Source: BOSTON LABS DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT LLC submitted to NRP
SMALL AND MID-SIZE FARM EFFICIENCY ECOSYSTEM
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1015889
Grant No.
2018-33610-28955
Cumulative Award Amt.
$99,950.00
Proposal No.
2018-00190
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Sep 1, 2018
Project End Date
Dec 31, 2019
Grant Year
2018
Program Code
[8.12]- Small and Mid-Size Farms
Recipient Organization
BOSTON LABS DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT LLC
11 BOYCE FARM RD
LINCOLN,MA 01773
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
Small farms are critical to the futureof America. Small farms promote and sustain communities, create jobs, improve the health of the land and of the people who live on it. Currently small to mid-sized farms raising pasture-based livestock have been left to invent/build their own feeding/watering systemsand are at a disadvantage to large, fully automated, high-efficiency systems on large scale farms. There remains a gap in manufactured equipment that caters to small farmsand the dynamic environment of pastures they raise their animals in. This discrepency is a disadvantage for current farmers and a deterrant for the next generation of farmers interested inpasture-based farming.We seek to research, design and develop a simple system of mobile equipement farmers can use to feed their flocks and increase efficiency up to 75%. We approached this project from several angles and categorize our main goals as follows:1. Increase hardware efficiency. We are designing a unique mobile feeding system that will enable farmers to increase their efficiency during feeding/watering while maintaining healthy, pasture-raised animals. This will reduce wasted time and make their products more competitive while also increasing quality of life for farmers and their families.2. Technology efficiency. We are developing a simple, wireless ecosystem that will enable farmers to monitor their remote flocks/herds and their feed levels. This technology is proven and robust. Saving time traveling from flock to flock will further increase farmers effeciency. Mobile management will also allow farmers to minimize feeding errors that lead to loss of production and income.3. Scale-ability. We want our systems to grow with farmers. Farming equipment, land, etc can be expensive and we seek to ensure farmers are not saddled with large sums of debt. We chose to build our system using industry standard equipment to minimize expenses and allow more small farmers to utilize these systems. Each system will be capable of feeding/watering small flocks of 50-100 hens and expand to feed 800-1,000 hens with minimal investment/effort. Compare this to the current method of pasture-based farmers who accumulate labor intensive feeding pans/trays as their flocks/farms grow. As their flocks grow, so does the time investment to manage, feed and water the flock. With our system the same time investment to feed 100 hens is required to feed 1,000.Our team is led by active farmers and supported by technical industry leaders ready and excited to make a difference or small farmers across the country.
Animal Health Component
40%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
5%
Applied
40%
Developmental
55%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
4023299202050%
4023510202050%
Goals / Objectives
Our goal is to improve the economic viability of small pasture-based farms by creating readily adaptable, easy-to-use feeding/watering systems for poultry and swine. We will achieve this goal bydramatically increasing the farmer's efficiency during feeding,enablingthem to be competitive in the marketplace and also reduce drudgery tasks.We will increase efficiency in three vital areas:1) Developing ecosystem of hardware for feeding/watering2) Developing ecosystem of software/technology for management3) Scalability. Designing #1 and #2 to be scale-able and adapt with farmers over time.8 Main Objectives for this Project:#1 Primary chassis design, engineering and development. Develop achassis capable of holding food/water and distributing it to the animals. Chassis must show potential to integratehardware and software ecosystems once fully developed.#2 Feed storage and distribution design. Determine ideal food/water storage devices for this device by talking with farming community (i.e. Buckhorn gravity bin?). Target feeding800-1,000 hens at maximum capacity--is this possible? Determine minimum angle we can achieve for dropout tube angle and still successfully distribute feed in the field. Determine ideal hand crank/motor common mounting plate location relative to main feed dropout. Determine mechanical options for feed pan/waterhanging system.