Source: SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
SYSTEMS ANALYSIS OF HYDROPONIC, AQUAPONIC, AND AEROPONIC FOOD PRODUCTION (HAAFP) IN SIX US CITIES
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1019317
Grant No.
2019-67012-29731
Cumulative Award Amt.
$164,837.00
Proposal No.
2018-08063
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jun 15, 2019
Project End Date
Jun 14, 2022
Grant Year
2019
Program Code
[A7201]- AFRI Post Doctoral Fellowships
Recipient Organization
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
SAN DIEGO,CA 92182
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
Hydroponic, aquaponic, and aeroponic food production (HAAFP) is a rapidly expanding segment of the national agricultural system. It is a potentially powerful contributor to solving 21st century challenges like feeding our growing and increasingly urban population under natural resource and climate constraints which will ensure Americans' security, prosperity, and health. Yet, little comprehensive, integrative research examines how urban HAAFP contributes to food security, economic development and sustainability in cities throughout the US. This knowledge is critical for cities seeking to expand urban food production and meet the nutritional needs of their growing populations without putting additional strain on environmental and economic resources. Acknowledging that cities in the US vary considerably in their political, social, environmental, and cultural contexts, this research compares HAAFP in six diverse cities: Seattle, Los Angeles, Detroit, New Orleans, New York, and Boston. Comparison will provide important knowledge on the factors that promote and constrain HAAFP in different regions in the US.I will examine and compare HAAFP using a combination of three methods: in-depth interviews with national and regional HAAFP organizations, comprehensive surveys of HAAFP practitioners, and spatial analysis of maps of HAAFP and its surrounding social and economic landscapes including median income level and poverty rates. The primary goal of this project is to increase knowledge of emerging, urban HAAFP systems in the US and their local impacts on communities' social, economic, and environmental resources. This knowledge will inform best practices in HAAFP systems, specifically as they relate to producing benefits for local communities like improved food security and job opportunities, as well as regional and national policy on urban food systems.
Animal Health Component
(N/A)
Research Effort Categories
Basic
100%
Applied
(N/A)
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
80360502060100%
Goals / Objectives
The main goal of this project is to better understand urbanhydroponic, aquaponic, and aeroponic food production (HAAFP) in the United States, particularly the actors involved,the keyfactors that promote and constrain its expansion, and its ability to be economically viable while alsoaddressing socio-economic and environmental concerns. Another important goal of this project is to understand how local, socio-spatial settingsinfluenceHAAFP; to that effect, this research examines HAAFPin six United States cities with unique political, social, environmental, and cultural contexts:Seattle, Los Angeles, Detroit,New Orleans, New York, and Boston.The objectives of the project include:Visualize the distribution of HAAFP inSeattle, Los Angeles, Detroit,New Orleans, New York, and BostonDetermine the principal motivations of actors (CEOs, managers, growers, etc.) participating in HAAFPExamine the socio-economic effects of HAAFP, specifically food security (i.e., how much food is grown, how much does it cost, and where is it distributed) and economic opportunities (i.e., how many jobs created and compensation)Quantifythe environmental benefits (i.e. amount of food produced) and stressors (i.e., water and energy consumption)Compare cross-sectional data across citiesto establish asociations that will serve as the basis for longitudinal research
Project Methods
I will use a mixed-method approach that combines qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis with data visualization in GIS. Specifically, I will map hydroponic, aquaponic, and aeroponic food production (HAAFP) spaces against socio-economic factors, including food security, in each city using GIS. I will analyze the maps using exploratory spatial data analysis to understand the local, socio-spatial contexts of HAAFP. I will conduct semi-structured phone interviews with key informants identified through targeted internet searches and social media outreach and subsequent snowball samplingfrom identified participants. Informants will complete a short demographic survey prior to interview. Interviews will be interpreted using the axial coding method in NVivo 9 computer-mediated coding software. Interview results