Source: N Y AGRICULTURAL EXPT STATION submitted to NRP
MITIGATING SPINETORAM RESISTANCE IN ONION THRIPS IN ONION USING A RESISTANCE MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1010407
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Oct 1, 2016
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2020
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
N Y AGRICULTURAL EXPT STATION
(N/A)
GENEVA,NY 14456
Performing Department
Geneva - Entomology
Non Technical Summary
Onion thrips is a devastating pest of onion throughout the world that is principally managed with insecticides. In New York State, there is evidence that onion thrips populations have likely developed resistance to spinetoram, the most effective insecticide used for thrips control. Resistance to this important thrips-management tool will threaten New York's onion industry. Research proposed herein will determine where and to what extent onion thrips resistance to spinetoram exists in various onion producing regions throughout New York State. Mitigating further resistance to spinetoram is paramount and we propose to develop a resistance management strategy that will also utilize a molecular tool for rapidly detecting resistance. We will communicate this information to the onion industry via local and regional presentations, on-line resources and through extension newsletters.
Animal Health Component
67%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
33%
Applied
67%
Developmental
0%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
2111451113067%
2113110115033%
Goals / Objectives
The purpose of this project is to examine the extent of resistance to spinetoram in onion thrips populations across the major onion-producing regions in New York and then to design a strategy to mitigate the spread and intensity of resistance. Specific objectives to address this goal are as follows:Obtain onion thrips populations from onion fields located in large and small onion cropping regions (mucks) across New York and calculate onion cropping intensity (in space and time) in proximity to each onion field.Determine the level of susceptibility to spinetoram in each onion thrips population and determine whether size of onion cropping region and/or onion cropping intensity are associated with levels of resistance.Evaluate the role of P450 monooxygenases in conferring resistance to spinetoram with the use of piperonyl butoxide.Identify mutation(s) conferring resistance to spinetoram in order to develop a high throughput molecular (PCR-based) assay that can rapidly detect spinetoram resistance alleles in thrips and monitor populations in the future.Refine recommendations to prolong utility of spinetoram for onion thrips management and then extend this information to onion growers via written and oral resources.
Project Methods
Objective 1: Onion thrips populations will be sampled from onion fields in large onion production systems (Elba Muck and Black Dirt regions in NY) and smaller ones (mucks in Oswego, Wayne and Yates Counties) in 2017-2018. Twenty populations will be sampled each year (10 each in large and small production systems). Insecticide application records will be obtained from growers in all fields sampled.Onion cropping history in the landscape around each onion field will be obtained from National Agricultural Statistics Service--Cropland Data Layer (CDL). The data layer is a remotely sensed, categorical description of agricultural, urban, and natural land use at a 30 m pixel resolution. Additionally, the location of all onion fields in New York can be obtained. Onion crop history within a 1, 5 and 10 km buffer for each sampled onion field will be determined from all available years prior to study year 2017 (2008-2016) and 2018 (2008-2017); pixels planted to onion will be given a value of "1" in the CDL. Annual CDL layers will be reclassified into a binary layer (onion or not onion) then sequentially summed to determine the number of years each pixel within the raster had been planted to onion.Objective 2: Field collections of onion thrips. For each onion thrips population, at least five thrips (larvae) will be collected from onion plants in each of approximately 15 spatially separated locations within a single onion field (>75 thrips total). Entire plants or portions of plants with the thrips larvae will be maintained in ventilated plastic boxes until pupation. Thrips pupae then will be removed from these containers using a fine-tipped paintbrush dipped in ddH2O and then placed on sanitized green onion plants. Before thrips are added to the green onion plants, the plants will be sanitized in 10% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite solution for 10 min (to insure it is free of eggs or larvae) and then allowed to dry for 4-5 days. This period will ensure us that they are thrips-free. Green onions with thrips pupae will be maintained at 25°C for approximately 7-10 d to ensure that adults have had time to lay eggs and for F1 larvae to reach second instar (L2).Determining levels of spinetoram susceptibility. Two bioassay methods will be independently used to determine spinetoram dose-response curves for each onion thrips population. The first will be the thrips insecticide bioassay system (TIBS). A 0.5 ml centrifuge tube will be filled with a commercial formulation of spinetoram (Radiant SC) and 2 percent v/v Dyne-Amic