Source: UNIV OF WISCONSIN submitted to NRP
MYCOTOXINS: BIOSECURITY, FOOD SAFETY AND BIOFUELS BYPRODUCTS (NC129, NC1025)
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1012878
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
NC-_old1183
Project Start Date
Oct 1, 2017
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2020
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
UNIV OF WISCONSIN
21 N PARK ST STE 6401
MADISON,WI 53715-1218
Performing Department
Bacteriology
Non Technical Summary
Mycotoxin contamination by toxin producing fungi is a continuing problem in Wisconsin (and the Midwest in general) resulting in both monetary loss (crop destruction) and health concerns (animal feeds). The most common fungi that produce mycotoxins in our food and feed products belong to the genera Aspergillus and Fusarium. The United States screens food well enough that we do not get high mycotoxin concentrations in human food (although this is costly), but occasional deadly mycotoxin poisonings have been attributed in pet foods (particularly aflatoxin contamination of dog food) which are not screened as tightly products intended for human consumption. These problems have been exacerbated in recent years with the finding that mycotoxins are concentrated in the dried distillers grains, the products accumulated from using maize as an ethanol source, and the increasing occurrence of mycotoxins thought to be due to changes in the climate. In fact, the climate changes affecting the world are expected to increase the frequency and concentration of mycotoxin contamination of crops with estimates of loss to a single crop (corn) from a single mycotoxin (aflatoxin) from $52.1 million to $1.68 billion annually in the United States alone. This proposal has two main objectives. One is to determine the process known as fusion that allows the fungus, Aspergillus flavus, to produce aflatoxin and also form hardened structures called sclerotia that can survive in the soil for years. Our second objective addresses how the soil microbiome affects mycotoxin production by fungi. This objective is built from our recent observations that bacterial-fungal interactions can drive development of mycotoxin producing species of both Aspergillus and Fusarium.
Animal Health Component
(N/A)
Research Effort Categories
Basic
100%
Applied
(N/A)
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
7121830110230%
7121510110235%
7121549104035%
Goals / Objectives
Objective 3. Better Understand the Biology and Ecology of Mycotoxigenic Fungi.
Project Methods
Objective 1. Conserved cellular mechanisms regulating mycotoxin synthesis, virulence or fungal development. Specific goals: to understand how LaeA regulates the Ham sensor complex MAPK pathway in A. flavus and if this pathway impacts fungal development, aflatoxin production and virulence. We hypothesize that ham mutants will be impaired in virulence due to inability of hyphae to fuse and penetrate seed tissue properly. We have already identified the five ham genes associated with this complex and deleted them in A. flavus. To complete this Objective, we will conduct the following experiments:A). Hyphal fusion: This can be assessed several ways such as by assessing fusion by microscope and/or assessing viability of heterokaryons (only viable if fusion occurs). For example, we can examine if fusion occurs by co-culturing GFP-histone labeled laeA or ham mutants with RFP-histone labeled WT to see if heterokaryonic hyphae develop (those hyphae containing both GFP and RFP nuclei). We also can create appropriate nutritional auxotrophic strains (e.g. uracil requiring WT fungus and arginine requiring laeA or ham mutants), co-culture them and see if they can grow without supplemental nutritional ingredients (e.g. without uracil and arginine in this particular case). If the two strains fuse, they will grow without supplementation. These are but two methods we can try but there are several other alternatives as described in the literature.B). Virulence: All ham mutants will be assessed for virulence on host seed (corn and/or peanut) as routinely carried out in our lab. If there is a loss in virulence, we will assess hyphal patterns of seed ingress as in Amaike et al. 2009.C). Localization of Ham proteins in laeA mutants. One or more Ham proteins will be fused to GFP and localization and quantitation analyzed in WT, DlaeA and overexpression laeA strains. We anticipate that Ham proteins will be increased in the OE::laeA strain which may underlie the increased number of sclerotia in that mutant.Depending on the results above, we will explore the possibility that Ham proteins might be targets of potential anti-fungal therapies.Objective 2. Impacts of the microbiome on mycotoxigenic fungi. Specific goals: to elucidate R. solanacearum/fungal interactions and impacts on mycotoxin production and fungal virulence and survival. We hypothesize that mycotoxin production increases in fungi when confronted with bacteria as part of a general stress response.A). Bikaverin: As mentioned above, we have found that bikaverin is induced in Fusarium spp. during confrontations with R. solanacearum (data not shown). This induction is apparently in response to ralsolamycin as bikaverin is not induced when Fusarium is grown next to the DrmyA R. solanacearum mutant. We will confirm this by co-culturing WT and DrmyA R. solanacearum strains with several Fusarium spp. and measuring bikaverin production and bikaverin gene expression. We also will culture Fusarium spp. with purified ralsolamycin. We expect more bikaverin synthesis in confrontations with WT R. solanacearum. If this is the case, we will delete the bikaverin synthase in one Fusarium spp. (Dbik) and then ask if loss of bikaverin production changes R. solanacearum/Fusarium interactions. For instance, it may be that bikaverin protects the fungus from colonization of chlamydospores by R. solanacearum.We are also interested to examine how polymicrobial virulence may be affected by both bikaverin and ralsolamycin. For this aspect, we will focus on F. oxysporum as, like R. solanacearum it is a wilt pathogen and we can assess both microbes for virulence in tomato plants. Currently we have GFP WT strains of both R. solanacearum and F. oxysporum to aid in visualization of microbial interactions in planta. One goal is to see if chlamydospores are formed in plant tissue and, if so, are they colonized by Ralstonia. We will examine both WT isolates of both microbes as well as DrmyA and Dbik strains as appropriate. We will also examine if bikaverin production increases in polymicrobial disease.B) Imizoquin: In an opposite manner to how ralsolamycin induces bikaverin in Fusarium spp., we have identified a novel A. flavus secondary metabolite we call imizoquin (data not shown) that is suppressed by ralsolamycin. Currently we have no data on the role - if any - of imizoquin on A. flavus or R. solanacearum. We have identified the imizoquin gene cluster in A. flavus and have made both a deletion and overexpression mutant (data not shown). We will now ask if these mutants impact R. solanacearum colonization of A. flavus and if the mutants are altered in any manner such as in fungal growth, spore production, aflatoxin synthesis and/or virulence.

