Source: University of Maryland Eastern Shore submitted to NRP
DEVELOPING A COST EFFECTIVE ACTIVATED GYPSUM AMENDMENT THAT REDUCES AMMONIA EMISSION FROM POULTRY LITTER BEDDING
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1015460
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Feb 9, 2018
Project End Date
Jan 31, 2022
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
University of Maryland Eastern Shore
11868 College Backborne Road
Princess Anne,MD 21853
Performing Department
Agriculture
Non Technical Summary
Protecting natural resources by utilizing a problematic waste product (gypsum drywall) as a source of material to reduce the harmful effects of NH3 emissions from poultry production is truly innovative. Further, the amendment of the gypsum (an USDA Conservation Practice Standard) in this study from pen litter trials to soil will improve soil health, change chemical and physical qualities, increase water and air infiltration rates. Gypsum also Improves water quality by reducing the transport of dissolved phosphorous, pathogens and other contaminates in surface and subsurface waters (USDA 2015).Since gypsum recovered from dry wall is (5% +/-) drier, more soluble than other sources, and reduces GHG (EPA -WARM) standards. It is a unique product that could contribute to the development of a superior ammonia emission reducing poultry bedding amendment in concert with organic acids to form an acidified form of gypsum.
Animal Health Component
60%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
40%
Applied
60%
Developmental
0%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
1020399107035%
1040199310030%
1330410207035%
Goals / Objectives
ObjectivesDevelop an advanced cost effective activated gypsum bedding amendment that reduces ammonia emissions in poultry houses,Determine changes in soil health and other soil properties after application of spent poultry house pen activated gypsum litter on soils, andImprove the research and critical thinking skills of (2) undergraduate interns.
Project Methods
The innovative aspects of this project deals with protecting our natural resources by utilizing a problematic waste product (gypsum drywall) as a source of material to reduce the harmful effects of NH3 emissions from poultry bedding material. Further, the amendment soil with an activated gypsum poultry bedding by-product, a USDA Conservation Practice Standard known for improving soil health by changing physical qualities which increases soil water and air infiltration is also indeed commendable. Gypsum also Improves water quality by reducing the transport of dissolved phosphorous, pathogens and other contaminates in surface and subsurface waters (USDA 2015). Our approach lends to solving a scientific problem of science that is of high importance to the poultry industry in five states and the nation.Gypsum from recycled wallboard used in this study is a low cost material that contains sulfate, the same anion used to trap ammonia, and calcium, which is beneficial to crop growth and soil chemical and physical properties. Gypsum recovered from dry wall is (5% +/-) drier, and more soluble than other sources. It is a unique product that could contribute to the development of a superior ammonia emission poultry bedding reducing amendment activated by organic acids. Since gypsum is a neutral salt that is unbuffered against changes in pH. We propose the acidification of gypsum using selected organic acids that can react with ammonia to form ammonium sulfate, (adds to litter N content) the same reaction that occurs with other acidifiers. Initially, we will test the effectiveness of various organic acids, which are relatively low cost, nontoxic, and available in solid form, to activate gypsum, which will in turn be used to reduce ammonia emissions from poultry bedding materials.Plan of Operation - Objective-1 Develop an advanced cost effective activated gypsum bedding amendment that reduces ammonia emissions in poultry houses, Phase IThis study phase will consist of benchtop trials to test the effectiveness of various formulations of gypsum-based amendments (hereafter referred to as "activated gypsum"). Air containing high ammonia concentrations (> 75 ppm) will be simultaneously drawn from a common source vessel into the bottom of three sample chambers at a very slow flow rate. The process of drawing gas from the headspace for analysis of ammonia concentration may be used to control the low flow rate. Thin layers of an activated gypsum formulation, 2.) PLT at the recommended rate of 50 lbs. per 1000 ft2, of a control having no amendment will be supported on a piece of non-reactive filter paper supported by a bed of glass beads. Ammonia concentrations in the source air and in the air in the headspace above the sample will be continuously monitored. The goal is to develop a formulation of an activated gypsum amendment that is as, or more effective than Poultry Litter Treatment (PLT) in reducing ammonia concentration in the headspace of the sample chamber in bench top experiments, and subsequently in poultry pen house studies.Phase IIThis phase will depend on the successful formulation of an activated gypsum amendment material in Phase I that will reduce ammonia emissions from poultry litter bedding material in improved rates as compared to existing products on the market, such as PLT. Subsequent poultry bird pen trials will be conducted in the UMES Environmental Poultry House comprised of 12 rooms measuring 20 ft x 20 ft housing 400 birds per room. The trials will consist of three treatments: activated gypsum, PLT at the recommended rate, and a control (no treatment) with four replications. Alternatively, we may choose to test the activated gypsum at a high and a low rate, thus four treatments and three replications of each will be used. Birds will be kept until 50 days of age. We will measure bird performance, ammonia concentrations, litter parameters (pH and moisture) and foot pad scores. Additionally, we will analyze the litter before and after the trial for nitrogen, phosphorus, sodium and calcium content. The UMES Environmental Poultry House will be in use to conduct all pen studies at applicable times of the year as determined based on availability and best house environmental conditions for best results.Phase IIIA recently published study on the effectiveness of FGD gypsum as an alternative bedding material for broiler production provides strong evidence that gypsum will not have negative effects on the birds (Watts et al., 2016). Therefore, we do not anticipate a need to repeat the pen tests. However, if additional trials are done, the cost will be the same as above.Plan of Operation - Objective-2 - Determine changes in soil health and other soil properties after application of spent poultry house pen activated gypsum litter on soils.UMES Farm soil-crop field experiment using one-eight acre plots will be established as a RCB design (three to four litter treatments replicated four times as shown below). Litter will be applied to soil to provide a minimum of 2 tons N/per acre using corn to determine crop yield differences due to spent litter treatment effects. Soil will be sampled at pre- and post- crop planting-harvest stages to determine soil health and other property differences due to litter application treatments. Soils will be sampled to a depth of 0-6 and 6-12 inches for GC Mass spectrometer analyses. Data will be analyzed using SAS v.9.1 (SAS Institute, 2000). Differences among treatments will be evaluated by a general linear model, and individual treatment means grouped by Tukey's pair-wise comparison, and other statistical tolls and programs will be employed as warranted.

