Source: UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON SYSTEM submitted to NRP
IS A DIVERSE GRASSHOPPER COMMUNITY BENEFICIAL TO THE HEALTH AND FUNCTIONING OF RANGELAND ECOSYSTEMS?
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1009824
Grant No.
2016-67014-25257
Cumulative Award Amt.
$150,000.00
Proposal No.
2015-07320
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
May 15, 2016
Project End Date
May 14, 2019
Grant Year
2016
Program Code
[A1111]- Plant Health and Production and Plant Products: Insects and Nematodes
Recipient Organization
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON SYSTEM
4800 CALHOUN ST STE 316
HOUSTON,TX 770042610
Performing Department
Biological Sciences
Non Technical Summary
Sustainable grazing systems that support the production of meat and other products for human consumption depend upon healthy, functioning rangeland ecosystems. Grasshoppers are an important, native component of these rangeland systems, but they compete with livestock for forage. Grasshopper outbreaks often trigger managers to use chemical control measures with the use of broad spectrum pesticides that kill insects indiscriminately. However, most grasshopper species are not pests and may actually be beneficial to rangelands. Individual grasshopper species can increase primary production, nutrient cycling, and influence soil microbial communities. However, we do not understand if the number and composition of grasshopper species present in a rangeland affect how that rangeland functions, or how environmental factors like productivity mediate those responses.Our goals are to determine: (1) the role of grasshopper diversity in rangeland ecosystems and (2) how the effects of grasshopper diversity vary with primary productivity. To achieve these goals, we will conduct a two year field experiment in a grassland in Texas to examine the role of grasshopper diversity in grassland ecosystems. We will manipulate grasshopper diversity (1, 2, 3, or 4 species) in large cages (0.5 m2) placed over native vegetation in a grassland. To test the effects of primary productivity, we will fertilize some of the diversity treatments. We will then measure a suite of important ecosystem processes in each diversity and productivity treatment, including decomposition, nutrient cycling, primary production, as well as responses of plant and soil microbial communities. These data will enable us to determine what role grasshopper diversity plays in grassland ecosystems, and whether the effects of grasshopper diversity vary with productivity.Our research will lead to better understanding of the role of grasshoppers and grasshopper diversity in rangeland ecosystems. This will provide information on insect-plant interactions, mechanisms of plant responses to insects, and improved biologically-based grasshopper management approaches to potentially support sustainable grazing systems. ?
Animal Health Component
40%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
60%
Applied
40%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
2110780107045%
2113110107045%
2110110107010%
Goals / Objectives
Goal 1: Determine if grasshopper species richness or functional richness (hereafter grasshopper diversity) influence the structure (composition of plant and microbial communities) and functioning (plant productivity, decomposition, nutrient cycling, and microbial functioning) of rangeland ecosystems.Objectives:1. Conduct a two-year field experiment to examine the effects of grasshopper diversity on grassland ecosystem structure and function. The experiment will manipulate grasshopper diversity in field enclosures.Goal 2: Determine if soil nutrient availability mediates the role of grasshopper diversity in the functioning of rangeland ecosystems.Objectives:1. As part of the two-year field experiment described above, we will add a fertilizer treatment, where nitrogen will be added to several of the diversity treatments. We will then examine the effects of grasshopper diversity on grassland ecosystem structure and function in treatments at ambient vs. elevated nutrient availability.Goal 3: Prepare a standard USDA grant to examine the effects of grasshopper diversity on grassland ecosystem processes along a latitudinal gradient of productivity levels, using pilot data from this seed grant.Objectives:1. Conduct a two-year field experiment as described above.2. In year 1, we will conduct a survey of plant and grasshopper communities in 8 grasslands along a latitudinal gradient. We will measure plant quality, plant community species richness, grasshopper density and species richness and look for latitudinal patterns.3. Analyze data from the field experiment and latitudinal survey and form specific hypotheses about the effects of grasshopper diversity on grassland ecosystems, and how those effects will vary with a latitudinal productivity gradient.4. Write a standard USDA grant, using these pilot data and hypotheses as the foundation. This grant will examine the effects of grasshopper diversity on grassland structure and function at four sites along a latitudinal gradient
Project Methods
1. Field ExperimentField experiment. The field experiment will take place at the UHCC, one of the three sites used for our pilot data, and one of the four sites planned for use in future studies. To examine the effects of grasshopper diversity on ecosystem processes, we will create 4 levels of species richness using two functional groups: grass feeders (2 species) and mixed feeders (2 species) in experimental cages. Field cages (basal area: 0.5 m2) will be stocked with 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 grasshopper species in all possible combinations. To test how the effects of herbivore diversity vary with productivity, we will run all 0-, 1-, and 4-species treatments at two levels of nutrient availability (ambient, fertilized at 10g N/m2). Treatments will be randomly assigned to cages, with 6 replicates each. Grasshoppers for stocking cages will be caught with sweep nets.Grasshoppers in all cages will be counted weekly and identified to species. Dead grasshoppers will be replaced to maintain diversity treatments. The experiment will run long enough to allow all grasshoppers to become adults, which usually takes 7-8 weeks.Plant production and diversity. Plant community composition in each cage will be assessed at the beginning and end of each growing season by counting