Source: PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY submitted to
AUTHENTIC PLANT POLLINATOR LANDSCAPE RESEARCH FOR EDUCATORS (APPL-RED)
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
TERMINATED
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1011606
Grant No.
2017-68010-25963
Project No.
PENW-2016-05150
Proposal No.
2016-05150
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Program Code
A7501
Project Start Date
Dec 1, 2016
Project End Date
Nov 30, 2020
Grant Year
2017
Project Director
Hill, K.
Recipient Organization
PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
408 Old Main
UNIVERSITY PARK,PA 16802-1505
Performing Department
Center for Sci And The Schools
Non Technical Summary
The APPL-RED professional development program addresses the AFRI Challenge Area of "Food Security" by involving middle and high school teachers serving underrepresented populations in research associated with the vital ecosystems services provided by pollinators. Nearly 90% of flowering plant species and 75% of our global agricultural crops use pollinators to set seed and produce fruit (Klein, et al. 2016; Ollerton, et al. 2011). Importantly, these fruit, vegetable, and nut crops provide the micronutrients we need in our diets to support active and healthy lifestyles (Chaplin-Kramer, et al. 2014; Ellis, et al. 2011). However, populations of pollinators, including both managed and wild bees are in decline, which has promoted scientists, policymakers and the public to evaluate factors causing these declines and deveo-p new approaches to conserve and promote pollinators (Evans, 2015; Grozinger, 2015). The plight of the polllinators serves as an outstanding framework that teachers can use to help their students understand how their food is produced, how agricultural systems can be designed to be sustainable, the importance of ecosystems services, how biodiversity contributes to these processes, and how the concerns of citizens can help shape agricultural policy. Furthermore, because the issues associated with pollinator declines and their contributions to agriculture are so broad, the associated research efforts are equally broad, integrating mulutiple fields and levels of biology. Thus, this topic can serve as a platform for teaching students about the wealth of scientific approaches and perspectives used in agricultural sciences.Current K-12 STEM education standards (NGSS) expect teachers to use the practices of scientists and engineers to teach core disciplinary ideas and cross-cutting concepts (Duschl, et al 2007; NRC, 2012; Lead States, 2013). A challenge to this reform is the lack of exposure to authentic research environment of most K-12 science teachers. The practices are often oversimplified as a "Scientific Method" and are operationalized in classrooms as a stepwise, linear process done by individual investigators (Windschitl et al. 2008). One method for providing teachers with first-hand insight into how research is performed is via summer teacher research experiences in which a teacher spends 5-6 weeks working in the lab of a researcher on a small component of the lab's overall research. Studies on immersion programs have shown the persistence of the concept of one true scientific method (Bell, et al 2003), rather an understanding of the dynamic, systems nature of authenticresearch, and few teachers showing changes in their teaching practice (Sadler, et al 2010).Furthermore, not many teachers are able to devote a large segment of their sumers to PD. Finally, such programs are costly, generally requiring $5,000 stipends per teacher per experience at a minimum and require a long term commitment by graduate students, post docs and/or faculty to mentor the teachers during the research experience. While abbreviated experiences require less time and cost, they still focus on a norrowly defined problem related to a small segment of the lab's overall research plan. The APPL-RED program takes a different approach, one that uses a workshop format to address content and issues associated with the overall research program of a research group and prepares teachers to engage their students in classrooom research projects that parallel the research group's research. Also, a consistent thread throughout the APPL-RED program is systems thinking appliedtonatural and man-made systems, and to the research process itself.The APPL-RED educational program brings together the strengths of Penn State's Center for Pollinator Research (CPR) and Center for Science and the Schools (CSATS). By incorporating a multitude of hands-on activities, active engagement in research projects, and site visits to apiaries, entomological museums and research farms, teachers will develop a systems-level understanding of the role of pollinators in sustainable agricultural systems, learn how researchers investigate these issues, participate in elements of the overall research process, and learn how to translate their learning to their students via classroom research projects associated with the research of PIs at the CPR. Middle schooland high school teachersserving rural and urban school districts will be prepared for student engagement in research through summer and academic year workshops at Penn State, followed by visits to selected schools by the PIs and their graduate students to support implementation of research projects and evaluate the outcomes of the programs. Teachers will also have the opportunity to serve as leaders by training other teachers in their school districts. Additionally, we will foster local interactions between teachers and extension specialists and volunteers from the Pennsylvania Master Gardener's Program, to help support educators and students in their efforts. Ultimately, we aim to develop on-line resources and courses to help distribute this program nationally.
