Source: UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS submitted to NRP
LOCALIZING ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE GOVERNANCE
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1020155
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Oct 1, 2019
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2024
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS
410 MRAK HALL
DAVIS,CA 95616-8671
Performing Department
Human Ecology
Non Technical Summary
This project supports the mission of the Agricultural Experiment Station by addressing the Hatch Act area(s) of: rural and community development.This project will study the implementation of two new California state policies related to environmental justice. Environmental justice refers to efforts to address the inequitable distribution of environmental and health burdens as well as access to positive amenities in disadvantaged communities (primarily local income communities and communities of color). It also seeks to increase the access and impact of these communities on the policy and planning decisions that affect their lives. Assembly Bill 617 establishes a process to conduct community-scale air monitoring and to develop plans to reduce air pollution emissions in disadvantaged and highly-polluted areas. Senate Bill 1000 requires cities and counties to produce elements of their General Plans (the documents that guide the long-term development related to transportation, land use, housing, environmental resources and other issues) that focus on environmental justice. Both policies emphasize the value of public participation and engagement, By studying the successes, challenges, lessons learned, and ideas for improvement for the implementation of these policies, the project intends to assist key stakeholders (state legislature and agencies; local governments and planners; community organizations) to collaborate on developing strategies to help these policies achieve their goals of improved health and well-being of typically over-burdened, under-served, and under-represented people and places.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
6086050305033%
8036099306033%
8056050308034%
Goals / Objectives
1. Generate new academic knowledge in the field of environmental justice studies about the potential and perils of California's turn towards localized environmental justice governance;2. Inform local, regional, and state agencies and governments about the factors that influence success in achieving environmental justice goals through local governance.3. Inform the activities of environmental justice social movement organizations to engage effectively in local governance.
Project Methods
Develop a research design for studying the implementation of SB 1000 and AB 617, with a focus on how these new policies have shifted relationships between key actors (environmental justice social movement organization; state, regional and local agencies and governments; and the business sector.The design will include the following.1. Two online surveys (in Qualtrics) to be administered to all stakeholders involved in the implementation of AB 617 and SB 1000 (one for each policy). Stakeholders will include environmental justice advocates; representatives from local, regional, and state agencies and governments; and business leaders.The AB 617 survey has been piloted in the current contract with CARB and will be adapted for use in a longitudinal application. The survey includes questions about participants assessments about the impacts of the policy on dynamics of conflict and collaboration between key stakeholder groups; incorporation of local knowledge into the air quality monitoring and emissions reduction strategy development; and ultimately, the effectiveness of addressing air pollution issues in the most disadvantaged communities. The AB 617 survey will be administered to the steering committees for the10 community air monitoring/ emissions reduction strategy communities (including residents, community advocacy organizations, and businesses), a statewide consultation group, regional air district representatives, CARB staff, and other interested parties.The SB 1000 survey will include questions about the community engagement process of developing the environmental justice elements, the perceived quality of the elements themselves in addressing community concerns, and the impacts on the relationships between different levels of governance systems. The SB 1000 survey will be administered to environmental justice advocates working at the statewide and local scales, residents involved in the planning process; local government officials and planners, and other civic leaders.The surveys will be analyzed through Qualtrics, identifying key themes and the variation in perceptions by population, place and affiliation.2. Two semi-structured key informant interview protocols (one for each policy) to gather in-depth information about the participants' perceptions of the above issues. The survey instrument for AB 617 has been piloted and covers open-ended versions of the question topics in the survey section above. A new protocol will be developed for SB 1000 to cover the categories of questions described in the survey section. The interviews tape recorded, transcribe and analyzed using the NVivo qualitative content analysis package. Each of the two policies will be studied through approximately 30 interviews each.

Progress 10/01/19 to 09/30/20

Outputs
Target Audience:In this period I have reached the following audiences: In February 2020 organized a one-day convening of 75 leaders from across the state involved in the implementation of California's Community Air Protection policy AB 617. Participants included community residents, policy advocacy organizations and regulatory leaders. In March 2020, I presented in a webinar to 10 members of the California Air Resources Board, who administer AB 617. In May 2020 I presented to the AB 617 Consultation Group, a committee of approximately 25 community leaders, industry leaders (including agriculture), and regulatory leaders from across the state about my evaluation report on AB 617. I have met regularly with two of the leaders of the California Air Resources Board (CARB) who are responsible for administering the policy to provide guidance on how to integrate the findings of my evaluation of AB 617. Changes/Problems:My ability to conduct field research (interviews, participant observation) in Fresno and Shafter has been greatly curtailed. While I have been able to collect information from Zoom meetings, this has not been an adequate substitute for direct field study. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?I provided training and professional development for two graduate students and one undergraduate student in field research, qualitative and quantitative data analysis, and report writing. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?My report on AB 617 has been disseminated through: the California Air Resources Board website, the one-day convening at UC Davis, through the 13 Community Steering Committees throughout the state, and through the Center for Regional Change's social media. It was also cited in a recent article in The Nation magazine: https://www.thenation.com/article/environment/ab617-environment-california-epa/ What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?I will be pursuing continued field work on my study on AB 617 implementation in the San Joaquin Valley. This will include participant observation (on zoom through the fall and then in person) of key meetings, interviews with expert stakeholders, and document analysis. This will also involve collaboration with my colleagues in the Central California Environmental Justice Network and UC Merced through the Robert Woods Johnson fellowship. I will also organize three on-line convenings of stakeholders involved in Ab 617 implementation in the summer of 2021. We project approximately 150-200 participants in each. Towards the end of the reporting project, I will launch my study of SB 1000: Environmental Justice and City and County General Plan Development. This will involve a survey of jurisdictions across the state development new General Plans with an EJ component.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? In this period I completed the production of my comprehensive evaluation of community engagement in the implementation of AB 617 and helped inform the future development of this innovative state policy to focus regulatory attention on the most disadvantaged communities in the state. I helped highlight the issues of health and environmental justice in the implementation of this policy and to foreground the voices of community residents and organizations in the process. As noted above, I launched an extension of my AES project with one campus-based and one extramural grant. This has allowed me to hire a graduate student to begin field work on the study of Ab 617 implementation in the San Joaquin Valley. This has mainly focused on attending a range of agency meeting in on-line forums including CARB board meetings; meetings of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District; and meetings of Community Steering Committees in Fresno and Shafter. The Shafter site has had a significant agricultural connection through piloting a pesticide application notification system and one on the regulation of certain pesticides near homes and schools. This will help in the development of sustainable agriculture in the San Joaquin Valley and beyond.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Other Year Published: 2021 Citation: London. Jonathan et al. Lessons Learned from California's Community Air Protection Policy (In Preparation) Journal of Environmental Justice
  • Type: Other Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: London, Jonathan et al., 2020. Community Engagement In AB 617: An Evaluation Of Challenges. Successes. Lessons Learned And Recommendations For The Future