will inform a survey instrument that will be distributed to HAAFP stakeholders and completed via phone or email. Surveys will include questions on economic development (inputs), outcomes on food security and economic opportunities, environmental stressors and benefits, and motivations. These indicators will be analyzed using appropriate statistical tests in SPSS and R to explore the strength and significance of relationships between variables, including various contextual factors and HAAFP measures of success. Quantitative data will be combined with the qualitative data in NVivo 9 to allow for a fine-grained analysis of the research questions. I will perform mixed analysis of the quantitative and qualitative data in geographic space by linking survey and interview results to the HAAFP maps. Individual indicators will be geocoded and linked to specific sites and census tracts in order to enable spatial analysis of patterns and variations inkey variables. This type of spatial analysis includes the computation of various indices of spatial correlation that unveil socio-spatial differences in inputs and outcomes of HAAFP.Efforts to deliver science-based knowledge will include workshops and dispersal of professional and academic publications.I will evaluate the success toward expected outcomes using the following milestones and indicators:Outcome: Increase in knowledge of the motivations of national and regional HAAFP actorsMilestone: Successful recruitment of national and regional key informants for interviews in first 3 months of the projectIndicator - successful creation of database of connections with at least 10 national and 40 regional HAAFP organizations; successful creation of project-based social media accounts to facilitate connections; at least 20 identified participantsMilestone: Successful recruitment of survey participants in each city in the first 6 months of the projectIndicator - at least 10 survey participants identified in connection database for each cityMilestone: Completion of interviews with key informants in first 6 months of the projectIndicator - percentcompletion of interviews with 8 national and 12 regional HAAFP actorsMilestone: Completion of interview transcription and coding in the first 6 months of the projectIndicator - percent transcriptions successfully uploaded, organized, and coded in NVivo 9 softwareMilestone: Completion of survey data collection in first 9 months of the projectIndicator - percent completion of at least 10 surveys per cityMilestone: Completion of survey data entry in the first 9 months of the projectIndicator - percent survey data collected and organized in an Excel worksheet; data uploaded and coded in NVivo 9 softwareOutcome: Increase in knowledge of the types and extent of urban HAAFPin six US citiesMilestone: Completion of HAAFP maps in the first 3 months of the projectIndicator - percent completion of geodatabase with locations and characteristics of HAAFP; percent completion of 6 maps of HAAFPOutcome: Increase in knowledge of the local, socio-spatial landscapes of HAAFPMilestone: Completion of HAAFP socio-spatial maps in first 3 months of projectIndicator - successful collection of Census data; percent completion of at least 12 maps that integrate HAAFP landscapes and Census data on local socio-economic characteristics and food securityOutcome: Increase in knowledge of economic inputs, socio-economic effects, environmental demands and benefitsof HAAFPin each cityMilestone: Completion of survey data collection in first 9 months of the projectIndicator - percent completion of at least 10 surveys per cityMilestone: Completion of survey data entry in the first 9 months of the projectIndicator - percent survey data collected and organized in an Excel worksheet; data uploaded and coded in NVivo 9 softwareMilestone: Completion of survey quantitative data analysis in the first 12 months of projectIndicator - percent completion of analysis of survey data in SPSS and R softwareOutcome: Increase in knowledge of how the above factors and barriers and opportunities vary across the chosen six cities;Milestone: Successful integration of quantitative, qualitative, and spatial data in the first 15 months of projectIndicator - percent completion of figures that compare the above-mentioned factors; percent completion of final maps that reflect survey data spatiallySuccessful distribution of findings will be measured in time of completion as well. Specifically, preliminary data should be presented in the first 12 months of the project and workshops in each city must be completed within20 months of the project start date. Publications should be completed throughout the project - academic publications should be submitted at a rate of one per 12 months; public publication(s)(white papers for professionals and policymakers) by the end of the project.

