Source: 3BAR BIOLOGICS INC. submitted to
SYSTEM FOR BIOLOGIC CONTROL OF SOYBEAN CYST NEMATODE
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
TERMINATED
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1010178
Grant No.
2016-33610-25481
Project No.
OHOW-2016-00820
Proposal No.
2016-00820
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Program Code
8.2
Project Start Date
Aug 15, 2016
Project End Date
Apr 14, 2017
Grant Year
2016
Project Director
Caldwell, B.
Recipient Organization
3BAR BIOLOGICS INC.
4887 CHADDINGTON DR
DUBLIN,OH 43017
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
This project will develop and qualify a system that is capable of treating soybean farming operations where susceptibility to SCN is the primary yield limiting pest. Soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines; SCN) is the major pathogen of soybean causing over $1 billion in crop losses annually. SCN is now considered endemic to North America and is spreading as more acres of land are planted in soybean. Widely prevalent strategies for SCN management include crop rotation and the use of resistant soybean cultivars. These approaches have met with only limited success in reducing the populations of parasitic nematodes in the field. The recent loss of SCN resistance in Ohio-grown soybean highlights the importance of generating new methods for SCN control such as biocontrol. Examples of biocontrol with nematicidal activity are found in the scientific literature including numerous strains of bacteria. However, commercial applications by the large seed companies are limited to spore-forming Bacillus strains. While these spore-formers have some limited ability to survive conventional on-seed application processes and supply chain conditions, they can be limited in their effectiveness against target pests. Environmental stress and abuse associated with manufacturing and distribution typically results in microorganism death and/or dormancy, which decrease viability and physiological activity of the microorganism at the time of application. Thus, current microbial products have decreased effectiveness and reliability.3Bar Biologics is creating a disruptive new system to deliver beneficial microorganisms - a low cost, disposable bioreactor that protects the microorganisms until the farmer is ready to activate the product prior to application. On-site growth of the beneficial microorganisms short-cuts the conventional supply chain, resulting in fresher, more viable microorganisms delivered to the field. This bioreactor opens up the potential for farmers to apply more effective microorganism strains with SCN control capability.The work plan addresses three technical objectives to create a functional prototype for commercialization of strains with demonstrated activity on SCN, to i) maximize cellular yields in the device with a number of proven beneficial strains, ii) characterize stability and compatibility of new formulations, and iii) evaluate efficacy against SCN in the field.This project is directly aligned with USDA NIFA Challenge Area 1) Global Food Security, and Priority 8.2.4) to research biobased approaches for plant protection against abiotic and biotic stresses.
Animal Health Component
0%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
0%
Applied
40%
Developmental
60%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
2121820112070%
2031820106030%
Goals / Objectives
The overall goal of the proposed project is to establish a new biopesticide product for soybean cyst nematode (SCN). The new biopesticide product builds on our minimum viable prototype bioreactor system for delivery of Pseudomonas spp. as a beneficial microbial inoculant. By providing production agriculture with more and better microbial products, our dependence on more costly chemical pesticides will be reduced, increasing the efficiency of production and lowering input costs to growers.Specific to the Phase I portion of this effort, two overarching goals include: 1) create a bioreactor system with adequate performance and stability that is capable of being commercialized at scale, and 2) qualify additional Pseudomonas spp. strains with SCN suppressive capability in the system. Each goal and supporting project objectives are discussed below.Goal 1: Create a bioreactor system capable of being commercialized at scaleThe technical objectives include:Objective 1: maximize cellular yields of the solid and liquid phases of the bioreactorObjective 2: characterize the stability and compatibility of new formulationsThe tasks for the first objective include testing key design variables impacting the number and stability of bacterial cells produced by the bioreactor, in order to maximize cellular yield and viability of inocula produced. This includes testing various beneficial Pseudomonas spp. strains from The Ohio State University's (OSU) collection, both as single strains and as consortia in the system.The task for the second objective involves testing the stability of the bioreactor contents to changes in supply chain conditions (primarily temperature) to evaluate storage stability lifetime. Also, the second objective involves evaluating the ability of various beneficial strains to tolerate mixing with various classes of fertilizers and pesticides that customers might wish to tank mix and/or co-apply with them.Goal 2: Qualify performance of bacteria strains with SCN suppressive capabilities in system Objective 3: evaluate relative efficacy on SCN in greenhouse and field situationsThe tasks for the third objective involve screening a subset of formulations for SCN suppression, enhanced plant growth, and yield under greenhouse and field conditions. This will allow an assessment of which strain(s) is most competitive in field situations at controlling SCN populations.Through these tasks, we will determine the formulation parameters, which will form the basis for biopesticide registration with US EPA. Thus, the proposed Phase I work will lead directly to Phase II trials and product evaluations to support biopesticide registration, which will involve extensive field-based testing beyond Ohio of the new formulations arising from Phase I. The Phase II work will accurately quantify field performance in a large-scale, regional testing program as well as further replicated trials in university field plots.
