Source: PH MATTER, LLC submitted to NRP
BIOMORPHIC SILICON ANODES FOR HIGH CAPACITY BATTERIES
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1019440
Grant No.
2019-33610-29776
Cumulative Award Amt.
$106,500.00
Proposal No.
2019-00739
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Aug 15, 2019
Project End Date
Oct 14, 2020
Grant Year
2020
Program Code
[8.8]- Biofuels and Biobased Products
Recipient Organization
PH MATTER, LLC
6655 SINGLETREE DR.
COLUMBUS,OH 432291120
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
In this SBIR project, pH Matter will utilize micro-algae as a feed-stock to produce a valuable engineering material for lithium ion batteries. This material could beused in a number of applications, but has recently found application in next-generation lithium ion battery (LIB) electrodes. Current battery materials suffer from low energy storage capacity and novel materials with high energy storage capacity are needed to enable wide-spread adoption of batteries for EVs and grid-energy storage.pH Matter, is developing a scalable and low-cost composite biomorphic silicon anode from micro-algae that can enable higher energy Lithium Ion Batteries (LIBs). The total market for LIBs was $25billion dollars in 2017and anticipated to grow to $69billion in 2022. The novel bio-based product "biomorphic silicon" would result in an improved low-cost LIB that could be potentially used as an energy storage system for renewable energy. The proposal would demonstrate the feasibility of using an existing aqua-cultural bio-based product (micro-algae) as a precursor to more valuable energy storage materials. This energy storage market for aqua-culture diatom suppliers could be as high as $5.46 billion.Develpment of this new agricultural supply chain will result in significant increase in jobs and strengthen the U.S. technology portfolio, while ushering energy independence.
Animal Health Component
50%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
50%
Developmental
50%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
13537992020100%
Goals / Objectives
?The major goals for this project are as follows:Demonstrate a cost effective process for converting micro-algae to active battery materials.Demonstrate a process to stabilize the battery materials in the electrochemical cell format.Demonstrate improvements in the battery cyclability of micro-algae precursors.Demonstrate a full cell energy density greater than 350 Wh/kg based on the full cell components at 50 cycles.
Project Methods
Methods include light manufacturing and conversion of bio-materials to high performance engineered materials.Measurement of bio-materials physical and chemical properties.Evaluate the electro-chemical peformance of the bio-derived materials compared to standard industrial materials.

