Source: UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND submitted to
MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF INTERSPECIES INTERACTIONS IN MITIGATING AQUACULTURE DISEASES
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
TERMINATED
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1019404
Grant No.
2019-67016-29868
Project No.
RI.W-2018-07179
Proposal No.
2018-07179
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Program Code
A1221
Project Start Date
Jul 15, 2019
Project End Date
Jul 14, 2023
Grant Year
2019
Project Director
Rowley, D. C.
Recipient Organization
UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND
19 WOODWARD HALL 9 EAST ALUMNI AVENUE
KINGSTON,RI 02881
Performing Department
Biomedical & Pharmaceutical Sc
Non Technical Summary
There is a critical, unmet need for novel tools to prevent and treat disease outbreaks at aquaculture facilities. Recently, marine bacteria belonging to the genus Phaeobacter have emerged as highly promising targets for development of disease prevention agents for larviculture. Using in vivo infection models, certain Phaeobacter strains demonstrate impressive host protection in cod, turbot, oyster, and scallop larvae.However, we currently lack fundamental knowledge of the molecular mechanisms than enable the favorable interspecies interactions between host, pathogen, and Phaeobacter.The long-term goal of our investigation is to develop new tools to enhance aquaculture.Here, we will define molecular mechanisms that determine the survival of oyster larvae when exposed to a probiotic bacterium, Phaeobacter inhibens S4, and a problematic, widespread shellfish pathogen with a broad host-range, Vibrio coralliilyticus RE22. We recently demonstrated that S4 is a safe and effective disease prevention tool for oyster hatcheries. This project will now test the hypothesis that specific and directed molecular mechanisms employed by the host, probiont, and pathogen determine the outcomes of interspecies interactions and, ultimately, the health and survival of the oyster. Mutagenesis will be used to elucidate the role of targeted pathways, especially those involved in type VI secretion systems (T6SS), that influence interaction outcomes. Genomic and (meta)transcriptomic analysis will be used to further illuminate pathways involved in probiont-pathogen interactions. This project addresses program objectives to define molecular and whole-animal aspects related to disease prevention and therapeutic intervention.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
100%
Applied
(N/A)
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
31137231100100%
Knowledge Area
311 - Animal Diseases;

Subject Of Investigation
3723 - Oysters;

Field Of Science
1100 - Bacteriology;
Goals / Objectives
Thelong-term goalof our investigation is to develop new tools for bacterial disease management in aquaculture (and alternatives to antibiotic treatment). Here, we will define the molecular mechanisms that determine the survival of oyster larvae when exposed to a probiotic bacterium,Phaeobacter inhibensS4, and a problematic, widespread shellfish pathogen with a broad host-range,Vibrio coralliilyticusRE22 (RE22). Probiont S4 was originally isolated from the inner shell of a healthy eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) and discovered to exert significant host protection against experimental challenge of larval and seed oysters with bacterial pathogens. We have demonstrated that S4 is safe and effective for use in oyster hatcheries. Further, we have sequenced the genomes for both S4 (accession no. NZ_LOHU00000000) and RE22 (accession no.LGLS00000000) and have performed successful mutagenesis on numerous targeted genes. Results from the current investigation funded by AFRI have shown that S4 probiotic activity is the result of several complementary mechanisms including antibiotic production (tropodithietic acid), biofilm formation, and repression of virulence factor production via the biosynthesis ofN-acyl-homoserine lactones, which serve as both quorum sensing (QS) signals for S4 and repressors of RE22 pathogen virulence factors by quorum quenching (QQ). We have also discovered that exposure of oyster larvae to S4 induces an innate immune response that likely enhances oyster resistance to RE22 infection. Additionally, we have uncovered that RE22 virulence is more complex than previously known, comprising protease activity controlled by quorum sensing (QS), hemolysins, and two type VI secretion systems (T6SS) that deliver toxic effectors to both the host (oyster larvae) and competing bacteria (S4 and other bacteria present in the system). The goal for this renewal is to address current knowledge gaps in host protection and pathogenesis, including the role of T6SS on pathogen-probiont-host interactions, novel mechanisms used by S4 to compete with RE22, and evaluating the impact of S4 on host microbiomes. We will test the following project hypothesis and accomplish the specific objectives below.Hypothesis: Specific and directed molecular mechanisms employed by oyster larvae, probiont S4, and pathogen RE22 determine the outcomes of interspecies interactions and, ultimately, the health and survival of the oyster (Fig. 1).Objective 1: Elucidate the role of the type VI secretion systems (T6SS) in mediating interactions between pathogen, probiont, and host.Objective 2:Discovery of novel mechanisms involved in probiont-pathogen interactions using transcriptomics.
