Source: KWJ ENGINEERING INC. submitted to
ULTRALOW POWER SENSORS FOR FIREFIGHTER SAFETEY AND MONITORING OF SURROUNDING AIR QUALITY
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1019432
Grant No.
2019-33610-29747
Cumulative Award Amt.
$100,000.00
Proposal No.
2019-00681
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jul 1, 2019
Project End Date
Feb 29, 2020
Grant Year
2019
Program Code
[8.1]- Forests & Related Resources
Recipient Organization
KWJ ENGINEERING INC.
8430 CENTRAL AVE STE C
NEWARK,CA 945603457
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
Wild fires produce significant air pollution, posing health risks to first responders, residents in nearby areas, and downwind communities. Wildfires are increasing in size and intensity, and the fire season is growing longer. Technologies for measuring air pollutants, including particulates, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, and carbon dioxide, over the wide range of levels expected in areas downwind of wildland fires are needed.KWJ proposes to integrate printed gas sensors and particle sensor into a single, <8oz package with the dimensions <4"x5"x1" (10x12.5x2.5cm). In Phase I, we propose using a prototype 7-gas board we have developed in collaboration with Intel, and integrate with Alphasense's VOC and OPC-R1 PM sensor, which is the current state-of-the-art in miniature, optical particle detection. We plan to design a package which can be deployed in a variety of ways: worn by personnel, attached to "javelins" which can be located and relocated around the perimeter by shoving into the ground, on vehicles, and - with the rapid advancement in small UAV capabilities and range - deployed around the fire perimeter on drones. In Phase II we plan to build and test an electrostatic PM sensor, which will measure particles down to 5nm, and use far less power than the optical sensors.Very small, light-weight, unobtrusive monitoring systems will broaden the conditions under which exposure studies can be performed and will remove the need for awkward, bulky or inconvenient sampling/collection devices and batteries. This system will expand the scope of air quality monitoring and provide increased capability to produce personalized data from mobile individuals, thus improving the ability of agencies to map pollutant levels, protect human health and well being relative to environmental inhalation hazards.The ultrafine particle sensor developed during Phase II of this project will complement KWJ's new class of amperometric gas sensor, the screen-printed electrochemical sensor (SPEC), deliver high performance sensing for a wide range of applications at commodity-level prices. This new, cost-competitive, high performance electrostatic ultrafine particle technology will bridge the cost-performance gap for particulate measurement applications, just as the printed amperometric sensor has done for gaseous monitoring.
Animal Health Component
33%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
33%
Applied
33%
Developmental
34%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
1220799200025%
1410499202050%
4040510208025%
Goals / Objectives
In this project, we propose a sensor package, combined with ultra-low power electronics and telemetry (both BLE and cellular) which will be of tremendous benefit both toward improving the efficacy and safety of fire fighters, as well as monitoring levels of toxic gaseous pollutants emitted by the wildfire. By developing a low-power, wireless monitor, we will provide a tool that provides protection in the immediate vicinity as well as protecting and warning residences in the fire's path and surrounding area.The technical goals of this proposed project is to develop an extremely small, ultralow power, wirelessly enabled monitor including sensors for particulate, VOCs and toxic gases including carbon monoxide (CO), NO2, SO2, and ozone. In Phase II we will add an electrochemical formaldehyde sensor which is currently in early stages of development.We propose to integrate the KWJ gas sensors and electronics into a single, <8oz package of the approximate dimensions 3"x5"x1" (7.5x12.5x2.5cm). In Phase I, we propose using the prototype 7-gas board we have developed in