Animal Health Component
0%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
20%
Applied
30%
Developmental
50%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
90330951070100%
Goals / Objectives
The overarching goals of the APPL-RED programare to promote precollege teachers' and students' understanding of1)factors contributing to the declinein populations of pollinators, including both managed and wild bees; and of 2)the complexnature of STEM research, in particular, FANH-related research in the area of plant-pollinator landscape design.Objectives associated with these goals are:1. Enhance teachers' and students' understanding of the systems nature of plant-pollinator landscape design and research2. Prepare teachers to engage their students in classroom research projects that parallel the PI's research3. Increase teachers' and students' understanding of FANH-subject areas underlying plant-pollinator research4. Increase teachers' and students' awareness of policies and issues associated with plant-pollinator research5. Increase teachers' awareness of available resources available to support ongoing classroom research projects in the area of plant-pollinator interactions.
Project Methods
Teachers will participate in a one week summer workshop and academic year follow-up PDaimed at improving understanding of key concepts associated with pollinator contributions to sustainable and healthy agroecosystems, enhancing understanding of the systems nature of this field and the integrative research approaches use devceloping skills used in scientific research, and utilizing best practices for developing and implementing STEM research projects in the classroom. Elements comprising the programare discussed separately below, however workshop activities will model how these elements become blended in the research process.1) Key Concepts:Concepts central to the proposal research area will be reinforced with workshop participants through lectures, hands-on activities in the classroom and in the field, in research projects, and in site visits. These concepts include:1)How have pollinators evolved and diversified, and why many different pollinators are needed to support different plants/crops?2)Why is biodiversity important and how does it contribute to sustainable and healthy agricultural and natural landscapes? What are current threats? 3)How can we design agroecosystems and other landscapes to be sustainable and support diverse pollinator communities and their ecosystems services?4) What do organisms need to survive and what is adaptation to environment? What are current threats to bee species and how do we manage different bee species? 5) What is IPMand what sociological factors undermine its use? How do we use IPM to support pollinators? 6) How do we test whether two sample groups differ in their characteristics (statistics). What is mathematical modeling and how is it used to study plant-pollinator interactions? 7) How are policies related to agricultural and environmental practices generated? What factors determine the type of research conducted in the US? 2) Systems Thinking: Several ongoing activities will contribute to building a systems thinking perspective to issues associated with pollinator contributions to agricultural systems generally and plant-pollinator relationships more specifically. Throughout the summer workshop, the teachers will learn about a variety of ongoing research projects at the Center for Pollinator Research (CPR).Havingteachers examine a variety of research projects will allow them to better appreciate the complexity of the system. To further promote their understanding of the systems nature of the research process, teachers will use the MASTER Model (M-model)- first in terms of research going on in the host labs, their own research projects and finally for designing classroom research projects TheM-model forCPR landscape design research consists of the various component research objectives aimed at answering the overarching research goal, which is to design plant-pollinator landscapes that promote incresased crop yields. Objectives include: a)Spatial and temporal plant preferences of pollinators/ b) Nutritional resources for pollinators; c) Policy and practice; d) Land-use patterns;e) Insect and plant biodiversity.Each research objective functions independently and synergistically with all the other objectives to inform overall landscape management research efforts. In the workshop, we will expand this diagram to discuss interrelationships and interdependencies in more detail. Teachers will also learn about methods for introducing students to systems thinking and its application to developing and implementing classroom research projects. Teachers will also hear about individual reseaerch projects from graduate students, post-docs, and/or faculty involved in the project. Thjis activity provides an opportunity for teachers to further understand the systems nature of the overarching research project.3) Plant-Pollinator Landscape Research Methods:As the different components of the overarching research plan are addressed, teachers will learn methods researchers use to study these components. For example, one objective of the overarching plant-pollinator landscape research agenda involves understanding which plant species are preferred by and provide the necessary nutritionfor different pollinator species. While addressing these components, teachers will learn research techniques such as(a) identifying different pollinator species in the field (b) collecting data on visitation rates of pollinators to different flowers (c) determining if pollinators are visiting flowers