Source: UNIV OF CONNECTICUT submitted to
EARLY AND SUSTAINED APPLICATION OF PROBIOTICS TO PROMOTE GROWTH, GUT MICROBIOME ESTABLISHMENT AND INTESTINAL FUNCTION IN BROILER CHICKEN
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
TERMINATED
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1016794
Grant No.
(N/A)
Project No.
CONS00994
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Program Code
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Oct 1, 2018
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2021
Grant Year
(N/A)
Project Director
Amalaradjou, MA.
Recipient Organization
UNIV OF CONNECTICUT
438 WHITNEY RD EXTENSION UNIT 1133
STORRS,CT 06269
Performing Department
Animal Science
Non Technical Summary
Increasing concerns over antibiotic use in animals and the emergence of antibiotic resistant pathogens resulted in the FDA directive curbing use of antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) in food animals including poultry. This has led to an urgent need for safe and natural alternatives to AGPs in promoting poultry health and performance. In this regard, several researchers have demonstrated the efficacy of probiotic supplementation to day-old chicks in improving performance in market birds. However, the period of embryonic growth and immediate post-hatch development account for almost half of the productive life of modern broilers. Furthermore, this developmental period is critical to attaining quality broiler performance at marketing. Therefore, early probiotic administration during embryonic development could be a potential and viable approach to promote sustained growth and development in broilers. Hence, this study will investigate the effect of probiotic administration during early embryonic development on promoting growth in embryos, hatchlings and broiler chicks. Ultimately, successful completion of this research can be expected to provide a feasible and practical treatment that can be applied in conjunction with routine poultry management practices to promote health and performance in chickens.Our central hypothesis is that probiotics significantly enhance embryonic growth and performance in broiler chicken by modulating the intestinal microflora and promoting intestinal function. We have based our hypothesis on published reports and our own preliminary studies, in which we demonstrate that in-ovo and in-feed application of probiotic cultures significantly improved growth and feed conversion ratio in layer embryos and pullets. Further, these changes were found to be associated with a significant increase in cecal lactobacilli population in probiotic treated chicks. Additionally, similar studies conducted with broiler lines (Ross 308) demonstrated a significant increase in body weight, morphometric measurements and cecal microbial population in embryos and hatchlings. The specific objectives of this study include:i) To determine the effect of in-ovo and in-feed probiotic administration on embryonic growth and post-hatch performance in broiler chickensii) To identify the effect of probiotic supplementation on the composition and diversity of the gut microbiome in the growing embryo, hatchling and broiler chicken.iii) To identify the effects of probiotic supplementation on intestinal function in the growing embryo, hatchling and broiler chicken.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
50%
Applied
50%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
30232201010100%
Goals / Objectives
The goals of the proposed study are to investigate the effect of early (in-ovo) and sustained (in-feed) probiotic supplementation on promoting growth and performance in broilers. Additionally, the effect of probiotic supplementation on the chicken gut microbiome and intestinal function will be investigated.
Project Methods
Objective 1. Experimental design: All animal experiments will be conducted with the approval of the UConn Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Freshly laid fertile eggs (Ross 308) will be obtained from a local commercial farm. A total of 1980 eggs will be needed for the study, with 660 eggs for each of the three replications. Eggs in each trial will be randomly assigned to one of the four experimental groups. The treatment groups include: i) Control (no probiotic treatment), ii) Lactobacillus paracasei DUP-13076 (LP), iii) L. rhamnosus NRRL-B-442 (LR) and iv) Probiotic cocktail (PC). Based on the power analysis (Lenth, 2007), we will sample 12 eggs/birds per treatment/time point to obtain a significant difference in morphometric and performance parameters between treated and control eggs/birds.Probiotic culture conditions and preparation of probiotic spray: Probiotic strains (Lactobacillus paracasei DUP 13076 and L. rhamnosus NRRL B-442) were selected based on our previous studies and preliminary layer trial (Muyyarikkandy and Amalaradjou, 2017). Each strain will be cultured separately and washed twice with sterile PBS. Equal portions from each of the two strains will be combined to make the two-strain probiotic cocktail. Appropriate dilutions of the cultures in PBS will be used to obtain the desired level of inoculum (9 log CFU/egg).Egg treatment, incubation and hatching: Freshly laid eggs will be transferred to the avian research facility at UConn. All settable eggs will be weighed individually, numbered and randomly assigned to the different treatments group. On day 0, 3, 7, 10, 14 and 18 of incubation, eggs will be sprayed