Source: LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
U.S. AGRICULTURAL TRADE AND POLICY IN A DYNAMIC GLOBAL MARKET ENVIRONMENT
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1018921
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
S-OLD 1072
Project Start Date
Mar 4, 2019
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2023
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY
202 HIMES HALL
BATON ROUGE,LA 70803-0100
Performing Department
Agri Economics & Agribusiness
Non Technical Summary
U.S. Agriculture is dependent on the International Market. The U.S. has long been a proponent of developing opportunities for trade through multilateral, bilateral, and regional trade agreements. Recent events, however, including the U.S. withdrawal from Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations and the announced renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) create uncertainties with respect to their implications for U.S. agriculture. The U.S. decision to withdraw from the Paris Accord creates uncertainties on the environmental front that will affect U.S. agricultural trade, both with respect to the reaction of countries that are markets for U.S. agricultural products as well as our ability to compete through the elimination or reduction of environmental regulations. While the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury has been directed to label China a currency manipulator, the tremendous economic growth in the United States only adds to U.S. purchasing power and exacerbates the Chinese trade surplus with the United States. At the same time, the Secretary of Commerce and the U.S. Trade Representative have been directed to identify all foreign trading abuses that unfairly affect American workers and use every tool under American and international law to end those abuses immediately, which will potentially result in retaliation.Although there is much evidence of a change in the stance of the U.S. with respect to international trade, it is important to note that the global market is changing as well. Evidence of this can be seen with Brexit, as Great Britain's vote to secede from the European Union will create the need for renegotiation and modification of numerous trade agreements involving Britain and the EU. Both countries will be forced to develop or renegotiate pacts with the United States as well as with our competitors and customers.The problem that comes to the fore is that it is often unclear what the implications of these actions will be for agriculture and related interest groups. During the period of 2006-2016, U.S. agricultural exports rose from $70.95 billion to $134.71 billion a 90 percent increase. Imports rose from $65.46 billion to $114.44 billion, resulting in a positive agricultural trade balance that nearly quadrupled from $5.49 billion in 2006 to $20.27 billion in 2016 (ERS and FAS, 2018). Given the importance and growth of international agricultural trade for U.S. agriculture and the U.S. economy, there is a need to determine the specific consequences for agricultural trade of these actions mentioned above. These implications include trade creation and trade diversion impacts, as well as price, quantity, and welfare implications for various interest groups, including agricultural producers, agribusiness, consumers, and the environment.The body of work proposed here will contribute to the understanding of agricultural trade and policy. As a group of researchers from multiple institutions, the output of this work will address the multifarious needs of the agricultural community and policy makers. As these constituencies are interested in a diverse group of products and policies both nationally and internationally, the collaboration of this project will address many of these different interests. The analysis will advance the science of economics of trade and policy in agriculture with new empirical techniques and new data.The outcomes of this research are expected to have positive consequences for numerous stakeholders associated with the U.S. food and agricultural sector. This includes agricultural producers, consumers, agribusiness firms, rural communities, policy makers, farm organizations and related constituencies in order for them to have the information necessary for informed decision making and policy design.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
6066110301040%
6106110301030%
6116110301030%
Goals / Objectives
1. Determine the impacts of U.S. and foreign policies, regulations, market structures, and productivity on U.S. food and agricultural trade, the economy, and the environment. Specifically, to examine the impact of the following a. foreign investment and multinational firms,
b. international and national events and policies (e.g., Farm Bill, immigration and labor issues, food fraud, food labeling laws), and
c. economic growth and changing policies of developing and emerging economies, including safeguards or other mechanisms that target food security. Determine the impacts of international trade agreements and institutions on U.S. food and agricultural trade, the economy, and the environment.ÿ Specifically, to examine the potential implications of the following: a. renegotiating preferential trade agreements (e.g., NAFTA),
b. not engaging in preferential trade agreements (e.g. Trans Pacific Partnership), and
c. future preferential trade agreements.
Project Methods
Methods to accomplish the objectives of this project include econometrics, simulation, spatial and optimization models, and time series analysis. Market behavior, supply and demand along with risk and uncertainty will be studied using these methods. The economic impacts will focus on changes in output, value added, employment, the welfare of consumers and producers, and government expenditures. Measures of economic performance will focus on prices, trade, economies at the regional and national level, and the environment. In addition, we will develop new methods and extend existing methods to accomplish these objectives.