Progress 06/15/19 to 06/13/22

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audience for this research is participants in hydroponic, aquaponic, and aeroponic food production (HAAFP) including business owners, entrepreneurs, nonprofit organizers, farmers, scientists, employees, volunteers, and advocates, as well as individuals, policymakers, and researchers interested in urban agriculture in the United States. ? Changes/Problems:The major changes to my project were the result of Covid19 restrictions. Due to the health risks and restrictions on travel, I was unable to visit and collect the detailed data I would need to fully accomplish the goals I had originally planned, specifically the fifth objective, which depended heavily on my collection of participant observations and building close relationships in the target cities. However, I was able to use the time I would no longer be traveling to expand the survey to include urban HAAFP participants throughout the United States and to focus on the impact the Covid-19 was having on my target population. ? What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The project has contributed substantially to my professional growth and provides evidence of my ability to develop and execute a high-level research project. I have gained experience as a principal investigator for a grant and as a project manager working with students. During the second year of the project, I worked closely with an AAPI LGBTQ+ student who had recently graduated with a bachelors of science in Geography with a special focus in Urban Studies during the second year of the project. We worked together for three months as a paid summer internship that I created using the grant funding. During that time, I mentored him on how to create functional and aesthetically pleasing maps that would illustrate his skills, find, compile, and organize geographic data, build policy briefs, and create an effective, impressive resume. When he applied for a job after the internship, I was asked to have a zoom-call with his prospective employees and it helped him land the job! I got a great amount of personal satisfaction and skill-building myself from mentoring him on the project and passing on my own skills and learning together. Overall, I was also able to build and strengthen practical research skills, including researching and cataloging pertinent data, mapping demographic data, understanding policy documents, creating, implementing, and analyzing a successful nationwide survey, and interviewing research participants. I think an invaluable lesson this project provided (although not intended) was how to be detailed in your research plans, but flexible enough to deal with unexpected changes and still be able to gather valuable data that contributes to accomplishing the goal of the main project. The realities of Covid19 forced me to be innovative and creative with the project and that experience will stick with me as I continue to research urban agriculture, social justice, and food technologies. ? How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The results have been disseminated to communities of interest through an official report on the national survey of HAAFP business and organizations titled,"Hydroponic, Aquaponic, and Aeroponic Food Production in the United State: Finding from a Nationwide Survey," which was also presented at a webinar that I promoted through the same channels I used to attract survey participants. I recorded the webinar and will be hosting the report and the video recording on a website dedicated for the project. The attendants and interested communities reflected those we hoped to target in this research. ? What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? I am proud to have accomplished many of the main objectives of this project despite the constraints of Covid-19. The research I have completed has led to a better understanding of the state of hydroponic, aquaponic, and aeroponic food production (HAAFP) in urban areas throughout the United States. I designed a thorough survey instrument that included 103 questions for participants in HAAFP. The goal was to examine (1) the principal motivations of actors involved in HAAFP, (2) the socio-economic effects of this agricultural sector including food security and economic development, (3) the environmental impacts of HAAFP on water and energy use and food production, and (4) the opportunities and constraints to this agricultural sector across the United States. The questions focused on demographic data and participation incentives, production practices, business practices, marketing practices, social practices, and challenges and opportunities. While initially I intended to distribute the survey to participants at facilities in the chosen target cities, Covid19 limitations broadened the scope of the survey. I launched it as a nationwide survey of participants in HAAFP in September of 2020 and collected data for 15 months. Overall, 245 responses were recorded and of those, 100 met the parameters for inclusion, namely participation in an HAAFP organization or business and located in an urban area as defined by the the United States Census Bureau. Through the use of the nationwide survey, I was able to ascertain the actors involved, the key factors that promote and constrain the growth of HAAFP, as well as its socio-economic and environmental impacts (objectives two, three, and four). I also created maps cataloging the presence of HAAFP within the United States pre-Covid. The importance of local, socio-spatial settings was captured by examining the region specific results of the survey. This provides a great basis for building on this research to capture the city-specific contexts and HAAFP interactions within them the health risks posed by Covid19 lessen. In the first year of the project, I prepared to explore local, socio-spatial settings of the six cities listed above (with Philadelphia replacing Boston) by creating census maps with HAAFP businesses and organizations located in that city mapped on them with the goal of reaching out to those businesses to be included as case studies (objective one). The census factors that we included were population density and federal poverty level, median household income, percent residential vacancy, and percentage non-White including Latinos (all at census tract level). I also did research on the regulatory environment for agriculture in these cities and created a comprehensive report of the state of urban agriculture policy in each, paying attention to supportive and obstructive policies. These tasks contributed to objective five. In the second year of the project, I was forced to pivot away from objectives one and five due to constraints of travel. I had planned to use a survey to gather data from the HAAFP participants located in the case study cities. Instead, I expanded the scope of the research to include HAAFP businesses and organizations across the United States and created the nationwide survey described above. The survey was incredibly successful, capturing detailed information on many of the urban HAAFP businesses and organizations throughout the United States. Many of the survey participants also expressed interest in taking part in short, semi-structured interviews to provide additional insights into their experiences in HAAFP, especially the challenges and opportunities that they have experienced that may influence its expansion in the United States. I analyzed the results of the survey and semi-structured interviews and wrote an official report titled, "Hydroponic, Aquaponic, and Aeroponic Food Production in the United State: Findings from a Nationwide Survey." I disseminated this report to the target audience via a webinar and a report, both of which will be available online on a webpage hosted on the San Diego State University website. The data I collected and analyzed to support the first and fifth objectives of the project are being used to create a detailed, comprehensive report on urban agriculture policy and its impact on HAAFP in the six cities chosen. The document is titled, "A Comprehensive Report on Urban Agriculture Policy and Hydroponic, Aquaponic, and Aeroponic Food Production in 6 U.S. Cities." These two documents are the foundation for an academic article in progress that critically analyzes the contributions of HAAFP on social movements to promote food justice in urban areas throughout the United States.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Under Review Year Published: 2022 Citation: O'Neal, B. 2022. Thinking and doing justice: urban agriculture in San Diego County. International Journal of Food Studies.
  • Type: Other Status: Other Year Published: 2022 Citation: O'Neal, B. 2022. Hydroponic, Aquaponic, and Aeroponic Food Production in the United States: Findings from a Nationwide Survey.


