Source: NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV submitted to NRP
IMPROVING LAGOON SLUDGE MANAGEMENT IN LAGOON-SPRAYFIELD SWINE PRODUCTION FACILITIES
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1019789
Grant No.
2019-68008-29894
Cumulative Award Amt.
$299,803.00
Proposal No.
2018-09129
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jul 1, 2019
Project End Date
Jun 30, 2024
Grant Year
2019
Program Code
[A1701]- Critical Agricultural Research and Extension: CARE
Recipient Organization
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV
(N/A)
RALEIGH,NC 27695
Performing Department
Biological And Agricultural En
Non Technical Summary
Swine production systems in North Carolina rely on anaerobic lagoons for manure treatment andstorage. Over time, lagoon solids (sludge)accumulation exceeds design criteria which reduces the lagoonfunction, increases malodorous emissions, and reduces the lagoon storage capacity to withstandextreme storm events. Traditional sludge removal and utilization approaches are botheconomically prohibitive to small and medium-size swine operations and environmentallychallenging due to the limited agricultural land and the elevated phosphorus and heavy metalcontent in sludge. Most of N.C. swine lagoons are over 20 years old with sludge buildup thatrequires removal and utilization. There is a critical need for sludge removal, processing andutilization approaches that are sustainable environmentally and economically.The proposed project will address the current sludge-related challenge through (1) characterizinganaerobic swine lagoon sludge composition and physical characteristics, (2) evaluating farm-scalesludge removal techniques and assessing how the removal technique changes sludgecharacteristics, (3) assessing the performance of thermal gasification and composting asconversion technology options for sludge and sludge-biomass blends, (4) characterizingcomposted and gasified sludge products as agronomic and soil additives, (5) comparing economicand environmental performance of sludge removal and conversion and utilization strategies, and(6) developing extension and outreach programming that integrates the data, results and findingsinto recommendations and resources to support sustainable sludge management.
Animal Health Component
70%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
10%
Applied
70%
Developmental
20%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
4033599202090%
1020199200010%
Goals / Objectives
This goal will be addressed through pursuing the following objectives:1. Quantify the effects of swine farm type, lagoon age, and size on the variability ofchemical and physical composition of swine lagoon sludge.2. Quantify the effects of sludge removal method on composition of removed lagoonsludge.3. Compare passive and active sludge dewatering methods from technical and economicperspectives.4. Evaluate the viability of thermochemical conversionas a sludge mineraland metal concentration method.5. Estimate the effects of sludge water content, blended biomass additive, and air flowratio on composition and yield of thermochemical conversion products, i.e., biochar/ash and flue gas,and the overall process economic and environmental performance.6. Evaluating composting as a viable sludge conversion technologies under different conditions and using different carbon-rich amendments.7. Characterizing products from lagoon sludge conversion and screening potentialutilization routes according to products physical, chemical and agronomic properties.8. Compare different sludge removal and utilization strategies (pathways) from technical,environmental and economic perspectives.
Project Methods
Methods:Lagoon sludge characterization:A lagoon surveying and sampling campaign will be conducted to quantify/characterize lagoon sludge and determine the role of farm on the composition of the lagoon sludge. The campaign will sample 20 different swine farms to capture variability in (a) farm types (Nursery, Feeder-Finisher, Sow), (b) on-farm manure handling system (e.g., pull-plug, flush system), and (c) sludge depth. Continuous sludge core samples (4 foot long) will be collected using a custom developed sampler. Depth-segmented samples will beanalyzed to determine elemental composition, energy content to assessthe role of sampling depth on the characteristics ofsludge and compared to the core sludge sample. Statistical Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) will be used to determine whether farm type, lagoon age, and sludge depth has an impact on sludge composition/characteristics.Sludge removal:A prototype sludge dredge will be developed and assessed in terms of power requirement, operating flow-rates and solids content allowable. This dredge will be operated on 3 different farms to remove accumulated sludge until it achieves steady operation. Recovered sludge will be sampled at different time points and the samples will be analyzed to assess performance of sludge over time and characteristics of recovered sludge compared to the core samples analyzed earlier. Statistical analysis will be utilized to assess the impact of time of operation, and type of lagoon on recovered sludge composition.Sludge dewatering:Two different sludge-dewatering systems will be assessed to determine system consumption, material throughput and characteristics/composition. A mass balance will be developed around each dewatering unit operation to quantify the fate of minerals and metals and the influence of the dewatering system on the composition and characteristics of dewatered sludge.Sludge composting:Three composting trials will