Progress 08/15/19 to 10/14/20

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audience will be battery researchers and battery materials customers that are seeking newhigh capacity durable anode material for lithium ion batteries. The initial target markets for the battery materialsare military, aerospace and consumer automotive. Suppliers of micro-algae may also be interested in the potential energy storage markets for their bio-materials. Changes/Problems:A no-cost extension was requested in early 2020 in order to have more time to collect full cell data and mitigate issues with lab-closures due to COVID. Equipment issues resulted in impedance analysis of full cells to not be carried. However, standard half cell and full cell voltage cycling and discharge capacity evaluation was carried out. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?pH Matter was able to hire chemical engineering interns from Ohio State University that served in a engineering technician role on the project. The interns learned methods for preparing battery materials and test procedures to measure battery performance. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Scientists from pH Matter planto attend battery conferences in the near future to share the project details, however, due to COVID restrictions conference attendance has been delayed. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?pH Matterplans to prepare a Phase II SBIR proposal in order to further improve the biomorphic silicon battery performance.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Superior silicon (Si) based battery anodes enable better Li-ion batteries (LIBS), less liable to fail, longer lasting, and with higher specific energy. Standard chemical synthesis methods for nano Si cannot create the best battery Si anode today., We have shown that algae, with our proprietary process, creates more durable and higher specific energy Si anode materials for LIBS. With our Phase I SBIR funding, pH Matter (PHM ) developed a process that converts the uniform nano structure of micro-algae (diatoms) into highly stable porous Si and demonstrated improved battery cycle life compared to commercial nano Si used in LIB anodes. Our research proves natural materials can be used for better LIB materials synthesis. Nature, has developed materials that can be of great utility for human needs. The ability of biological organisms to self-assemble intricate three-dimensional structures in large volumes to provide a uniform product enables agriculture to deliver materials of great value to LIB manufacturers. Recent materials research in nano-technology has proven nature to be the ideal model for materials synthesis. With the advantage of time, nature through the process of evolution, has been the most successful laboratory to have ever existed. The ability of biological organisms to self-assemble intricate three-dimensional structures in large volumes provides a blue print for materials scientist to harness for future methods of commercial nano-assembly. Diatoms, a 3-dimensional natural silica biomaterial generated from single cell algae with unique nano and micro-morphologies and patterns has been shown to have several exceptional structural, mechanical, optical, and chemical properties optimized through millions of years of evolution. PHM demonstrated in our Phase I SBIR that 3-dimensional natural silica biomaterial from single cell algae with unique nano and micro morphologies and structures have significant advantages over Si produced from expensive and dangerous chemical precursors such as silane, a colorless, flammable, poisonous gas that can explode in air. Si is used in semiconductors, solar PV, and other applications and is being used in next-generation LIB anodes. Today standard commercial Si suffers from severe degradation during LIB charge and discharge cycles so major improvements are needed in the Si morphology (shape) and micro-structure (size) to develop better anode materials. Our trade-secret biomorphic shape-preserving reactions convert uniform nano-porous diatom silica structures into optimum shape, size and porosity for improved Si anode cyclability versus conventional chemical synthesis of Si particles. The intricate nanostructures that micro-algae possess cannot be economically replicated using synthetic chemical production methods that are the industry standard today. Industrial processes to create nano structured Si are expensive ($1,000's/kg) , use toxic chemicals such as hydrofluoric acid (HF) to chemically etch porous structures, or use silane to grow structures from catalysts, and can be expensive and difficult to scale up to high volume manufacturing. Commercial adoption of electric vehicles is limited in part by the low specific energy of today's LIBs. Achieving better battery performance targets requires significant improvement in major LIB cell components, including the anode. PHM's new biomimetic (mimicking nature) approach could achieve desired power and energy goals, by exceeding today's conventional Si materials limits and improving Si anode lifetime, cycle fade, charge/ discharge rate, and efficiency. Million mile Li-ion batteries being developed by Tesla, GM, and Chinese vendors focus mainly on cathode improvements to extend battery lifetimes. Their strategies include limiting use of Ni and Co in the cathode, expensive elements which reduce battery cycle life. Improvements in cathode stability and reduction in expensive Ni and Co usage, combined with PHM's focus on high specific energy Si anodes, will result in lower cost LIBS for E-transport including air, land, and sea platforms as well as micro-grid and main grid. Figure 1 shows the value of our bio--ag based innovation versus expensive and toxic based nano-Si technology. Our Phase I SBIR results show less than 27% decline in battery capacity over 50 charge discharge cycles versus 90% for commercial nano Si. PHM's advanced bio-morphic Si anode materials enables us to develop commercial Si anodes with Phase II funding that will be price competitive with graphite anodes on an energy basis ($15/kWh). Some of the key goals of the project were the following: The major goals for this project are as follows: • Demonstrate a cost effective process for converting micro-algae to active battery materials. • Demonstrate a process to stabilize the battery materials in the electrochemical cell format. • Demonstrate improvements in the battery cyclability of micro-algae precursors. • Demonstrate a full cell energy density greater than 350 Wh/kg based on the full cell components at 50 cycles. The following list of Phase I objectives were demonstrated during the project: PHM was able to demonstrate the economic conversion of commercial bio-silica diatom frustules while retaining porosity of the final silicon product. pH Matter developed methods to remove/clean the organic lipids of the micro-algae to produce a high purity silica frustule that was then converted to phase pure silicon which was confirmed by x-ray diffraction techniques. PHM used a moderate temperature metallurgical reaction to obtain the final biomorphic silicon product. PHM demonstrated a process to uniformly carbon coat the silicon obtained from bio-morphic conversion. This carbon coating was found to further improve silicon cycle life. PHM developed the capability to carbon coat the biomorphic silicon using low-cost gas phase carbon in continuous rotary reactors. PHM demonstrated improvements in the cyclability in the battery anodes produced from the bio-morphic silicon in both half-cell and full cell measurements when compared to commercial grade nano-silicon. These cells were prepared in a high energy density format (>350 Wh/kg). With certain species of micro-algae, the cycle life was improved by a factor of 5X.