to collect nectar or pollen (d) analyzing the nutritional quality of pollen using basic spectrophotometric methods (e) evaluating the impact of different sites/landscapes on pollinator fitness. Many of these approaches can be incorporated by teachers into their classroom research projects, as long as teachers have access to pollinator plants (in school gardents, patio boxes, or public gardens).Along with learning these and other research practices, teachers will also learn to work with existing data sets collected by the Master Gardeners to investigate numerous polant-pollinator related research questions and will have access to reference insect speciments found at the Frost Entomology Museum.4) Translation of Authentic Research into Classroom Research Projects: During the workshop, teachers will have engaged in sample research practices that they can then implement in their classroom research projects, including. mining data sets, evaluating pollinator communities in different landscapes, assessing plant pollinator interactions, looking to see how much pollinators contribute to the yield of different plants, etc. Under the guidance of APPL-RED faculty and graduate students, teachers will use the MASTER Model to design a classroom research project that incorporates science practices learned during the workshop, identify key underlying concepts that pertain to that research project, and situate the classroom research project within the PI's overarching research plan.5) Follow-up Support for Implementation of Classroom Research Projects: During the academic year, PD will continue to be provided through two focused one-day workshops that address topics such as progress on classroom classroom plant-;pollinator research projects, updates on research from members of the CPR, and addition research methods as needed. Teachers will also be paired with local Master Gardners to facilitate efforts in maintaining pollinator plants at the school or identifying local gardens for students to visit. A second level of support will be available to teachers interested in engaging their students in more extensive classroom research experiencce. Selectedteachers will receive both ffeedback on classroom research project design, a classroom visit by the PI, CoPI and or graduate student, and a small amount of funds to help purchase materials for the project. Students will create posters and presentations to be shared with researchers and teachers at the Capstone Workshop in year 3. Teachers will also engage in Action Research to investigate impacts of the research project on student learning.6) Evaluation: Formative and summative evaluation will use a mixed-method research design. Quantitative and qualitative data will be gathered through surveys, interviews, performance reports and work sample analysis. We will use a combination of the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) model (Stufflebeam et al;. 2000) and the Guskey (2000) model for evaluating teacher PD which examines teachers' reactions, learning, application of learning, student learning and organizational support. Formative evaluation will be ongoing and discussed with the APPL-RED team. A summative evaluation will be completed in year 3 to assess the achievement of the goals and objectives of APPL-RED, the impact of changes to the plans.

Progress 12/01/16 to 11/30/20

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audience for the workshop were K-12 teachers from school districts across Pennsylvania. Twenty-nine teachers attended the workshops that occurs in the Summer of 2017 and 2019. Of the 27 teachers who attended the professional development workshops, 3 were elementary teachers and 24 were secondary science and/or agricultural education teachers. The table below provides demographic information about these school districts. Bald Eagle Area SD: 1 teacher;1.27% Black or African American; 1.06% Hispanic; 0.53% Multi-race; 96% White; 37% Economically disadvantaged Curwensville SD: 4 teachers; 0.46% Black or African American; 0.28% Hispanic; 0% Multi-race; 98% White; 47.87% Economically disadvantaged Mifflin County SD: 4teachers; 1.97% Black or African American; 3.11% Hispanic; 1.74% Multi-race; 92.72% White; 50.14% Economically disadvantaged Hazleton SD: 1 teacher; 2.33% Black or African American; 47.77% Hispanic; 0.63% Multi-race; 61.58% Economically disadvantaged East Lycoming SD:1 teacher; 0.55% Black or African American; 0.43% Hispanic; 0.79% Multi-race; 97.56% White; 35.33% Economically disadvantaged State College SD: 3 teachers; 2.41% Black or African American; 3.49% Hispanic; 5.08 Multi-race; 80.75% white; 16.15% Economically disadvantaged Lebanon SD: 1 teacher; 6.58% Black or African American; 57.87% Hispanic; 0.81% Multi-race; 33.74% White; 83.03% Economically disadvantaged Bellefonte SD: 1 teacher; 0.82% Black or African American; 1.71% Hispanic; 2.34% Multi-race; 94.29% White; 32.38% Economically disadvantaged Pittsburgh SD: 1 teacher; 52.98% Black or African American; 2.7% Hispanic; 7.44 Multi-race; 33.15% White; 61.97% Economically disadvantaged Winchester Thurston School:1 teacher; 8.42% Black or African American; 0.78% Hispanic; 9.67% Multi-race; 72.54% White; Economically disadvantaged - not reported Saint Joseph's Catholic Academy: 2 teachers;1.63% Black or African American; 2.44% Hispanic; 5.69% Multi-race; 84.55% White;Economically disadvantaged - not reported Nativity BVM High School: 1 teacher; demographics - not reported The Grier School: 1 teacher;3.7% Black or African American; 11.4% Hispanic; 0% Multi-race; 45.3% White;Economically disadvantaged - not reported (all girlsschool) Conrad Weiser Area SD: 2 teachers;5.31% Black or African American; 11% Hispanic; 2.15%Multi-race; 79.42% White; 35.99%Economically disadvantaged Christian School of York: 1 teacher;7.05% Black or African American; 4.36% Hispanic; 2.01% Multi-race; 77.52% White;Economically disadvantaged - not reported Department of Defense Education Activity, Spangdahlem, Germany: 1 teacher; demographics - not reported Also targeted were the entomology graduate students, post doc and faculty involved in the program. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Two 5-day summer workshops were held, one in June of 2017 and one in June of 2019. The 2017 workshop was attended by 16 teachers while the 2019 workshop was attended by 13 teachers from across Pennsylvania. Activities during this workshop focused on accomplishing the goals outlined in the proposal. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Attending teachers have disseminated information from the workshop as well as plans for design of pollinator gardens and for classroom research projects within their school districts. Entomology and science education faculty have presented information about the workshop at the annual Center for Pollinator Research Symposium (May 2017), through the Center for Pollinator Research annual newsletter, the website (http://ento.psu.edu/pollinators), and through the regional pollinator listserv managed by the Center (which reaches multiple stakeholder groups, institutions, and states). The Center for Science and the Schools has provided information describing the workshop and curricular materials on its website (csats.psu.edu). What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Goal 1: Enhance teachers' and students' understanding of the systems nature of plant-pollinator landscape design and research Twenty-seven teachers over the course of two summers (2017 and 2019) participated in discussions of plant-pollinator landscape research and the systems nature of that research using a MASTER model systems diagram. Teachers also utilized the MASTER model format to generate initial plans for eventual classroom research projects appropriate for students ranging from upper elementary grade levels to advanced high school classes. Goal 2: Prepare teachers to engage their students in classroom research projects that parallel the PI's research Twenty-seven teachers participated over the course of two summers (2017 and 2019) in numerous research activities and drew from these experiences as well as discussions during the workshop to generate initial plans for engaging their students in actual research practices used in plant-pollinator research. Research activities included collecting plant-pollinator pairs in the field and investigating patterns of visitation via pollen analysis; determination of distribution of pollinators across a research plot consisting of a variety of potential host plants; and collection of nectar from different plants and analysis of sugar concentration. Discussions and demonstrations included the life cycles of bees with different social levels (Osmia, Bumble bee and Honeybee), their nesting requirements, and how poor nutrition, pesticides, pathogens, parasites and habitat loss impact them. Groups of teachers that were from the same school district-initiated development of cohesive district-wide plans for using plant-pollinator landscape research as a thread for their K-12 science curriculum. All of the teachers developed initial plans for classroom research projects related to and expanding upon the research practices they learned about during the workshop. For the 2019 workshop, a teacher that participated in the Summer of 2017 was invited back to present on how she incorporated APPL-RED pollinator-related activities in a four course series (Botany, Zoology, Genetics, and Research). Goal 3: Increase teachers' and students' understanding of FANH-subject areas underlying plant-pollinator research Presentations, research activities and demonstrations centered on FANH subject areas provided background information for teachers to understand the practices and challenges associated with plant-pollinator landscape research. Subject areas that were addressed included aspects of evolution, biodiversity, ecology, organismal biology, and integrated pest management. These were addressed via presentations and discussions about the progression of research into causes of pollinator decline, nutritional ecology of bees, and how the ecology of a particular bee species influences its response to a particular stress or its needs for certain resources in the environment. Goal 4: Increase teachers' and students' awareness of policies and issues associated with plant-pollinator research Teachers participated in a discussion about overall problems underlying plant-pollinator landscape research and strategies of field research associated with these issues. They also participated in a presentation/discussion about the responses of the research community, public, and policymakers to address the phenomenon of pollinator decline. Goal 5: Increase teachers' awareness of available resources available to support ongoing classroom research projects in the area of plant-pollinator interactions. In addition to learning about numerous websites with information about planning pollinator gardens, teachers learned about how to access BeeScape to evaluate the land use and land cover patterns in their areas of interest, the database from Master Gardeners with information about plant-pollinator interactions, and how to contact Master Gardeners in their local areas. Further information is being posted on the Center for Pollinator Research website.