Project Methods
Phase I efforts involve individual tasks that map to each of the three project objectives.Objective 1: Maximize cellular yields of the solid and liquid phases of the bioreactor. Task 1: Optimize key design variables of bioreactor based on cell counts. The purpose of this task is to improve upon the current bioreactor design with the goal of 1) extending shelf stability in solid phase beyond 6 months and 2) increasing cellular yields by at least 10-fold in both solid and liquid phases. This task will inform lead design(s) of a more robust, second-generation bioreactor for testing targeted SCN-inhibitory Pseudomonas strains (88A6, 48C10, 38D4, 89F1).Modified formulations: Modified formulations of the current soybean substrate will be evaluated: i) addition of nutrient source (tryptic soy broth (TSB), to increase cellular yields), ii) addition of glycerol (stabilizing agent), iii) addition of both nutrient source and glycerol. Tests will involve the currently used Pseudomonas strain (Wood3). Bacterial culture will be prepared and inoculated onto the solid substrate according to current manufacturing practice. Bioreactors will be maintained at room temperature (25oC), with activation at T=0 (initial), 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks. Bioreactors will be sampled and cell counts measured at 48 hrs and 14 days post activation. Active cell counts from each sample will be determined using the drop plate method.Advanced encapsulation formulation: Encapsulation in alginate beads has been shown to enhance survival of gram-negative bacteria for a year or longer at room temperature. Certain additives (e.g., starch, glycerol, skim milk) may further enhance stability. Alginate beads will be generated and loaded with bacterial culture and the following additive combinations: i) starch, ii) skim milk, iii) glycerol, iv) starch and skim milk, and v) all three additives. Stability of the cells with time will be measured by dissolving the alginate beads and measuring the cell count.Task 2: Evaluate survival and cellular yields of additional strains and consortia in the bioreactor. The purpose of this task is to extend the utility of the second-generation bioreactor design to deliver targeted SCN-inhibitory Pseudomonas strains (88A6, 48C10, 38D4, 89F1) with the goal of achieving equivalent or improved product stability and cellular yields of the lead design(s) as compared to the current Wood 3 strain. Tests will involve SCN-inhibitory strains both individually and in combination in the lead design(s), following the same procedure as Task 1. For treatments involving multiple strains (consortia), the identity of the cultured bacteria will be confirmed by re-isolation, colony morphology matching, and, as needed, 16S sequence-based identification. Completion of this task will support selection of individual strain(s) and/or consortia that appear relatively robust in the bioreactor system to move forward with in field testing.Objective 2: Characterize the stability and compatibility of new formulations.Task 3: Evaluate stability of inoculant strains in the packaged bioreactors. The purpose of this task is to evaluate lead design(s) at both ambient and accelerated temperature degradation conditions with the goal of establishing a data set to inform product recommendations regarding storage conditions and expected shelf life. Tests will involve storage of bioreactors at either 5oC, 25oC, or 40oC, with activation of the bioreactor at T=0 (initial), 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks. Activated bioreactors will be maintained at room temperature, with samples taken and cell counts measured at 48 hrs and 14 days post activation. The experiment will be repeated twice. Note: this task will be continued as part of a Phase 2 project aiming to assess the maximum viability period of the product up to