collaboration with Intel (see Figure 4 at right), and integrate with Alphasense's VOC and OPC-R1 PM sensor, which is the current state-of-the-art in miniature, optical particle detection. During the Phase I work, we plan to make use of our current digital sensors' interfaces, as well as the digital interfaces of the commercial particle sensor, to make the system as modular as possible. This task includes bread boarding all of the required sensors and components defined in the next section, as well as gas testing, characterization, and validation of the final system. Developing the system in a modular fashion will facilitate integration of PM sensor iterations as they evolve on Tasks 3 and 4 of Phase I and further in Phase II - particle sensor development and miniaturization. Those tasks are essential to meet the size and power requirements of the personal multi-hazard monitor
Project Methods
KWJ will build a prototype device that contains multiple sensors of the highest specificity and sensitivity for the target air contaminants. The envisioned gas detection device consists of multiple KWJ/SPEC printed sensors in an array (the printed sensors are 1.0 cm x1.0 cm x 0.1cm) and we intend to use 6-8 sensors (5-7 gas sensors with a total volume ultimately of 1cm3 + VOC + PM2.5 sensor of 30cm3 in Phase I) and a PCB of about 100cm2. By the end of Phase II, we expect our entire device to be about 10x12x1cm (120cm3) and contain high performance selective sensors powered up to 1 week by an internal battery.The Phase I method for prototype development will be:Validate the individual sensors for this rugged, widely variable environmentKWJ employs a "3-Tier" sensor evaluation:Tier 1: Sensitivity (Resolution and MDL), Linearity, Response Time, repeatabilty of span and BL stabilityTier 2: Stability of response (continued exposure), cross-sensitivity/interferences, temperature effect (span and BL), Transient RH effects on span and BL; recovery from high concentrations and interferences; capacity of selective chemical filter (where applicable).Tier 3: Long-term stability under: i) ambient conditions; ii) Temperature cycling (accelerated aging); iii) <10% RH; iv) >95% RHValidate the commercial VOC and PM sensors for this environment.During Phase I, we will evaluate several optical PM sensors (current plan is to test the Alphasense OPC-R1 and newly introduced Sensirion SPS30) using a particle generator (Model 9302, TSI Incorporated) which provides a large constant dose of 5±0.3 μm poly-styrene latex spheres (PSL) (Duke 2000 Series, Thermo Fisher Scientific) to a test chamber. The density and number of spheres will be monitored using a handheld reference meter (Model 8306, Particles Plus).For VOC sensor evaluation, we plan to use ethene, to test response to the NMHC emitted in the highest concentration under variable T, P, RH as well as varying CO2 and CO convcentrations.Integrate the selected sensors into Phase I prototype monitors and test to the requirements of the specific wildland firefighting applications, e.g., stable accuracy and precision over the temperature extremes encountered outdoors. and low power requirements compatible with battery operation and reliable operation in dirty, hot, humid conditions.KWJ has 3 environtmental chambers with -70 to +100C, 0 to >95% RH, and mass flow controllers to allow introduction of samples from low ppb to ppm levels of target gases.We will measure accuracy while varying temperature, as well as in the presence of other potential interferences.From the Phase I test results and design reviews with wildfire and air monitopring experts, we will develop design of an integrated system design built around the Phase I sensor and electronics, including power requirements for low power on-board potentiostat, wireless communications, etc. to be built and field-tested in the Phase II follow-on development effort.In parallel, we will develop the electrostatic PM sensor design concept, and review with our prospective Phase II and III partners, including TSI, Alphasense, and Sensirion. A stable, high particle count electrostatic PM sensor will allow us to monitor ultrafine particulate (<200nm), as the optical sensors have a lower nominal size limit of 0.3µm.