Publications


    Progress 12/01/18 to 11/30/19

    Outputs
    Target Audience:The target audience for the workshop were K-12 teachers from school districts across Pennsylvania. Of the 13 teachers attending the professional development workshop, two were elementary teachers and 11 were secondary science and/or agricultural education teachers.The table below provides demographic information about these school districts. District Number of teachers Black or African American Hispanic Multi-race White Economically disadvantaged Bald Eagle Area SD 1 1.27% 1.06% 0.53% 96.28% 37% Mifflin County SD 2 1.93% 3.43% 1.93% 92.21% 56.5 Winchester Thurston School 1 8.42% 0.78% 9.67% 72.54% Not reported Saint Joseph's Catholic Academy 2 1.63% 2.44% 5.69% 84.55% Not reported Nativity BVM High School 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A The Grier School 1 3.7% 11.4% 0% 45.3% Not reported Conrad Weiser Area SD 3 5.31% 11% 2.15% 79.42% 35.99% Christian School of York 1 7.05% 4.36% 2.01% 77.52% Not reported Department of Defense Education Activity, Spangdahlem, Germany 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Efforts involved in the week-long summer workshop, which consisted of formal instruction and field research work. Changes/Problems:Teachers who attended the 2019 summer workshop experienced delays in implementation due to COVID-19. These teachers will be implementing in the 2020-2021 school year in order to refine and make adjustments to their classroom research projects. In addition, the inclusion of elementary teachers in the Summer 2019 workshop uncovered the need for more focused lesson plans involvingplant pollinator research at the elementary level. As a result, we have continued to work with these teachers to develop elementary specific lesson plans and ideas for future professional development emphasizing plant-pollinator relationships. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?A 5-day summer workshop was held June 24-28, 2019. The workshop was attended by 13 teachers from across Pennsylvania. Activities during this workshop focused on accomplishing the goals outlined in the proposal. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Attending teachers have disseminated information from the workshop as well as plans for design of pollinator gardens and for classroom research projects within their school districts. The developed workshop activities and lesson plans have been posted on the Center for Pollinator Research website. The Center for Science and the Schools has provided information describing the workshop on its website (csats.psu.edu). What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?During the next reporting period, we plan to: Due to the impacts of COVID-19, many teachers from our 2019 workshop were unableto implement their classroom research projects. Teachers will be implementing and reporting on their classroom research projects in the 2020-2021 academic year. We have had several elementary teachers who have attended our workshop and identified a need for a more focused professional development for elementary teachers on plant pollinator relationships. We will continue to work with these teachers to develop some elementary focused lesson plans and professional development.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? Goal 1: Enhance teachers' and students' understanding of the systems nature of plant-pollinator landscape design and research Teachers participated in discussions of plant-pollinator landscape research and the systems nature of that research using a MASTER model systems diagram. Teachers also utilized the MASTER model format to generate initial plans for eventual classroom research projects appropriate for students ranging from upper elementary grade levels to advanced high school classes. Goal 2: Prepare teachers to engage their students in classroom research projects that parallel the PI's research Teachers participated in numerous research activities and drew from these experiences as well as discussions during the workshop to generate initial plans for engaging their students in actual research practices used in plant-pollinator research. Research activities included collecting plant-pollinator pairs in the field and investigating patterns of visitation via pollen analysis; determination of distribution of pollinators across a research plot consisting of a variety of potential host plants; and collection of nectar from different plants and analysis of sugar concentration. Discussions and demonstrations included the life cycles of bees with different social levels (Osmia, Bumble bee and Honeybee), their nesting requirements, and how poor nutrition, pesticides, pathogens, parasites and habitat loss impact them. Groups of teachers that were from the same school district-initiated development of cohesive district-wide plans for using plant-pollinator landscape research as a thread for their K-12 science curriculum. All of the teachers developed initial plans for classroom research projects related to and expanding upon the research practices they learned about during the workshop. Goal 3: Increase teachers' and students' understanding of FANH-subject areas underlying plant-pollinator research Presentations, research activities and demonstrations centered on FANH subject areas provided background information for teachers to understand the practices and challenges associated with plant-pollinator landscape research. Subject areas that were addressed included aspects of evolution, biodiversity, ecology, organismal biology, and integrated pest management. These were addressed via presentations and discussions about the progression of research into causes of pollinator decline, nutritional ecology of bees, and how the ecology of a particular bee species influences its response to a particular stress or its needs for certain resources in the environment. Goal 4: Increase teachers' and students' awareness of policies and issues associated with plant-pollinator research Teachers participated in a discussion about overall problems underlying plant-pollinator landscape research and strategies of field research associated with these issues. They also participated in a presentation/discussion about the responses of the research community, public, and policymakers to address the phenomenon of pollinator decline. Goal 5: Increase teachers' awareness of available resources available to support ongoing classroom research projects in the area of plant-pollinator interactions. In addition to learning about numerous websites with information about planning pollinator gardens, teachers learned about how to access BeeScape to evaluate the land use and land cover patterns in their areas of interest, the database from Master Gardeners with information about plant-pollinator interactions, and how to contact Master Gardeners in their local areas. Further information is being posted on the Center for Pollinator Research website.