with 200 µl of PBS (group 1) or probiotic (9 log CFU/egg in groups 2-4). The sprayed eggs will be incubated in a thermostat incubator for 18 days under standard conditions (Upadhyaya et al., 2015). On day 18, the eggs will be removed, weighed individually followed by probiotic/PBS treatment application and transferred to the incubator set up for hatching for 3 days or until hatch.Embryo sampling and morphometric measurements: Twelve eggs per treatment will be randomly sampled on days 0, 7, 10, 14 and 18 of incubation. The eggs will be weighed and opened through the blunt end for morphometric assessments (O'Dea et al., 2006; de Oliviera et al., 2014). The embryos will be euthanized by cervical dislocation prior to dissection. Embryonic development will be evaluated by the absolute and relative weights of body, yolk and organs as described by Li et al. (2013). Briefly, the thorax, leg, heart, liver, stomach and intestines will be excised and weighed. Additionally, starting on day 14, jejunum and its contents will be collected for further analysis in objective 2 and 3.Hatch sampling: On day of hatch (day 21), percent hatchability will be recorded and hatchlings will be weighed prior to placement on floor pens. Twelve hatchlings from each treatment group will be sacrificed and morphometric measurements will be performed as described under embryo sampling. Organ weights will be expressed relative to body weight (Aravind et al., 2003). Additionally, jejunum and its contents will be collected for further analysis in objective 2 and 3.Broiler chicken, diet and management: Hatchlings will be weighed and tagged. They will be housed on floor pens with wood shavings as bedding and supplemental heat at the UConn avian facility. Broiler birds will be started on a 23% CP, 3000 kcal/kg ME ration and then placed on a 20% CP, 3200 kcal/kg grower/finisher ration at 3 weeks of age. The feed will be supplemented daily with 200 µl of PBS or probiotic (9 log CFU/g of feed) from hatch until sacrifice (week 5).Body weight and Feed conversion ratio: Prior to feeding, individual body weights will be obtained on weeks 1-5. Feed consumed will be recorded daily on per pen basis, the uneaten food will be collected once daily before morning feeding and feed conversion ratio will be calculated (Kalavathy et al., 2003).Organ weights, abdominal fat deposition and carcass yield percentages: On weeks 1-5, twelve birds from each treatment group will be sacrificed. Head and feet of the bird will be removed, followed by defeathering, and evisceration. Carcass, breast and leg weight will be measured and expressed as a percentage of live body weight (Sarangi et al., 2016). Internal organs including gizzard, heart, liver, spleen, small intestine, cecum, and colon will be collected. Both absolute and relative percent of organ weight to the body weight will be calculated (Kalavathy et al., 2003). Additionally, jejunum and its contents will be collected for further analysis in objective 2 and 3.Objective 2. Microbiome sequencing: Briefly, at each sampling time (d14, d18, d21, wk1, wk3, and wk5), jejunal contents (n=6/group) will be collected and stored at -80ºC until further processing. Sequencing will be performed at the MARS Facility at UConn. DNA from the jejunal contents will be extracted and DNA libraries will be constructed according to the Illumina MiSeq DNA Sample Prep Guide. DNA from the samples will be PCR amplified using primers targeting the V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene (V4). Sequencing will be performed on the Illumina MiSeq2000 platform according to the manufacturer's protocol (Hsieh et al., 2017).Objective 3. Sample collection: At each sampling time (d14, d18, d21, wk1, wk3, and wk5) under objective 1, jejunum (n=6/group) will be excised and segments (1 cm long) will be placed in three separate tubes: 1) fixed in buffered formalin for histology, 2) collected in RNAlater and stored at -80°C for qPCR and 3) stored at -20°C for determination of enzyme activity (Uni et al., 2003).Histomorphological analysis: Since the height of villus in the ileum indicates the turnover of epithelium and thereby nutrient metabolism, the villus height will be measured in this study (Demir et al., 2003; Awad et al., 2009). Briefly, formalin fixed samples will be processed to measure villus height and crypt depth as described by Awad et al (2009). Further, villus surface area will be calculated from villus height and width at half height (Tako et al., 2004).Real-time qPCR: For the assay, RNA will be extracted from the jejunal sections using RNeasy Plus kits (Qiagen), subject to cDNA synthesis and RT-qPCR will be performed using SYBR green chemistry (Invitrogen). Primers for genes encoding digestive enzymes (Aminopeptidase, isomaltase, glucoamylase) and transporters (Oligopeptide transporter, glucose and galactose transporter and Sodium-potassium transporter) will be evaluated for their differential gene regulation with reference to gapdh expression (endogenous control; Bages et al., 2015; Fernandez-Alarcon et al., 2017). The comparative Ct method (2-ΔΔCt) will be used to assess differential gene expression (Bookout and Mangelsdorf, 2003).Brush border enzyme activity: Enzyme activities will be assayed in homogenized jejunal tissue. Maltase activity will be colorimetrically assayed using maltose as a substrate and aminopeptidase activity will be determined by hydrolysis of p-nitroanilide (Uni et al 2003; Murugesan et al., 2014).

