Source: COMMUNITY ALLIANCE WITH FAMILY FARMERS FOUNDATION submitted to
EXPANDING FOOD SAFETY OUTREACH AND EDUCATION FOR LOCAL FOOD SYSTEMS IN CALIFORNIA
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
TERMINATED
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1010534
Grant No.
2016-70020-25799
Project No.
CALW-2016-07342
Proposal No.
2016-07342
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Program Code
A4182
Project Start Date
Sep 1, 2016
Project End Date
Aug 31, 2018
Grant Year
2016
Project Director
Runsten, D.
Recipient Organization
COMMUNITY ALLIANCE WITH FAMILY FARMERS FOUNDATION
36355 RUSSELL BLVD
DAVIS,CA 95616
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
California has a majority of all farms covered by FSMA, and California has also revised its directmarketing laws to require all direct marketing farms, regardless of size, to implement GAPs. This iscreating increasing demand for food safety education and guidance tailored to the small farmcommunity. The Community Alliance with Family Farmers (CAFF) has been conducting outreachand education on food safety to small, minority, disadvantaged, immigrant, and organic farmers inCalifornia for the past five years. In that time we have reached over 2,000 farmers in workshopsand helped 200 farmers complete on-farm food safety plans. We have collaborated with a variety oforganizations in this effort, including UC Cooperative Extension, ALBA, CCOF, Hmongorganizations, and various buyers, and we have at different times translated materials andworkshops into Spanish, Hmong, and Chinese. This Food Safety Outreach Project seeks to expandour program by 1) incorporating material on FSMA into workshop presentations, handouts,webinars, and on our web site; 2) working with UC Cooperative Extension and CDFA to developan appropriate strategy for food safety education for these smaller farms in California; 3) offeringworkshops in the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys, where we have had only a limited presenceand where there are additional immigrant groups; and 4) creating materials specific to organicfarms. We have started on this last task with a Western SARE grant that includes UC, Oregon StateUniv, CCOF, and Oregon Tilth, which will help us collaborate with the Regional Center at OSU.
Animal Health Component
0%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
50%
Developmental
50%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
50150103100100%
Knowledge Area
501 - New and Improved Food Processing Technologies;

Subject Of Investigation
5010 - Food;

Field Of Science
3100 - Management;
Goals / Objectives
Increase the understanding of FSMA, GAPs, food safety issues in post-harvest handling, the intersection of FSMA rules and National Organic Program (NOP) rules, and emerging food safety standards among small and historically underserved farms.Create approachable, understandable food safety educational tools and techniques to serve small and/or organic farms.Increase the quality (translating when necessary) and availability of food safety resources available to small, underserved and immigrant farming communities.Expand food safety outreach and education into new and underserved regions including the San Joaquin and Sacramento Valleys.
Project Methods
1. Stakeholder involvementCAFF represents many of the relevant stakeholders in this instance. We are in contact with about 9,000 farmers in California, including the 4,000 direct market farmers throughout the state. For the past three years, we have sent an annual letter to the direct market farmers in the state about food safety; the most recent letter discussed FSMA and the various exemptions, which has led to farmers contacting us, seeking clarification and assistance.We will use this network of farmers as we disseminate more information about FSMA and advertise workshops. We will also rely on the cooperating NGOs and specific buyers to help us access particular groups of farmers and disseminate resources. We expect to hold many workshops on farms and work with those farmers to participate in the planning and execution of the workshops.2. Proposed project activitiesThe following activities will occur during the two years of the grant project period, starting in the fall of 2016:Hire and train Project Manager - food safety project manager (Project Manager)Meet with cooperating organizations for planning, including commodity groups, CDFA, UC Cooperative Extension, CCOF, ALBA, Wild Farm Alliance, select buyers (Project Director and Project Manager)Organize material, including: FSMA rules and exemptions (Produce Safety Alliance 8 hour training not appropriate for most of this population; we are working with FDA, NSAC and UC Davis on alternatives); Organics and FSMA; GAPs updated for FSMA; Post-harvest wash options for conventional and organic (materials reviewed by Trevor Suslow)Translate key resource documents into Spanish (contractor)Work with specific crops and minority groups on targeted outreach utilizing assistance of Cooperative Extension Small Farm Advisors, commodity groups, and NGOs, e.g.CAFF can reach:Beginning farmers with help from Jennifer Sowerwine at UC Berkeley, Soil Born Farms, Farmers Guild, Center for Land Based Learning, ALBA, Farmer-Veteran Coalition, and UC Santa Cruz.Hmong farmers with help from Cooperative Extension and packing houses in Fresno.Latino farmers with help from ALBA, packing houses, and the Strawberry Commission (Project Director and Project Manager)Conduct workshops and have them evaluated by the participants--use evaluations to improve workshops and to determine who needs follow-up (Project Director and Project Manager and some translators)Conduct one-on-one follow-up with farmers where needed (Project Manager)Respond to inquiries from farmers (Project Manager)Send annual letter to direct market farmers in California (Project Director)Call back farmers previously assisted one-on-one to follow up (Project Manager)Update website as new materials are developed, and share them with cooperators and stakeholders (Outreach Coordinator, Project Manager)Compile outcomes and share them with cooperators and stakeholders (Project Director and Project Manager)Reporting and invoicing (Outreach Coordinator and Finance Administrator)3. Techniques to be used and their rationaleWe have come to stress the need for farmers to perform a risk assessment on their farms as a first step toward a food safety plan appropriate to the farm; often certain elements of standard food safety plans are irrelevant on particular farms, and really every farm is unique. We have developed materials that we utilize in this work that we believe are appropriate to the scale of these farms, which are on our website:http://www.caff.org/programs/foodsafety/templates/http://www.caff.org/resources/foodsafety/In the past we budgeted large amounts of money for workshop expenses but found that most workshops were organized by various partner organizations and that we should focus our resources on providing materials, presentations, and one-on-one advice. We learned that translation was often necessary with immigrant farmers and that we should translate written materials into Spanish but not Hmong; we are translating more documents now into Spanish and putting them on our website in anticipation of this project.We try to hold workshops on farms, if possible, as we limit the presentations to a few hours and then go out and walk around to look at food safety issues up close. This often allows for the incorporation of farmer-to-farmer extension, which is one of the more effective ways to convey information, since farmers who have actually implemented food safety practices are the most credible sources of information for these types of farmers.For the farmers who are actually subject to the Produce Rule or Preventive Controls Rule, there will have to be more presentation of material, but we are still working with FDA and NSAC to determine how to go about this. FDA has acknowledged that alternatives to the Produce Safety Alliance presentation--8 hours with over 280 power point slides--will have to be developed. The PSA provides useful material but the one-day format of pure presentation is not appropriate for these small farmers, who do not have hired food safety personnel and often have a limited education and/or limited English ability.