Progress 06/15/20 to 06/14/21

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audiences reached in this reporting year was representative of and participants in the hydroponic, aquaponic, and aeroponic food production industry. Also, I made connections with membership of the leadership teams at multiple non-profits engaging in this industry. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?I have received training in survey dissemination, interview expereince, and mapping. I have also had the opportunity to mentor an undergraduate student closely and work with them on project management skills, organization, and of course, mapping! How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Not yet - however, I plan in the third year of the project to publish the results for a public and academic audience. I also plan to hold a webinar to discuss the results with interested parties and continue discussion of the industries future, especially in the context of Covid. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?In the next reporting period, I plan to 1) analyzesurvey results, 2) code and analyzeinterview data, 3) hold a webinar, 4) preparepublications for dissemination to the target audience and research community.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? This reporting period, Ilaunchedthe survey and am continuing to collect data using this tool. I was incredibly successful in creating connections with stakeholders to get these surveys to the target study group (HAAFP participants) and have received over 250 responses. The number continues to grow, so we have continued the collection; however, we will be ending survey data collection in June and begin survey analysis. I hace conducted interviews with key regional stakeholders representing for profit and nonprofit participants in the industry, as well as shorter interviews with HAAFP for profit and nonprofit business owners. I was really excited to work with an undergraduate student in the Geography department on mapping HAAFP businesses acros the United States. It went really well and we now have a map of HAAFP businesses that continues to get more comprehensive as we analyze the surveys.