Progress 10/01/18 to 09/30/21

Outputs
Target Audience:Due to support obtained through this project, the PI has been able to train a graduate student in basic microbiology, broiler production, and microbiome sequencing and analysis. In addition, results of the study have been shared with the larger community including, researchers, academics, regulators and industry partners. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The project has provided the opportunity to train a graduate student in poultry embryology and production. Specifically, the student was engaged in conducting in vivo experiments to characterize the effects of supplementing probiotics to embryonated broiler eggs on embryonic and post-hatch growth. Furthermore, the student has also been trained in necropsy, tissue sampling, sample processing, microbiome sequencing, data analysis and data management. In addition to conducting experiments, the student also performed statistical analysis of the data to interpret the results of the study and is being trained in scientific writing. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Results of the study were shared with the scientific community and stakeholders through presentations at local, regional and multistate hatch meetings. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Effect on growth and efficiency: Broilertrials were run to investigate the effect of early probiotic supplementation on growth and performance. For the study, embryonated Ross 308 eggs were sprayed with phosphate buffered saline (control) or probiotics {Lactobacillus paracasei DUP 13076 (LP), L. rhamnosus NRRL B 442 (LR) on days 0, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, and 18 of incubation. The eggs were incubated in a hovabator with automatic turning and embryos were sampled at regular intervals for growth and weight measurements. On day 18, eggs were set in the hatcher for 3 days. Following hatch, birds were raised on feed with or without probiotics (~9 log CFU/g of feed) until the end of the study (42 days post-hatch). Chicks were sacrificed on weeks 1, 3 and 5, and morphometric parameters were recorded. At each sampling time morphometric measurements including embryo weight, body weight, breast weight and feed intake were measured. The experiments were set out as a completely randomized design with stratified sampling, and data were analyzed using Proc GLIMMIX and Proc PLM of SAS. Results from this study demonstrated that early probiotic supplementation significantly improved embryonic growth in the treatment groups when compared with the control. Of interest is the significant increase in embryo weight (~ 5-7%) and crown rump length (8.1 cm vs 8.6 cm) in treatment groups compared to the control. This is noteworthy since longer chicks have been associated with better use of egg nutrients and higher post hatch growth. In addition, there was no significant difference in the yolk-sac weight or its percentage relative to original egg weight between the different groups. This suggests that the observed increase in embryo weight in the treatment groups (in the absence of a proportionate decrease in yolk sac mass) may be attributed to better nutrient utilization in the probiotic groups (Lr and Lp) as opposed to the control. Further, we did not observe any gross morphological changes in the internal organs. Additionally, probiotic supplementation did not exert any adverse effects on embryo viability. Furthermore, early probiotic supplementation not only improved embryonic development but also provided sustained enhancement of post-hatch growth in chicks. Specifically, probiotic treatment resulted in higher body weights and relative breast weight throughout the study period. Additionally, a significant increase in carcass weight and dressing percentage was also observed in the probiotic treatment groups. For instance, on week 5 post-hatch, the dressing percentage in the probiotic groups was 68-70% when compared to 63% in the control group (P≤0.05). Furthermore, this increase in growth was found to be associated with an improvement in feed conversion efficiency in the probiotic treated groups when compared to the control. Effect on cecal microbiome: The effect of probiotic supplementation on the cecal microbiome of broilers was assessed. For the microbiome analysis, cecal contents from the control, LP and LR groups were collected on week 1 and week 3 post-hatch. Following collection, the samples were stored at -80°C until further processing. DNA extraction and QC analysis were performed as per standard protocols. Multiplex sequencing reactions were performed on an Illumina Mi-Seq platform with an average read length of 250 bp, and 16 S DNA paired-end library was created. Mothur v1.39.5 was used for quality control, data trimming and making OTU clustering. Unique fasta sequences were aligned with custom Silva seed database, Silva.seed.v_128.align with starting length of 13862 and cutoff of 23444. The sequences that did not align to reference database were removed. The data were then preclustered to 1% to reduce the computational time, and the reads were then classified with reference to Silva.seed.v_128.tax with a cutoff of 80. OTU classification was done up to four taxa levels, and alpha and beta diversities were measured using Bray-Curtis, Jaccard, and theta-yc. A rarefied OTU table was made to create the heatmap and select indicator species. The median microbial richness index of LR and LP were higher than the control on day 7. By the third week, the richness index was highest for LR, followed by LP. The microbial community richness index indicates that in ovo probiotic administration followed by in-feed supplementation resulted in an increase in richness index over time. A rarefied sample of 10000 OTUs was selected to create the heat map. The heatmap shows that both Firmicutes and Clostridiales were abundant in all the samples including control. Specifically, Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae were the major families associated with the cecal microbiome. In probiotic treated hatchlings, Ruminococcaceae was abundant than Lachnospiraceae in contrast to control. In particular, Ruminococcaceae were relatively more abundant in probiotic-treated groups on week 3 when compared to the control. This is quite relevant since studies have correlated an abundance of Rumenococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae to high feed efficiency. These data also support our observation of an increase in feed efficiency of the probiotic treated group when compared to the control.