Project Methods
Specific Objective 1: Elucidate the role of the type VI secretion systems (T6SS) in mediating interactions between pathogen, probiont, and host.T6SSs are highly effective delivery mechanisms for toxins (anti-host and anti-bacterial), but have not been previously investigated for their role in aquaculture systems. Effector toxins and antitoxins will be identified in the pathogen (V. coralliilyticusRE22) genome and mutagenesis of targeted genes will be performed to confirm their role in virulence and competition. This objective will inform how T6SS contributes to virulence and competition in multi-organism interactions and affect survival outcomes in aquaculture systems.Specific Objective 2:Discovery of novel mechanisms involved in probiont-pathogen interactions.We will exploit genomic resources developed in previous research (i.e. reference genomes for S4 and RE22) to explore novel mechanisms of probiont-pathogen interaction. Mining of transcriptomes from co-cultures of RE22 and S4 will be used to identify pathways involved in competition between these two bacterial species.

Progress 07/15/19 to 07/14/23

Outputs
Target Audience:The major target audience is the bivalve aquaculture industry in the United States.We have a solid record in reducing unnecessarily duplicative efforts through collaboration with a variety of stakeholders involved in bivalve aquaculture. Coordination with stakeholders is managed by Dr. Gomez-Chiarri, a member of the Eastern Oyster Genome Consortium, Eastern Oyster Shellfish Breeding Consortium, Northeast Regional Aquaculture Center Technical Advisory Committee, the East Coast Pathology Working Group, and Northeast Bivalve Hatchery Health Collaborative. These relationships allow us to coordinate and integrate our research with other national efforts on the management of infectious diseases in bivalve aquaculture. We are also extensively involved in outreach and extension, routinely interacting with industry stakeholders and developing workshops at conferences attended by the industry, such as the Milford Aquaculture Seminar and the Northeast Aquaculture Conference and Exposition (NACE). We strive to highlight our research using news resources, publications, participation in open houses and other events. Our students take advantage of the SciWrite program at URI, developing media pieces on their research (e.g., a podcast on probiotics, a shiny app on oyster microbial communities). We are also thoroughly committed to Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Initiatives, with five of our current graduate students are underrepresented minorities. A long-term goal of this project is the creation of new products to prevent infectious disease outbreaks in aquaculture facilities.We were successful in developing a stable, liquid formulation of our probiont S4 and a U.S. patent was awarded in 2023. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?A total of seven graduate students (five women, three men) have contributed to this project. Fourof these graduate students belong to underrepresented minority groups*.Three of these students finished their PhD degrees#. Graduate students: Christopher Schuttert#, Jessica Coppersmith, Tejashree Modak#, Margaret Rosario*#, Jaypee Samson, Damian Cavanaugh*, Kira Bernabe*, Jamal Andrews* Undergraduate researchers involved in this project: Margaret Hill, Riley Sullivan, Willy Njeru, Simon Metcalf, Sean Ovalles, Sydney Charette How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?In addition to the publications and products previously listed, numerous presentations were provided at scientific conferences by both PIs and graduate students. Recent examples include the annual CRWAD, the Annual Meeting of the National Shellfisheries Association (Baltimore, MD, March 2023),and Applied Hologenomics(Bilbao, Spain, Fall 2022). What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Role of Type VI secretion systems (T6SS) in virulence of the pathogenVibrio coralliilyticus. Previous research by us and others has shown that the bivalve and coral pathogen,Vibrio coralliilyticusstrain RE22Sm, utilizes two complementary T6SSs as virulence factors (T6SS1 located on chromosome one, T6SS2 on chromosome two). Mutations in key target T6SS genes, includinghcp(hemolysin