Recipient Organization
COMPOST PLANT, L3C, THE
21 MOUNT HOPE AVE
PROVIDENCE,RI 02906
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
Food waste is a significant and complex problem for the United States. Americans generate over 250 million (short) tons of trash a year, and organic materials such as paper and paperboard, yard trimmings, and food waste continue to make up a large component of the waste stream. These organic materials collectively account for a significant portion of U.S. methane emissions, as organic waste produces methane in landfills, and landfills are the third largest source of methane in the United States. Food waste recycling (composting and anaerobic digestion) offers the most scalable path to reducing food waste nationally, but on-the-ground infrastructure to manage food waste is seriously underdeveloped, especially in New England. The reality is that composting infrastructure in particular is lagging far behind policy drivers and community interest in diverting food waste and organic materials.We are in need of innovation in the organics management sector to develop replicable, scalable cost-effective solutions for organics, with an emphasis on decentralized approaches to managing food waste, leaf/yard waste, and other organic waste. Forced air composting offers distinct advantages over traditional windrow composting or static piles in terms of efficiency of land use and ability to control odor, but generally at a significantly higher capital cost. While different types of forced air composting systems are in use across the country, they tend to be cost-prohibitive for agricultural operations or small to mid-size compost operators, increase time and labor of operations by requiring manual removal and reset of air pipes, or provide uneven air flow to compost piles, resulting in pockets of unfinished material.This SBIR Phase 1 Research project will test a new technological design for an aerated static pile (ASP) composting system, one that presents an improvement to these systems with regard to cost, ease of use, and consistency of airflow, bringing high potential for commercialization.There are four core criteria by which our ASP composting system will be evaluated for this project: air distribution, capital cost, durability of materials, and operational labor/time cost.Our ASP unit is designed with the intention of scalability and replicability: at a small scale, we believe this would be a viable model for a farm to deal with on-farm waste, have increased revenue from food waste tipping fees and/or collections, and produce a high-quality compost for on-farm use or sale. At the larger end of the processing spectrum, the unit could be scaled to process food waste feedstocks from high-density areas in an industrial-scale facility.Rural areas, with a broader land base and more familiarity with agricultural-manufacturing technology, have the opportunity to connect directly with critical sources of nitrogenous material (food waste), which are primarily generated in areas of high density populations. A decentralized approach to food waste and organic waste processing and management would serve as a model for rural communities, increasing rural economic development opportunities, and enhancing environmental quality. Food and organic waste is one of the largest, yet least recovered, waste streams in the U.S., and it is time to catalyze a change in our thinking. By turning this waste stream into an environmental and community resource, we can extend the life of our landfills, close the loop with our local food systems, and enhance the economic vitality of rural communities.
Animal Health Component
70%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
20%
Applied
70%
Developmental
10%
Goals / Objectives
Goal: To test a new technological design for an aerated static pile (ASP) composting system, one that is cost-effective for agricultural and industrial use, easy to set up and remove,delivers more even and consistent air flow,and is scalable in its design based on needed processing capacity.Objectives:Cost-effectiveness: ASP unit provides equal processing volume capacity at lower capital cost versustraditional below-gradeASP composting systemsAir Flow: Provideeven and consistent air flow to static composting pile, reducing the risk of uneven air distribution and pockets of unfinished materialSet up/Removal: Reducelabor and operator time to set up and remove aeration delivery unit versus traditional above-grade ASP composting systemsScalability: Optimize unit design and engineeringto allow for scalable use (fromsingle-unit to multi-unit)Environmental/Socio-economic benefits: Assess broaderenvironmental and/or socio-economic benefits to the local community
Project Methods
Compost site (approximately 1 acre) will be prepared for research (clearing and grading). Concrete blocks will be delivered for creation of 2 static pile bays, and a site will be established for receiving and mixing feedstocks. Two aeration delivery units will be constructed for the research trials. Blower and manifold system for the bayswill be installed, and unit will be dry-tested to check air flow rates. Setup of the unit in the bay and removal from the baywill be observed and timed, without any material loaded. Based on feedstock tests conducted,appropriate volumetric and nutrient recipes (C:N ratio, moisture content, bulk density) for testing with the system will be finalized, mixed, and loaded. TheBeltsville approach (in which aeration is controlled solely by time, with blowers on continuously for a set period of time or set number of minutes per hour) and the Rutgers approach (in which aeration is controlled by temperature, with temperature feedback sensors turning blowers on and off to keep pile temperatures in the 130-140F range) will both be trialed, and the relationships between moisture, temperature, and airflow will be tracked wtih each method. A minimum of 10 batches will be processed, on a four-to-six week rotation cycle in each bay.After each ASP cycle, batches will be moved to a windrow at the site for curing, and labeled to document timeline for stabilization and maturity.Solvita Compost Maturity Tests will be conducted on the material on a regular 4 week cycle, and when mature, finished samples will be sent in for comprehensive lab analysis (bulk density, pH, conductivity, TS, TVS, NO3-N, NH4-N, total C, total N, total P, K, Mg, Ca, B, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, plus compost maturity level).