Progress 07/01/19 to 02/29/20

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audience for this work includes the USDA, US Forest Service, US EPA and all state and local agencies responsible for monitoring and mitigating the effects of wildland fires. The proposed air quality monitor would be a vluable tool not only for detection and early warning of wildfires, but also provide realtime air quality information to the emergency responders as well as residents and towns in the vicinity as well as downwind from these fires. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?We have discussed our monitor concept with staff at both the USDA and US EPA, in anticipation of a coordinated field test during Phase II. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?This is the Final Report for the Phase I project. If we receive funding for Phase II we plan to fabricate several field-testable prototype monitors using the down-selected COTS gas and particles sensors as determined in Phase I. In parallel, fabrication and testing of the concept prototype electrostatic particle sensor will be a major focus of the Phase II effort. The concepts outlined in the Phase I Final Technical Report will be tested in detail in Phase II - a substantial portion of the Phase II project will be devoted to design, fabrication and testing of the low-power electrostatic particle sensor. This sensor will not only greatly reduce the power requirements of the monitor, it will add the capability of measuring ultrafine particulate (<300nm D).

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? To date we have assembled a prototype monitor for wireless monitoring and transmission of toxic gaseous pollutants emitted by the wildfire. This wirelessly enabled monitor includes sensors for particulate, CO2 and toxic gases including CO, NO2, SO2, and ozone, as well as a generic IAQ sensor which responds to a broad range of gazes including some VOCs. In Phase I, we fabricated a bench prototype cellular module leveraging a 7-gas board using SPEC amperometric gas sensors, and integrated with Sensirion's SPS30 PM and SCD30 NDIR CO2 sensors, and Alphasense's OPC-N3 PM sensor, which is the current state-of-the-art in miniature, optical particle detection. During the Phase I work, we made use of our current digital sensors' interfaces, as well as the digital interfaces of the commercial particle and CO2 sensors, to make the system as modular as possible. This prototype monitor, with cellular communication, was tested under ambient outdoor conditions to demonstrate functionality. In parallel to this concept demonstration, we evaluated the SPEC gas sensors and several low-cost CO2 and particle sensors to determine best available combination of sensors for integration into the Phase II field prototype. This evaluation included effect of temperature on signal, sensitivity and resolution, and response time. We benchmarked the low-cost sensors against an evaluation module provided by South Coast Science, which utilizes Alphasense amperometric and NDIR gas sensors. We used the new generation Alphasense OPC-R1 as the benchmark particle sensor. Electrostatic-based Particle sensor: Several design concepts were discussed with our planned Phase II collaborators - Dr. Peter Hesketh (Ga Institute of Technology) and Dr Chris Hogan (University of MN Dept of Mech Engg and Aerosol Research). The Phase I resources and timeframe do not allow fabrication and testing of the concept prototype electrostatic particle sensor. This will be a major focus of the Phase II effort. The concepts outlined in Section 3 of the Phase I Technical Report will be developed in more detail for inclusion in the Phase II proposal, and a substantial portion of the Phase II project will be devoted to modeling and prototype fabrication.

Publications


    Progress 07/01/19 to 02/29/20

    Outputs
    Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?This project has provided our engineering team the opportunity to develop skills in App development, cloud communication and data management, and low power electronics for remote deployed devices. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?By the end of Phase I we will have evaluated the candidate sensors for down-selection in the Phase II field prototypes, and evaluated the operational abilities and shortcomings of the bench prototype cellular module. We will prepare a revised design with anticipated hardware revisions and down-selected sensor set for inclusion in the Phase II prototype.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? Summary: Initial evaluation of Sensors has been done. • The as-received accuracy of the Alphasense CO, NO2 and SO2 sensors was poor. The CO sensor under-reported the actual concentration by 70%, while NO2 and SO2 reported 40% and 50% of the delivered concentration, respectively. The ozone sensor reported within 15% of the actual value as measured by the reference monitor. • As-received accuracy of the SPEC CO sensor was acceptable, within 5%. The NO2 and SO2 sensors both read 40% low using the Cal Factor provided on the label, comparable to the Alphasense sensors. The SPEC ozone sensor reported levels within 10% of the reference monitor. • It is possible that surface scrubbing of the trace reactive gases affected the actual delivered concentrations - In Phase II we will integrate reference monitors for all gases in the test/calibration fixture used for the field prototypes. Evaluation of low-cost PM sensors: We purchased Sensirion and Plantower low-cost optical particle sensors. These sensors are available in quantities for <$50, and use similar technology to that in the Alphasense OPC-R1 ($150) and OPC-N3 ($350). These three "low-cost sensors were tested against a Particles Plus 8306 hand-held reference analyzer ($4,200) which was calibrated at the factory against a NIST traceable reference analyzer. Detailed results will be provided in the Fianl Technical Report. Initial response and sensitivity tests indicate that these low-cost particle sensors correlate very well with the Particles Plus 8306 reference analyzer used to monitor the chamber conditions. Wireless Telemetry of Data: For the Phase I prototype, we are using a particle.io "ElectronDash" board with integrated cellular capability. The data is transmitted to the cloud at 15-minute intervals (frequency can be increased with corresponding use of power). Summary plots are provided on the screen of laptop or other portable device (see working concept screens below.) The data is stored permanently on the server, and can be downloaded to local computer for further analysis. Particle sensor design: KWJ held a design review meeting for the proposed electrostatic particle sensor design concept with Dr Peter Hesketh of Ga Institute of Technology's MiRC, and Dr Chris Hogan of the Univ of Minnesota Mechanical Engineering Dept. The concept variations provided in proposal were reviewed, with extremely benficial design criteria raised in these discussions. A more detailed design discussion will be held in January, to address these issues and others that Dr. Hogan may raise on further review. This feedback will be used to develop a 2nd-iteration design concept for Phase II fabrication that resolves these issues.

    Publications