be conducted utilizing different carbon amendment: [1] Bermudagrass, [2] penut hulls and [3] wood shavings. Samples will collected at the start and every 4 days. Compost temperature and weight will be monitored continuously and recorded and will be utilized to assess the change of material density and mass during the process. Data collected will be utilized to assess mass and energy balance as well as emissions associated with the composting process.Sludge Gasification: Different sludge-based products will be gasified in a pilot-scale, continuous-feed gasification unit to assess the performance of different sludge-based products as gasification feedstock.Dewatered sludge alone or blended with carbon sources (grasses, peanut hulls and poultry litter) will be evaluated as potential feedstock for gasification system. Temperature and energy consumption will be collected during tests. Flue gas composition and flow rate will be analyzed to quantify gas emissions. Samples will be collected from each feedstock and the resulting ash fraction and analyzed to determine mineral and metal concentrations, carbon content, pH, COD and EC. Power consumption by motors will be monitored. After terminating each gasification trial,unconverted feedstock, char and ash inside the gasification chamber will be collected and weighted to conduct a complete mass balance.Sludge processing products characterization & comparisonSludge products generated after removal, dewatering and conversion will be compared in terms of nutrient content profile, heavy metal content, and pH. Agronomic recommendations for nutrients and metal application rate for different crops, grasses and vegetables will be assessed to estimate most suitable use for the sludge-based products. Furthermore, potential blend ratios of different sludge-based products alone or with addition of synthetic chemical fertilizers will be evaluated.Comparative assessment of utilization pathwaysThe following anaerobic lagoon sludge processing pathways will be evaluated:1. Sludge removal > dewatering> mixing w/ biomass>composting2. Sludge removal> dewatering> mixing w/biomass>àgasification3. Sludge removal> dewatering> gasification4. Sludge removal> extrusion>gasification5. Sludge agitation and mixing> hauling and land application6. Sludge removal>dewatering geotextile bags>gasificationA comparison basis of a unit mass (kg) of sludge solids (100% TS) at the lagoon bottom will beused to evaluate the changes during removal from the lagoon, coagulation and geotextile filtration,blending with other biomasses and conversion through thermochemical or biological processes.Economic Assessment: Capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operating expenditures (OPEX) involved in each pathway will be compiled using (1) quotes and estimates from equipment providers and manufacturers, (2) Renting rates for equipment and machinery, (3) current gas and propane prices, and (4) estimates of labor compensation estimates in Eastern North Carolina. Technical reports andengineering process modeling tools will be utilized to develop a process model and evaluate the technical and economic performance of each pathway. The net present value (NPV) of the investment associated with each processing pathway will be utilized as the economic assessment approach. EnvironmentalAssessment:The environmental performance of the listed sludge processing pathways will be evaluated usingthe life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology.In this project,global warming potential (GWP), eutrophication, resource depletion, human toxicity, non-renewable energy use will be assessed for the listed pathways. These impact categories were selected tocapture the key dimensions of impact associated with sludge management andutilization.Efforts: Activities outlined in the methods section above will be incorporated into formal and informal education programs through laboratory and field research methodologies for undergraduate and graduate students in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (CALS) and the College of Natural Resources (CNR) at NC State University to provide hands-on experience related to data collection and process monitoring.The findings of these methods, i.e., data and recorded videos/photoswill be used to develop research deliverables (peer-reviewed publications and conference proceedings, and meeting presentations/posters) as well as outreach training and experiential learning opportunities. These opportunities will include:Field days where producers and various stakeholders will be invited to observe testing/operation of different processing and conversion technologies.Workshops where the data and insights will be leveraged for design training exercises to demonstrate impacts of adopting these technologies.Factsheets and webpages that host raw data with relevant metadata as well as summaries of results and findings.Evaluation: Project evaluation tools will leveraged to assess progress and ensure intended goals are met. These evaluations will include:Feedback from formulated advisory board regarding deliverables measured against (1) intended outcomes, and (2) timeline announced for the project.Input will be solicited from research experts during professional meetings and events and used to inform methodology and gauge impacts and help steer efforts to increase impacts.Surveys will be provided to trainees and field-day attendees to gauge knowledge increases.Feedback forms will be provided on the project webpage to enlist feedback from visitors regarding utility of information/knowledge provided and opportunities to increase impacts.