    Publications


      Progress 12/01/17 to 11/30/18

      Outputs
      Target Audience:The target audience included teachers who attended the first 5-day summer workshop. Eight of the original 15 teachers attended the follow-up workshop. Numbers of teachers and demographics of the school district in which they serve are listed below. Efforts involved in the workshop consisted of formal instruction and curriculum planning for secondary classrooms. Mifflin County SD: 1 teacher; 1.97% Black or African American; 3.11% Hispanic; 1.74% Multi-race; 92.72% White; 50.14% Economically disadvantaged. Curwensville SD: 3 teachers; 0.46% Black or African American; 0.28% Hispanic; 0% Multi-race; 98% White; 47.87% Economically disadvantaged. Hazleton SD: 1 teacher; 2.33% Black or African American; 51.1% Hispanic; 0.86% Multi-race; 44.76% White; 61.58% Economically disadvantaged. State College Area SD: 1 teacher; 2.41% Black or African American; 3.49% Hispanic; 5.08% Multi-race; 80.75% White; 16.15% Economically disadvantaged. Tulpehocken Area SD: 1 teacher; 2.57% Black or African American; 11.11% Hispanic; 1.53% Multi-race; 83.54% White; 38.89% Economically disadvantaged. East Lycoming SD: 1 teacher; 0.54% Black or African American; 0.78% Hispanic; 1.32% Multi-race; 96.52% White; 37.39% Economically disadvantaged. Changes/Problems:Due to the fact that CoPI Grozinger was selected as an Evolutionary Think Tank Fellow at University of Muenster for the summer 2018 (and CoPI Hatch was also be involved), we postponed the second 5-day summer workshop to the summer, 2019. We are asking for a no-cost extension in order to provide follow-up for teachers who attend the second summer workshop. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?A 1-day workshop was held April 13, 2018. The workshop was attended by eight of the original 15 teachers from across Pennsylvania. Activities during this workshop focused on refining the teachers' curriculum plans to engage students in plant-pollinator landscape research projects. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Attending teachers have disseminated information from the workshop as well as plans for design of pollinator gardens and for classroom research projects within their school districts. Entomology and science education faculty have presented information about the workshop at the annual Center for Pollinator Research Symposium (May 2018), and through the regional pollinator listserv managed by the Center (which reaches multiple stakeholder groups, institutions, and states). The Center for Science and the Schools has provided information describing the workshop on its website (csats.psu.edu). What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?During the next reporting period, we plan to: Hold a second summer 5-day workshop with K-12 educators Develop an APPL-RED website. Develop formal lesson plans based upon the workshop activities. These lesson plans will be posted on the APPL-RED website.

