Source: MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIV submitted to NRP
TRAINING AND PREPARING CULTURALLY RESPONSIVE AGRICULTURAL EDUCATORS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1014062
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Sep 7, 2017
Project End Date
May 31, 2020
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIV
(N/A)
MISSISSIPPI STATE,MS 39762
Performing Department
Human Sciences
Non Technical Summary
With the globalization of classrooms, teachers may be facing greater expectations and challenges relative to understanding and embracing diverse underrepresented cultures in their learning environments. As the classroom continues to become more diverse, innovative teaching methods are needed for preparing educators to meet the needs of learners, and to recruit underrepresented populations into agriscience education programs. Key factors in preparing pre-service teachers for teaching diverse underrepresented populations include: becoming advocates and fostering a willingness to cross boundaries for social justice, understanding that students bring personal experiences and knowledge to the classroom that will influence classroom practices, and modeling culturally responsive teaching.To help recruit and retain diverse and underrepresented populations our educators should become culturally reponsive in their teaching approaches.Methods used to collect and analyze related data include, focus groups, interviews, surveys, preservice teacher curriculum, and instructional culturally responsive teaching techniques.Potenital outcomes include, an increase in diverse and underrepresented agriscience student populations at both the secondary and post-secondary levels, ultimately encouraging a more diverse mindset to help with critical issues in agriculture.
Animal Health Component
20%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
70%
Applied
20%
Developmental
10%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
90360993020100%
Goals / Objectives
The main aim for this project is to disseminate culturally responsive teaching techniques to help teach diverse and underrepresented students in agriculture.There are a number of major project objectives that fall under this aim:Objective one: Identify effective culturally responsive teaching techniques that help engage diverse underrepresented student populations in learning environments.Objective two: Identify the impact culturally responsive teaching has on diverse underrepresented student populations in learning environments. Objective three: Utilize the results of objective one and two to implement changes and improvements to current teacher preparation programs to improve beginning teachers' abilities to interact with diverse underrepresented populations.Objective four: Develop strategies which secondary, public school agriscience teachers can use to recruit and retain diverse underrepresented populations into their learning environments.The following research project will work to meet the needs ofthree nationalresearch priority areas beginning with identifying culturally responsive teaching techniques, imbedding cultural competence training in the pre-service agriscience degree program, and providing in-service training to help recruit and retain diverse underrepresented student populations in to the field of agriscience. All of these efforts could help to recruit and retain diverse and underrepresented populations in the high school agriculture programs, which could impact postsecondary enrollment of underrepresented student populations.
Project Methods
Objective One and Two Design, Methods, and ProceduresThe first part of exploring these two objectives will include focus group methodologies. This series of focus groups will be used to identify culturally responsive teaching techniques, which have been effective and impactful for diverse underrepresented populations enrolled at Mississippi State.The population will be the Mississippi State students who are active in student organizations meant for diverse underrepresented populations on campus (i.e. MANNARS, Black Student Union, LGBTQ + Union, and Linking Internationals in the Community).Four to six focus groups will be conducted. Interviews and member checks with willing focus group participants will also be conducted to help triangulate the data obtained in the focus group sessions.Data will be collected by the researcher according to qualitative methodologies. A moderator and co-moderator will use a semi-structured moderator guide to encourage discussion of the topic. Focus group discussions will be audio-recorded and later transcribed verbatim.Through the focus groups, key instructors at Mississippi State who exhibit culturally responsive teaching will be identified and will become the population for the second part of exploring objectives one and two. Interviews and classroom observations with this population will be conducted to help identify effective and impactful culturally responsive teaching. Qualitative methodologies will be used to gather information during this stage of research.Objective Three Design, Methods, and ProceduresThrough analysis of objectives one and two the current preservice teacher program will be evaluated. Changes and improvements to current teacher preparation program will be implemented to improve beginning teachers' abilities to interact with diverse underrepresented populations.The population for this objective will consist of students in the Agricultural Education, Leadership, and Communications- Teaching concentration area. Culturally responsive teaching will be imbedded in the preservice program throughout several courses necessary for quality teaching in secondary agriscience programs.Once the population enters the teaching field, they will be followed longitudinally (approximately 3-10 years) to evaluate the effectiveness of the preservice program to train students in working with diverse underrepresented populations. Data will be collected through surveys and classroom observations. Objective Four Design, Methods, and ProceduresThe results of objective one and two will be utilized to identify recruitment strategies and programs aimed at diverse underrepresented high school and college students. Students enrolled in the high school programs, tracked through objective three, will be tracked longitudinally through their college career.Quantitative survey instruments will focus on culturally proficiency knowledge gain, behavior change, commitment to the agriculture industry, and ways high school agriscience teachers could improve their recruitment and retention of diverse and underrepresented student populations.The population will be all high school and college students who were enrolled in the classes taken by the teacher population from objective three. The sample will consist of those students (high school and community college) currently in an agriculture program who voluntarily participate in the program.