two years post manufacturing.Task 4: Evaluate tank-mix compatibility in vitro. The purpose of this task is to systematically evaluate the current Wood 3 strain and targeted SCN-inhibitory strains for compatibility with various chemistries, with the goal of establishing a chemical compatibility chart to inform product recommendations regarding tank mixes. Common starter fertilizer mixes planned for testing include: 6-24-6, 5-15-20, 10-34-0. Common pesticides planned for testing include: Captan, Fludioxinil, Metalaxyl, Tebuconazole, Thiram, Clothianidin, Imidacloprid, Glyphosate, and 2,4-D. Test compounds will be serially diluted in 96 well-plates in 2-fold increments from 4X to 1/8X of the recommended tank-mix concentration for each substance. To these, an equal volume of bacteria inoculum will be added at the labeled rate for tank mixing (i.e. 3 x 106 cells per ml). Plates will be incubated at room temperature for 48 hrs, after which 100 microliters of media will be added to the wells of the plate. Turbidity will be assessed after 48 hrs to determine the level of tolerance of cells to the various chemicals. The experiment will be repeated twice.Objective 3: Evaluate relative efficacy on SCN in greenhouse and field situations. Task 5: Conduct trials of new formulations in the greenhouse and field. The purpose of this task is to evaluate targeted SCN-inhibitory strains for efficacy against SCN under controlled conditions, with the goal to demonstrate product efficacy comparable to laboratory-based results reducing SCN numbers by nearly 40%. Tests will be conducted in two parts: 1) individual strains under direct SCN pressure in the greenhouse, and 2) individual and a combination of SCN-inhibitory strains under microplot field conditions. In each case, treatments will include SCN-inhibitory strains in fresh bacteria culture or activated from the bioreactor, and applied as either a soil drench or seed treatment. In addition, the current Wood3 strain is included as a negative control (it is not SCN-inhibitory, but does promote plant growth). A water drench and "blank" bioreactor will be included as treatment controls. A block design with multiple replicates (20) will be used.Greenhouse: Greenhouse trials will evaluate SCN efficacy and plant growth promotion of soybean. Soybean seeds (cv. Lee 74) will be germinated in a sand-turface potting mix. At 2 week growth stage, pots will be inoculated with bacteria and 3-4 days later inoculated with SCN eggs. After 45 days, mature female cysts will be counted to assess efficacy of treatments against SCN. Separate soybean plants (grown in 4 inch pots and BACCTO potting mix) will be used to assess plant growth promotion at 45 days by measuring plant height, stem width, fresh root weight, dry root weight, root length, and shoot length.Microplots: A microplot test system located at the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center's (OARDC) Wooster, Ohio campus will be utilized. Each microplot consists of a large PVC tube (10 inch diameter by 12 inch deep) buried 11 inch in the soil. Each tube will be placed with eight soybean seeds (cv. Lee 73), inoculated with bacteria treatments (either as soil drench or seed treatment), and 3-4 days later inoculated with 80,000-100,000 SCN eggs. Nematodes will be harvested and counted 30 days after inoculation and at the end of the season. For multiple-strain (consortia) treatments, soil-DNA extraction and strain-specific primers will assess presence/absence of strains in the individual and consortia treatments. Stand counts and end of season yield will also be measured.Completion of the greenhouse and microplot trials will provide an initial assessment of biopesticide potential of the SCN-inhibitory strains. Results will help inform selection of strains to move forward in a Phase 2 project for further product development and field trials.