      Impacts
      What was accomplished under these goals? Goal 1: Enhance teachers' and students' understanding of the systems nature of plant-pollinator landscape design and research. Teachers who attended the July 2017 workshop were invited to apply for additional funding support and in-depth engagement with the APPL-RED team to help them implement their classroom research plans. Eight of the 15 teachers who attended the summer workshop in 2017 also participated in a one-day workshop to review the workshop activities and make connections to the plant-pollinator landscape research being conducted at the Penn State Center for Pollinator Research. These workshop activities were connected to the research projects presented in the APPL-RED MASTER model systems diagram. Goal 2: Prepare teachers to engage their students in classroom research projects that parallel the PI's research. Teachers who attended the July 2017 workshop were invited to apply for additional funding support and in-depth engagement with the APPL-RED team to help them implement their classroom research plans. Teachers provided formal presentations of their classroom project plans to the APPL-RED team. Based upon the review session and using the APPL-RED MASTER Model structure, the teachers revised their curriculum plans as well as engaged in school garden design activities with Master Gardeners. Final classroom research project plans were submitted by the teachers for feedback and approval. Goal 3: Increase teachers' and students' understanding of FANH-subject areas underlying plant-pollinator research. Discussions centered on FANH subject areas provided context-specific information and ideas for teachers to understand engage students in plant-pollinator landscape research practices in their individual school settings. Subject areas that were addressed included aspects of evolution, biodiversity, ecology, organismal biology, and integrated pest management as these topics are taught at the precollege level. Goal 4: Increase teachers' and students' awareness of policies and issues associated with plant-pollinator research. During the prior summer workshop, a timeline activity was created that included critical research findings along with the responses of the research community, public, and policymakers related to pollinator decline. Teachers discussed incorporating this timeline activity in their classrooms to help students better understand the relationships between research and social issues related to pollinator decline. In addition, PI-Hill introduced the timeline activity to a group of 12 preservice agricultural science teachers in an undergraduate course entitle "Science Literacy and Policy in the 21st Century" to build their awareness of policies and issues associated with plant-pollinator research. Four of the preservice teachers requested and received copies of the materials associated with the timeline activity. Goal 5: Increase teachers' awareness of available resources available to support ongoing classroom research projects in the area of plant-pollinator interactions. Master Gardeners presented information regarding the establishment of school gardens and links to multiple websites with information about planning pollinator gardens. An APPL-RED website is being developed to post additional information as shared web portal. This will continue to be expanded over the course of the program.

      Publications


        Progress 12/01/16 to 11/30/17

        Outputs
        Target Audience:The target audience for the workshop were middle and high school teachers from school districts across Pennsylvania. Numbers of teachers and demographics of the school districts in which they serve are listed below.Efforts involved in the workshop consisted of formal instruction and field research work. Curwensville SD:4 teachers; 0.46% Black or African American; 0.28% Hispanic; 0% Multi-race; 98% White; 47.87% Economically disadvantaged Mifflin County SD:2 teachers; 1.97% Black or African American; 3.11% Hispanic; 1.74% Multi-race; 92.72% White; 50.14% Economically disadvantaged Hazleton SD:1 teacher; 2.33% Black or African American; 47.77% Hispanic; 0.63% Multi-race; 61.58% Economically disadvantaged East Lycoming SD:1 teacher; 0.55% Black or African American; 0.43% Hispanic; 0.79% Multi-race; 97.56% White; 35.33% Economically disadvantaged State College SD:3 teachers; 2.41% Black or African American; 3.49% Hispanic; 5.08 Multi-race; 80.75% white; 16.15% Economically disadvantaged Lebanon SD: 1 teacher; 6.58% Black or African American; 57.87% Hispanic; 0.81% Multi-race; 33.74% White; 83.03% Economically disadvantaged Bellefonte SD:1 teacher; 0.82% Black or African American; 1.71% Hispanic; 2.34% Multi-race; 94.29% White; 32.38% Economically disadvantaged Pittsburgh SD: 1 teacher; 52.98% Black or African American; 2.7% Hispanic; 7.44 Multi-race; 33.15% White; 61.97% Economically disadvantaged Also targeted were the entomology graduate students, post doc and faculty involved in the program. Changes/Problems:Due to the fact that CoPI Grozinger was invited selected as an Evolutionary Think Tank Fellow at University of Muenster for the summer of 2018 (and CoPI Patch will also be involved) we plan to postpone the second 5-day summer workshop to the summer, 2019 and ask for a no-cost extension in order to provide follow-up for teachers attending that second summer workshop. To accomplish the proposed follow-up for teachers, we will offer two follow-up workshops in spring and fall 2018 for selected teachers, which will allow us to collaborate with these teachers to get feedback on classroom implementation from the 2017 workshop and develop curricula and lesson plans for dissemination and possible inclusion in the 2019 workshop. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?A 5-day summer workshop was held July 24-28, 2017. The workshop was attended by 15 teachers from across Pennsylvania. Activities during this workshop focused on accomplishing the goals outlined in the proposal. Also, the graduate students and post doc attended all planning meetings and most of the workshop events, thereby gaining experience with planning K-12 teacher professional development workshops. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Attending teachers have disseminated information from the workshop as well as plans for design of pollinator gardens and for classroom research projects within their school districts. Entomology and science education faculty have presented information about the workshop at the annual Center for Pollinator Research Symposium (May 2017), through the Center for Pollinator Research annual newsletter, the website (http://ento.psu.edu/pollinators), and through the regional pollinator listserv managed by the Center (which reaches multiple stakeholder groups, institutions, and states). The Center for Science and the Schools has provided information describing the workshop on its website (csats.psu.edu). What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?During the next reporting period, we plan to: Expand the resources listed on the shared communication portal, focus on follow-up with teachers Invite teachers who attended the July 2017 workshop to apply for additional funding support and in-depth engagement with the APPL-RED team to help them implement their classroom research plans. From these applicants we will select teachers from up to 4 school districts. Provide mini-workshops in spring and fall 2018 for selected teachers to present additional research methods and finalize lesson plans to be carried out during the spring and fall, 2018. Engage these teachers in Action Research during upcoming academic year (2018-2019) Provide formal training for the APPL-RED staff on strategies for effective engagement with K-12 teachers and students led by CSATS staff.