spreader/sticker. After 4 h, contents will be discarded and remaining solution will evaporate in the open air until dry, leaving only insecticide residues on the tube walls. In the tube cap, 0.08 ml of a nutritive 10 percent sucrose solution, containing food coloring for detection of leaks, will be added and sealed with thinly stretched Parafilm.The second bioassay method will use formulated product that will be added to the liquid diet in the tube cap. This bioassay method will rely on ingestion of the active ingredient, which the thrips will acquire by feeding through the Parafilm-covered tube cap. Conducting these different bioassays will enable us to evaluate two types of exposures (contact versus oral) primarily because thrips behavior regarding contact is unclear. For both bioassay methods, early L2s will be collected using a fine-tipped paintbrush dipped in ddH2O. Insects will be exposed for 24 h, after which morbidity and mortality will be recorded.Calculating LC50 and LC95 values for each population. A preliminary run of each assay technique will be performed to obtain rough mortality estimates ranging from 0 to 100 percent. Five equally spaced log-scale concentrations will be prepared, ranging from 0.1 to 1000 ppm active ingredient. Concentrations will be prepared using a serial dilution process. For each bioassay method, a single replicate of each exposure rate will be tested. Five F1 L2 onion thrips will be placed in each treated tube using a fine-tipped paintbrush (not dipped in ddH2O). Thrips selected for each dose will come from a single 50 ml tube (one isolate). Placement of L2 in the tubes will be identical for both delivery mechanisms.Once the approximate range of mortality is established, a final run for each assay type will be conducted in which a series of seven equally spaced log-scale spinetoram concentrations will be prepared from 0 to 100 percent mortality range established from the preliminary assay. Concentrations will be prepared using a serial dilution process and each dose will be independently replicated three times; this will be done for each insecticide exposure method. A total of 15 F1 L2 onion thrips will be placed in each treated tube using a fine-tipped paintbrush. After data are collected 24-48 hrs later, replicates within a single concentration will be evaluated using Student's t-test to ensure no error in dilution preparation. Abbott's mortality adjustment will be performed on all data and PoloPlus version 2.0 will be used for probit analysis and calculation of LC50 and LC95 values.Objective 3: Maximum sub-lethal toxicity of piperonyl butoxide (PBO), an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, will be determined using a similar process as described in Objective 2. Both TIBS and the tube cap diet bioassay will be performed. Seven equally spaced log-scale concentrations of PBO will be prepared, ranging from 10 to 10000 ppm and will be prepared using a serial dilution process. A single replicate of each exposure rate will be tested. Five F1 L2 onion thrips will be placed in each treated tube (one dose) using a fine-tipped paintbrush. To evaluate the effect of PBO as suppressing the resistance, the process described in Objective 2 will be repeated in its entirety. However, the maximum sub-lethal rate of PBO will be added to each spinetoram concentration after serial dilutions are complete. Data collection and statistical analyses will follow the procedure described in Objective 2.Objective 4. Identification of genes conferring resistance to spinetoram. If the bioassays with PBO indicate that P450-mediated metabolism is not the mechanism of resistance, we will sequence the alpha6nAChR cDNA from the most susceptible and resistant populations that are collected. In brief, RNA will be extracted from L2s, cDNA will be synthesized and the fragments of alpha6nAChR will be amplified by PCR (using degenerate primers) and sequenced. From this information we will work to determine the full length cDNA sequence. It is possible that the full length cDNA may not be made in the resistant strain, and that will be readily detected by our methods, as will any sequence differences. If the PBO assays indicate that P450 monooxygenases are the cause of spinetoram resistance we will sequence and compare the transcriptomes of the susceptible and resistant populations in order to find the P450s that are overexpressed.?Objective 5. Results from this study will be used to refine existing recommendations for managing onion thrips with spinetoram and to mitigate insecticide resistance development. While this information will be particularly useful for stakeholders in New York, those from other onion-production regions in the US will similarly benefit. We will communicate our findings to stakeholders at key meetings held for the US onion industry and annual regional growers' meetings in theGreat Lakes region. All presentations will be available through Cornell's Vegetable website. We also will publish results in Onion World magazine, which is the voice of the onion industry and read by essentially all onion producers, processors, and researchers, representing the best avenue of written communication with our stakeholders. We will involve undergraduate and graduate students in field and laboratory research. Students will receive training in both classical and molecular evaluations of insecticide resistance.

