Source: PURDUE UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
THE ECONOMICS OF DIGITAL AGRICULTURE
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1019254
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
May 10, 2019
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2023
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
PURDUE UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
WEST LAFAYETTE,IN 47907
Performing Department
Agricultural Economics
Non Technical Summary
Digital agriculture can address long standing challenges faced by participants throughout the industry. Impacts, however, will flow beyond agriculture to adjacent sectors, consumers, and society as a whole. Producers will be equipped with objective research to make better investment decisions. As the number of digital farm management platforms grows, producers will increasingly demand unbiased sources of information. Practices that do not improve profitability or generate off-farm benefits will be discouraged while beneficial solutions will be uncovered. The project will also help producers gain efficiencies through optimal use of digital agriculture. The conditions and practices under which activities such as variable rate application or UAV scouting improve profitability will be better understood. The promise of precision agriculture as a means of mitigating environmental damages has not been fully explored. Precision fertilizer application could reduce nutrient leaching and runoff, a major source of water pollution. Research performed in this area will inform on-farm practices, policy recommendations, and incentive programs that benefit downstream users and reward producers. Digital agriculture may help reverse the "brain drain" from rural farming communities to urban centers. As digital farming raises the demand for specialized labor, young people with technical skills will face higher opportunity costs of leaving agriculture. This trend, along with the expansion of internet access, could help revitalize rural communities. Research driven insights can help aid this process.Domestically, blockchain technology will be transformational in two agricultural areas: supply chain management and food traceability. Blockchain links chunks of data together in "blocks" that, once added to the "chain," cannot be altered, thereby ensuring security and reducing counterparty risk. The need for third party authentication is eliminated by requiring approval from participants in the blockchain before new blocks can be added. The world's first blockchain based agricultural trade place in January of 2018. A shipment of U.S. soybeans to China was handled entirely by a blockchain platform that cut the transaction time in half. More promising are "smart contracts" which automatically execute pre-agreed upon terms (e.g. payment for grain delivered to an elevator) in real time when the conditions of the agreement are authenticated in the blockchain.Blockchain will also dramatically improve food safety and traceability. Products passing through the supply chain are tracked and verified at each step from producer to processor to consumer, ensuring compliance. Walmart, in partnership with IBM, trialed a blockchain tracking system for sliced mangos that cut the amount of time required to trace the product back to its source from one week to 2.2 seconds. Blockchain may also diminish food fraud. In October of 2018, three Nebraska corn and soybean growers were charged with selling conventionally grown crops as certified organic for a period of seven years, pocketing close to $11 million. Combining blockchain technology with on-farm data can prevent such cases where conventional certification is inadequate. While blockchain and smart contracts present unique opportunities, enthusiasm from industry and media may overstate their impact on agriculture. The project will ground this enthusiasm in unbiased research.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
6017210301050%
6016030209050%
Goals / Objectives
The overarching goal of this project is to understand the economic implications of emergent digital technologies in agriculture with an emphasis on the collection and analysis of agricultural data. Five specific objectives are to be addressed:Estimate the costs and benefits to producers of adopting various digital agriculture technologies and identify the practices necessary for profitable implementation. Cost-benefit analyses will help guide farmers' investment decisions.Discover how distributed ledger technology (i.e., blockchain and smart contracts) can be leveraged to improve traceability, ensure food safety, demonstrate sustainability, and reduce transactions costs across the supply chain.Investigate how precision technologies and data analytics can improve environmental and sustainability metrics and internalize environmental externalities.Explore solutions to data privacy concerns that incentivize data sharing while ensuring privacy and creating value for producers.