Publications


    Progress 08/15/19 to 08/14/20

    Outputs
    Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems:So far all milestones have been met up to month 6. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We plan to validate performance in a half-cell and full cell format.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? The specific technical objectives for Phase I are the following: Demonstrate the magnesiothermic conversion of bio-silica diatom frustules while retaining porosity. *Achieved Porosity enhancements demonstrated after magnesiothermic reduction. Demonstrate a process to carbon coat the silicon obtained from bio-morphic conversion. *Achieved pH Matter has demonstrated process for carbon coating biomimetic silicon with uniform surface coverage and measured conductivity enhancements. Demonstrate improvements in the cyclability in half-cell and full cell measurements of the diatomic silicon versus commercial grade nano-silicon. Demonstrate a full cell energy density greater than 350 Wh/kg based on the full cell components at 50 cycles. Specific technical questions answered during the first 4 months of research to demonstrate feasibility of the approach are: What is the best commercially-available diatom frustule structure to use? Two micro-algae mono-cultures (Thalassiorsira weissflogii (TW) and Thalassiorsira pseudonane (TP)) have been purified (Figure 1 and 2) and converted from silica to silicon using a modified magnesiothermic reduction reaction (described below). Preliminary testing suggests that the TP frustule is more active for lithiation. What are the optimum chemical conditions (time/temperature/acid concentration) to fully digest the organic/lipid matter in the diatom/micro-algae frustule? The as-received diatoms (micro-algae) were separated from the aqueous media by filtration, after filtration a solution (hypo-chlorite) was used to remove organic lipids from silica frustules by washing for 24 hours and subsequent centrifugation. This resulted in a pure frustule with no remnant organics. What are the optimum process conditions necessary to fully convert the bio-silica to phase pure silicon while maintaining morphology (porosity) and phase purity? 3 different magnesium reduction methodologies were evaluated to reduce the silica frustule to phase pure silicon.Ultimately, one method (Gen-3) was down-selected that resulted in the highest phase purity (determined by x-ray diffraction). ? Are salt additives needed to mitigate the heat generated from the exothermic magnesiothermic reduction reaction and improve the morphology pore preservation of the original diatom? Salt additives were found to not be necessary for any of the reduction runs.The down-selected process (Gen-3) described above is less exothermic (does not require salt heat quenchers) than the Gen-1 and 2 procedures and as a result is a result is anticipated to be a more scale-able process. Is attrition milling necessary to reduce the particle size of the diatomic silicon to ensure uniform anode electrode coatings? Attrition milling is currently being evaluated and results are anticipated in the next couple of weeks Does diatomic silicon result in improved capacity and cyclability versus nano-silicon in half cell and full cell testing? Half-cells of diatomic silicon have been prepared and are currently being tested, biomorphic TP silicon produced in the Gen-3 reaction has similar capacity to commercial silicon. What is the best carbon coating precursor (gas or liquid) phase to adequately cover the nano and micro-pores of the diatomic silicon? Gas phase (ethylene pyrolysis) was selected due to uniformity of carbon surface coverage What is the cost of the diatom conversion process at scale versus synthetic silica conversion? An economic evaluation of the process at scale will be conducted before the Phase II proposal submission.

    Publications


      Progress 07/01/19 to 06/30/20

      Outputs
      Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems:So far all milestones have been met up to month 6. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We plan to validate performance in a half-cell and full cell format.

      Impacts
      What was accomplished under these goals? The specific technical objectives for Phase I are the following: Demonstrate the magnesiothermic conversion of bio-silica diatom frustules while retaining porosity. *Achieved Porosity enhancements demonstrated after magnesiothermic reduction. Demonstrate a process to carbon coat the silicon obtained from bio-morphic conversion. *Achieved pH Matter has demonstrated process for carbon coating biomimetic silicon with uniform surface coverage and measured conductivity enhancements. Demonstrate improvements in the cyclability in half-cell and full cell measurements of the diatomic silicon versus commercial grade nano-silicon. Demonstrate a full cell energy density greater than 350 Wh/kg based on the full cell components at 50 cycles. Specific technical questions answered during the first 4 months of research to demonstrate feasibility of the approach are: What is the best commercially-available diatom frustule structure to use? Two micro-algae mono-cultures (Thalassiorsira weissflogii (TW) and Thalassiorsira pseudonane (TP)) have been purified (Figure 1 and 2) and converted from silica to silicon using a modified magnesiothermic reduction reaction (described below). Preliminary testing suggests that the TP frustule is more active for lithiation. What are the optimum chemical conditions (time/temperature/acid concentration) to fully digest the organic/lipid matter in the diatom/micro-algae frustule? The as-received diatoms (micro-algae) were separated from the aqueous media by filtration, after filtration a solution (hypo-chlorite) was used to remove organic lipids from silica frustules by washing for 24 hours and subsequent centrifugation. This resulted in a pure frustule with no remnant organics. What are the optimum process conditions necessary to fully convert the bio-silica to phase pure silicon while maintaining morphology (porosity) and phase purity? 3 different magnesium reduction methodologies were evaluated to reduce the silica frustule to phase pure silicon.Ultimately, one method (Gen-3) was down-selected that resulted in the highest phase purity (determined by x-ray diffraction). ? Are salt additives needed to mitigate the heat generated from the exothermic magnesiothermic reduction reaction and improve the morphology pore preservation of the original diatom? Salt additives were found to not be necessary for any of the reduction runs.The down-selected process (Gen-3) described above is less exothermic (does not require salt heat quenchers) than the Gen-1 and 2 procedures and as a result is a result is anticipated to be a more scale-able process. Is attrition milling necessary to reduce the particle size of the diatomic silicon to ensure uniform anode electrode coatings? Attrition milling is currently being evaluated and results are anticipated in the next couple of weeks Does diatomic silicon result in improved capacity and cyclability versus nano-silicon in half cell and full cell testing? Half-cells of diatomic silicon have been prepared and are currently being tested, biomorphic TP silicon produced in the Gen-3 reaction has similar capacity to commercial silicon. What is the best carbon coating precursor (gas or liquid) phase to adequately cover the nano and micro-pores of the diatomic silicon? Gas phase (ethylene pyrolysis) was selected due to uniformity of carbon surface coverage What is the cost of the diatom conversion process at scale versus synthetic silica conversion? An economic evaluation of the process at scale will be conducted before the Phase II proposal submission.