Progress 07/01/19 to 06/30/24

Outputs
Target Audience:This projecttargetedswine producers and crop growers in the state of North Carolina (NC) and states with similar swine production systems that rely on lagoons for manure treatment and storage. In addition, we targeted extension agents and technical service providers (manure haulers, consultants, etc.) and any personsassisting swine producers in planning and executing lagoon maintenance tasks including sludge removal and cleanout. Other audiences we engaged through the project report include: regulatory and producer assistance programs, i.e., NC Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and NC Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (NCDA&CS), as well as swine integrators and entities responsible for making diet decisions for swine producers.The project activities engaged topic experts on manure management in other land-grant institutions and federal research centers (USDA NRCS and USDA ARS)in the southeastern region of the US, and across the country. Changes/Problems:The awarded project included a specific goal targeting the investigation of thermochemical conversion of sludge as a pathway of inquiry. However, in the course of executing earlier project steps we identified key challenges to this goal. The main barrier is the physical and chemical properties of sludge, as observed through the sampling and characterization steps. Sludge was found to contain high ash content (>40% on a dry-weight basis), as well as low calorific (energy) value, ranging from 9 to 11 MJ per kg dried sludge. This is equivalent to 55% of the energy density of wood. Combined with this observation is the high water content in the recovered sludge, typically between 92% to 80%, which require additional drying. Expending energy to dry the sludge, or otherwise resources to blend it with dry feedstocks such as wood shavings or grasses, will not contribute to the overall value of the blend and will add additional steps to the proposed management that reduce likelihood of economic adoption. Additionally, the presence of high ash content is associated with operational problems in thermochemical conversion reactors (pyrolyzers and gasifiers) due to the formation of glass-like residue that can interrupt feeding and operations. Due to these complications, the exploration of sludge conversion through thermochemical conversion was not further pursued. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?A series of training events (classroom presentations and activities, field tours and demonstrations) were conducted throughout the life of the project to share knowledge and information gathered in the course of the project. Annual training events conducted in key swine production counties, i.e., Duplin, Sampson, Bladen, and Wayne between 2019 and 2023 featured annual project updates to report to the audience of technical specialists and producers findings from the project. Audiences for these training events range from 25 to 100 attendees, in addition to state-wide Zoom trainings recorded for producers unable to attend in person. Several demonstrations and field tours were conducted for technical specialists and extension agents to provide high technical detail information and collect questions and concerns regarding technology uptake and producer key needs. Webinar series, LPELC (https://lpelc.org/webinar-series/) was used as delivery mechanism to share findings and updates on the project with the broad audiences of the learning community to share discoveries and solicit insights/recommendations. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?As a result of the project activities and disseminationof our findings, the community of NC swine producers have accepted the use of non-conventional methods for sludge removal and land application, notably the excavation of sludge for further processing and sale. More than one entity in NC has developed the concept of sludge drying for distribution as a finished product, including Smithfield Foods and Phinite. These implementations have incorporated the concept of centralization to streamline the drying and remove the burden of oversight and management from the animal producers. Department of envionmental quality (DEQ) in NC started permitting the construction of sludge drying beds on-farm. The NC State General Assembly has approved a $4,000,000 program titled, "Livestock Waste Management: Innovative Fertilizer Production" that particularly lists "turning generated sludge in on-farm lagoons into fertilizer products, intermediaries, and soil additives". The lead PI on this project served as the subject matter expert (SME) in evaluating and scoring proposed technologies/projects. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Through the activities of this project, the following was accomplished: Variability of chemical and physical characteristcs of swine lagoon sludge across farms was captured through a sampling campaign. Through sampling and analyses conducted, a consistent profile of nutrients in the lagoons was discovered showing low volatile solids (VS) in the recovered solids, around 50% of the recovered solids. These findings highlight the effective operations of anaerobic lagoons in NC, particularly in reducing the biological oxygen demand (BOD) in the fresh manure through anaerobic microbial activities. Concentrations and ranges of nutrients were captured in factsheets developed and published by the research team. The effects of sludge removal method on composition of removed lagoon sludge was quantified Through a series of sampling and sludge removal activities that the project team has participated in, we captured data representing sludge properties as well as process parameters. Sludge removal through [1] slurrying and pumping, [2] vacuum removal, [3] dredging, and [4] excavation have been observed with data collected to capture rates, composition, and cost of the process. The team developed a techno-economic assessment (TEA) model to compare the most competitive techniques, i.e.,slurrying and pumping, andexcavation to showcase to compare these technologies. Evaluating composting as a viable sludge conversion technologies under different conditions and using different carbon-rich amendments Composting of lagoon sludge was investigated using various locally available carbon sources, including bermuda hay, poultry litter, and tree clearing waste. We studied the inclusion of different rates of sludge into composting to assess inclusion rate impacts on process performance and finished compost quality. Results point to a good quality compost product for both inclusion rates evaluated, 10% and 20% by weight. Fate and transformation of manure carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) was captured through the process and reported to facilitate conducting a LCA assessment of the process. The findings are documented in peer-reviewed project publication and the student dissertation. Characterizing products from lagoon sludge conversion and screening potential In this task, we compare the chemical and physical properties of slurried sludge to composted sludge as well as dried sludge to evaluate cost of transport, application, and recommended rates to avoid overapplication of nutrients. Compare different sludge removal and utilization strategies (pathways) from technical, environmental and economic perspectives. A life-cycle assessment (LCA) and technoeconomic assessment (TEA) of different sludge utilization pathways were compared. The analysis showed the management of sludge as slurry to be the most economic approach where cropping acreage are readily available to producers (within 1 mile from the farm). In situations where acreages are not readily accessible and require a transportation of few miles, alternative sludge management approaches become more economically attractive, particularly sludge excavation. In scenarios reflective of NC context, the excavation and drying of sludge proved to be the most economic for managing sludge nutrients. Thermochemical conversion of sludge and sludge-based products proved to be a challenging and an non-ideal practice. This is primarily due toits high ash content (>40% on a dry-weight basis), limited energy content in the sludge (11 MJ/kg dried sludge), and the energy required to dry the sludge to acceptable conversion levels, often exceeding the sludge energy content.