Project Methods
This project will make use of methods that span existing economic analysis tools used to measure value, estimate relationships among variables, and identify causal effects. The specific methods employed will vary by objective. As a first approximation of the extent of digital agriculture's current reach, the project will rely heavily on primary data collection, i.e. surveys and field experiments. The basic characterization of the digital agriculture marketplace represents the "low hanging fruit" of this project and is best achieved using survey methods. Both the Center for Food and Agricultural Business (CAB) and the Center for Commercial Agriculture (CCA) possess survey tools and, most importantly, lists of targeted survey audiences which the project will leverage. Institutional Review Board exempt status approval will be obtained before conducting the surveys. The project will also seek grants and other external funding sources which will facilitate the collection of primary field data. The project director applied as a co-PI for a NSF/NIFA Innovations at the Nexus of Food, Energy and Water Systems (INFEWS) grant and a USDA NIFA Food and Agriculture Cyberinformatics and Tools Initiative (FACT) grant in the fall of 2018 with collaborators from multiple disciplines and universities. Though the grants address separate issues, INFEWS will research the potential for precision technologies to reduce water use in fruit and tree nut production while FACT will focus on using field data to improve nutrient recommendations, they will both, if funded, generate substantial primary data for analysis.To estimate the economic viability of digital agriculture technologies, standard methods of cost-benefit analysis will be used. Cost-benefit analysis calculates the discounted net present value of future payoffs and can be used to determine the lifetime profitability of a technology investment. New techniques that incorporate uncertainty in yield, prices, input supplies, etc. into traditional cost-benefit analysis such as option value theory and Monte Carlo simulation provide realistic modelling scenarios (Carey and Zilberman, 2002). Where possible, the project will conduct randomized control trials (RCT) where adoption of a technology and non-adoption are randomly assigned to farmer participants or to specific fields within a farmer's land holdings. RCTs are the best method for identifying causal treatment effects, conditional on observable factors. Once estimated, treatment effects can then be plugged in to other analyses tools such partial budgets and cost-benefit. To estimate optimal implementation of investments such as variable rate technology (VRT) or drones, the project will analyze spatial data using GIS software. Datasets will include field and sub-field level information on farm management practices (chemical application rates, irrigation, soil sampling densities, etc.), agro-climatic conditions (soil characteristics, precipitation, temperature, etc.), and output measures (crop yield, soil erosion, carbon sequestration, etc.). Data will be analyzed using both spatial and time-series econometric tools where available. Spatial econometrics captures neighborhood effects that exist among variables observed in space while time-series econometrics capture temporal relationships among longitudinal variables. Both tools are useful for evaluating optimal use of precision agriculture techniques. Various econometric techniques will be used to estimate the impact of blockchain and its derivative, "smart contracts" (protocols that automatically execute when certain pre-defined conditions are satisfied within a blockchain) on the food system. These technologies change the trust dynamics among supply chain participants. Third parties required to solve information problems could be replaced by blockchain-based systems that ensure accountability. For producers, processors, and distributors, the impact of trust-enhancing technologies will be examined through their effects on delivery times, transactions costs, and vertical integration. Data may be observed at the firm or industry level. To estimate consumer responses to traceability, changes in demand and preferences for foodstuffs will be observed. Consumer data may include point-of-sale scanner data or surveys. The project will evaluate the potential for digital agriculture to improve environmental and sustainability outcomes that flow off-farm. The benefits and costs of these outcomes are often unrealized by the producers generating them. To understand how digital agriculture can help producers internalize these externalities, this project will rely on field experiments, observational data, and producer surveys and apply various statistical techniques to identify causal effects. The primary focus will be the effect of nutrient runoff (nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K)) but will also consider localized environmental conflicts such as chemical drift (e.g., dicamba) across property lines. Data may be collected from drainage tile or in-field sensors measuring environmental conditions and related back to the use of precision application or digital solution designed to reduce damage using statistical techniques. Data issues will be analyzed through producer and agribusiness surveys that measure how data is used, perceptions of data security, and ways to incentivize data sharing. Data privacy is a major concern among producers. However, opportunities to create value through data collaboration exist. Growers willing to share farm management data demonstrating sustainable practices may enjoy higher prices or be eligible for more favorable marketing terms. The project will make use of both quantitative and qualitative analysis methods to discover these potential sources of value.