Progress 08/15/16 to 04/14/17

Outputs
Target Audience:Our validated market subsegment is family-owned farms in Ohio and adjacent states that are growing corn, soybean, and wheat on over 500 acres. Based on the recent USDA Census released May 2014, there are 25,000 farms of this size in our initial target geography. These are full time family farms that are generally working to increase their acreage under management. These large family farms reference each other in a number of ways, as they are both competitive with each other for land but are also neighbors willing to share and help each other. Through our extensive customer discovery process interviewing over 100 farmers, the main problem they are experiencing right now is being squeezed between low future price projections for their crop and simultaneous double digit increases in input costs, specifically fertilizers and pesticides. Many also have a significant fixed asset cost as they have invested in new equipment in recent years. The best way for farmers to leverage their fixed assets and ensure their ability to pay down capital debt is to change the variable side of the equation: increase yield while reducing input costs. Our technology specifically targets this key need of farmers looking to increase their yield while simultaneously reducing chemical applications in order to ensure their farm is sustainable for future generations. Plant-parasitic nematodes are among the most destructive plant pathogens worldwide, causing more than $100 billion in yield losses annually to 21 agronomic crops (Sasser and Freckman, 1987). In the United States alone, an estimated loss of $7 to 9 billion in yield is reported due to plant-parasitic nematodes (Koenning et al., 1999). Soybean is perhaps the best representative of an agronomic crop significantly affected by a plant-parasitic nematode in the United States. Soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines; SCN) is the major pathogen of soybean causing over $1 billion in crop losses annually (Wrather et al., 2001). SCN is now considered endemic to North America and is spreading as more acres of land are planted in soybean. Widely prevalent strategies for SCN management include crop rotation and the use of resistant soybean cultivars. These approaches have met with only limited success in reducing the populations of parasitic nematodes in the field. Crop rotation limits the agronomic output a field can achieve while only delaying the ultimate buildup of nematodes in the soil. The use of resistant soybean cultivars has been the most effective approach in managing nematode populations. However, natural resistance in soybean to SCN is a complex trait often requiring multiple genes for even limited resistance to a specific nematode population (Concibido et al., 2004). Furthermore, frequent use of the same resistant cultivars has lead to the rise of resistance-breaking strains of SCN which erodes the value of these resistant traits (Williamson and Hussey, 1996). An OSC funded project in the Taylor laboratory has identified numerous populations of SCN from Ohio that are able to grow on the mostly widely used SCN resistant soybean varieties (unpublished results). This loss of resistance to SCN in Ohio grown soybean highlights the importance of generating new methods for SCN control. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Through this project our undergraduate and graduate interns received signfiicant training in lab techniques and microbiology. They were also able to interact with facluty and staff at The Ohio State University who were conducted the greenhouse and microplot testing and thus developed a deeper understanding of microbe; plant interactions and how to quantify benefits in a field setting through replicated trials and statistical analysis. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Objective 1: Maximize cellular yields of the solid and liquid phases of the bioreactor Task 1: Optimize key design variables of bioreactor based on cell counts: Alginate "beads" approximately 1-2 mm in size were generated and loaded with bacterial culture of Pseudomonas strain Wood3 and the following additive combinations: i) skim milk, ii) glycerol, iii) skim milk and glycerol, or iv) no additives (just alginate encapsulation). The alginate beads were dried under laminar airflow for 24 hours, then stored at room temperature for the duration of the study. Beads where placed in bacteria growth media and incubated for six hours. Based on these results (out to 6 months storage), alginate encapsulation including skim milk and glycerol of Pseudomonas strain Wood3 appears to be an effective formulation strategy for improving shelf stability from weeks to months. With addition of alginate beads, Pseudomonas strain Wood3 maintains stability in the bioreactor system for at least 6 months (study is still ongoing), compared to only approximately 8 weeks on the solid substrate alone. Based on results to date using alginate encapsulation, the ability to extend shelf stability in solid phase beyond 6 months and increase cellular yields in liquid phase to levels in the 107 to 108 CFU/mL range appears feasible and warrants further exploration and development. Task 2: Evaluate survival and cellular yields of additional strains and consortia in the bioreactor: Our initial targets for testing were Pseudomonas strains 48C10 (Grp. IX representative) and 88A6 (Grp. VI representative) with the goal of achieving equivalent or improved product stability and cellular yields as compared to Pseudomonas strain Wood3 when stored at ambient temperature. To start, the SCN-active strains were compared to strain Wood3 using the baseline formulation in the bioreactor system. Strain 48C10 proved to be more stable than the other