Progress 10/01/17 to 09/30/20

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audience is the general research community including NC members and participants at the Asilomar Fungal Genetics and American Phytopathological Society meetings. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?This was a difficult year to COVID-19 and precluded travel to meetings. Still, all of my student presented their work at a local meeting by zoom. Also, my student Nick Raffa graduated in Dec 2020 and has started a job with industry. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Yes, one paper was published and there are two more in preparation. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? We continue to examine the role of fungal:bacterial communities on mycotoxin synthesis. We find that when bacteria and fungi encounter each other, mycotoxin synthesis by fungi can either be induced (putative protection for fungus) or repressed (putative advantage for bacterium). This has now changed our concept of mycotoxin production in crops. We have published some of this work (J of Fungi.). We are working on (i) how bacteria may survive in fungi and if mycotoxin production alters this survival and if (ii) patulin synthesis by the post-harvest pathogen Pencillium expansum is in response to competition with other microbes found in apple orchards or on the apple.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Steffan B, Venkatesh N, Keller, NP (2020) Lets Get Physical: Bacterial-Fungal Interactions and Their Consequences in Agriculture and Health. J Fungi. 6(4):E243. doi: 10.3390/jof6040243.


Progress 10/01/18 to 09/30/19

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audience is the general research community including NCCC members and participants at the Asilomar Fungal Genetics and American Phytopathological Society meetings. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Both students, Nandhitha Venkatesh and Nicholas Raffa, went to the 2019 Asilomar Fungal Genetic meeting (March) this past year to present their research. Both students are mentoring undergraduate students. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Yes, to the attendees at the Asilomar Fungal Genetic meeting. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We are interested in understanding the mechanisms leading to fungal:bacterial cross talk and the ecological significance of this cross talk. We are focused on elucidating the molecules/genes that allow bacteria to enter fungi and how this entry impacts both fungal and bacterial survival.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? We have gained tremendous insight into the role of fungal:bacterial communities on mycotoxin synthesis. We find that when bacteria and fungi encounter each other, mycotoxin synthesis by fungi can either be induced (putative protection for fungus) or repressed (putative advantage for bacterium). This has now changed our concept of mycotoxin production in crops. We have published some of this work (Frontiers Microbiology. 10:403. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00403.). Previous HATCH work showed that, moreover, bacteria can enter inside of pathogenic fungi, a topic we are further exploring (see below). Furthermore, we find that fungal toxins can impede growth of pathogenic bacteria.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: Venkatesh N, Keller NP (2019) Mycotoxins in conversation with bacteria, fungi and plants. Frontiers Microbiology. 10:403. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00403.