Progress 10/01/16 to 09/30/20

Outputs
Target Audience:Audiences targeted to receive information generated from this project included onion growers, University extension educators and faculty, professional crop consultants, agri-chemical company representatives, vegetable seed company representatives and the public. Efforts to transfer knowledge about our research have focused primarily on verbal presentations at stakeholder-based meetings, extension educator-based meetings, on-farm visits and extension newsletters and magazines. Changes/Problems:No onion thrips populations in New York State that we examined were resistant to spinetoram. Consequently, we were not able to address objectives 3 and 4 because they involved determining the mechanism and genetics of resistance to spinetoram in onion thrips populations. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The project involved mentoring one technician, one graduate student and an undergraduate student over the course of this project. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Results have been disseminated to several communities of interest including the general public, onion growers and the scientific community. The following are examples of the communities and information shared. Results from our project have been discussed with the New York onion industry via multiple oral presentations at Cornell Cooperative Extension regional meetings as well as nationally at professional entomology meetings. Results have been reported via written articles in a Cornell Cooperative Extension newsletter and the popular trade magazine, Onion World. In all cases, our results showing that there is no resistance to spinetoram in onion fields suggests that our current insecticide resistance management program for onion thrips using selective insecticides and action thresholds is likely mitigating resistance development. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? The susceptibility of onion thrips to spinetoram was assessed from populations collected in commercial onion fields in New York. LC50s for adults were generated from feeding assays and ranged from 2.07-5.08 ppm, but grower reports indicated that onion thrips populations continue to be susceptible to spinetoram. Moreover, both regional and temporal variation in susceptibility were similar among these populations based on survival at individual concentrations tested, despite significant differences in LC50s. These results suggest some genetic heterogeneity among onion thrips populations and serve as a valuable reference for the continued monitoring of onion thrips susceptibility to spinetoram, contributing to ongoing efforts to manage insecticide resistance in this system. Additionally, the performance of three types of laboratory bioassays were compared to identify which was best for determining onion thrips sensitivity to spinetoram (Radiant SC), a commonly used insecticide in New York onion fields. Assays included TIBS (Thrips Insecticide Bioassay System - a contact assay), a feeding-only assay, and a leaf dip assay (contact + feeding). We wanted to understand how different types of exposure to spinetoram via these assays influenced thrips morality, the assay that generated an LC50 with relatively low 95% confidence intervals and which bioassay was easiest to use. A susceptible colony of onion thrips from Elba, NY was used for all assays. Assays were conducted by placing varying numbers of adult thrips in vials or petri dishes that contained 7-8 rates of spinetoram (range: 0.01 to 100 ppm) and an untreated control. Results indicated that all three assays had significantly different dose-mortality relationships and LC50s. The feeding-only assay had the highest LC50 (1.63 ppm), while those that included contact were much lower (0.014 ppm and 0.045 ppm for leaf dip and TIBS assays, respectively). The leaf dip assay had the smallest 95% confidence interval (0.009-0.022 ppm). These results suggested that contact with spinetoram had a greater impact on thrips mortality than their exposure to spinetoram only via feeding. Results from a field simulation experiment with spinetoram generated an LC50 of 1.58, which was very similar to the LC50 generated from the feeding-only assay. Finally, the feeding-only assay was the easiest to set up and took less time to collect data than the other assays. Our results will be communicated to extension educators and crop consultants so that they can use the feeding-only assay to monitor resistance to spinetoram in the future. Finally, results from this project were considered when revising guidelines for managing onion thrips with insecticides in commercial onion fields https://rvpadmin.cce.cornell.edu/uploads/doc_900.pdf.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: Moretti, E. A., and B. A. Nault. 2019. Onion thrips control in onion, 2017. Arthropod Management Tests, 44(1): DOI 10.1093/amt/tsz003.
