Progress 06/01/19 to 05/31/21
Outputs Target Audience:The workshop was designed to promote in-depth dialogue, debate and policy discussions among a small group of invited keynote speakers, selected presenters and other attendees. The workshop attracted experts from the academe, government representatives at multiple levels, NGOs and think-tanks. The presentations and dicussions enhanced our understanding of the interrelated nature of innovation, regulation, environmental quality, and economic development in rural communities in the United States. Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?
Nothing Reported
How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The main deliverable of the workshop was the special issue. The results and knowledge from the research and the workshop are disseminated through the special issue of the ARER. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?
Nothing Reported
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
Objectives 1 and 2: (Accomplishment Reported in 2020 Progress Report) We brought together 23 participants into the workshop to discuss empirical and theoretical work on environmental regulation and innovation adopted by specific localities in the US. The paper presentations generated a lot of dicussion during the sessions and throughout the duration of the workshop. Of the 23 participants, 2 were keynote speakers, 11 were paper presenters. The rest were active scholars in the field of environmental regulation and innovation. Each keynote address bookended the workshop.The introductory keynote was given by Kathleen Segerson from University of Connecticut. She provided context to disparate local environmental regulations by discussing how inter-jurisdictional spillovers versus spatial heterogeneity give rise to arguments favoring either federal versus local control over regulations. The closing keynote was given by David Popp from Syracuse University. To offer innovation as a solution, he discussed the general lessons from energy-related innovation, much of which arise from his own large body of research and applies them to local jurisdictions to promote not just diffusion or deployment of innovations but also development of new technologies. Objective 3: (Accomplished in Calendar Year 2020 - New to Final Report) During the reporting period, under the supervision of the project director who served as guest co-editor, the following were publised as as 2020's 2nd Issue: Special Issue on "Environmental Regulation and Innovation in Rural Communities" in NAREA's journal, ARER: 5 peer reviewed articles, 2 invited pieces from the keynote speakers and one foreword from the co-editors. The pieces cover a wide range of topics in environmental regulation from land use, water, to energy and innovative technological and governance related solutions. The link to the special issue and the citations to each paper are indicated on the "Products" page and copied here: The special issue can be found at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/agricultural-and-resource-economics-review/issue/1DCC23958FF7EB7E8FD45F2F47EDF9F7 The citations of the articles are as follows: Harrington, D., & Heintzelman, M. (2020). Foreword. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 49(2), 193-195. doi:10.1017/age.2020.16 Segerson, K. (2020). Local Environmental Policy in a Federal System: An Overview. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 49(2), 196-208. doi:10.1017/age.2020.14 Sharma, B., Cho, S., & Hellwinckel, C. (2020). Optimal Budget Allocations for Protected Area Acquisition To Store Carbon in a Local Community Under Economic Growth Uncertainty. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 49(2), 209-236. doi:10.1017/age.2020.10 Yehouenou, L., Grogan, K., Bi, X., & Borisova, T. (2020). Improving BMP Cost-Share Enrollment Rates: Insights from a Survey of Florida Farmers. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 49(2), 237-269. doi:10.1017/age.2020.5 Liu, H., & Ruebeck, C. (2020). Knowledge Spillover and Positive Environmental Externality in Agricultural Decision Making under Performance-Based Payment Programs. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 49(2), 270-290. doi:10.1017/age.2020.18 Fu, G., Liu, P., & Swallow, S. (2020). Effectiveness of Public versus Private Ownership: Violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 49(2), 291-320. doi:10.1017/age.2020.4 Aleti, S., & Hochman, G. (2020). Non-Constant Elasticity of Substitution and Intermittent Renewable Energy. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 49(2), 321-359. doi:10.1017/age.2020.7 Popp, D. (2020). Promoting Clean Energy Innovation at the State and Local Level. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 49(2), 360-373. doi:10.1017/age.2020.15 Budget During the reporting period, the remainder of the budget (19, 506.2) was spent on publication fees ($7,875) and honoraria (11,631.2) to the authors of the published (peer-reviewed and invited) pieces.
Publications
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2020
Citation:
The special issue of ARER in 2020 contains 5 peer reviewed articles which were presented during the workshop, 2 keynote papers from the workshop's keynote speakers and foreword from the editors. The two keynote papers bookend the special issue. The paper by Segerson discusses environmental federalism; the paper by Popp focuses innovation as a solution to local environmental problems.