co-regulated pilus, tube of the T6SS assembly) andvgrG(valine- glycine repeat protein G, tip of the nanomachine) were created by allelic exchange mutagenesis using homologous recombination. Wild-type (wt) and mutant strains were tested for killing of other bacteria (T6SS null-E. coliSm10 cells) and larval eastern oysters. Mutation ofhcp1resulted in complete loss of virulence toward larval oysters and attenuated virulence towardE. coliSm10. Mutation ofvgrG1also resulted in the complete loss of virulence toward oyster larvae but did not affect virulence towardE. colicells. Mutation ofvgrG2significantly reduced virulence against larval oysters but maintained full virulence towardE. colicells. Complementation of mutants restored the wt phenotype against both larval oysters and preyE. colicells. These findings support the hypothesis thatV. coralliilyticusRE22Sm has two T6SSs that enable killing ofE. coliprey cells and oyster larvae.Further experiments, however, discovered that thatthe wrong gene was targeted forhcp2. Although competition experiments with the other mutants and transcriptomic studies still support the roles of T6SS1 and T6SS2 in RE22 pathogenesis, we are making newhcp2 mutants to validate these results.We will do a more complete manualannotation of ourVibrio coralliilyticusRE22 genome to aid in future transcriptomic and mutagenesis studies,and validate all mutants using genome sequencing and gene expression data. Evidence for T6SS effector-immunity gene pairs.Bacteria use their T6SS to deliver effectors (e.g., toxins) to targeted cells and produce immunity proteins to protect against self-intoxication. We identified effector-immunity (E/I) gene pairsin V. parahaemolyticusPSU5579, the causative agent of Acute Hepatopancreatic Necrosis Disease in shrimp. The antibacterial T6SS1 in PSU5579 exhibits strong homology to the T6SS2 in RE22 (71% nucleotide identity with 92% query coverage, E=0.0) across 23 genes that make up the core T6SS genes. The gene order within these two gene clusters is identical. In contrast, the T6SS2 gene clusters share little homology and conservation of gene order. Both strains (PSU5579 and RE22) possess homologs of several previously reported and validated antibacterial E/I modules that are widely distributed throughout theVibriogenus. For example, both possess a gene encoding a GHH domain nuclease followed by genes encoding hypothetical proteins, one of which is predicted to be an immunity protein and one or two others that appear to be divergent duplicated immunity proteins. These results now encourage the experimental validation of these E/I gene pairs in RE22. Some of these T6SS effectors may have potential roles in the suppression of oyster larval immune responses by RE22 that we have previously reported in 2020. Role of outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) on RE22 virulence.Another potential mechanism of delivery of virulence factors to other organisms are OMVs. RE22 OMVs were isolated by ultracentrifugation and characterized by nanoparticle tracking analysis and dynamic light scattering.Hemocytes from healthy adult oysters were exposed to varying concentrations of OMVs. Treated hemocytes demonstrated increased metabolic activity (resazurin metabolism).This suggests that oyster hemocytes respond to pathogen OMVs as part of the oyster innate immune response. Role of T3SS in virulence of the pathogenVibrio coralliilyticus.Transcriptomic data from competitions between probiont S4 and pathogen RE22 indicated that another virulence factor, T3SS, may have a role in RE22 virulence. We identified the structural genes of T3SS in the RE22 genome and selected several for deletion:sctE(major translocon),sctA(needle tip),sctC(secretin ring), andsctV(export gate). A mutant ofsctVdemonstrated a reduction of RE22 virulence against larval oysters. ProbiontPhaeobacter inhibinsS4 downregulates gene expression of RE22 virulence factors.Our previous research has shown that S4 has complex mechanisms of action against RE22, including antibiosis, niche exclusion through biofilm formation, and quorum quenching.To more deeply elucidate the molecular interactions between RE22, competition experiments were conducted by co-culturing probiont S4 established biofilms with pathogen RE22 for