Source: KANSAS STATE UNIV submitted to NRP
DISEASE PHENOTYPING: DETERMINING THE REACTION OF WHEAT LINES TO DISEASES
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1019633
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Oct 1, 2019
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2024
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
KANSAS STATE UNIV
(N/A)
MANHATTAN,KS 66506
Performing Department
Plant Pathology
Non Technical Summary
Diseases have traditionally been a major limiting factor in the production of wheat in Kansas. Estimated losses from all wheatdiseases averaged about 16% from 1976 through 1988. Using the average farm value for wheat for the past 5 years ($2billion/year), a 16% loss would be equivalent to about 320 million dollars each year.Planting resistant varieties is arguably the best control method for plant diseases. Such a practice is relatively inexpensiveand "environmentally friendly." Annual savings to wheat producers in Kansas from planting resistant varieties has beenreported in the past to be about $58 million but now surpasses $100 million. Itis important to continue to developresistant cultivars to maintain and improve on this success story. A main component of this development is expertise providedby wheat pathologists to phenotype wheat lines. That is the main goal of the research outlined in this project.The wheat breeder is the focal point of the effort to produce new varieties; however, many other professionals alsocontribute. Wheat pathologists are members of that group because part of the selection process is determining the reaction ofthose breeding lines to important diseases (disease phenotyping). This can help the breeders eliminate susceptible lines fromthe population and advance resistant ones. Data produced by the experiments described here will help breeders develop wheatvarieties with improved resistance to important diseases.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
2121540116050%
2161540116050%
Goals / Objectives
Determine the reaction of wheat breeding lines and commercial wheat cultivars to various diseases.Report results to breeders/geneticists (breeding lines) to allow them to make selections and advance resistant lines.Report cultivar disease reactions to Kansas wheat producers using the KSU Extension publications Kansas Performance Tests with Winter Wheat Varieties and Wheat Variety Disease and Insect Ratings.
Project Methods
Procedures:Field evaluation nurseries. Field disease evaluation nurseries for barley yellow dwarf, wheat streak mosaic, and Fusarium head blight will be established each year. Resistance to these diseases is a current priority for the Kansas wheat breeding effort. If evaluations for other diseases are desired, they will also be established. Each disease has its own unique requirements to obtain a good evaluation nursery and only a summary is provided here. In general, procedures involve planting numerous breeding lines and check varieties (varieties with established reactions to the pathogen under investigation) in research plots. At the appropriate time, nurseries are inoculated with the desired pathogen and a conducive environment (e.g. mist irrigation) to ensure the development of an epidemic. The lines are visually evaluated for reaction to the disease multiple times, statistical analyses performed on the resulting data, and results given to the breeders and extension specialists. Major cooperators who are directly associated with the project include Drs. Erick De Wolf (Extension wheat pathologist and epidemiologist) Allan Fritz (wheat breeder), Guorong Zhang (wheat breeder), Guihua Bai (USDA geneticist, Manhattan), and Bernd Friebe (wheat geneticist).Evaluations in the greenhouse. Numerous breeding lines and cultivars can be evaluated in the greenhouse during the fall, winter, and spring. Diseases of interest, and for which there are appropriate greenhouse evaluation protocols, include Fusarium head blight, 1 take-all root rot, 2 tan spot, 3 Fusarium crown and root rot4, pythium root rot, 5 Wheat streak mosaic virus, 6 and Triticum mosaic virus 7. Again, each disease has its own unique requirements to obtain accurate disease phenotyping and only brief summaries are provided here. For Fusarium head blight, plants are grown to the heading stage, the central spikelet on each head is inoculated with spores of the fungus, heads are covered with a plastic bag for 48 hours to maintain high humidity, and the disease is evaluated 14 days after inoculation. For take-all root rot, Fusarium crown and root rot, and pythium root rot, inoculum is sown with the seed and the fresh weights of lines or cultivars measured after four weeks of growth. Wheat viruses are inoculated at the three leaf stage with a mixture of virus-infected plant sap and a wounding agent. Plants are evaluated 14-21 days later. For the foliar diseases, seedlings at the three-leaf stage are inoculated with spores of the fungus, plants placed in a mist chamber to provide suitable leaf wetness for spore germination and infection, and the amount of disease evaluated after a suitable incubation period. Data from greenhouse experiments will be shared with project cooperators as described above.