Progress 09/01/16 to 08/31/18

Outputs
Target Audience:We reached beginning, diversified, minority, disadvantaged, organic, and direct market farmers throughout the course of this project. More specifically, we provided technical assistance to Chinese growers in San Benito, CA, Mien strawberry growers near Sacramento, and Latino growers on the central coast of CA and in Imperial Valley. Changes/Problems:An unexpected outcome that we had was the somewhat low attendance on the two webinars we did on this educational topic. We think that can be improved in the future by doing two concrete things. First, we need to promote and provide the live webinar at a time of year when farmers are more available (winter) and not during the busy spring and summer months. Secondly, we need to partner with other organizations that have good email lists and communications so that they can cross-promote the event. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?A core part of this project was providing training on technical food safety regulations to small, minority, and beginning farmers. As was noted in a previous question, we provided over 500 farmers with on-farm food safety educational opportunities. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?We have shared the educational materials with growers via our in-person trainings, farm visits, webinars, mailing, and phone/emails. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? All of our goals were accomplished in a variety of ways. Over the course of the project period we provided 26 in-person trainings to farmers at conferences, farms, and other local buildings. There were 473 attendees in total at these trainings and they had 297 food safety questions answered. Workshop attendees filled out a pre/post training evaluation and we found that on average, attendees had a 77% change in knowledge on Good Agricultural Practices post training and a 91% change in knowledge about the Food Safety Modernization Act post training. These trainings mainly occurred in English, but there were also three in Spanish and two in Mandarin. We presented at the EcoFarm conference twice, the CA Small Farm Conference, the Guildraising conference (twice), the Latino Farmers Conference, and at a number of farms across the state. We also visited 20 farms to provide one-on-one technical assistance and education. We presented two webinars to a total of 29 participants.

Publications


    Progress 09/01/16 to 08/31/17

    Outputs
    Target Audience:Beginning, diversified, minority, disadvantaged, organic, and direct market farmers are the target farmer audiences that we have reached thus far and will continue to reach in the future. Changes/Problems:Since starting the grant we've realized that there is workshop fatigue and have thus proposed that we reduce the number of workshops from 25 to 20 and instead provide additional 1-on-1 technical support to growers and regional buyers. 1-on-1 or small group support to growers tends to be more effective at getting growers to actually implement changes because of the direct communication about what needs to happen on specific farms. We have submitted a request to change the scope of work and budget to Gail Martin. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?One training for growers occurred at the California Small Farm Conference and another training occurred at the Latino Farmer Conference. CAFF staff attended the entire conference at both and were able to incorporate professional development while also delivering educational material to growers during the CAFF food safety trainings. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?New resources and additional info on upcoming food safety trainings has been added to our website, promoted through word of mouth, and advertised in a hard paper mailing to 5,000+ California growers as well at 10,000+ CAFF e-newsletter subscribers. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We plan on completing between 12-17 food safety trainings in a variety of locations across the state as well as to a variety of farmer audiences (non-English speakers, beginning farmers, limited resource growers, organic growers). Additional CAFF food safety plan template documents are in the process of being translated and other resources will be as well. We are in the process of developing a "Farmer Action Plan" that will help growers prioritize next action steps for reducing food safety risks on their farm. More 1-on-1 technical assistance will be provided to growers via email, phone, and farm visits. Another hard copy paper mailing will go out to growers in February updating them on new FSMA developments as well as promoting CAFF's resources and in person trainings.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? We have developed additional content areas on our website on the following topics: postharvest, webinars, Food Safety Modernization Act Overview, FSMA Water, and food safety trainings. Additionally, we now have two free, publically available webinars for organic growers, and two webinars for small scale growers on FSMA. 29 food safety plan template documents were translated into Spanish. 8 food safety trainings were given to 144 farmers, which included a training in Spanish as well as multiple trainings to beginning farmers. Over 125 questions from growers on FSMA, GAPs, and other food safety questions have been answered thus far.

    Publications

    • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Other Year Published: 2017 Citation: 8 different training presentations, 29 Spanish translated documents, and five new website pages have been created to date. We will have two webinars, one paper mailing, 12-17 more presentations, and a completed Farmer Action Plan tool by the end of the grant.