Progress 09/07/17 to 05/31/20

Outputs
Target Audience:No steps were taken within this reporting period of January 1, 2020 - May 15, 2020. Changes/Problems:This project will have a new close date because I have accepted a faculty position elsewhere. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?A seminar was conducted for Mississippi State Unversity faculty through the request of the Center of Teaching Learning on Culturally Responsive Teaching. This seminar allowed for in-service training of faculty. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Focus group results have been disseminated to the American Association for Agricultural Education at both regional and national meetings. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Overall, objectives 1, 2, and 4 were approached and mostly met during the duration of this project. We had not gotten to objective 3 by the new closing date on this project. Through this project, we worked towards identifying culturally responsive teaching techniques, embedding cultural competence training in the pre-service agriscience degree program, and providing in-service training to help recruit and retain diverse underrepresented student populations. All of these efforts could help to recruit and retain diverse and underrepresented populations in the high school agriculture programs, which could impact postsecondary enrollment of underrepresented student populations. The following tasks were accomplished related to objective one: and two 1. Focus groups were conducted with underrepresented minority students during the spring, twelve students participated 2. Additional focus groups were held this fall with the majority student population, five students participated 3. These focus groups were analyzed to identify themes related to what students classify as culturally responsive teaching and how these techniques impact their learning 4. Conference presentation abstract was submitted and accepted to be presented in 2019 5. Additional focus groups were concluded in fall 2019, helping to accomplish objectives one and two of identifying culturally responsive teaching techniques and their impact on learners.

Publications

  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Accepted Year Published: 2020 Citation: Russell, C., Jagger, C. B., & Petersen, A. (2020) Investigation of Culturally Responsive Teaching: Undergraduate vs. Graduate Experiences. The American Association of Agriculutual Education 2020 Southern Region Conference Proceedings. Poster Presentation.


Progress 10/01/18 to 09/30/19

Outputs
Target Audience:During the 2019 reporting period, our primary target audience was undergraduate students at Mississippi State University as you wrapped up our focus groups. Additionally, faculty and students at conferences and seminars were reached through the dissemination of study results. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?A seminar was conducted for Mississippi State Unversity faculty through the request of the Center of Teaching Learning on Culturally Responsive Teaching. This seminar allowed for in-service training of faculty. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Focus group results have been disseminated to the American Association for Agricultural Education at both regional and national meetings. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?For the next reporting period, the project will make a shift to objectives three and four. I will be taking a close examination of our pre-service program and identify ways to embed culturally responsive teaching strategies into our curriculum and train pre-service students on how to utilize similar strategies to help recruit and retain underrepresented populations in their future school programs.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Focus groups were concluded this fall 2019, helping to accomplish objectives one and two of identifying culturally responsive teaching techniques and their impact on learners.

Publications

  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Accepted Year Published: 2019 Citation: Russell, C., Petersen, A., & Jagger, C. B. (2019). Culturally Responsive Teaching: Experiences of underrepresented students. Poster Presentation at the 2019 Southern Region American Association for Agricultural Education Conference. Birmingham, AL.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Accepted Year Published: 2019 Citation: Grant, C., & Jagger, C. B. (2019). Cultural Competence: How skilled are students across majors? Poster Presentation at the 2019 Southern Region American Association for Agricultural Education Conference. Birmingham, AL.


Progress 10/01/17 to 09/30/18

Outputs
Target Audience:Target audience reached through this project included undergraduate andgraduate students at Mississippi State University. Approximately 20 students participated in focus groups conducted for both underrepresented minority students as well as the majority student population on campus. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Through connections made with this project, I was able to delivera culturallyresponsive teaching workshop for faculty memberson campus through the Center of Teaching and Learning. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Since we have had low participation with the focus groups, additional intact groups will be contacted such as student organizations and specific classes to continue getting feedback from the focus group approach until saturation of data has been reached. Additionally, results from these focus groups will be disseminated at regional and national conferences.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? The following research project will work towards identifying culturally responsive teaching techniques, embedding cultural competence training in the pre-service agriscience degree program, and providing in-service training to help recruit and retain diverse underrepresented student populations. All of these efforts could help to recruit and retain diverse and underrepresented populations in the high school agriculture programs, which could impact postsecondary enrollment of underrepresented student populations. During this reporting window, the following tasks were accomplished related to objective one: and two 1. Focus groups were conducted with underrepresented minority students during the spring, twelve students participated 2. Additional focus groups were held this fall with the majority student population, five students participated 3. These focus groups were analyzed to identify themes related to what students classify as culturally responsive teaching and how these techniques impact their learning 4. Conference presentation abstract was submitted and accepted to be presented in 2019

Publications


    Progress 09/07/17 to 09/30/17

    Outputs
    Target Audience:Approximately ten graduate students were contacted to be part of a pilot focus group to be held in November 2017. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?During the next reporting period will focus onthe following goals: 1. Training graduate students in qualitative research methods specifically in focus group facilitation. 2. Mississippi State University diverse underrepresented populations will be recruited to participate in focus groups related to identifying culturally responsive teaching techniques and their impact on learners. 3. Data from focus groups will be analyzed to help prescribe changes to the current pre-service agriculture education teacher program. 4. Results of focus groups will also be disseminated to appropriate regional and national outlets.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? The following research project will work towardsidentifying culturally responsive teaching techniques, imbedding cultural competence training in the pre-service agriscience degree program, and providing in-service training to help recruit and retain diverse underrepresented student populations. All of these efforts could help to recruit and retain diverse and underrepresented populations in the high school agriculture programs, which could impact postsecondary enrollment of underrepresented student populations. During this reporting window the following tasks were accomlished related to objective one: 1. IRB proposal submitted 2. Graduate students contacted to request participation in pilot focus group to begin identifying cultural responsive teaching techniques and fine tune the focus group protocol.

    Publications