Publications


    Progress 10/01/19 to 09/30/20

    Outputs
    Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems:There has been a delay in the completion of the proposed in vivo trials due to the ongoing pandemic. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?During this reporting period, a graduate student was trained in conducting poultry trials. Specifically, the student engaged in conducting in vivo experiments to characterize the effects of supplementing probiotics to embryonated broiler eggs on embryonic and post-hatch growth. Furthermore, the student was also trained in necropsy, tissue sampling, sample processing, microbiome sequencing, data analysis and data management. In addition to conducting experiments, the student also performed statistical analysis of the data to interpret the results of the study. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?In continuation of the proposed research activities, additional poultry trials are planned to validate our previous data. Cecal contents will be collected to perform microbiome sequencing and analysis. Further, intestinal samples will be processed to assay enzymatic activity via colorimetric and qPCR assays.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? During this reporting period, the effect of probiotic supplementation on the cecal microbiome of broilers was assessed. For the microbiome analysis, cecal contents from the control, LP and LR groups were collected on week 1 and week 3 post-hatch. Following collection, the samples were stored at -80°C until further processing. DNA extraction and QC analysis were performed as per standard protocols. Multiplex sequencing reactions were performed on an Illumina Mi-Seq platform with an average read length of 250 bp, and 16 S DNA paired-end library was created. Mothur v1.39.5 was used for quality control, data trimming and making OTU clustering. Unique fasta sequences were aligned with custom Silva seed database, Silva.seed.v_128.align with starting length of 13862 and cutoff of 23444. The sequences that did not align to reference database were removed. The data were then preclustered to 1% to reduce the computational time, and the reads were then classified with reference to Silva.seed.v_128.tax with a cutoff of 80. OTU classification was done up to four taxa levels, and alpha and beta diversities were measured using Bray-Curtis, Jaccard, and theta-yc. A rarefied OTU table was made to create the heatmap and select indicator species. The median microbial richness index of LR and LP were higher than the control on day 7. By the third week, the richness index was highest for LR, followed by LP. The microbial community richness index indicates that in ovo probiotic administration followed by in-feed supplementation resulted in an increase in richness index over time. A rarefied sample of 10000 OTUs was selected to create the heat map. The heatmap shows that both Firmicutes and Clostridiales were abundant in all the samples including control. Specifically, Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae were the major families associated with the cecal microbiome. In probiotic treated hatchlings, Ruminococcaceae was abundant than Lachnospiraceae in contrast to control. In particular, Ruminococcaceae were relatively more abundant in probiotic-treated groups on week 3 when compared to the control. This is quite relevant since studies have correlated an abundance of Rumenococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae to high feed efficiency. These data also support our observation of an increase in feed efficiency of the probiotic treated group when compared to the control.