Progress 10/01/19 to 09/30/20

Outputs
Target Audience:Local Farmers, scientists,and graduate students Changes/Problems:Due to COVID, we were not able to conduct greenhouse experiments as planned. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Student research development skills for three undergraduates were provided. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The product developed is still being tested for patent consideration. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Conduct additional experiments in the greenhouse or field trials to determine the effects of bedding material used in poultry influences on soil healthphysical, chemical, and biological indicators.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Acidified Calcium Sulfate has a greater potential for improving water quality since our results showed significantly lower water-soluble phosphorus content in the litter when compared to PLT ®. Benchtop tests and pen tests showed equally effective and no significant difference in ammonia control provided by PLT.® and Acidified Calcium Sulfate. Both amendments provided significantly lower ammonia emissions when compared to the control.Pen test results showed no difference between the Acidified Calcium Sulfate blend pre-dissolved and Acidified Calcium Sulfate - dry. However, field trials conducted in commercial poultry houses revealed that the Acidified Gypsum Sulfate blend dry did not provide good ammonia emission control. Thus, we recommend that adequate water be added to pre-dissolve the Acidified Calcium Sulfate after application.Litter analyses after the pen tests showed similar sulfur content in PLT® treated litter compared to Acidified Calcium Sulfate. PLT® had greater sodium content, while the litter treated with Acidified Calcium Sulfate had higher calcium content, which resulted in significantly lower water-soluble phosphorus content in the litter.Bird performance and footpad scores were the same or similar for both products tested.A new product was developed and is still being tested.

Publications


    Progress 10/01/18 to 09/30/19

    Outputs
    Target Audience:Scientist in the subject matter area and the poultry industry Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?For undergraduates How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?American Society of Agronomy meeting What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Continue research trials