Publications

  • Type: Theses/Dissertations Status: Published Year Published: 2023 Citation: Patil, P. S. (2023). Evaluation of Valorization Pathways for Swine Lagoon Sludge Management. North Carolina State University.
  • Type: Peer Reviewed Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2023 Citation: Patil, P., Sharara, M., Shah, S., Kulesza, S., & Classen, J. (2023). Impacts of utilizing swine lagoon sludge as a composting ingredient. Journal of Environmental Management, 327, 116840.
  • Type: Peer Reviewed Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2025 Citation: Simulation Model For Swine Lagoon Sludge Drying in Solar-assisted Greenhouse Systems. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 104057.


Progress 07/01/22 to 06/30/23

Outputs
Target Audience:This project targeted swine producers and crop growers in the state of North Carolina (NC) and states with similar swine production systems that rely on lagoons for manure treatment and storage. In addition, we targeted extension agents and technical service providers (manure haulers, consultants, etc.) and any persons assisting swine producers in planning and executing lagoon maintenance tasks including sludge removal and cleanout. Other audiences we engaged through the project report include: regulatory and producer assistance programs, i.e., NC Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and NC Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (NCDA&CS), as well as swine integrators and entities responsible for making diet decisions for swine producers. The project activities engaged topic experts on manure management in other land-grant institutions and federal research centers (USDA NRCS and USDA ARS) in the southeastern region of the US, and across the country. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?• Annual training events conducted in key swine production counties, i.e., Duplin, Sampson, Bladen, and Wayne in 2021, 2022, and 2023featured annual project updates to report to the audience of technical specialists and producers findings from the project. Audiences for these training events range from 25 to 100 attendees, in addition to state-wide Zoom trainings recorded for producers unable to attend in person. • Demonstrationsand field tours were conducted for technical specialists and extension agents to provide high technical detail information and collect questions and concerns regarding technology uptake and producer key needs. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?• Annual training eventsconducted in key swine production counties, i.e., Duplin, Sampson, Bladen, and Wayne in 2021, 2022, and 2023featured annual project updates to report to the audience of technical specialists and producers findings from the project. Audiences for these training events range from 25 to 100 attendees, in addition to state-wide Zoom trainings recorded for producers unable to attend in person. • Demonstrationsand field tourswere conducted for technical specialists and extension agents to provide high technical detail information and collect questions and concerns regarding technology uptake and producer key needs. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?The following goals are targetted for the coming reporting period 7. Characterizing products from lagoon sludge conversion and screening potential utilization routes according to products physical, chemical and agronomic properties. 8. Compare different sludge removal and utilization strategies (pathways) from technical, environmental and economic perspectives. ?

