Source: UNIV OF CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO submitted to
USING VACCINES TO INCREASE POLLINATOR HEALTH: TESTING A HONEY BEE NOSEMA VACCINE
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1008834
Grant No.
2016-67030-24830
Cumulative Award Amt.
$100,000.00
Proposal No.
2015-11028
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jan 15, 2016
Project End Date
Jan 14, 2019
Grant Year
2016
Program Code
[A1801]- Exploratory: Exploratory Research
Project Director
Nieh, J. C.
Recipient Organization
UNIV OF CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO
9500 GILMAN DRIVE
LA JOLLA,CA 92093
Performing Department
Div. of Biological Sciences
Non Technical Summary
Honey bees are responsible for the annual pollination of at least $17 billion worth of US crops, but face severe health challenges. Nosema ceranaeis a fungus thatcauses a common and widespread infection that is associated with poor colony health and Colony Collapse Disorder. Currently, Nosema diseaseis primarily treated with a single antibiotic. Because of the potential for antibiotic resistance and the transfer of resistant genes in humans, it is desirable to find an alternative treatment, one that relies upon the natural honey bee immune system. Based upon data from bees reared in the lab, we found thatfeeding honey bee larvae heat-killed N. ceranaspores can activate honey bee immunity and substantially reduces infection levels when these "immunized" bees are exposed to Nosema as adult bees. The proposed research will test if this "immune-priming", a vaccine-like treatment can also work (1) in naturally-reared honey bee larvae, (2)in beesimmunized as adults, and (3) in field tests of colonies. To test the effectiveness of our treatments, we will measureindividual bee infection level, the number of infected bees per treatment, bee immune gene activation, and effects on bee longevity.
Animal Health Component
0%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
100%
Applied
0%
Developmental
0%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
21130101090100%
Goals / Objectives
Honey bees are responsible for the annual pollination of at least $17 billion worth of US crops, but face severe health challenges. Nosema ceranaecauses a common and widespread infection that reduces honey bee health and is primarily treated with a single antibiotic. Activating insect immunity against fungal infectionsprovides a natural countermeasure that should be difficult for pathogens to evolve resistance against. This has been demonstrated with heat-killed bacteria, but it remains unclear if this strategy would work with a heat-killed fungal pathogen like Nosema cerana.In our preliminary data, we show that autoclaved N. ceranaespores fed to A. melliferalarvae reared in vitro (immune priming) and subsequently fed live Nosemaspores as adults have infection levels reduced by 85% upon adult death. The proposed research would test the efficacy of this immune priming treatmentin vivo and with field colonies. If successful, we will have developed a new treatment against N. ceranaeand created a potentallytransformative approach to treating honey bee fungal diseases. Specifically, we will determine if immune priming conveys protection against infection when administered in vivo to (1) larvae or (2) adults upon emergence. Based upon these results, we will test if (3) immune primingeither larvae or young adults in field colonies boosts colony immunity against Nosema infection. We will measure individual bee infection level (midgut spores/bee), number of infected bees per treatment, bee immune gene activation, and effects on bee longevity.Overall goal:We will test if immune priming activates honey bee immunity againstN. ceranaeand therefore decreases subsequent infection when bees are exposed toN. ceranae.Ourspecific objectivesare as follows. We will determine if immune priming conveys protection against infection when administeredin vivoto (1) larvae or (2) adults upon emergence. Based upon these results, we will test if (3) immune priming either larvae or young adults in field colonies boosts colony immunity againstNosemainfection. We will measure pathogen prevalence (proportion of infected bees per treatment), abundance (spore counts /bee), immune gene activation, and effects on longevity.
Project Methods
Obj. 1 (Exp. 1) Testing effects of immune priming treatment on larvae naturally reared in vivo (Nieh, UCSD)This experiment tests the efficacy of vaccinating larvae reared in natural colonies. To obtain larvae of the same age, we will place an empty worker brood comb frame in the colony, remove the frame after 6 days, and visually determine that the larvae, based upon size, are three days old. We will select brood patch with approximately 300 three-day old larvae and divide them into two sections. A clear plastic sheet will be placed over the brood patch and marked to indicate larvae locations. Each section will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatments. One group will receive only 50% sterile sucrose syrup (control) and another group will receive 40k autoclaved spores per bee (vaccinated). Each larva (n=150 larvae per treatment) will be fed 2 μl of 50% syrup with a pipette. A previous study showed that nurses did not remove much of such food, because at least 80% of such provided food was consumed by larvae (Hanley et al., 2003). The comb will then be returned to the colony for 5 days and then moved to an incubator at 50% humidity and 34.5 °C (Milbrath et al., 2013). Cages made of hardware cloth will be placed over each treatment area so that newly emerged bees from the two groups do not mix (Hanley et al., 2003). We will have four treatments (Table 1): two treatments at larval stage (vaccinated or not) and two treatments at adult stage (inoculated with live spores or not). Inoculation will be during the first day of worker emergence, with 2 μl of syrup (with or without spores). Bees will then be isolated for 30 min to reduce spore transmission. Inoculating 1-day old bees resulted in higher Nosema spore loads than inoculating 5-day old bees (Milbrath et al., 2013). Each custom-made plastic cage (Eiri et al., 2015) will have 25 workers and sterilized pollen (bee-collected pollen irradiated to kill potential pathogens mixed with 50% sucrose solution) and 50% sterile sucrose solution in a gravity