      Publications


        Progress 07/01/19 to 04/14/20

        Outputs
        Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems:So far all milestones have been met up to month 6. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We plan to validate performance in a half-cell and full cell format.

        Impacts
        What was accomplished under these goals? The specific technical objectives for Phase I are the following: Demonstrate the magnesiothermic conversion of bio-silica diatom frustules while retaining porosity. *Achieved Porosity enhancements demonstrated after magnesiothermic reduction. Demonstrate a process to carbon coat the silicon obtained from bio-morphic conversion. *Achieved pH Matter has demonstrated process for carbon coating biomimetic silicon with uniform surface coverage and measured conductivity enhancements. Demonstrate improvements in the cyclability in half-cell and full cell measurements of the diatomic silicon versus commercial grade nano-silicon. Demonstrate a full cell energy density greater than 350 Wh/kg based on the full cell components at 50 cycles. Specific technical questions answered during the first 4 months of research to demonstrate feasibility of the approach are: What is the best commercially-available diatom frustule structure to use? Two micro-algae mono-cultures (Thalassiorsira weissflogii (TW) and Thalassiorsira pseudonane (TP)) have been purified (Figure 1 and 2) and converted from silica to silicon using a modified magnesiothermic reduction reaction (described below). Preliminary testing suggests that the TP frustule is more active for lithiation. What are the optimum chemical conditions (time/temperature/acid concentration) to fully digest the organic/lipid matter in the diatom/micro-algae frustule? The as-received diatoms (micro-algae) were separated from the aqueous media by filtration, after filtration a solution (hypo-chlorite) was used to remove organic lipids from silica frustules by washing for 24 hours and subsequent centrifugation. This resulted in a pure frustule with no remnant organics. What are the optimum process conditions necessary to fully convert the bio-silica to phase pure silicon while maintaining morphology (porosity) and phase purity? 3 different magnesium reduction methodologies were evaluated to reduce the silica frustule to phase pure silicon.Ultimately, one method (Gen-3) was down-selected that resulted in the highest phase purity (determined by x-ray diffraction). ? Are salt additives needed to mitigate the heat generated from the exothermic magnesiothermic reduction reaction and improve the morphology pore preservation of the original diatom? Salt additives were found to not be necessary for any of the reduction runs.The down-selected process (Gen-3) described above is less exothermic (does not require salt heat quenchers) than the Gen-1 and 2 procedures and as a result is a result is anticipated to be a more scale-able process. Is attrition milling necessary to reduce the particle size of the diatomic silicon to ensure uniform anode electrode coatings? Attrition milling is currently being evaluated and results are anticipated in the next couple of weeks Does diatomic silicon result in improved capacity and cyclability versus nano-silicon in half cell and full cell testing? Half-cells of diatomic silicon have been prepared and are currently being tested, biomorphic TP silicon produced in the Gen-3 reaction has similar capacity to commercial silicon. What is the best carbon coating precursor (gas or liquid) phase to adequately cover the nano and micro-pores of the diatomic silicon? Gas phase (ethylene pyrolysis) was selected due to uniformity of carbon surface coverage What is the cost of the diatom conversion process at scale versus synthetic silica conversion? An economic evaluation of the process at scale will be conducted before the Phase II proposal submission.

        Publications