    Publications


      Progress 10/01/18 to 09/30/19

      Outputs
      Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? During this reporting period, the graduate student has been trained in conducting poultry trials. Specifically, the student was engaged in conducting in vivo experiments to characterize the effects of supplementing probiotics to embryonated broiler eggs on embryonic and post-hatch growth. Furthermore, the student has also been trained in necropsy, tissue sampling, sample processing and data management. In addition to conducting experiments, the student also performed statistical analysis of the data to interpret the results of the study. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?In continuation of the proposed research activities, additional poultry trials are planned to validate our preliminary data. Further, cecal contents will be collected to perform microbiome sequencing and analysis.

      Impacts
      What was accomplished under these goals? During this reporting period, initial broilertrials were run to investigate the effect of early probiotic supplementation on growth and performance. For the study, embryonated Ross 308 eggs were sprayed with phosphate buffered saline (control) or probiotics {Lactobacillus paracasei DUP 13076 (LP), L. rhamnosus NRRL B 442 (LR) on days 0, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, and 18 of incubation. The eggs were incubated in a hovabator with automatic turning and embryos were sampled at regular intervals for growth and weight measurements. On day 18, eggs were set in the hatcher for 3 days. Following hatch, birds were raised on feed with or without probiotics (~9 log CFU/g of feed) until the end of the study (42 days post-hatch). Chicks were sacrificed on weeks 1, 3 and 5, and morphometric parameters were recorded. At each sampling time morphometric measurements including embryo weight, body weight, breast weight and feed intake were measured. The experiments were set out as a completely randomized design with stratified sampling, and data were analyzed using Proc GLIMMIX and Proc PLM of SAS. Results from this study demonstrated that early probiotic supplementation significantly improved embryonic growth in the treatment groups when compared with the control. Of interest is the significant increase in embryo weight (~ 5-7%) and crown rump length (8.1 cm vs 8.6 cm) in treatment groups compared to the control. This is noteworthy since longer chicks have been associated with better use of egg nutrients and higher post hatch growth. In addition, there was no significant difference in the yolk-sac weight or its percentage relative to original egg weight between the different groups. This suggests that the observed increase in embryo weight in the treatment groups (in the absence of a proportionate decrease in yolk sac mass) may be attributed to better nutrient utilization in the probiotic groups (Lr and Lp) as opposed to the control. Further, we did not observe any gross morphological changes in the internal organs. Additionally, probiotic supplementation did not exert any adverse effects on embryo viability. Furthermore, early probiotic supplementation not only improved embryonic development but also provided sustained enhancement of post-hatch growth in chicks. Specifically, probiotic treatment resulted in higher body weights and relative breast weight throughout the study period. Additionally, a significant increase in carcass weight and dressing percentage was also observed in the probiotic treatment groups. For instance, on week 5 post-hatch, the dressing percentage in the probiotic groups was 68-70% when compared to 63% in the control group (P≤0.05). Furthermore, this increase in growth was found to be associated with an improvement in feed conversion efficiency in the probiotic treated groups when compared to the control.

      Publications