Progress 10/01/17 to 09/30/18

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audience is the general research community including NCCC members and participants at the Asilomar Fungal Genetics and American Phytopathological Society meetings. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Four graduate students (one of them supportedthrough Hatch) were involved in these two studies and presented their work at international meetings. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?As above, these studies have been presented at professional meetings. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We will continue to work on these objectives stemming from logical expansions of scientific questions arising from the published works.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? The ultimate goal is to figure out how fungi make toxins that contaminate our food and feed products. We were able to achieve two major studies that resulted in two publications. 1. Specific goal 1: to find pathways that impactfungal development, aflatoxin production and virulence of A flavus. Aspergillus flavus is a saprophytic soil fungus that poses a serious threat worldwide as it contaminates many food and feed crops with the carcinogenic mycotoxin called aflatoxin. This pathogen persists as sclerotia in the soil which enables fungal survival in harsh environmental conditions. Sclerotia formation by A. flavus depends on successful cell communication and hyphal fusion events. Loss of LaeA, a conserved developmental regulator in fungi, abolishes sclerotia formation in this species whereas overexpression (OE) of laeA results in enhanced sclerotia production. Here we demonstrate that sclerotia loss and inability to form heterokaryons in A. flavusΔlaeA is mediated by homologs of the Neurospora crassa ham (hyphal anastomosis) genes termed hamE-I in A. flavus. LaeA positively regulates ham gene expression and deletion of hamF, G, H, or I phenocopies ΔlaeA as demonstrated by heterokaryon and sclerotia loss and reduced aflatoxin synthesis and virulence of these mutants. Deletion of hamE showed a less severe phenotype. hamE-I homologs are positively regulated by the clock controlled transcription factor ADV-1 in N. crassa. Similarly, the ADV-1 homolog NosA regulates hamE-I expression in A. flavus, is required for sclerotial development and is itself positively regulated by LaeA. We speculate that a putative LaeA>NosA>fusion cascade underlies the previously described circadian clock regulation of sclerotia production in A. flavus. Specific Goal 2: Impacts of the microbiome on mycotoxigenic fungi.Small-molecule signaling is one major mode of communication within the polymicrobial consortium of soil and rhizosphere. While microbial secondary metabolite (SM) production and responses of individual species have been studied extensively, little is known about potentially conserved roles of SM signals in multilayered symbiotic or antagonistic relationships. Here, we characterize the SM-mediated interaction between the plant-pathogenic bacterium Ralstonia solanacearum and the two plant-pathogenic fungi Fusarium fujikuroi and Botrytis cinerea We show that cellular differentiation and SM biosynthesis in F.fujikuroi are induced by the bacterially produced lipopeptide ralsolamycin (synonym ralstonin A). In particular, fungal bikaverin production is induced and preferentially accumulates in fungal survival spores (chlamydospores) only when exposed to supernatants of ralsolamycin-producing strains of R.solanacearum Although inactivation of bikaverin biosynthesis moderately increases chlamydospore invasion by R.solanacearum, we show that other metabolites such as beauvericin are also induced by ralsolamycin and contribute to suppression of R.solanacearum growth in vitro Based on our findings that bikaverin antagonizes R.solanacearum and that ralsolamycin induces bikaverin biosynthesis in F.fujikuroi, we asked whether other bikaverin-producing fungi show similar responses to ralsolamycin. Examining a strain of B.cinerea that horizontally acquired the bikaverin gene cluster from Fusarium, we found that ralsolamycin induced bikaverin biosynthesis in this fungus. Our results suggest that conservation of microbial SM responses across distantly related fungi may arise from horizontal transfer of protective gene clusters that are activated by conserved regulatory cues, e.g., a bacterial lipopeptide, providing consistent fitness advantages in dynamic polymicrobial networks.IMPORTANCE Bacteria and fungi are ubiquitous neighbors in many environments, including the rhizosphere. Many of these organisms are notorious as economically devastating plant pathogens, but little is known about how they communicate chemically with each other. Here, we uncover a conserved antagonistic communication between the widespread bacterial wilt pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum and plant-pathogenic fungi from disparate genera, Fusarium and Botrytis Exposure of Fusarium fujikuroi to the bacterial lipopeptide ralsolamycin resulted in production of the antibacterial metabolite bikaverin specifically in fungal tissues invaded by Ralstonia Remarkably, ralsolamycin induction of bikaverin was conserved in a Botrytis cinerea isolate carrying a horizontally transferred bikaverin gene cluster. These results indicate that horizontally transferred gene clusters may carry regulatory prompts that contribute to conserved fitness functions in polymicrobial environments.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2018 Citation: Conserved Responses in a War of Small Molecules between a Plant-Pathogenic Bacterium and Fungi. Spraker JE, Wiemann P, Baccile JA, Venkatesh N, Schumacher J, Schroeder FC, Sanchez LM, Keller NP. MBio. 2018 May 22;9(3). pii: e00820-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00820-18.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2017 Citation: Front Microbiol. 2017 Oct 5;8:1925. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01925. eCollection 2017. A Cellular Fusion Cascade Regulated by LaeA Is Required for Sclerotial Development in Aspergillus flavus. Zhao X, Spraker JE, Bok JW, Velk T, He ZM, Keller NP