strains with ambient storage stability out to roughly 4 to 5 months. Based on these findings, coupled with its high bioactivity against SCN, it was decided to move forward with strain 48C10 in more advanced formulation work. However, in the Phase II portion of this project we will test other SCN-active strains for their longevity as well. Alginate beads containing Pseudomonas strain 48C10 with skim milk and glycerol added were generated and evaluated for storage stability at ambient temperature, in terms of recovery with beads included in the bioreactor system. In the bioreactor system, strain 48C10 was consistently recovered from the alginate beads at similar colony counts as strain Wood3. Based on these preliminary results, it is anticipated that strain 48C10 will perform as well or better than strain Wood3 as it relates to longevity and achieve equivalent or improved product stability (greater than 6 months) and cellular yields (107 CFU/mL or greater). To evaluate feasibility of consortia (applying two or more bacteria) in the same bioreactor system, alginate beads containing either strain 48C10 or strain Wood3 were added together with the solid substrate. The impact of bead quantity was also investigated, with either 25 beads each or 50 beads each added with the solid substrate and stored at ambient temperature. For differentiation, media plates with or without the antibiotic rifampicin were used (strain Wood3 is rifampicin-resistant). At 14 DPA, both strains 48C10 and Wood3 were recovered at levels ranging between 106 to 108 CFU/mL and were found at levels similar to that observed at 2DPA (data not shown), indicating that these two bacteria were stable when grown together even for long periods of time. Based on results to date using alginate encapsulation, consortia of bacteria (i.e., at least two strains) can be feasibly added together in the bioreactor and produce cellular yields of 106 CFU/mL or greater. Objective 2: Characterize the stability and compatibility of new formulations. Task 3: Evaluate stability of inoculant strains in the packaged bioreactors: Tests involve storage of bioreactors at 5oC, 25oC, or 40oC, with activation of the bioreactors after storage times of t=0 (initial), 4, and 8 weeks (this study is ongoing). Based on preliminary temperature storage data, after 8-week storage at 40oC, there was no recovery of strains 48C10 or Wood3 using the baseline formulation (solid substrate). However, bioreactors with alginate beads showed survival of strain 48C10 after 8 weeks at 40oC, but with a delayed lag phase with limited growth at 2 DPA and approximately 106 to 107 CFU/mL after 14 DPA. Based on these preliminary results, the alginate encapsulation appears to provide a protective effect for the bacteria at elevated temperatures. Task 4: Evaluate tank-mix compatibility in vitro: est chemical compounds were serially diluted in 96 well plates in 2-fold increments from 4X to 1/8X of the recommended tank-mix concentration. To these, an equal volume of bacteria inoculum was added and the plates were incubated at room temperature for 24 hr after which cell counts were measured. Overall, the Pseudomonas strains are compatible with most of the herbicides and insecticide tested. Objective 3: Evaluate relative efficacy in greenhouse trials and in the field. Task 5: Conduct SCN trials of new formulations in the greenhouse and field: The Taylor laboratory conducted a microplot study at the Ohio State University Research Farm to determine whether application of SCN-active Pseudomonas to soybean plants growing in field-based microplots could reduce nematode numbers. Control treatments included non-inoculated Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) and the non-SCN-active Pseudomonas strain Wood3. Two single SCN-active strain treatments included Pseudomonas strains 48C10 and 88A6. Two other sets of combinatorial treatments were evaluated. The first combination included the SCN-active Group IX strain combination strains; 48C10, 38D7, 38D4, and 39A2 (Grp 9). The second combination group included at least one SCN-active strain from across the different Pseudomonas groups; strains 48C10, 38D4, 88A6, 36G2 and Wood1 (Comb). Each microplot is a 10 inch wide PVC pipe cut to 12 inches in length and buried in the ground and filled with Ohio soil:sand (75:25 vol). The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design with on average 15 microplots per treatment. End concentration of bacteria was determined to be (1x104 cfu/gram of soil) in each microplot. Two days after bacterial inoculation of the microplots, 87,000 freshly isolated SCN eggs were added to each microplot and watered in with 1L of water. Microplots where allowed to grow over the summer and soil samples isolated in the fall. SCN cysts were isolated from the soil samples using an elutriator and the cysts crushed to release the eggs. The total number of eggs/plant found for the control TSB treatment was comparable to that observed for the non-SCN active strain Wood3. Treatments 88A6 and the quarter-strength Group IX treatment were virtually the same as the control treatments. The single strain 48C10 and the full strength Group IX treatment did produce a trend in reducing SCN numbers (~22%; P<0.1). Interestingly, the combinatorial strain representing 5 unique strains from different Pseudomonas groups did show significant activity in reducing SCN numbers for both the quarter-strength (~33% reduction; P<0.05) and full-strength treatment (~26% reduction; P<0.05). The data obtained from these studies suggest that certain individual strains may be useful in reducing SCN numbers but the combination of these strains could prove to be more efficacious in reducing SCN activity. We have conducted one field microplot season to date.

Publications