five hours and comparing gene expressions to concurrently grown monoculture controls. In co-culture, RE22 genes involved in virulence were down regulated, including genes belonging to secretion systems such as Type III and Type VI.Additionally,decreased expression of several RE22 genes for flagellar proteins, including flagellin,flgA, flgE,fliD, andfliL,was observed under co-culture conditions. Reduced RE22 motility in the presence of tropodithietic acid (TDA), an antibiotic produced by S4Sm, has been previously reported. However, this transcriptome analysis indicated that reduced RE22 motility may also be partly due to downregulation ofdisulfide bond family protein genesdsbAanddsbD. Mutations or deletions ofdsbAhavebeen linked to decreased virulence and motility in gram-negative bacteria, including otherVibriospecies. RE22 was found to upregulate efflux pump genes, likely in response to the production of TDA by S4Sm. While RE22 differentially expresses hundreds of genes when challenged with S4Sm, only a few dozen S4Sm genes were statistically differentially expressed during these experiments. Interestingly, an acyl-homoserine-lactone (AHL) synthase was highly down regulated in S4Sm during co-culture with RE22. We previously discovered that S4Sm AHLs act as quorum quenchers against RE22, and therefore it was curious to observe reduced expression of the S4Sm AHL synthase gene during exposure to RE22. P. inhibensS4 is resistant to pathogen RE22 attack.WhileE. coliis highly susceptible to T6SS-mediated killing by RE22,P. inhibensS4 is >350-fold less susceptible thanE. colito killing by RE22. Experiments with S4 targeted mutants showed that TDA (antibiotic) production and a fully functional QS network are important in its resistance to attack by RE22.This finding supports the utility ofP. inhibensS4 as a probiont to help mitigate RE22 infections. Genomic characterization of themarine probiontPhaeobacter inhibensS4Sm.A new assembly ofP. inhibensS4Sm was completed utilizing long read sequencing chemistry, closing the genome and filling in numerous gaps in the previous assembly. The genome was submitted to NCBI under accession numberGCF_030060455.1 and was annotated using theNCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP). The completed genome permitted a pangenome analysis comparing S4Sm with all the otherP. inhibensgenomes on NCBI and will improve analysis of RNA-Seq differential gene expression (DGE) analysis of S4Sm experiments described above. In summary, our data confirm that: (1)P. inhibensS4 is an excellent probiont againstV. coralliilyticusRE22; (2) the probiotic mechanisms of host protection against RE22 are multifactorial, including contributions from TDA production, biofilm formation, AHL-mediated QQ, and immune modulation of the host; and (3) the pathogenicity of RE22 relies on bacterial secretion systems to target bacterial prey cells and cause disease in oyster larvae.We have also discovered other potential mechanism of probiont S4 activity.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2023 Citation: Takyi, E., LaPorte, J., Sohn, S., Stevick, R.J., Witkop, E.M., Gregg, L.S., Chesler?Poole, A., Small, J., White, M.M., Giray, C. and Rowley, D.C., Nelson D.R., Gomez-Chiarri M. 2023. Development and evaluation of a formulation of probiont Phaeobacter inhibens S4 for the management of vibriosis in bivalve hatcheries. Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries, 3(3), pp.256-267.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2023 Citation: LaPorte, J.P., Spinard, E.J., Cavanagh, D., Gomez-Chiarri, M., Rowley, D.C., Mekalanos, J.J., Mittraparp-Arthorn, P. and Nelson, D.R., 2023. Draft Genome Sequence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus PSU5579, Isolated during an Outbreak of Acute Hepatopancreatic Necrosis Disease in Thailand. Microbiology Resource Announcements, 12(2), pp.e00873-22.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Accepted Year Published: 2023 Citation: Takyi E, Stevick RJ, Witkop EM, Gregg LS, Chesler?Poole A, Small J, White MM, Hudson R, Giray C, Rowley DC, Nelson DR, Gomez-Chiarri M. (2023) Probiotic treatment modulates the bacterial microbiome of larval eastern oysters, Crassostrea virginica, in hatcheries. Aquaculture, accepted with revisions.