  • Type: Other Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: Moretti, E., and B. Nault. 2019. Monitoring onion thrips susceptibility to Radiant SC. Cornell Cooperative Extension, Cornell Vegetable Program. VegEdge 15(24): 6-7.
  • Type: Other Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: Moretti, E., and B.A. Nault. 2019. Are onion thrips developing resistance to Radiant SC? Onion World. 35(8): 6-8.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: Moretti, E. A., R. S. Harding, J. G. Scott and B. A. Nault. 2019. Monitoring onion thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) susceptibility to spinetoram in New York onion fields. J. Econ. Entomol. 112(3): 14931497.
  • Type: Other Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Nault, B., and C. Hoepting. 2020. Insecticide programs to consider for onion thrips control in onion in 2020. VegEdge 16(14): 8-9.
  • Type: Theses/Dissertations Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: Yannuzzi, I. 2020. Comparison of bioassays used to monitor onion thrips (Thrips tabaci) susceptibility to spinetoram. Honors thesis. April 2020. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.


Progress 10/01/18 to 09/30/19

Outputs
Target Audience:Audiences targeted to receive information generated from this project included onion growers, University extension educators and faculty, professional crop consultants, agri-chemical company representatives, vegetable seed company representatives and the public. Efforts to transfer knowledge about our research have focused primarily on verbal presentations at stakeholder-based meetings, extension educator-based workshops, on-farm visits and extension newsletters and magazines. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The project involved mentoring one technician, one graduate student and an undergraduate student in 2019. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Results from our project were discussed with the New York onion industry. Oral presentations were given at Cornell Cooperative Extension regional meetings. Written information was presented at a professional conference as well as a Cornell Cooperative Extension newsletter and a popular trade magazine. In all cases, our results showing that there is no resistance to spinetoram in onion fields suggests that our current insecticide resistance management program for onion thrips using selective insecticides and action thresholds is mitigating resistance development. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Plans for the next reporting period include repeating the field simulation experiment to related bioassay results with mortality levels of onion thrips on spinetoram-treated onion plants. Additionally, we intend to publish the this study. If time permits, a diagnostic dose, estimated to kill 90% of thrips, will be used to predict control failures in fields across the region.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? In 2019, the performance of three types of insecticide sensitivity bioassays were compared for use with onion thrips: TIBS (Thrips Insecticide Bioassay System - a contact assay), s feeding-only assay, and s leaf dip assay (contact + feeding). We wanted to understand how different types of exposure to insecticides via these assays influenced thrips morality, the assay that generated an LC50 with relatively low 95% confidence intervals and which bioassay was easiest to use. A susceptible colony of onion thrips from Elba, NY and spinetoram (Radiant SC), a commonly used insecticide in New York onion fields, were used for all assays. Assays were conducted by placing varying numbers of adult thrips in vials or petri dishes that contained 7-8 rates of spinetoram (range: 0.01 to 100 ppm) and an untreated control. Results indicated that all three assays had significantly different dose-mortality relationships and LC50s. The feeding-only assay had the highest LC50 (1.63 ppm), while those that included contact were much lower (0.014 ppm and 0.045 ppm for leaf dip and TIBS assays, respectively). The leaf dip assay had the smallest 95% confidence interval (0.009-0.022 ppm). These results suggested that contact with spinetoram had a greater impact on thrips mortality than their exposure to spinetoram only via feeding. Results from the field simulation experiment generated an LC50 of 1.58, which was very similar to the LC50 generated from the feeding-only assay. Finally, the feeding-only assay was the easiest to set up and took less time to collect data than the other assays. Our results will be communicated to extension educators and crop consultants so that they can use the feeding-only assay to monitor resistance to spinetoram in the future.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: Moretti, E. A., R. S. Harding, J. G. Scott and B. A. Nault. 2019. Monitoring onion thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) susceptibility to spinetoram in New York onion fields. J. Econ. Entomol. 112(3): 14931497.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: Moretti, E. A., and B. A. Nault. 2019. Onion thrips control in onion, 2017. Arthropod Management Tests, 44(1), 12 doi: 10.1093/amt/tsz003.