        Impacts
        What was accomplished under these goals? Goal 1: Enhance teachers' and students' understanding of the systems nature of plant-pollinator landscape design and research. Teachers participated in discussions of plant-pollinator landscape research and the systems nature of that research using a MASTER model systems diagram. Teachers also utilized the MASTER model format to generate initial plans for eventual classroom research projects. Goal 2: Prepare teachers to engage their students in classroom research projects that parallel the PI's research. Teachers participated in numerous research activities and drew from these experiences as well as discussions during the workshop to generate initial plans for engaging their students in actual research practices used in plant-pollinator research. Research activities included collecting plant-pollinator pairs in the field and investigating patterns of visitation via pollen analysis; evaluating attraction of pollinators to different host plants in a research plot; collection of nectar from different plants and analysis of sugar concentration; and examination of the effect of adult nutrition and fecundity in painted lady butterflies. Discussions and demonstrations included the life cycles of bees with different social levels (Osmia, bumble bee and honey bee), their nesting requirements, and how poor nutrition, pesticides, pathogens, parasites and habitat loss impact them. Groups of teachers that were from the same school district initiated development of cohesive district-wide plans for using plant-pollinator landscape research as a thread for their K-12 science curriculum. All of the teachers developed initial plans for classroom research projects related to and expanding upon the research practices they learned about during the workshop. Goal 3: Increase teachers' and students' understanding of FANH-subject areas underlying plant-pollinator research. Presentations, research activities and demonstrations centered on FANH subject areas provided background information for teachers to understand the practices and challenges associated with plant-pollinator landscape research. Subject areas that were addressed included aspects of evolution, biodiversity, ecology, organismal biology, and integrated pest management. These were addressed via presentations and discussions about the progression of research into causes of pollinator decline, nutritional ecology of bees, and how the ecology of a particular bee species influences its response to a particular stress or its needs for certain resources in the environment. Goal 4: Increase teachers' and students' awareness of policies and issues associated with plant-pollinator research. Teachers participated in a discussion about overall problems underlying plant-pollinator landscape research and strategies of field research associated with these issues. They also participated in a presentation/discussion about the responses of the research community, public, and policymakers to address the phenomenon of pollinator decline. This presentation also included a timeline activity to help teachers better understand the relationships between research and social issues related to pollinator decline. Goal 5: Increase teachers' awareness of available resources available to support ongoing classroom research projects in the area of plant-pollinator interactions. In addition to learning about numerous websites with information about planning pollinator gardens, teachers learned about how to access CropScape to evaluate the land use and land cover patterns in their areas of interest, the database from Master Gardeners with information about plant-pollinator interactions, and how to contact Master Gardeners in their local areas. Further information is being posted on a shared web portal. This will be expanded over the course of the program. Goal 6: Provide training and experience for graduate students, post-doctoral fellows, and faculty in educational goals and effective strategies for middle- and high-school students (This goal was added post-award.) Two PhD-level graduate students (Tyler Jones and Emily Erickson), one postdoctoral fellow (Doug Sponsler), and two faculty (PIs Grozinger and Patch) from the Department of Entomology and Center for Pollinator Research at Penn State worked with PIs Ward and Hill from the Center for Science and the Schools to develop curricular goals, research experiences, and lectures for the program, and were involved in all aspects of the short course. During the course, additional discussions with the teachers focused on their curricular requirements, how pollinator-themed research can fit into these, logistical constraints faced by teaching in typical middle- and high-school settings, and effective strategies for student engagement and learning.

        Publications