AR are aldo-keto reductases and use the same co-factor, the AR-specific inhibitor sorbinil inhibited AR only indicating that they are different enzymes. In addition, unique post-abiotic stress phenotypes were observed in the sdh anti-sense lines, failing to fully recover after drought and salt stress. The determination that sorbitol, and perhaps ribitol as well, plays a role in abiotic responses in tomato provides a cornerstone for future studies examining how they impact tomato tolerance to abiotic stresses, and if their alteration could improve stress tolerance.

Publications