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? • Evaluating composting as a viable sludge conversion technologies under different conditions and using different carbon-rich amendments o Composting of lagoon sludge was investigated using various locally available carbon sources, including bermuda hay, poultry litter, and tree clearing waste. We studied the inclusion of different rates of sludge into composting to assess inclusion rate impacts on process performance and finished compost quality. Results point to a good quality compost product for both inclusion rates evaluated, 10% and 20% by weight. Fate and transformation of manure carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) was captured through the process and reported to facilitate conducting a LCA assessment of the process. The findings are documented in peer-reviewed project publication and the student dissertation. • Characterizing products from lagoon sludge conversion and screening potential o In this task, we compare the chemical and physical properties of slurried sludge to composted sludge as well as dried sludge to evaluate cost of transport, application, and recommended rates to avoid overapplication of nutrients. ?

Publications

  • Type: Peer Reviewed Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2022 Citation: Patil, P. S., & Sharara, M. A. (2022). Impacts of sonication on biomethane potential (BMP) and degradation kinetics of pig lagoon sludge. Biosystems Engineering, 223, 129-137.


Progress 07/01/21 to 06/30/22

Outputs
Target Audience:During this reporting period, our project activities targeted (1) extension agents and staff with responsibilities involving animal manure management on-farm, (2) technical consultants and 3rd party service providers who assist NC swine producers in developing nutrient management plans and schedule lagoon operations, (3) Technical staff affiliated with swine integrators in NC (e.g., Smithfield Foods, Prestage) supporting company farms, and (4) NRCS state-level conservation teams working to assist swine producers in managing and closing swine lagoons. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? A research presentation was delivered at the international meeting for the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE) in 2022 (Houston, Texas). The presentation highlighted project findings and collected feedback regarding scaling up of the process andutilization avenues for end-product (compost). How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Routineannual training events for operators in charge (OIC) responsible for managing swine farms in NC are held in various counties. These events were leveraged for training opportunities to provide producers with data and information regarding the opportunity to use composting to manage lagoon sludge. Data regarding recipe, feedstock properties, temperatures and product yield were shared. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?In the nextreporting period, we will evaluate the gasification process performance for dewatered lagoon sludge solids, and conduct a technoeconomic and life cycle assessment study to compare conventional sludge management strategy (agitation and hauling to fields) with alternative management approaches, including: Excavation of lagoon sludge solids to move high-solid product for land application, Composting of lagoon sludge solids to create a stable, nutrient-balanced product, Drying lagoon sludge solids to create a nutrient-dense product for land application, and Gasification of lagoon sludge solids to condense manure nutrients.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? This goal will be addressed through pursuing the following objectives: 1. Quantify the effects of swine farm type, lagoon age, and size on the variability of chemical and physical composition of swine lagoon sludge. 2. Quantify the effects of sludge removal method on composition of removed lagoon sludge. 3. Compare passive and active sludge dewatering methods from technical and economic perspectives. 6. Evaluating composting as a viable sludge conversion technologies under different conditions and using different carbon-rich amendments. 7. Characterizing products from lagoon sludge conversion and screening potential utilization routes according to products physical, chemical and agronomic properties.

Publications

  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2022 Citation: Patil, P. S., & Sharara, M. A. (2022). Impacts of Swine Lagoon Sludge Inclusion rate on the Composting Process and Compost Quality. In 2022 ASABE Annual International Meeting (p. 1). American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Accepted Year Published: 2022 Citation: Patil, P. S., & Sharara, M. A. (2022). Impacts of sonication on biomethane potential (BMP) and degradation kinetics of pig lagoon sludge. Biosystems Engineering, 223, 129-137.