Progress 10/01/19 to 09/30/20

Outputs
Target Audience:The outcomes of this research are expected to have positive consequences for several stakeholders associated with the U.S. food and agricultural sector. This includes agricultural producers, consumers, agribusiness firms, rural communities, policy makers, farm organizations and related constituencies in order for them to have the information necessary for informed decision making and policy design. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Significant opportunities for training and professional development have been provided by this project. One graduate student has assisted in research as a component of her graduate training. In addition, the PI has been able to attend meetings of the S-1072 multistate project and gained insight into international trade issues through collaboration with colleagues from other landgrant universities. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The results of our research and collaboration have been disseminated through two journal articles in Crop Science, which reaches a community than that of journals which primarily target agricultural economists. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Work will be completed to determine the impact of COVID-19 on agricultural trade flowing through the ports of south Louisiana to determine differences in impacts between countries and commodity groups.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Research was conducted to determine the role of U.S. and foreign policies, market structures and regulations on the sugar productivity. Specifically, the impact of mecanization and technology adoption was analyzed to determine its impact on the productivity of the Louisiana and Florida sugar industries.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: 2. Kennedy, P.L., A. Schmitz, A., and F. Zhang (2020), Sugar Recovery Rates in Louisiana, Florida, and Australia (19002018): Sugarcane Varietal Development and Cultural Practices, Crop Science, 2020;111. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20281.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: 3. Schmitz, A., P.L. Kennedy, and F. Zhang (2020), Sugarcane and Sugar Yields in Louisiana (1911-2018): Varietal Development and Mechanization, Crop Science, 60(2020):13031312. Online version at https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20045.


Progress 03/04/19 to 09/30/19

Outputs
Target Audience:Target audiences reached during this reporting period were industry leaders, government officials, and academics interested in the impact of agricultural trade policies and the exchange rate on international agricultural trade and the agricultural economy. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Funding was provided for a Ph.D. level graduate research assistant who is examining the Intraregional Trade Effects of CAFTA-DR. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The results have been disseminated to communities of interest through refereed journal articles, conference presentations, and an M.S. thesis. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?The following research will be conducted : 1) Examine the Intraregional Trade Effects of CAFTA-DR in the Textile and Clothing Industry 2) Analyze Internal Migration and the Effects of the Textile and Clothing Industry in Honduras 3) Determine the Impact of tariffs and retaliatory tariffs on Agricultural Trade between China and the United States, and 4) Determine the Impact of exchange rates on agricultural trade policy between North American countries.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? In cooperation with other investigators in this Multistate project, analyses were conducted to determine the relationship between international trade and food storage in achieving food security. A theoretical framework was developed and data for the Indian rice sector was analyzed to show that trade can be a cost-effective substitute for storage in achieving food security. Another analysis with collaborators from the University of Florida and the University of Tennessee examined the adoption of Genetically Modified Seed in the production of sugarbeets. Our analysis found that although producers can benefit from increased efficiencies using GMO crops, they must consider potential impacts of GMOs on the demand for their product.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: Kennedy, P.L., A. Schmitz, and G.C. van Kooten (2020). The Role of Storage and Trade in Food Security, Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization, 0(0): -. Retrieved 6 Nov. 2019, from doi:10.1515/jafio-2019-0056.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: van Kooten, G.C., A. Schmitz, and P.L. Kennedy (2020). Is Commodity Storage an Option for Enhancing Food Security in Developing Countries? Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization, 0(0): -. Retrieved 8 Nov. 2019, from doi:10.1515/jafio-2019-0054.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: Kennedy, P.L., A. Schmitz, and K.L. Delong (2019). Biotechnology and Demand Concerns: The Case of Genetically Modified U.S. Sugar Beets, AgBioForum: The Journal of Agrobiotechnology Management & Economics, 22,1(2019): Online Advanced Publication, 1-12.