  • Type: Other Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: Moretti, E., and B. Nault. 2019. Monitoring onion thrips susceptibility to Radiant SC. Cornell Cooperative Extension, Cornell Vegetable Program. VegEdge 15(24): 6-7.
  • Type: Other Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: Moretti, E., and B.A. Nault. 2019. Are onion thrips developing resistance to Radiant SC? Onion World. 35(8): 6-8.


Progress 10/01/17 to 09/30/18

Outputs
Target Audience:Audiences targeted to receive information generated from this project included onion growers, University extension educators and faculty, professional crop consultants, agri-chemical company representatives, vegetable seed company representatives and the public. Efforts to transfer knowledge about our research have focused primarily on verbal presentations at stakeholder-based meetings, extension educator-based workshops and on-farm visits. Changes/Problems:To date, no onion thrips populations examined in our project have been identified as resistant to spinetoram. If results are similar in 2019, we will not be able to address Objectives 3 and 4 because they involve determining the mechanism and genetics of the resistance. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The project involved mentoring one technician and one graduate student in 2018. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Results from our project were discussed briefly with the New York onion industry. Oral presentations were given at three formal Cornell Cooperative Extension regional meetings and one twilight meeting during the summer in 2018. Management of onion thrips using selective insecticides and action thresholds was also communicated to the New York onion industry via Cornell Cooperative newsletters and to subsets of growers in various Upstate New York regions. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Plans for the next reporting period include relating bioassay results with mortality levels of onion thrips on spinetoram-treated onion plants. Additionally, a new project will compare results of three different bioassay methods to determine which bioassay is most appropriate for monitoring onion thrips susceptibility to spinetoram. Suitability will be determined based on several factors, including resources, time, convenience, and relationship of bioassay generated mortality levels with mortality levels observed on treated onion plants. If time permits, a diagnostic dose, estimated to kill 90% of thrips, will be used to predict control failures in fields across the region.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Onion thrips populations were collected from commercial onion fields in two geographic regions in 2018 and examined for their susceptibility to spinetoram. Each field was separated from other onion fields to ensure that they were not managed by the same onion grower. We hypothesized that onion thrips populations would be less sensitive to spinetoram in the Elba muck region compared with all other regions because populations likely have been exposed more frequently to spinetoram. Thus, we anticipated that LC50s would be higher in the Elba populations than the others. LC50s for adults were generated from adult feeding assays and ranged from 2.07-5.08 ppm, but grower reports indicated that onion thrips populations continued to be susceptible to spinetoram. Moreover, both regional and temporal variation in susceptibility were similar among these populations based on survival at individual concentrations tested, despite significant differences in LC50s. These results suggested some genetic heterogeneity among onion thrips populations, but populations from Elba were not less susceptible than those from other regions. These data will serve as a valuable reference for the continued monitoring of onion thrips susceptibility to spinetoram, contributing to ongoing efforts to manage insecticide resistance in this system. While these results are excellent news for New York onion growers, we will continue to stress the importance of not relying exclusively on spinetoram to manage onion thrips infestations. We will encourage growers to use spinetoram in a prescribed sequence with insecticides belonging to different classes during the season. Moreover, we will continue to encourage growers to adopt action thresholds to determine if and when insecticide applications are needed, rather than rely on a weekly spray schedule.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Accepted Year Published: 2019 Citation: Moretti, E.A., Harding, R.S., Scott, J.G., and B.A. Nault. 2019. Monitoring onion thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) susceptibility to spinetoram in New York onion fields. J. Econ. Entomol. (in press)