The special issue can be found at:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/agricultural-and-resource-economics-review/issue/1DCC23958FF7EB7E8FD45F2F47EDF9F7
The citations of the articles are as follows:
Harrington, D., & Heintzelman, M. (2020). Foreword. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 49(2), 193-195. doi:10.1017/age.2020.16
Segerson, K. (2020). Local Environmental Policy in a Federal System: An Overview. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 49(2), 196-208. doi:10.1017/age.2020.14
Sharma, B., Cho, S., & Hellwinckel, C. (2020). Optimal Budget Allocations for Protected Area Acquisition To Store Carbon in a Local Community Under Economic Growth Uncertainty. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 49(2), 209-236. doi:10.1017/age.2020.10
Yehouenou, L., Grogan, K., Bi, X., & Borisova, T. (2020). Improving BMP Cost-Share Enrollment Rates: Insights from a Survey of Florida Farmers. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 49(2), 237-269. doi:10.1017/age.2020.5
Liu, H., & Ruebeck, C. (2020). Knowledge Spillover and Positive Environmental Externality in Agricultural Decision Making under Performance-Based Payment Programs. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 49(2), 270-290. doi:10.1017/age.2020.18
Fu, G., Liu, P., & Swallow, S. (2020). Effectiveness of Public versus Private Ownership: Violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 49(2), 291-320. doi:10.1017/age.2020.4
Aleti, S., & Hochman, G. (2020). Non-Constant Elasticity of Substitution and Intermittent Renewable Energy. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 49(2), 321-359. doi:10.1017/age.2020.7
Popp, D. (2020). Promoting Clean Energy Innovation at the State and Local Level. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 49(2), 360-373. doi:10.1017/age.2020.15
|
Progress 06/01/19 to 05/31/20
Outputs Target Audience:The workshop was designed to promote in-depth dialogue, debate and policy discussions among a small group of invited keynote speakers, selected presenters and other attendees. The workshop attracted experts from the academe, government representatives at multiple levels, NGOs and think-tanks. The presentations and dicussions enhanced our understanding of the interrelated nature of innovation, regulation, environmental quality, and economic development in rural communities in the United States. Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?
Nothing Reported
How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?
Nothing Reported
What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?For the next reporting period, we will complete the peer review process and publish the accepted papers in the special issue of ARER: "Environmental Regulation and Innovation in Local Communities" in August 2020. This will be the main form of dissemination of the workshop's output and will accomplish Objective 3.
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
Objectives 1 and 2: (Accomplished) We brought toogether 23 participants into the workshop to discuss empirical and theoretical work on environmental regulation and innovation adopted by specific localities in the US. The paper presentations generated a lot of dicussion during the sessions and throughout the duration of the workshop. Of the 23 participants, 2 were keynote speakers, 11 were paper presenters. The rest were active scholars in the field of environmental regulation and innovation. Each keynote address bookended the workshop.The introductory keynote was given by Kathleen Segerson from University of Connecticut. She provided context to disparate local environmental regulations by discussing how inter-jurisdictional spillovers versus spatial heterogeneity give rise to arguments favoring either federal versus local control over regulations. The closing keynote was given by David Popp from Syracuse University. To offer innovation as a solution, he discussed the general lessons from energy-related innovation, much of which arise from his own large body of research and applies them to local jurisdictions to promote not just diffusion or deployment of innovations but also development of new technologies. Objective 3: (In Progress) During the reporting period, NAREA's journal, ARER recieved 6 submissions from presenters for peer review and 2 invited pieces from the keynote speakers for the special issue dedicated to the 2019 workshop. Five of those 6 are currently in the peer-review process scheduled for publication in August 2020. The pieces cover a wide range of topics in environmental regulation from land use, water, to energy and innovative technological and governance related solutions. The guest co-editors are the co-PIs of this grant. During the reporting period, pasrt of budget was been spent on (1) covering travel and lodging of all participants $6,705.12 (2) travel, lodging and honoraria for the keynote speakers: $3,199.79 (3) supplies: $321.73 (4) vendor fees: $4,609.35 In the next reporting period, the remainder of the budget ($20,914) is allocated for publication fees and honoraria to the authors of the published (peer-reviewed and invited) pieces.
Publications
|