Publications


    Progress 06/15/19 to 06/14/20

    Outputs
    Target Audience:The target audience is individuals interested in or working inhydroponic, aquaponic, and aeroponic industries throughout the United States. Changes/Problems:Theonly major change to the project has been trading out Boston for Philadelphia as a target city. Philadelphia is a much more respresentative and interesting case. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The project has been incredibly helpful in sharpening my mapping skills and policy research skills. I have gained the most in understanding and implementing how to create a successful survey. This project is the first in which I have used this research tool. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?No, the results have not been disseminated yet. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?In the next reporting period, I will be doing the following: 1) launching the survey, 2) interviewing key regional stakeholders in the HAAFP industry, 3) mapping HAAFP business across the entire United States, 4) interviewing HAAFP business owners, 5) analyzing survey results, 7) coding interview data, and 6) preparing publications for dissemination to the target audience and research community.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? I am making fantastic progress toward the goals of the project. In the first year of the project, I have done targetted research to catalogue the hydroponic, aquaponic, and aeroponic food production (HAAFP) business and organizations in each of the target cities, as well as throughout the entirety of the United States. I have created a comprehensiveexcel sheet that includes the HAAFP businesses and organization as well as locations, contacts,coordinate information, and other descriptive categories. I have created a series of maps for each of the cities that include the HAAFP businesses mapped against population density and federal poverty level, median housefhold income, percent vacancy, and percentage non-White including Latinos (all at census tract level). These maps will aid in accomplishing objectives one and three. I have done policy research and created comprehensive documents that outline the political support or barriers for the HAAFP industries in each of the cities. After multiple drafts,I have a finalized, comprehensive survey to be disseminated that examines objectives two, three, and four.

    Publications

    • Type: Journal Articles Status: Submitted Year Published: 2019 Citation: ONeal, B. and Joassart-Marcelli, P. (2019). Commodity Networks of Urban Agriculture and Microgeographies of Food Justice in San Diego.
    • Type: Journal Articles Status: Submitted Year Published: 2020 Citation: ONeal, B. (2019). Thinking and doing justice: urban agriculture in San Diego County.


    Progress 05/01/19 to 04/30/20

    Outputs
    Target Audience:The target audience is individuals interested in or working inhydroponic, aquaponic, and aeroponic industries throughout the United States. Changes/Problems:Theonly major change to the project has been trading out Boston for Philadelphia as a target city. Philadelphia is a much more respresentative and interesting case. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The project has been incredibly helpful in sharpening my mapping skills and policy research skills. I have gained the most in understanding and implementing how to create a successful survey. This project is the first in which I have used this research tool. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?No, the results have not been disseminated yet. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?In the next reporting period, I will be doing the following: 1) launching the survey, 2) interviewing key regional stakeholders in the HAAFP industry, 3) mapping HAAFP business across the entire United States, 4) interviewing HAAFP business owners, 5) analyzing survey results, 7) coding interview data, and 6) preparing publications for dissemination to the target audience and research community.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? I am making fantastic progress toward the goals of the project. In the first year of the project, I have done targetted research to catalogue the hydroponic, aquaponic, and aeroponic food production (HAAFP) business and organizations in each of the target cities, as well as throughout the entirety of the United States. I have created a comprehensiveexcel sheet that includes the HAAFP businesses and organization as well as locations, contacts,coordinate information, and other descriptive categories. I have created a series of maps for each of the cities that include the HAAFP businesses mapped against population density and federal poverty level, median housefhold income, percent vacancy, and percentage non-White including Latinos (all at census tract level). These maps will aid in accomplishing objectives one and three. I have done policy research and created comprehensive documents that outline the political support or barriers for the HAAFP industries in each of the cities. After multiple drafts,I have a finalized, comprehensive survey to be disseminated that examines objectives two, three, and four.

    Publications

    • Type: Journal Articles Status: Submitted Year Published: 2019 Citation: ONeal, B. and Joassart-Marcelli, P. (2019). Commodity Networks of Urban Agriculture and Microgeographies of Food Justice in San Diego.
    • Type: Journal Articles Status: Submitted Year Published: 2020 Citation: ONeal, B. (2019). Thinking and doing justice: urban agriculture in San Diego County.