Progress 10/01/19 to 09/30/20

Outputs
Target Audience:Several presentations were made to producer groups and theagribusiness community through events put on by Purdue University's Center for Food and Agricultural Business and the Center for Commercial Agriculture. This included multiple webinars, live speaking engagements, podcasts, and pre-recorded videos. Topics covered include precision agriculture benefits and data usage in agriculture. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The project PI has provided mentoring and guidance to multiplegraduate students on digital agriculture related projects. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Results of this project were presented to the following groups: • Pudue Center for Commercial Agriculture Top Farmer Conference (Jan, 2020): Results of farm data usage survey presented to an audience of agricultural producers from in and around Indiana. • Pudue Center for Commercial Agriculture Advisory Council Meeting(Jan, 2020): Presented general project results and goals to members of the Purdue Center for Commercial Agriculture advisory board. A workshop was performed with advisory board members to better design survey instruments and direct the project's future research goals. • 2020 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association (AAEA) Annual Meeting (Aug 2020): Presented initial results of a paper by the PI and co-authors on precision agriculture adoption and efficiency. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?I intend to work on accomplishing the above goals by publishing academnic journal articles using data obtained from primary surveys and USDA ARMS data. I will also continue to participate and present at conferences for commercial producers and agribusiness stakeholders. I will seed grant funding to support my research and graduate students.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? 1. The PI and colleagues implemented a nationwide phonesurveyof corn and soybean producers on their collection and usage of farm data. The survey led to multiple outputs including extension presentations, press publications, and a journal article that is currently under review. Additional output will be generated from this survey. The PI gained access to the USDA Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS). The ARMS contains questions about precision agriculture technology adoption. The PI and co-authors have performed analysis of the data to estimate the efficiency benefits associated with adoption of different precision agriculture technology bundles. This analysis has generated a journal article that is currently under review and multiple extension and press materials. Analysis continues to beperformed on the ARMS survey to generate future publications. 2. The PI served as faculty advisor to graduate student in the Purdue MS/MBA program focused on estimating the feasibility of blockchain technology for livestock production. The student performed a study of consumers'willingness-to-pay for traceability in beef for their master's capstone project under the PI's guidance. 3. The PI is currently part of a research project using USDA ARMS data to estimate the propensity to adopt cover crops and no-till technology. 4. The PI and collaborators performed a survey of agricultural producers to estimate farmers' willingness-to-pay to rent cropland that comes with historical farm data. The survey was designed to understand how farmers value farm data. Initial result suggest some willingness-to-pay. Results motivated a longer mail in survey which is currently being designed. The PI and co-authors submitted a grant proposal to fund the long-form survey in the fall of 2020.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: DeLay, Nathan D., Hayley H. Chouinard, Cory G. Walters, and Philip R. Wandschneider. 2020. The Influence of Crop Insurance Agents on Coverage Choices: The Role of Agent Competition. Agricultural Economics 51 (4): 623-638
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: DeLay, Nathan D., S. M. Thumbi, Julia Vanderford, Elkanah Otiang, Linus Ochieng, M. Kariuki Njenga, Guy H. Palmer, and Thomas L. Marsh. 2020. Linking Calving Intervals to Milk Production and Household Nutrition in Kenya. Food Security 12: 309-325
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Chaterji, Somali, Nathan D. DeLay, John Evans, Nathan Mosier, Dennis Buckmaster, and Ranveer Chandra. 2020. Data Systems and Analytics for Sustainable and Digitized Agriculture: Techniques, Policy, and Challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.09786
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Under Review Year Published: 2021 Citation: DeLay, Nathan D., Nathanael M. Thompson, and James R. Mintert. Understanding the Farm Data Lifecycle: Collection, Use, and Impact of Farm Data on U.S. Commercial Corn and Soybean Farms. revisions requested at Precision Agriculture
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Under Review Year Published: 2021 Citation: DeLay, Nathan D., Nathanael M. Thompson, and James R. Mintert. Precision Agriculture Adoption and Technical Efficiency. under review at Journal of Agricultural Economics
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Under Review Year Published: 2021 Citation: DeLay, Nathan D., Brady E. Brewer, David Boussios, and Allen M. Featherstone. The Impact of Crop Insurance on Farm Financial Outcomes. under review at Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Precision Agriculture Adoption and Technical Efficiency. 2020 AAEA Annual Meeting (virtual). Kansas City, Missouri.
  • Type: Other Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: DeLay, Nathan D., Hayley H. Chouinard, Cory G. Walters, and Philip R. Wandschneider. 2020. Examining the Role of the Crop Insurance Selling Agent. University of Nebraska Cornhusker Economics, April 2020.