Progress 07/01/20 to 06/30/21

Outputs
Target Audience:During this reporting period, our project activities targeted (1) extension agents and staff working to support producers and consultants, (2) technical consultants and 3rd party service providers who help NC swine producers develop nutrient management plans and schedule lagoon operations, (3) Technical staff affiliated with swine integrators in NC (Smithfield Foods, Prestage) supporting company farms (4) NRCS (National Manure team) and state-level conservation team working to assist swine producers in managing and closing swine lagoons. Changes/Problems:COVID-19 delays caused signficant delays to project milestones due to disrupted lab operations and inability to carry out research activities during long periods in adherence with University, state, and county guidances. These delays require an extension to the project duration to accomplish committed tasks. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?A series of state training events were conducted as part of existing credit hour requirement for operators in-charge (OIC), as well as dedicated events for technical specialists, Eastern North Carolina Technical Assistant Group (ENCTAG), to demonstrate researchedtechnologies and findings. These training events were held quarterly to showcasedata collection, demonstrations of sludge removal/decanting technologies along with sludge composting. In addition, tours to a commercial facility already carrying out sludge composting was coordinated to increase technology awareness to identify key reserach needs by such facilities. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Findings have been dessiminated through training and seminars to stakeholders, as well as posts on web portal to communicate these activities to non-scientific audiences working in this space. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?During the following reporting period, we are planning to: Complete sludge composting trials and report yields, compost quality, as well as GHG emissions associated with the process, Evaluate thermochemical conversion of sludge on commercial-scale gasifier to report yields, product qualities, and net energy ratio (NER). Compare different sludge removal and utilization strategies (pathways) from technical, environmental and economic perspectives.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? The following objectives have been accomplished: 1. Quantification ofeffects of swine farm type, lagoon age, and size on the variability of chemical and physical composition of swine lagoon sludge. 2. Quantification of effects of sludge removal method on composition of removed lagoon sludge. 3. Evaluating passive and active sludge dewatering methods from technical and economic perspectives. 4. Evaluate the viability of thermochemical conversionas a sludge mineral and metal concentration method.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Owusu-Twum, M. Y., & Sharara, M. A. (2020). Sludge management in anaerobic swine lagoons: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 271, 110949.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Patil, P. S., & Sharara, M. A. (2020). Evaluating anaerobic digestion kinetics for swine manure using BMP assay tests. In 2020 ASABE Annual International Virtual Meeting (p. 1). American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2021 Citation: Patil, P. S., & Sharara, M. A. (2021). Investigation of the Impact of Sonication on organic matter solubilization and Biomethane potential (BMP) of swine lagoon sludge. In 2021 ASABE Annual International Virtual Meeting (p. 1). American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.


Progress 07/01/19 to 06/30/20

Outputs
Target Audience:Our sludge-focusedproject is currently in data collection stage (sampling) andearly outreach phase. The project activities, progress and activities have been shared through various outreach events. We made contact with the following following stakeholder groups: (a) extension agents and specialist with livestock production duities assisting producers across N.C., (b) extension agents and specialists with no-livestock production duities who are primarily focused on crop and pasture prodction, (c) Individual producers and contract growers who licensed to operate and run livestock facilities (d) consultants and advisors used by producers for sludge-related survices, including dredging, hauling and land-application (e) Integrators and production supervisors who oversee a large number of swine operations and are responsible for scheduling lagoon maintenance and sludge removal. (f) Technology developers and supporting-industry participants attending training and selling additives and products to help producers improve waste management systems. Changes/Problems:Disruption due to COVID-19 closures has significantly slowed down field and sampling activities which pushed our time-line back. Sludge drying is a critical/under-studied aspect of swine manure management, particularly in nutrient-dense and humid regions such as North Carolina. Accordingly, the research scope of this project will benefit greatly from including an assessment of the drying process and its potential to facilitatetransport and processing of sludge, beyond gasificaiton and composting, towards organo-mineral fertilizer/soil conditioner products. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided??[a] Four (4) training sessions, each 1 hour plus Q&A after the event, on sludge management topics were conducted: Two (2) were part of N.C. Pork Council Conferences ((1) Northeast N.C. Annual Meeting, and (2) N.C. State-wide Annual Meeting), while the other Two (2) were part of N.C. Annual Extension Conference and regular training sessions. [b] A workshop/field-day (3-hours) was conducted in Raleigh, N.C. (November 2019) to specialists on sludge drying technology challenges and opportunities. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The results have been shared through in-person training meetings with extension ain key production counties: Sampson Co, and Duplin Co. The findings are currently being compiled into peer-reviewed factsheets and manuscripts to dissemenate results as they arebeing generated. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Complete sampling activities Conduct composting and gasificaiton testing activities Post results and media content to online portal and publicize it in training/outreach activities

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Goals (1) is almostcompleted after most of the lagoon sampling has been carried out with preliminary data analysis is underway. Four types of swine oeprations (Grow-Finish, Farrow-wean, Nursery, and Sow) will be sampled and compared. Goal (2) is being accomplished by comparing records of removed sludge and method of removal, against our first-hand sampling data to assess impacts of removal on composition of removed sludge.

Publications

  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Submitted Year Published: 2019 Citation: Sharara, M. 2019. Challenges and Opportunities in Swine Lagoon Sludge Management. (Presentation). 2019 Annual International Meeting (AIM) of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. July 7-10, 2019, Boston, MA.
  • Type: Other Status: Awaiting Publication Year Published: 2020 Citation: Sharara, M., Owusu-tuwum, M., Sludge Sampling in Anaerobic Treatment Swine Lagoons,(Number pending), NC Extension Publication Factsheet.