Progress 07/15/21 to 07/14/22

Outputs
Target Audience:We have a solid record inreducing unnecessarily duplicativeeffortsthrough collaboration with a variety of stakeholders involved in bivalve aquaculture. Coordination with stakeholders is managed by Gomez-Chiarri, a member of the Eastern Oyster Genome Consortium, Eastern Oyster Shellfish Breeding Consortium, Northeast Regional Aquaculture Center Technical Advisory Committee, the East Coast Pathology Working Group, and Northeast Bivalve Hatchery Health Collaborative (in process of being established). These relationships allow us to coordinate and integrate our research with other national efforts on the management of infectious diseases in bivalve aquaculture. We are also extensively involved inoutreach and extension, routinely interacting with industry stakeholders and developing workshops at conferences attended by the industry, such as the Milford Aquaculture Seminar and the Northeast Aquaculture Conference and Exposition (NACE).We strive to highlight our research using news resources, publications, participation in open houses and other events (e.g., Ocean Exploration Zone at the Volvo race stopover in Newport).Our students take advantage of the SciWrite program at URI, developing media pieces on their research (e.g., a podcast on probiotics,a shiny appon oyster microbial communities). We are also thoroughly committed to Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Initiatives, with five of our current graduate students being underrepresented minorities. Changes/Problems:The pandemic has caused some delays in accomplishing our goals, but we are on track to complete the aims of this project. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?A total of seven graduate students (five women, two men) have contributed to this project. Five of these graduate students belong to underrepresented minority groups. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Modak, T. H. & Gomez-Chiarri, M., 2020, Contrasting immunomodulatory effects of probiotic and pathogenic bacteria on Eastern oyster,crassostrea virginica, larvae.Vaccines8, 1-23 Schuttert, Christian W., et al. "Two Type VI Secretion Systems in Vibrio coralliilyticus RE22Sm exhibit differential target specificity for bacteria prey and oyster larvae."bioRxiv(2021). Submitted publications now in peer review: Takyi, et al., Probiotic treatment in the hatchery shifts the composition of bacterial microbiomes in larval eastern oysters, Crassostrea virginica, submitted to Frontiers in Marine Science Takyi et al.EVALUATION OF A FORMULATION OF PROBIONT PHAEOBACTER INHIBENS S4 ON LARVAL OYSTER PERFORMANCE IN THE HATCHERY, submitted to Aquaculture Rsearch Laporte et al.Draft Genome Sequence ofVibrio parahaemolyticusPSU5579, Isolated During an Outbreak of Acute Hepatopancreatic Necrosis Disease (AHPND) in Thailand, submitted to Microbial Resource Announcements What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Future plan: Test the virulence of RE22T3SS mutants against oyster larvae. Experimentally validate T6SSE/I gene pairs in RE22.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Probiont S4 treatment leads to immunomodulation in the host, while RE22 causes immunosuppression.We used transcriptomics to probe how S4 (probiont) and RE22 (pathogen) modulate gene expression in oyster larvae. Interestingly, larvae exposed to RE22 showed evidence of immunosuppression, mainly focused on inhibition of signaling cascades involved in immune activation in response to bacteria (e.g., MyD88, NF-kappaB), and blocking expression of immune effectors downstream of these pathways. In contrast, gene expression profiles after S4 exposure were consistent with activation of these immune signaling pathways and upregulated expression of both bacterial and viral immune effectors. Therefore, pretreatment of larvae with S4 leads to the production of immune effectors, which then are present in the system when pathogen RE22 is added, probably contributing to pathogen neutralization before it is able to cause immunosuppression. The antibacterial and pathogenic roles of T6SS inV. coralliilyticusRE22. Our sequencing of the RE22 genome revealed two T6SS gene clusters. T6SS ofV. choleraeis involved in attack on other bacteria and intestinal colonization. We constructed mutants of key genes in both the S4 T6SS1 (gene cluster on chromosome 1) and T6SS2 (on chromosome 2) andtestedwhether the mutants wereimpaired for killing eitherbacteria or oyster larvae (Table 1).Mutations toeitherhcp1orvgrG1(encodingthe tube and tip of the nanomachine, respectively) resulted in sharply reduced predation by RE22 againstE. coliprey, withhcp2removal having a more profound effect. Table 1. Effect of mutations inV. coralliilyticusRE22 T6SS genes