Progress 05/10/19 to 09/30/19

Outputs
Target Audience:Multiple presentations were made to members of the agribusiness community through events put on by Purdue University's Center for Food and Agricultural Business and the College of Agriculture. Specifically, I gave presentations on agricultural data and blockchain technology to professionals from agricultural input supply companies, ag-tech startups, agricultural trading companies, the agricultural finance community, and more. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The primary outlets for the results generated by this project include the following conference presentations: Pudue Center for Commercial AgricultureTop Farmer Conference(Jan, 2019) Purdue College of Agriculture Digital Ag Roundtable (Sep, 2019) Pudue Center for Food and Agricultural Business Executive Summit (Oct, 2019) Pudue Center for Food and Agricultural Business National Conference (Nov, 2019) As well as press publications such as blogs and interviews disseminated through the Purdue Center for Commercial Agriculture and Purdue Center for Food and Agricultural Business websites. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?I intend to work on accomplishing the above goals by publishing academnic journal articles using data obtained from primary surveys and USDA ARMS data. I will also continue to participate and present at conferences for commercial producers and agribusiness stakeholders.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? The PI and co-authors implemented several primary data surveys regarding precision agriculture adoption and data use among commercial producers. An initial survey of UAV/drone ownership and usage was conducted as part of the Purdue/CME Group Ag Econ Barometer. Improved understanding of why commercial producers choose not to invest in drone technology was generated. This motivated a second survey of farm data software usage which improved understanding of what software products are available and being used. Press publications directed at industry participants were produced by both survey results. A more comprehensive survey was completed in August of 2019 which asked large corn and soybean producers to identify how they collect, manage, and analyze farm data. Key insights generated from this survey have been presented at the Purdue Center for Food and Agricultural Business National Conference. The survey results will result in both popular press publications and academic research articles. A better understanding of the impact of blockchain technology on agriculture was developed during the reporting period. This was accomplished by networking and engaging with industry participants that are actively pursuing blockchain solutions in the food system. Several outreach activities were performed by the PI on the potential of blockchain technology for agriculture. Proprietary farm-level data was obtained from the USDA Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS) from ERS. Analysis of this data will generate new insights into the environmental and sustainability implications of precision agriculture adoption. The PI reviewed the legal status of farm data which informed contributions to popular press publications and working papers on the value of farm data. Solutions to issues around data privacy have been attempted in industry and could be explored by public universities. More research is needed to accomplish this goal.

Publications

  • Type: Other Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: DeLay, Nathan D. Understanding Farm Data Usage. Purdue Center for Food and Agricultural Business Blog post, Oct 4, 2019. DeLay, Nathan D. Purdue survey looks at farmer use of ag data software.Indiana Prairie Farmer, May 30, 2019 https://www.farmprogress.com/management/purdue-survey-looks-farmer-use-ag-data-software. DeLay, Nathan D. The Blockchain: A New Form of Trust. Purdue Center for Food and Agricultural Business Quarterly Review Series, March 2019.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Other Year Published: 2019 Citation: Farm Data Use in Commercial Agriculture. 2019 Purdue Center for Food and Agricultural Business National Conference. West Lafayette, IN. Blockchain for Agriculture: Promise, Potential, and Reality. 2019 Purdue Center for Food and Agricultural Business Executive Summit. West Lafayette, IN. Blockchain for Agriculture: Promise, Potential, and Reality. 2019 Purdue University Digital Agriculture Roundtable. West Lafayette, IN. The Impact of Crop Insurance on Farm Financial Outcomes. 2019 AAEA Annual Meeting. Atlanta, GA. The Impact of Crop Insurance on Farm Financial Outcomes. 2019 WAEA Annual Meeting. Coeur dAlene, ID. "Using Technology Beyond Precision Applications to Improve Profitability." 2019 Purdue University Top Farmer Conference. West Lafayette, IN.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: DeLay, Nathan D., Brady E. Brewer, David Boussios, and Allen M. Featherstone. 2019. TheImpact of Crop Insurance on Farm Financial Outcomes.Selected paper prepared for presentation at the 2019 Agricultural & Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA, July 22-July 24, 2019
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: DeLay, Nathan D. \The Impact of Federal Crop Insurance on the Conservation Reserve Program." Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 48 (2): 297-327 https://doi.org/10.1017/age.2019.9 DeLay, Nathan D., Hayley H. Chouinard, and Philip R. Wandschneider. 2019. \Categorizing Agritourism Operations and Identifying Barriers to Success." Journal of Agribusiness 37 (1): 1-22