the number of species present and then visually estimating percent cover of each functional group (grass, forb, shrub). At the end of each growing season, we will destructively sample aboveground plant biomass from all cages to estimate ANPP. Plant biomass from 0.2m2 area in each cage will be clipped 2 cm above the ground, sorted to functional group (grass, forb, shrub), dried at 60°C for 48 hours and weighed. A subsample will be reserved for nutrient analyses. Litter decomposition and microbial community diversity. Litter turnover rates will be measured using decomposition bags with litter from the most common plant species. We will determine bacterial and fungal community composition on a pooled initial sample and again at the end of the second year in the 0, 1, and 4 species, unfertilized treatments. DNA will be extracted from the soil and community composition will be assessed via amplicon sequencing of the V4-V5 region of the bacterial/archeal 16S gene and the fungal ITS1 region. Bacterial and fungal diversity will be determined using Shannon's diversity index and Faith's phylogenetic diversity. Fungal-to-bacterial dominance will be determined via quantitative PCR.We will assess microbial biomass, extracellular enzyme activity, and community level catabolic response profiles (CRP), to examine the effects of grasshopper diversity on microbial function. Microbial biomass will be determined via substrate induced respiration. Extracellular enzyme activity will be determined and will enable us to assess function as well as microbial nutrient demand. CRP will allow us to determine the ability of microbial communities to catabolize various C substrates.Evaluation: Successful completion of the experiment with data on grasshopper effects on primary production, decomposition, microbial communities, and nutrient cycling.2. Latitudinal SurveyIn August of year 1, we will measure grasshopper community density and diversity at eight sites along a latitudinal gradient: (1) the USDA research site, MT (47°28'N, 104°4'W); (2)Thunder Basin National Grassland, WY (43°22'N, 105°6'W); (3) the Central Plains Experimental Range, CO (40o51'N, 104o40'W); (4) Sandhills grasslands, NE (41°50'N, 100°23'W); (5) Konza Prairie Biological Station, KS (39o05'N, 96o35'W) (6) Tallgrass Prairie Preserve, OK (36°22'N, 99°04'W); (7) Caddo National Grassland, TX (33°44'N, 95°58'W); (8)University of Houston Coastal Center, TX (29o23'N, 95o02'W).Grasshopper field densities will be measured using the ring count method. We will place 25 rings (area: 0.1m2) every 2 m along four transects (100 rings/site). Grasshopper species composition will be measured using 200 sweep net samples (4 sets of 25 high/fast sweeps; 4 sets of 25 low/slow sweeps). Plant biomass will be measured by destructively sampling vegetation from 10 plots (10cm x 1m) at randomly chosen points along the transects. C:N analyses will be run on the dried samples of the five most common grass and forb species at each site. We will measure plant diversity in ten 0.1m2 quadrats from random points along each transect (40 total/site). We will count the number of species in each ring and categorize them by functional group (grass, forb, shrub).Evaluation: successfully collect data set on latitudinal patterns in plant and grasshopper communities and plant foliar quality.3. Data analysis and interpretation.Field experiment. We will use repeated-measures ANOVA with sequential sums of squares to assess the effects of species richness and functional richness on response variables. To account for the remaining dependency between species richness and functional richness, we will use models that fit either species richness or functional richness first, and use a contrast to decompose the relative variation of the other term. Multivariate methods, including nonmetric multidimensional scaling and a group separation test such as permutation MANOVA, will be used to determine if grasshopper functional and species richness alters microbial community composition and function and plant community composition.Survey. We will use ANCOVA to assess effects of grasshopper functional richness and latitude on plant diversity, biomass and quality. Data will be assessed to determine whether to use an equal slopes model (indicating no effect of latitude) or an unequal slopes model (indicating these relationships vary with latitude). Where site is significant, pairwise comparisons will be made as appropriate for the model tested.Evaluation: data sets analyzed and prepared for publication4. Efforts and EvaluationResults from our experiments will be disseminated to the scientific and management community through the publication of data in peer reviewed journals. We anticipate at least two peer-reviewed publications from this study focusing on (1) grasshopper diversity effects on grassland ecosystem processes and (2) grasshopper diversity effects on soil microbial communities. We will also present the results of our study at scientific conferences such as the Ecological Society of America and the Entomological Society of America meetings. Evaluation: successful publication of data and presentation of results at two scientific conferences.Results from our experiment will be analyzed and used to create strong hypotheses about the role of grasshoppers in grassland ecosystems, and how those effects are likely to vary along a latitudinal gradient. This will inform a full USDA proposal, which we will begin writing after the second year of the field experiment has been conducted. Evaluation: write and submit a full USDA proposal Educational efforts associated with this grant include classroom instruction that will incorporate data from this research. Laws, Pennings, and Prather currently teach a course on grassland ecology that will discuss the research. Evaluation: Incorporation of data into class materialsEach summer, we will involve undergraduate students in the project. Students will have the opportunity to conduct independent research while learning basic methods for field ecology and scientific inquiry. ?Evaluation: successfully recruiting students to conduct independent research on topics related to the project. This will include successfully gaining funding through university programs aimed at supporting undergraduate research, and the student(s) presenting their research at the annual undergraduate research forum held at the University of Houston.