onE. coliSm10 prey cell killing and oyster larvae survival. Attacker cell strain Prey cell survival (% of start)a Oyster larvae survival (%)b V. coralliilyticusRE22 wt 0.046% 48% RE22 hcp1 mutant 6.25% 89% RE22 hcp2 mutant 34% 74% RE22 vgrG1 mutant 0.026% 90% RE22 vgrG2 mutant 0.074% 84% aT6SS anti-bacterial assay conditions: attacker cells: prey cells = 4:1; cells incubated on a filter for 4 h, 27°C; cells resuspended, and enumerated by dilution and plating;bOyster larvae challenged with RE22 for 24 h as described in Karim et al. (2013)6;95.4% survival with no RE22 added. These results revealed that both of the RE22 T6SSs, and especially T6SS2, are involved in antibacterial activity. Just as importantly, we also discovered that the T6SS1 of RE22 isa majorvirulence factor for killing oyster larvae.Mutations in eitherhcp1orvgrG1resulted in near complete attenuation of larval killing.Mutations inhcp2andvgrG2also increased larval survival (1.5-1.75-fold), although to less of an extent as compared tohcp1orvgrG1. Additionally, mutations that disrupt quorum sensing in RE22 (e.g., delta-luxNanddelta-?vcpR) significantly reduced both antibacterial T6SS activity and pathogenicity against oysters.This finding is transformative in our understanding of the pathogenicity of RE22 against oyster larvae, and establishes the T6SS1 as a critical virulence factor in larval killing.It further suggests that the RE22 T6SS are regulated by QS, which aligns with studies from otherVibriospecies. Evidence for T6SS effector-immunity gene pairs.Bacteria use T6SS to deliver effectors (e.g., toxins) to target cells and produce immunity proteins to protect against self-intoxication.Weidentifiedeffector-immunity (E/I) gene pairs inV. parahaemolyticusPSU5579, the causative agent of Acute Hepatopancreatic Necrosis Disease in shrimp. When we compared the genomes of PSU5579 andV. coralliilyticusRE22, we found that the antibacterial T6SS1 in PSU5579 exhibited strong homology to the T6SS2 in RE22 (71% nucleotide identity with 92% query coverage, E=0.0) across 23 genes that make up the core T6SS genes. The gene order within these two gene clusters is identical. In contrast, the T6SS2 gene clusters share little homology and conservation of gene order. Both strains possess homologs of several previously reported and validated antibacterial E/I modules that are widely distributed throughout theVibriogenus. For example, both PSU5579 and RE22 possess a gene encoding a GHH domain nuclease followed by genes encoding hypothetical proteins, one of which is predicted to be an immunity protein and one or two others that appear to be divergent duplicated immunity proteins.These results now encourage the experimental validation of these E/I gene pairs in RE22. Probiont S4 isresistantto pathogen RE22 attack.WhileE. coliis highly susceptible toT6SS-mediatedkilling by RE22, we found thatP. inhibensS4 is >350-fold less susceptible thanE. colito killing by RE22, and further that antibiotic (TDA) production and a fully functional QS network are highly important in its resistance to attack. S4 downregulates gene expression of RE22 virulence factors.We have also measured global changes in gene expression for both the probiont and pathogen during co-culture competition experiments using transcriptomics (Fig.4). When RE22 was added to an established biofilm of S4, we observed downregulation of genes and pathways linked with RE22 virulence (e.g., T1SS, T3SS, T6SS, motility and adhesion pathways)and also changes in the expression of pathways that likely contribute to pathogenicity (e.g.,dsbAanddsbD, involved in the formation and maintenance of disulfide bonds that are critical for the activity of key proteins involved in virulence in other gram-negative bacteria). RE22 also upregulates expression of genes coding for efflux pumps (involved in toxin removal) in response to S4. On the other hand, gene expression of S4 was mostly unaffected by RE22.These results support our hypotheses that mechanisms of S4 probiotic activity include down-regulation of expression of virulence factors in pathogen RE22, an effectthat is modulatedby QS. Role of T3SS in virulence of the oyster and coral pathogenVibrio coralliilyticus.The above studies revealed that when knocking outa single copy of either thehcporvgrGgene of the two T6SSs, a reduction in virulence was observed. However, when the second copy of either gene was deleted, there was an increase in virulence to levels greater than observed in the single gene knockout. We therefore hypothesized that another virulence factor, T3SS, is being upregulated in the absence of a functional T6SS. We identified the structural genes of T3SS in the RE22 genome and selected several for deletion:sctE(major translocon),sctA(needle tip),sctC(secretin