Recipient Organization
SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY
PO BOX 2275A
BROOKINGS,SD 57007
Performing Department
Animal Science
Non Technical Summary
Feed costs are the most significant operating cost in pork production, accounting for nearly 70% of operating expenses. Over the last decade, feed ingredient prices have increased due to amplified international demands and the use of feed ingredients for biofuel production (Woyengo et al., 2014). At the same time, swine genetics companies continue to improve the ability of swine to achieve lean gain. Converting feed efficiently to lean tissue, which ultimately becomes pork, will maximize the efficiency of swine production.Feed additives are low inclusion ingredients designed to provide benefits in the growth, feed efficiency, and/or feed intake of animals and ultimately lower the cost of production. There are a myriad of commercially available feed additives with associated claims. However, not all products have been the subject of peer reviewed research in a commercial setting. This may be a result of new innovation or because products have only been tested with smaller numbers of animals. This makes it difficult to recommend which feed additives swine producers should choose. Furthermore, responses to feed additives may be affected by the feeding, environmental, and management conditions (Chastanet et al., 2007). For example, feed additive development trials may involve animals fed for short periods of time, animals that are limit fed diets, and/or animals that are individually housed under carefully controlled environmental conditions. These conditions diverge considerably from those found in the industry where diets are fed for long periods of time, animals have free access to feed, and animals are group housed in large pens in buildings subject to environmental variabilities. Pigs housed under commercial conditions and subjected to the normal stressors of the wean-to-finish environment can significantly aid in the evaluation of the impact of feed additives on the overall cost of production. This project will serve to provide swine producers with pertinent information about the effects of specific nutritional, environmental, and management strategies which will allow them to make informed decisions.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Goals / Objectives
The overall goal of this project is to improve the production efficiency of growing and finishing swine through nutrition, environment, and management strategies, alone or in combination.Objective 1: To develop nutritional strategies to improve the production efficiency of growing and finishing swineFeed additives are included in swine diets to improve production efficiency and/or profitability. For example, a feed additive may improve the feed efficiency or average daily gain of growing and finishing pigs. Alternatively, a feed additive may decrease the total cost of the diets fed to growing and finishing pigs. In either case, the choice to include feed additives will be based on economics.Examples of common feed additives include trace minerals, phytogenics, essential oils, enzymes, probiotics and prebiotics. The inclusion of feed additives may require changes in nutritional formulation strategy or they may be added to diets without changes to the diet formulation.Objective 2: To develop environmental strategies to improve the production efficiency of growing and finishing swineThe environment (e.g. air quality and temperature) can have an impact on the production efficiency of growing and finishing swine. Changes in the exposure of animals to ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and/or other gases in the environment may impact the production efficiency of swine. Likewise, the thermal environment has an impact on the production efficiency of pigs. Monitoring and optimizing the environmental conditions during feed additive trials will provide additional novel information on any interactions related to the inclusion of feed additives.Objective 3: To develop management strategies to improve the production efficiency of growing and finishing swineThe management of housing conditions, including the available feeder and waterer space, of growing and finishing swine may impact production efficiency. Pen group variability may also impact production efficiency. Management of differential housing conditions will provide additional information on any interactions with feed additives and environmental conditions.
Project Methods
Trials will focus on the growth performance and feed efficiency of the animals. Animals will enter the 1200 head off-site wean-to-finish facility from a commercial sow farm. Piglets will be housed in 50 pens of 25 pigs/pen. Standard production practices will be followed, unless different procedures are required for scientific reasons. Feed will be quantified and delivered by the Feedlogic system to individual pens according to treatment allocations and/or feeding schedule. Pen groups will be weighed on the pen scale weekly for the first 6 to 8 weeks. Above pen average weights of 50 lb, pens will be weighed every two weeks until pigs are marketed. According to commercial practice, heavier groups of pigs will be marketed before the entire barn is marketed.Objective 1: To develop nutritional strategies to improve the production efficiency of growing and finishing swineApproximately 1,100 pigs will be assigned to 44 pens or 1,125 pigs will be assigned to 45 pens with 25 pigs per pen. Nutritional studies will evaluate various diets with or without feed additives, as well as differing water sources with or without water additives. Test subjects will include either weaned piglets approximately 20 days old (nursery), after pigs have achieve approximately 50 lbs of body weight (grow-finish), or from wean-to-finish. A control diet formulated to match a common industry diet will be included as one of the treatments. Pens will be weighed and blocked by weight to one of four or five treatments with eleven or nine pens per treatment, respectively. Grow-finish pigs may have previously participated in a nursery trial, so carryover effects will be included in the randomized complete block statistical model.Null hypothesis: There will be no effect of nutritional strategy on the production efficiency of growing and finishing swine.Objective 2: To develop environmental strategies to improve the production efficiency of growing and finishing swineApproximately 1,100 pigs will be assigned to 44 pens with 25 pigs per pen. Specific environmental parameters (e.g. air speed, temperature, and/or quality) will be adjusted within one of the two rooms. Test subjects will include either weaned piglets approximately 20 days old (nursery), after pigs have achieve approximately 50 lbs of body weight (grow-finish), or from wean-to-finish. A common diet formulated to match an industry diet will be fed to all pens. Pens will be weighed and blocked by weight to one of two room treatments with 22 pens per treatment. The results will be analyzed according to a randomized complete block statistical model. Null hypothesis: There will be no effect of environmental strategy on the production efficiency of growing and finishing swine.Objective 3: To develop management strategies to improve the production efficiency of growing and finishing swineApproximately 1,100 pigs will be assigned to 44 pens or 1125 pigs will be assigned to 45 pens with 25 pigs per pen. Management strategies (e.g. stocking density, waterer or feeder access, or feed delivery) will be applied to pens of pigs. A common diet formulated to match an industry diet will be fed. Test subjects will include either weaned piglets approximately 20 days old (nursery), after pigs have achieve approximately 50 lbs of body weight (grow-finish), or from wean-to-finish. Pens will be weighed and blocked by weight to one of four or five treatments with eleven or nine pens per treatment, respectively. Grow-finish pigs may have previously participated in a nursery trial, so carryover effects will be included in the randomized complete block statistical model.Null hypothesis: There will be no effect of management strategy on the production efficiency of growing and finishing swine.