Progress 05/15/16 to 05/14/19

Outputs
Target Audience:Our target audience for this project is the academic scientific community. We reached this community through scientific presentations and publications. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Over the course of the grant, we have trained 3 postdocs, 1 graduate student and 3 undergraduates in scientific techniques relevant to rangeland ecology. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?We have disseminated our results through scientific publications (one published, two in preparation) and scientific talks. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Goal 1: We conducted the experiment, analyzed the data, and published a paper (Laws et al. 2018) based on the results. We have a second manuscript in preparation. Goal 2: We conducted the experiment, analyzed the data, and have a manuscript in preparation. Goal 3: We completed objectives 1-3, but want to finish publishing our initial results before we complete objective 4 (write a standard USDA grant).

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2018 Citation: Laws, A. N., C. Prather, D. H. Branson, S. C. Pennings. 2018. Effects of grasshoppers on prairies: herbivore composition matters more than richness in three grassland ecosystems. Journal of Animal Ecology 87:1727-1737.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2018 Citation: Lucas, J.M., M. Strickland. 2018. The little things that run the world: How microbes and invertebrates interact and shape our ecosystems. Institute for Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Studies Lightning Talk, Moscow, ID.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2018 Citation: Lucas, J.M., M. Strickland. 2018. From microbial communities to ecosystem processes: How antibiotics and herbivores shape soil and human health. Integrative Research and innovation Centers Lunch and Learn presentation, Moscow, ID.


Progress 05/15/17 to 05/14/18

Outputs
Target Audience:In year 2 of running the experiment, 8 undergraduate students and volunteers contributed to the research in the field and/or in the lab.These students were given training in field methods for sampling plants and insects.One of these students has been working on this project for almost two years, and is now applying for graduate school in biology. The scientific community is another target audience for the project. We communicated our results to the scientific community through a poster presentation, conference attendance, and manuscript submissions. Changes/Problems:As described in last year's project report, we changed the experimental method and the location of the experiment for the field study conducted in 2017 (described below). The other change is that we originally planned to do analyses on soil microbial communities for a subset of the treatments in the 2017 experiments. Because we had money left over, we are now expanding those analyses to look at all the treatments rather than a subset. Site and methodological changes in 2017. We conducted the field experiment at a different site between 2016 (University of Houston Coastal Center) and 2017 (Katy Prairie) because the 2016 site had been colonized by invasive crazy ants (Nylanderia fulva). We were unaware of this when beginning the experiment. The ants kill a variety of invertebrates, including adult grasshoppers. Therefore, we moved the experiment to the nearby Katy Prairie, where the ants have not invaded yet. We also modified the experimental design in 2017. The results from the 2016 experiment were qualitatively very similar to results observed in the pilot experiment described in our proposal (which had a very similar design). Because of this, we felt that more could be learned from a slightly different experiment as opposed to the same experiment conducted once again. In the pilot study/2016 design, we replaced grasshoppers each week in a press experiment. In the 2017 design, we allowed grasshoppers to decline over time to measure how grasshopper diversity affects secondary production. In the pilot study/2016 design, we used 4 species and tested all possible combinations of species. We did not observe an effect of grasshopper species richness on grassland processes. We hypothesized that perhaps more species would need to be used to see an effect of richness. Therefore, we decided to increase the number of grasshopper species used to 6. The treatments used were: no grasshoppers, 6 grasshopper species together, each of the six species apart. Each of these treatments was crossed with a fertilizer treatment (control; 10gN/m2). The 2016 employed a fertilization treatment for a subset of treatments and results indicated that fertilizer may have an effect at high grasshopper species richness, which is why a fertilizer treatment was employed in the 2017 design. I have been trying to get help with a change request as not all of my co-PI's are listed in REEport. Chelse Prather, Michael Strickland, Steve Pennings, and Jayne Jonas (who were all part of the original SEED grant proposal) are not listed here. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Work on this project involved 4 undergraduates and volunteers who were trained on plant and insect identification, as well as methods for measuring plant and insect communities. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?A. Laws and S. Pennings attended a conference on grassland restoration and conservation from Nov. 14-16, 2017. A. Laws presented the following poster: Angela N. Laws, Chelse M. Prather, Steven C. Pennings, David Branson, Jayne Jonas, Michael Strickland, Anthony Joern. November 2017. Does grasshopper diversity affect grassland ecosystems? A test across three grassland sites.America's Grasslands Conference. Fort Worth, TX. A. Laws attended the PD Meeting at NIFA headquarters in Washington D.C., October 2017. C. Prather attended the Ecological Society of America meeting in Portland, OR. August 2017. A. Laws gave a tour of coastal prairie to a graduate poetry class in September, 2017. A. Laws gave a talk on grassland ecology and the role of grasshopper diversity to an undergraduate field biology class in July, 2017. S. Pennings gave a talk on coastal prairie to a group of K-12 students in October, 2017. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Future plans are stated above under "what was accomplished under these goals?". We are completing laboratory analyses of soil microbial communities as well as statistical analsyes. We are planning to meet again in 1-2 months with completed analyses to outline 1-2 journal articles that will be based on the research conducted by this SEED grant. At that time we will also discuss ideas for a full USDA proposal based on our findings. We will create a timetable and assign duties at that meeting.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Goal 1, objective 1: Conduct a two-year field experiment to examine the effects of grasshopper diversity on grassland ecosystem structure and function. Status: Complete. We have completed both years of the proposed experiments. We have data on plant composition and on plant productivity.Data on nutrient cycling and soil microbial communities are still being analyzed.As in the pilot experiment, we find that grasshopper species composition is more important than species richness to grassland processes. Goal 2, objective 1: as part of experiments described in Goal 1, we will add a fertilizer treatment to examine how the effects of grasshopper diversity on grassland processes varies with elevated nutrient availability. Status: Complete.The field experiments have been performed.We modified the design for the experiment conducted in Year 2 (see section on changes below), to cross the fertilizer treatment with all grasshopper diversity treatments instead of just a subset.Analyses on the soils collected from those treatments are being analyzed. Goal 3, Objective 1: Conduct a two-year experiment as described above Status: Complete Goal 3, Objective 2: Conduct a survey of plant and grasshopper communities in 8 grasslands along a latitudinal gradient. Status: Completed in Year 1 Goal 3, Objective 3: Analyze data from the field experiments and survey and form specific hypotheses about the effects of grasshopper diversity on grassland ecosystems, and how those effects will vary with a latitudinal productivity gradient. Status: In progress.J. Jonas is leading the statistical analyses.She has completed the analyses for the 2017 experiment and has begun analyses for the 2018 field experiment (which will be complete after the soil community analyses are completed) and the 2017 field survey.We have plans to meet again in one month to discuss analyses and outline 1) publications based on the data and 2) a new USDA grant based on the findings from this SEED grant. Goal 3, Objective 4: Write a standard USDA grant, using the described field and latitudinal survey as the foundation. Status: In progress.We recently held a meeting for all collaborators on the project (A. Laws, C. Prather, J. Jonas, D. Branson, M. Strickland, S. Pennings, and A. Joern; March 2018) to discuss future directions on this research and a new USDA grant.We discussed several ideas for proposal ideas to pursue.It was decided that we should first finish analyses on the previous two years' work and convene again in 1-2 months to discuss the data and talk about what future questions would be most interesting.A. Laws is taking a job at a non-profit (The Xerces Society) and will not be involved in the next set of proposals. However, C. Prather and J. Jonas have agreed to take the lead on the project and will submit a full USDA proposal with the other collaborators on this project.Our plan is to submit a full USDA proposal for the 2019 funding cycle.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Under Review Year Published: 2018 Citation: Laws, A. N., C. M. Prather, D. H. Branson, S. C. Pennings. In Revision. Effects of grasshoppers on prairies: herbivore composition matters more than richness in three grassland ecosystems. Journal of Animal Ecology.