#3 Scalability design. Sucessfullytransition from gravity fed system to auger system (either hand crank or motor driven). Determinineideal configurations for scalability for both chassis and feed distribution. Determine if scalability must be tool free. Determine if one-person assembly a must. Determine if dropout tubes can be "quick release".#4 Gravity fed water system. Determine optimal spacing, density, layout and design for gravity water system. Determine if watersystem must be scalable or if it can be static.#5 CRICKET breadboard development. Successfullyget all sensors, communication devices, motor to communicate together. Can we remotely access the CRICKET and identify feed levels, water levels, battery life?#6 Hardware efficiency metric. Can we reduce flock maintenance/labor for feed/water by 75%? To prove this metric our team must show a working prototype capable of feeding a flock independently for a minimum of 7 days.#7 Technology efficiency metric. Utilizing CRICKET technology can we reduce labor managing flocks by an additional 15%. To prove this metric our team must show a reduction in time management of flocks directly related to the CRICKET. The metric we will use to measure this management efficiency rate is Trips Taken to SF3. Reducing the number of trips taken to manage feed/water by 15% is our target.#8 Detachable shade system. Can we achieve a successful preliminary shade design that is detachable? This will prove further accessories in future development.
Project Methods
Traditional Product Development methods will be utilized for this project: Research-->Design-->Development-->Evaluate-->Repeat.Research: Ourt team has aligned itself with industry leading experts running small farms, product development and software development companies. Our access to farmers is the key to our team and plays a critical role in our project. This concept was born from the farming community and in order to be succesfull must satisfy their requirements. Using workshops to bring our board of farming advisors and our team together, we will align common practices, needs, failures, and must haves in the small farming community to guide our path during design and development. These items will be the map for futurephases and be key markers for our sucess at the end of our project. Does our product satisfy the needs of the farmers? Do they support the outcome?Design: This phase brings three groups together: the animals, the farmer and the product. While there are functional requirements we must prove to feed animals efficiently, design will play a critical role at streamlining the assembly of the product, interaction between animal and equipment, scale-ability, cost and shipping. Each one of these items is important for different reasons, but together are critical to bringing a succesful product to market that is capable of making a successful impact. Our designs will be loosely brainstormed together as a team and further developed/clarified offline before being brought back to our team and advisors.Development: With a general chosen direction, our team of designers and engineers will use industry standard software programs to quickly and efficiently evaluate the chosen design on the computer before implementing in prototype form. The development phase often cycles back to Research-->Design as issues arise and must be resolved. This phase then brings the collective thoughts, ideas, designs into reality and begins testing them. For our project we will be running two concepts in parallel: hardware (feeding/watering) and software (remote monitoring). These items will be proven using preliminary test methods (crude prototypes) beore being applied andbuilt into a functional prototype.Evaluate: This is where we will test our Objectives listed in the "Goals" section with our working prototype. The most important Objective for this grant is to prove significant increases in efficiency. The unit of measurement we will use to evaluate an increase in efficiency is Trips Taken to the field over a course of time.Hardware Efficiency Metric:Target 75% increase in efficiency for farmers. Working prototype must independently feed a flock of hens for 7 days in the pasture. Exact number of hens TBD. By reducing the number of trips a farmer must make to maintain and feed the animals, a 7 day stretch compared to daily visits will prove the technology capable of performing as advertised and increasing efficiency by 75%.Technology Efficiency Metric: Targert increase 15% increase in efficiency. This metric will be measured by documenting the number of times farmer needs to attend the flock for maintence, evaluation, etc and comparing it to the number of times our Technology would allowed him/her to not make the trip, thus saving time. Trips taken/prevented will be documented via survey with farmers. Working prototype will prove capabilitiesin lab setting.