Progress 10/01/19 to 09/30/20

Outputs
Target Audience: Wheat breeders/geneticists in the hard winter wheat region; public breeders include those at KSU, UNL, SDSU, MSU, CSU, U of T, OSU, and NDSU; private breeders include those at BASF,Limagrain, AgriPro, Bayer, and Westbred. Geneticists include Dr. Friebe, Dr. Gill, and Dr. Bai who are housed in Throckmorton Hall on the KSU campus. Dr. Anderson-Onofre and Dr. DeWolfuses these data to annually update two popular extension publications that are available to wheat producers as a "hard copy" or online. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?In 2020, due to COVID-19, only one undergraduate student worked on this project. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Each year, the KSU Cooperative Extension Service publishes two important publications that contain information relative to the reaction of commercial wheat varieties to disease. These are popular with producers and are titled Kansas Performance Tests with Winter Wheat Varieties (Lingenfelser et al., 2013) and Wheat Variety Disease and Insect Ratings (De Wolf et al., 2013). Both are also available over the internet. They contain ratings on a 1 (resistant)-to-9 (susceptible) scale for about 30 or 60 commercial cultivars, respectively, to 12 different diseases. Part of the mission of the Wheat Pathology Lab is to constantly evaluate commercial wheat varieties for reaction to diseases. As information is gathered, the above publications are updated and wheat producers can get the best available data. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Field disease evaluation nurseries for barley yellow dwarf, Wheat streak mosaic,Fusarium head blight, Common bunt, and tan spot will be established each year. These are some of the diseases currently occupying a main focus of the Kansas wheat breeding effort. If evaluations for other diseases are desired, they will also be established. Experimental designs for field experiments are usually randomized complete block with 4-5 replications. Each disease has its own unique requirements to obtain a good evaluation nursery and only a brief summary will be provided here. In general, procedures involve planting numerous breeding lines in appropriate- sized plots that are to be inoculated. In some experiments, adjacent plots are also planted and maintained disease free. At the appropriate time, nurseries are inoculated with the desired pathogen and a conducive environment (e.g. mist irrigation) provided to ensure the development of an epidemic. At the proper growth stage, the lines are visually evaluated for reaction to the disease, statistical analyses performed, and data given to the breeders and extension specialists. Statistical analyses usually include analysis of variance followed by entry mean separation using Fisher's Protected Least Significant Difference (P=0.05). For reporting to wheat producers, phenotypic values are transformed to a 1-to-9 scale where 1 is highly resistant and 9 is highly susceptible. Transformations are made using linear regression with equations obtained from certain "check" cultivars that are included in the experiments. Major cooperators who are directly associated with the project include Drs. Allan Fritz (wheat breeder), Guorong Zhang (wheat breeder), Guihua Bai (USDA geneticist, Manhattan), Bernd Friebe (wheat geneticist), Bikram Gill (wheat geneticist), and Erick De Wolf (wheat extension pathologist). In addition to field nurseries, numerous breeding lines and cultivars can be evaluated in greenhouse experiments during the fall, winter, and spring. Experimental designs are usually randomized complete block with 4-20 replications. Diseases of particular interest, and for which there are accurate greenhouse evaluation techniques, include Fusarium head blight, take-all, tan spot, Stagonospora leaf blotch, and Septoria leaf blotch. Each disease has its own unique requirements to obtain accurate disease phenotypes and only brief summaries are provided here. For Fusarium head blight, plants are grown to the heading stage, the tenth spikelet from the bottom of each head is inoculated with spores of the fungus, heads covered with a "zip-lock"plastic bag for 48 hours to maintain high humidity, and disease evaluated 14 days after inoculation. For take-all root rot, inoculum is sown with the seed and the fresh weights of plants measured after growth for four weeks. For the remaining three diseases, seedlings at the three-leaf stage are inoculated with spores of the fungus, plants placed in a mist chamber to provide suitable leaf wetness for infection, and the amount of disease evaluated after an appropriate incubation period. Statistical analyses of data are as described above. Data from greenhouse experiments will be shared with breeders and extension personnel (mentioned above).

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Reports are given to breeders/geneticists that contain the phenotypic data. Data are uploaded to online databases (e.g. T3). Data are published in various journals (especially Plant Disease Management Reports). Results are disseminated to Kansas wheat producers through the KSU Extension publications Kansas Performance Tests with Winter Wheat Varieties and Wheat Variety Disease and Insect Ratings.

Publications

  • Type: Other Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: 1. Ranabhat, N., Bruce, M., Davis, M., and Rupp, J.L., (2020) Reaction of selected Kansas winter wheat cultivars to Barley yellow dwarf, 2019. Plant Disease Management Report (PDMR), 14:CF088. (1, 2, 6). 2. Mangel, D., Bruce, M., Davis, M., and Rupp, J.L., (2020) Evaluation of foliar fungicides for control of tan spot of spring wheat, 2019. Plant Disease Management Report (PDMR), 14:CF089 (1, 2, 6). 3. Mangel, D., Bruce, M., Davis, M., and Rupp, J.L., (2020) Reaction of Kansas Intrastate Nursery winter wheat accessions to Fusarium head blight, 2019. Plant Disease Management Report (PDMR). 14:CF090. (1, 2, 6). 4. Ranabhat, N., Bruce, M., Davis, M., and Rupp, J.L., (2020) Reaction of Kansas and Nebraska winter wheat accessions to Fusarium head blight (FHB), 2019. Plant Disease Management Report (PDMR), 14:CF091. (1, 2, 6). 5. Lingenfelser, J., De Wolf, E. D., Fritz, A., Knapp, M., Lollato, R., Andersen Onofre, K., Whitworth, J., Adee, E., Dooley, S., Esser, A., Kimball, J., Larson, M., Stensaas, D., Keith, T., Dylan, W. Haag, L., Mengarelli, L, Sassenrath, G., Schlegel, A., Zhang, G., Knopf, J., Bohnert, C. August 2020. 2020 Kansas Performance Tests with Winter Wheat Varieties: Report of Progress 1128. SRP 1158. 6. Hollandbeck, G. F. Andersen Onofre, K. A., DeWolf, E., Todd, T. 2020. Kansas cooperative plant disease survey report: preliminary 2020 Kansas wheat disease loss estimates. Agriculture.ks.gov 7. Andersen Onofre, K. and De Wolf, E. D. 2020. Foliar fungicide efficacy ratings for wheat disease management 2020. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. Pub No. EP-130. 8. Andersen Onofre, K., De Wolf, E. D., Lollato, R. and Whitworth, J. R. 2020. Wheat Variety Disease and Insect Ratings 2020. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. Pub No. MF991. 9. Andersen Onofre, K., De Wolf, E. D. Seed treatment fungicides for wheat disease management 2020. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. Pub No. MF2955.