Progress 05/15/16 to 05/14/17

Outputs
Target Audience:In year 1 of running the experiment, 6 undergraduate students worked on the project in the field and/or in the lab. These students were given training in field methods for sampling plants and insects. Two of the students are still working on the project. C. Prather gave a talk about the importance of grassland insects at the International Congress of Entomology in Florida in September, 2017. This talk was geared towards the scientific community. A publication on our pilot study is in review for publication in Ecology, which will communicate our results to the scientific community. Changes/Problems:While running the cage experiment in 2016, we discovered that invasive tawny crazy ants (Nylanderia fulva) have invaded our study site. The ants colonized the exclosures and were killing grasshoppers (including adult grasshoppers). By the end of the experiment, grasshopper mortality was very high in the cages and field densities of grasshoppers were also very low. We ended the experiment two weeks earlier than originally intended because of high grasshopper mortality. Because our design called for us to replace missing grasshoppers each week, we were still able to see an effect of grasshoppers on ecosystem processes, but the effect was likely muted by high mortality from the ants. We consulted with experts on the crazy ants, and have determined there is no way to keep the ants out of the cages without using pesticides that would also affect the grasshoppers. For year 2, we have moved the experiment to a nearby grassland site where the ants have not yet invaded. Because the experimental results are very similar to those we found in the pilot study (grasshopper richness is not important, but grasshopper functional composition is), we decided that two changes in the experimental design would give us more information than simply repeating the same experiment again for a third time. (1) In our previous design, grasshoppers were replaced each week to maintain grasshopper diversity treatments in a press experiment. We have decided to change this so that we are not replacing the grasshoppers each week. We hypothesize that grasshopper species richness will have an effect when we allow grasshopper densities to decline over the course of the experiment, as is seen in other similar studies of consumer richness. This is because grasshopper survival will likely vary with grasshopper species richness. (2) In our previous design, we added fertilizer to the 0, 1, and 4 grasshopper species treatments. We found an intriguing interaction between grasshopper species richness and fertilizer treatment where plant species richness increased with grasshopper richness in fertilized treatments, but not unfertilized treatments. To examine this trend further, we crossed all grasshopper composition treatments with a fertilizer treatment and we increased the number of grasshopper species used in the experiment from 4 to 6 to better reflect natural grasshopper communities. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?In year 1 of running the experiment, we have trained 6 undergraduate students who worked on the project in the field and/or in the lab. These students were given training in field methods for sampling plants and insects, as well as training in running ecological field experiments. Two of the students are still working on the project. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?We have one paper in review in Ecology. A second paper covering the results from last summer's experiment is in preparation. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We are running a field experiment in Year 2. This will enable us to complete Goal 1, Goal 2, and Goal 3, objective 1.We are currently analyzing the data from year 1, and will continue to analyze data from year 2 in the fall (Goal 3, objective 3). We will write a paper for publication on each year's data and begin writing a full grant for submission to the USDA (Goal 3, objective 4).

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Goal 1, Objective 1: In progress. We have completed the first year of the proposed experiments. We have data on plant composition and on plant productivity. Data on litter decomposition are still being collected. Data on nutrient cycling and soil microbial communities are still being analyzed. As in the pilot experiment, we find that grasshopper species composition is more important than species richness to primary productivity. Goal 2, Objective 1: In progress. We included a fertilizer treatment in the year 1 experiment. We did observe an interaction between fertilizer and grasshopper richness effects on plant richness. Effects of grasshopper diversity and nutrient addition on litter decomposition, nutrient cycling, and soil communities are still being examined. We have expanded the fertilizer treatment in the year 2 experiment to see if the trend observed in year one is supported. Goal 3, Objective 1: In progress. We have completed the first year of the experiment, the second year of the experiment is currently underway. Goal 3, Objective 2: Complete. We conducted the survey as described in the proposal during year 1. Goal 3, Objective 3: In progress. We are working on analyzing data from year 1 of the experiment and from the latitudinal survey. Goal 4, Objective 4: We have not yet begun work on a full USDA grant. We are waiting for results from the experiment being conducted in year 2.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Under Review Year Published: 2017 Citation: Laws, A. N., C. M. Prather, D. H. Branson, S. C. Pennings. In Review. Effects of grasshoppers on prairies: herbivore composition matters more than richness in three grassland ecosystems. Ecology.