ring), andsctV(export gate). At this time, asctVmutant has been constructed and tested.The?sctVstrain consistently demonstrated a reduction of virulence. An average increase of 74% was observed in larval survival when challenged with the mutant strain as compared to the wild type (3 trials). In summary, our data now demonstrate that: (1)P. inhibensS4 is an excellent probiont againstV. coralliilyticusRE22; (2) the probiotic mechanisms of host protection against RE22 are multifactorial, including contributions from TDA production, biofilm formation, AHL-mediated QQ, and immune modulation of the host; and (3) the pathogenicity of RE22 relies on previously unidentified secretion systems that deliver toxins to target cells.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2021 Citation: Schuttert, Christian W., et al. "Two Type VI Secretion Systems in Vibrio coralliilyticus RE22Sm exhibit differential target specificity for bacteria prey and oyster larvae." bioRxiv (2021).
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Under Review Year Published: 2022 Citation: Laporte et al. Draft Genome Sequence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus PSU5579, Isolated During an Outbreak of Acute Hepatopancreatic Necrosis Disease (AHPND) in Thailand, submitted to Microbial Resource Announcements.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Under Review Year Published: 2022 Citation: Takyi, et al., Probiotic treatment in the hatchery shifts the composition of bacterial microbiomes in larval eastern oysters, Crassostrea virginica, submitted to Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Under Review Year Published: 2022 Citation: Takyi et al. EVALUATION OF A FORMULATION OF PROBIONT PHAEOBACTER INHIBENS S4 ON LARVAL OYSTER PERFORMANCE IN THE HATCHERY, submitted to Aquaculture Research
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Modak, T. H., & Gomez-Chiarri, M. (2020). Contrasting immunomodulatory effects of probiotic and pathogenic bacteria on eastern oyster, crassostrea virginica, larvae. Vaccines, 8(4), 588.


Progress 07/15/20 to 07/14/21

Outputs
Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Six graduate students have been involved in this project to varying extents during the review period. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Conference presentations and publications are in progress. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We will complete the stated goals and disseminate findings to the scientific community through conference presentations and publications.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? We have largely completed the studies of the T6SS in Phaeobacter inhibens. A manuscript is in the final stages of preparation and is expectedbe submitted to the ASM journal mSphere in the coming weeks. We have also completed a transcriptomics experiment that has revealed complex intereactions between our pathogen and probiont. These results are being presented at the upcoming CRWAD conference. A publication will follow. URI has licensed our probiont formulationto Kennebec River Biosciences. We are hoping this now leads to comercialization of this organism for aquaculture use. Pretreatment of eastern oyster,Crassostrea virginica,larvae with probiont S4 leads to significantly increased larval survival after challenge with pathogen RE22 as compared to non-treated larvae.Genome sequencing of pathogen RE22 and probiont S4 have now led to the identification of putative virulence factors in RE22 and mechanisms of action of S4 against RE22.Targeted gene knock-out experiments in RE22 showed that one of the two copies of the Type 6 Secretion System (T6SS) identified in the genome of RE22 targets mainly the larval host, while the other copy targets mainly other bacteria.The mechanisms of action of probiont S4 are complex, including, but not limited to, antibiosis, biofilm formation, and quorum quenching. Gene expression patterns of RE22 and S4 in competition suggest that S4 can reduce expression of a variety of virulence factors in RE22, including T6SS and motility. Moreover, treatment of oyster larvae with probiont S4 leads to immunostimulation, while treatment of larvae with pathogen RE22 leads to immunosuppression.A liquid formulation of probiont S4 has been developed for commercial use in shellfish hatcheries. Daily delivery of probiontS4 toC. virginicalarvae in the hatchery led to changes in the bacterial communities in the larvae, including changes in the composition, but not relative abundance, of Vibrionales. Our research is revealingbetter understanding of the mechanisms of virulence of pathogen RE22, as well as pathogen-probiont interactionsin vitroandin vivo.The ultimate goal is to optimizeprobiotic use in shellfish hatcheries.