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? The main objective of this project was to develop an organic product that could be used as an amendment to poultry litter bedding for reducing ammonia emissions in poultry houses and be competitive with sodium bisulfite (PLT®) in terms of effectiveness and cost. Additionally, we wanted to provide other advantages in our product such as the provision of essential elements like sulfur and calcium to the soil when expended litter is land applied to support crop production and enhance soil health. This was accomplished through the development of an organic product, Acidified Calcium Sulfate. Additionally we hypothesized that Acidified Calcium Sulfate would absorb more moisture, thus keeping the litter bedding drier which helps control ammonia volatilization, and also reduce the incidence of bird footpad lesions. The Acidified Calcium Sulfate would also have the added advantage of reducing the solubility of phosphorus, which reduces the risk of runoff when applied to soils. Our conclusions and applications of our results are as follows: Acidified Calcium Sulfate has a greater potential for improving water quality, since our results showed significantly lower water soluble phosphorus content in the litter when compared to PLT ®. Benchtop tests and pen tests showed equally effective and no significant difference in ammonia control provided by PLT ® and Acidified Calcium Sulfate. Both amendments provided significantly lower ammonia emissions when compared to the control. Pen test results showed no difference between the Acidified Calcium Sulfate blend pre-dissolved and Acidified Calcium Sulfate - dry. However, field trials conducted in commercial poultry houses revealed that the Acidified Gypsum Sulfate blend-dry did not provide good ammonia emission control. Thus, we recommend that adequate water be added to pre-dissolve the Acidified Calcium Sulfate after application. Litter analyses after the pen tests showed similar sulfur content in PLT® treated litter compared to Acidified Calcium Sulfate. PLT® had greater sodium content, while the litter treated with Acidified Calcium Sulfate had higher calcium content, which resulted in significantly lower water-soluble phosphorus content in the litter. Bird performance and footpad scores were the same or similar for both products tested.

    Publications


      Progress 02/09/18 to 09/30/18

      Outputs
      Target Audience:Poultry house chicken growers Delmarva Poultry Industry Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Two undergraduate students were trained on how in initiate and conduct pen and benchtop studies. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?It is too early to in the study for dissemination of results as additional experiments are being performed. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Continue with additional trials as warranted as stated in the study objectives.

      Impacts
      What was accomplished under these goals? Benchtop Experiments Two-gallon jars containing fresh poultry litter were treated with either Control, Commercial (a commercial ammonia-reducing product), and Gypsum (acidified gypsum mix) had promising results in which the commercial product and acidified gypsum treatments performed effectively and similarly. They reduced ammonia volatilization significantly compared to the Control treatment and continued reductions for nearly two weeks. The follow up study employed the same protocol as the first, but involved replications of the treatments: two Control, two Commercial, and two Gypsum treatments. Again, the reductions in ammonia volatilization were from 35 - 50% for the Commercial and Gypsum treatments. The follow up study employed the same protocol as the first, but involved replications of the treatments: two Controls, two Commercial, and two Gypsum. Again, the reductions in ammonia volatilization were from about 40 - 60% for the Commercial and Gypsum treatment. Pen Trials Pen trials were conducted as a Randomized Complete Blockdesign of four treatments: Control (no amendment), Commercial product at a recommended rate (75 pounds/1,000 square feet), acidified gypsum pre-dissolved (100 pounds/1,000 square feet), and acidified gypsum not dissolved (100 pounds/1,000 square feet). Three pens were assigned each treatment through randomization. Each penwas 20x20 ft and is equipped with commercial pan feeders, nipple drinkers, and thermostat controlled forced air heaters. Four hundred one-day old chicks were placed in each pen. Ammonia production was measured weekly using Gastec 10 hour dosimeter tubes, bird performance (weight gain feed conversion ratio and mortality), litter moisture, litter pH, litter nutrient content and broiler foot pad scores was also measured. Room weights were obtained at the end of the trial. Mortality was recorded daily (include room# and bird weight). Standard industry operating procedures for the facility will be followed. Temperature, ventilation, and lighting were similar to commercial conditions. The first pen trial occured from February 28, 2018 to April 19, 2018. There were no significant differences for any of the measurements. The lack of difference between ammonia volatilization and reduction were likely due to a very low moisture content of the initial poultry litter bedding during placement of the chicks, or onset of the study. Fora current pen trial, a flock of chickens was managed in the poultry experimental pens in order to bring moisture contents of the litter to commercial house levels. A new trial ocured on January 21, 2019. The final litter samples from the first pen trial were saved, and a soil incubation test was conducted in the lab to determine if the ammonia-reducing treatments would have any impact on the nutrient content of soils on which the litter was applied. Incubation Trials Our hypothesis for the incubation trial was that the gypsum treatments will decrease phosphorus readily extracted by water (WEP) from the poultry litter and into the soil. Poultry litter at average rate of application from each of the pens was applied on, and mixed with two different soils: 1. Low P soil and 2. High P soil in two-gallon jars. Additional moisture was applied to maintain the initial moisture content when soils dried for the two month duration of the incubation period. The water extractable phosphorus (WEP) was measured from the two soils prior to the treatments, and the soil/litter mixes from each jar is currently being analyzed for WEP. When the WEP analysis is completed for the incubation trial, the data will be organized and compared. These data will become part ofupcoming progress reports.

      Publications