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Awaiting Publication Year Published: 2019 Citation: Moretti, E.A., and Nault, B.A. (2019). Onion thrips control in onion, 2017. Arthropod Management Tests. (In press)


Progress 10/01/16 to 09/30/17

Outputs
Target Audience:Audiences targeted to receive information generated from this project included onion growers, University extension educators and faculty, professional crop consultants, agri-chemical company representatives, vegetable seed company representatives and the public. Efforts to transfer knowledge about our research have focused primarily on verbal presentations at stakeholder-based meetings, extension educator-based workshops and on-farm visits. Changes/Problems:To date, no onion thrips populations examined in our project have been identified as resistant to spinetoram. If results are similar in 2018, we will not be able to address objectives 3 and 4 because they involve determining the mechanism and genetics of the resistance. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The project involved mentoring one technician and one graduate student in 2017. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Results from our project were discussed briefly with the New York onion industry. Oral presentations were given at three formal Cornell Cooperative Extension regional meetings and one twilight meeting during the summer in 2017. Management of onion thrips using selective insecticides and action thresholds was also communicated to the New York onion industry via Cornell Cooperative newsletters and to subsets of growers in various Upstate New York regions. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Plans for the next reporting period include repeating the research that was conducted in 2017 as well as continuing to disseminate results from these studies to the US onion industry, especially the onion growers in New York.?

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Onion thrips populations were collected from 8 commercial onion fields in 2017 and examined for their susceptibility to spinetoram. In 2017, 3 fields were located in the Elba muck, which is the second largest contiguous muck area in New York and home to the second largest onion production area in the state. Each field was in proximity to other onion fields that may or may not have been managed by the same onion grower. The remaining 5 onion fields were located throughout central and western New York and were on much small mucks than the Elba muck and all fields were separated from other onion grower's fields. We hypothesized that onion thrips populations would be less sensitive to spinetoram in the Elba muck compared with the other locations because populations likely have been exposed more frequently to spinetoram. Thus, we anticipated that LC50s would be higher in the Elba populations than the others. Using an ingestion-based feeding bioassay for 48 hours, LC50s and 95% confidence intervals were determined for each thrips population. Overall, the mean LC50 for all 8 populations was 2.9 µg/ml (range: 1.8 to 3.5 µg/ml) and mean 95% confidence intervals were 2.2 to 21.4 µg/ml. The LC50s from populations in the Elba muck and those from the other areas were 2.9 µg/ml and 2.8 µg/ml, respectively. The estimated field dose of spinetoram applied to onion is approximately 18 µg/ml (this would be a 6 fl oz per acre rate applied in a spray volume of 30 gallons per acre). Therefore, our results indicate that all onion thrips populations examined were susceptible to spinetoram and that no differences in susceptibility existed among Elba populations and those in smaller mucks throughout Upstate New York. While these results are excellent news for New York onion growers, we will continue to stress the importance of not relying exclusively on spinetoram to manage onion thrips infestations. We will encourage growers to use spinetoram in a prescribed sequence with insecticides belonging to different classes during the season. Moreover, we will continue to encourage growers to adopt action thresholds to determine if and when insecticide applications are needed, rather than rely on a weekly spray schedule.

Publications