Publications


    Progress 07/15/19 to 07/14/20

    Outputs
    Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems:Research progress has been greatly attenuated since March due to COVID-19. We are hoping to resume research activities this summer as restrictions begin to ease. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?In year 1, this highly collaborative and cross-disciplinary project has supported the training and professional development of two graduate students, Jessica Coppersmith and Christopher Shuttert. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?We've been prevented from disseminating our results due to cancellations of scientific conferencesbecause ofCOVID-19.An abstract was submitted for a presentation at CRWAD 2020 and amanuscript is in preparation for the above results related to Objective 1. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We hope to make make progress on Objective 2 in the coming year. Labs at URI are now starting to slowly resume research activities following shutdowns due to COVID-19. Prior to the shutdown, we had been able to perform a competition experiments between probiont S4 and pathogenRE22; however, progress was halted before libraries could be generated fromisolated RNA, andwe will now have torepeat these experiments.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? Objective 1:Elucidate the role of the type VI secretion systems (T6SS) in mediating interactions between pathogen, probiont, and host. The oyster pathogen,Vibrio coralliilyticusstrain RE22Sm, utilizes two distinct and complementaryType VI Secretion Systems (T6SSs) as virulence factors against prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. T6SS1 is located on chromosome one, and T6SS2 is located on chromosome two. In year 1, we investigated the specific roles of the T6SS against larval Eastern Oysters,Crassostrea virginicaand T6SS null bacterial prey cells,E. coliSm10. Mutations were created in key T6SS genes (hcp1, hcp2, vgrG1, and vgrG2) and the resulting RE22Smmutants were tested for pathogenicity against larval oysters or bacteria prey. Progress & Results:Mutations in the T6SS geneshcp1orhcp2(hemolysin co-regulated pilus) andvgrG1orvgrG2(valine-glycine repeat protein G) were created by allelic exchange mutagenesis using homologous recombination. Wild-type (wt) and mutant strains were tested for killing of T6SS nullE. coliSm10 cells by mixing RE22 and prey cells at an MOI of ~4, co-incubating for 4h, and quantifying cell changes by spot plating. Larval oyster challenges were accomplished by exposing ~100 oyster larvae to bacteria at a CFU/mL of 1×105for 24h. Mutation ofhcp1resulted in a complete loss of virulence toward larval oysters and attenuated virulence towardE. coliSm10 (1.2 log decline of prey cells versus 3.34 log decline from wt). Mutation ofhcp2resulted in reduced virulence against larval oysters (80% survival versus 53% survival with RE22Sm infection control), and significantly reduced killing of preyE. colicells (0.47 log decline of prey cells versus 3.34 log decline from wt). Mutation ofvgrG1alsoresulted in the complete loss of virulence toward oyster larvae but did not affect virulence towardE. colicells. Mutation ofvgrG2significantly reduced virulence against larval oysters (~90% relative survival versus 53% with RE22Sm infection control) but maintained full virulence towardE. colicells.Complementation of thehcpandvgrGmutants restored the wild-type phenotype against both larval oysters and preyE. colicells. Conclusions:V. coralliilyticusRE22Sm has two T6SSs that enable killing other bacteria and oyster larvae. T6SS1 plays a more significant role in virulence against oyster larvae. Mutations in either T6SS reduce killing ofE. coli, though mutations in T6SS2 show a greater effect on bacteria killing. We propose that full pathogenic activity ofV. coralliilyticusRE22Sm requires both T6SS1 and T6SS2 to kill competing microbes and oyster larvae.

    Publications