Progress 09/01/18 to 12/31/19

Outputs
Target Audience:Our target audience were small and mid sized farmers.Pete Lowy, our partner in this project was our specific category expert who consultted with us during the project. Pete and his staff use our product/system daily for feeding poultry. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Results have been reported to our network of small farmers during development. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? We want to improve the economic viability of small pasture-based farms by creating equipment that increases farmers efficiency during feeding and watering. Every day, small pasture-based farmers feed their animals by hand or with inefficient systems. This puts them at a disadvantage competing against large farms with automated indoor feeding systems doing routine tasks more efficiently with easy access to electricity. Our invention proves small farms can experience an 86% reduction in time feeding pastured poultry. The system has been operational for 407 days and made atremendous dailyimpact on the small farm staff by reducing the amount of time they spend feeding their chickens. Before our system the farm staff drove to the fields and manually feed 10+ 50 lb feeders 7 days/week. Today, with our system that is down to 1 time/week. This efficiency allows the farm staff to invest their time to other new projects, farm repairs, community outreach and farm sales, and has experienced an increase in quality of life by reducing drudgery tasks.All 8 objectives listed in our proposal were met. 1. Chassis design:Our goalwas to research and design an affordable, durablechassis frame that would accept our feeding/water system and be mobile/durable enough to be moved through rough fields while feeding animals on pasture. We designed a cost effective chassis that sits on top of an existing,readily available agriculture product called a Running Gear.A Running Gear is a heavy duty steel framed wagon. On top of this we designed a wood/steel platform capable of holding our feed bin, water tank and the technology package we developed and named "The CRICKET" (see #5). Through a series of tests we determined our feeding tubes required 30 degrees at a minimum to maintain the flow of feed into the troughs.In order to achieve this correct feed angle we designed an elevated platform in which the food/water is stored. Our platform had to be lifted at least 1.5' above the wagon deck in order to maintain the proper angle for feed flow. 2. Feed storage: Our goalwas to design a system capable of storing 1 ton of pelleted feed and automatically feed up to 800-1,000 chickens while being easily moved throughout fields and pastures.A gravity flow container manufactured by Buckhorn was the best starting point for this system.They are proven, rugged, and have 2 million in service worldwide today.In combination with our CRICKET system we are capable of feeding upto 1,000+ chickens!We were able to accomplish this by utilizing feed sensors in the feed troughs thereby ensuring the feeders were continually filled when nearing empty.Lay rates for the hens were monitored and remain stable. 3. Scalability: Our goal was to transition from a gravity fed system (no motor) to auger fed system (motor, sensors, solar panels/battery) allowing the system to grow with the flock. Our design centers around the dropout opening of a Buckhorn gravity flow bin. We used this single source container to provide feed for small flocks of 0-100 chickens (via gravity, very simple, low cost) to large flocks of 800-1,000 utilizingmultiple feeders. We designed a custom gravity dropout diverter, connecting the Buckhorn bin to our feeders, allowing a small flock to be fed via gravity. If the flock grows bigger, this gravity connector is removed andtheauger system is installed in its place. The auger system drops feed down six additional dropouts which connect to the center tube. The auger is powered by a commercially available electric motor, which is powered by a series of deep cycle batteries, capable of running the motor for up to one week without being recharged. The batteries are charged and managed by a series of solar panels and a controller.This system has been operational for over a year with no intervention regarding power management and has been very successful. 4. Gravity water system. Our goal was to integrate a no-hassle gravity fed water system centrally located with food. We accomplished exactly that which has further reduced the monotonous task of water maintenance that used to be spread throughout the fields.We combined this objective (#4) with objective #8 (shade) into a single design that is simple, sturdy and effective.In order to have enough space for both feed, water and chickens all in close proximity, we needed to create space between both feed and watering containers. Not only was this a necessity, it was a welcome way to spread the chickens out and gave us a great opportunity to offer the chickens much needed shade in the summertime. We connected five watering containers to the ends of five long steel poles, and between the poles we put mesh shade tarp so hens had a large shady area. The poles were attached to our chassis on the Running Gear at a single pivot point, creating a "fan" that could be spread out on the side of our system, or "collapsed" while the farmers moved the system to fresh grass. A simple system of rubber tubes fed the bell waterers from the main water tank sitting on the running gear chassis. 5. CRICKET: Our goal was to get sensors, motor, solar panels, battery, communications to work/communicate together. We were unsure of their viability working in real world conditions.We successfully created the CRICKET creating a custom wired breadboard (prototype PCB) and Verizon cellular integration. We also designed an iPhone app that could log in remotely from anywhere in the world to check feed/water levels, battery level, and see live video of chickens to check if there were any issues. This made an impact on farmers because it changed their daily living routines. They no longer had to drive to the fields to check if there was enough water or feed. Instead they could simply open the app to check feed/water levels and when they needed to be replenished. This saved them travel/mental time dedicated to the discipline of feeding the chickens. Instead they had more time available for other initiatives on the farm. 6. Hardware Efficiency:This metric was self-imposed--a 75% increase in efficiency was our goal. Prior to this project the farmers fed chickens 7 days/week. 75% more efficient would require the system to operate independently for 5.25 days.For 400+ days this system has been operating with 1 feed/water check per week, 86% more efficient than previous feeding patterns. This has proven to be a steady, reliable time saver for the farmers and staff and allowed them to invest time into new projects on the farm. 7. Software Efficiency:This metric was self-imposed--a 15% increase in efficiency in trips taken to the pasture was our goal. 15% more efficient required us to reduce trips by 1 trip/week. Our system reduced trips taken to the fields by 6 days/week, a 71% increase in efficiency.The combination between the software and hardware of this system made a real-world impact on the farmers, changing their daily behaviors, tasks and increasing their quality of life and interaction with the community. 8. Detachable Shade: Dedicated shade for pasture-poultry does not currently exist for farmers. We successfully created a detachable shade system (as described in section 4 above) we affectionately call the "bat wing". This shade is critical to the health of the flock as summer temperatures increase stress on animals. This system has proved invaluable for our flock because it changes where the chickens rest throughout the day which in turn affects the land. Raising chickens in pasture tends to kill/destroy the grass in very specific areas (around food and under coops) because the chickens instinctually scratch the grass where they eat and rest.By creating a large, shaded area that offers food, water, shade and protection, we have created a broad space for the chickens to scratch. This system is mobile and can be moved in smaller increments, allowing grass to recover in a more predictable manner.

Publications


    Progress 09/01/18 to 08/31/19

    Outputs
    Target Audience:Our target audience were small and mid sized farmers, primarily Pete Lowy, our partner in this project. Pete and his farm hands use the system daily. Changes/Problems:No major changes in the design, but delayed funding made our team shift roles significantly in order to keep the project going with no funds available. It worked out but was a bit stressful in the moment! :) What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?We are in the process of understanding the community interest and what that would look like if brought to market. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We are currently working with LARTA advisor to develop a business plan.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? The system is a success. All main objectives were met and exceeded. Our target test period was 7 days using our prototype. The system has been operational for 7+ months and is still going.

    Publications