feeder (5 ml syringe). The pollen and sugar solution will be replaced each 5 days. Five bees per treatment will be sampled at age 1 (day of emergence), 6 and 14 to determine how long gene activation from the immune priming treatment lasts. These bees will be recorded as "censored" during survival analysis. Remaining bees will be observed for mortality. Dead bees will be removed and frozen for midgut spore counts (Cantwell, 1970). In total, we plan to run 25 bees per treatment per colony, for a total of 2,000 bees.Immune gene analysis (Huang, MSU): We will measure expression of four immune genes, abaecin, defensin, apidaecin, and hymenoptacin (Chaimanee et al., 2012a) and two reference genes, actin (Chaimanee et al, 2012) and GAPDH ((Scharlaken et al., 2008)). Samples will be shipped from UCSD to MSU using RNAlater. Equal numbers of treated and control bees are run on each 96-well plate with all 6 genes. Each gene per sample will be run in triplicate using standard methods.Obj. 2 (Exp. 2) Testing adult immune priming treatment (Nieh, UCSD)This experiment tests the effect of vaccinating newly emerged adult bees. A frame of capped brood will be removed from each colony, placed inside a nuc box and incubated as in Exp. 1. Vaccination (Table 1) will be administered to newly emerged adult bees, which will be isolated, treated (2 µl dose), and caged as in Exp.1. Sample sizes will be the same as Exp. 1. At 6 days of age, bees will be cooled and placed into individual vials and receive the inoculation as in Exp. 1 (Table 1). Half of the bees will receive live N. ceranae spores, and the other half sterile sucrose only. Bees will then be treated as in Exp. 1. The immune gene analysis (Huang, MSU) will be identical to Exp. 1.Obj. 3 (Exp. 3): Testing vaccination with field tests using full-sized colonies. (Huang, MSU) This experiment tests the effect of vaccinating bees (either in brood or young adults, depending upon the results of Exps. 1 & 2) in field colonies. Bees will be obtained and vaccinated with 40k Nosema spores per bee, as described in Exp 1. Unlike the first two experiments, we will only have two treatments: (t2) un-vaccinated and (t4) vaccinated bees so that we can increase the number of marked bees per treatment. Each of the two treated areas will be covered with a cage made with hardware cloth, allowing us to separate the two bee groups. For each treatment, 100 bees will be individually marked with queen bee tags and 200 bees marked with the same color paint mark. In the inoculation phase, we will capture these bees individually in vials, feed them 40K spores per bee in 2 µl of sugar syrup, or syrup only (Milbrath et al., 2013) and release them after 1 hr to the natal colony. Tagged bees will be tracked for survival by checking for their presence once every 5 days. If we vaccinate in adults, then the two groups of bees will be paint-marked (N=400 per group) in two different colors, vaccinated individually or fed syrup; and returned to their natal colony. On day 5, we will recover 300 bees from each group, cool them and inoculate both groups with live spores as each bee wakes up. One subset (n=100 per group) will be tagged and one (N=200 per group) painted with an additional paint (i.e. they become "double-painted"). Any bees with only one paint would be not used for the following observations. Double-paint-marked bees will be sampled for immune gene expression (N=10 bees) on day 6 and for Nosema spore counts (day 10 and day 20). Age of first foraging will be determined by blocking the colony entrance for 30 min in the morning and in the afternoon and recording the tag ID of the returning bees. We will measure the age of first foraging to assay the effects of Nosema infection and of our immune priming treatment. N. ceranae infection decreases the age of first foraging (Goblirsch et al., 2013), similar to N. apis (Huang, 2011). This experiment will be repeated in at least four 10-comb colonies (600 bees per colony, 2,400 bees total). To limit potential Nosema spread, all colonies will be in an isolated apiary. Based upon our preliminary qPCR results, and immunes genes identified in the literature, we will perform qPCR to analyze gene activation in bees that receive our field treatments.Table 1.Treatments and expected results for Exps. 1 & 2. The immune priming treatment consists of 40,000 (40K) autoclaved spores in 50% sucrose and the control consists of sterile 50% sucrose with no spores. Gene activation will be measured with separate groups of bees sampled at ages described in the experiments. Total midgut spore counts will be measured upon adult death.Overall treatmentVaccinationExp. 1: larvae (3-day old)Exp. 2: adults (1-day old)InoculationExp. 1: adults (1-day old)Exp. 2: adults (6-day old)Expected result1) 0K/0Ksterile sucrosesterile sucroseNo gene activation, no infection2) 0K/40Ksterile sucrose40K live sporesGene activation from infection alone, high infection3) immune priming treatment/0Kimmune priming treatmentsterile sucroseGene activation from immune priming treatment alone, no infection4) immune priming treatment/40Kimmune priming treatment40K live sporesGene activation from immune priming treatment & infection, no or low infection

Progress 01/15/16 to 01/14/19

Outputs
Target Audience:During our entire project, our target audience has been industry, beekeepers, organic gardeners, and researchers. Changes/Problems:There were multiple issues, normal experimental problems, encountered during these experiments. However, we were able to resolve all of these issues. In particular, we had issues with the field colony experiments due to weather and other factors. However, we were able to complete these experiments with the requested no-cost extension. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The project has provided research training and professional development for two MS/BS students at UCSD: Alex Neskovic and Andrey Rubanov, one visiting scientist, Xianbing Xie and one visiting Ph.D. student, Honghong Li. In addition, it provided support for two MS students who were paid to maintain the bee colonies at the Nieh apiary (Edmund Lau and Joshua Ludicke) and two undergraduates to maintain bees at the Huang apiary (Scott Malaya and Nathan Laurenz). How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?These results have been disseminated to the following stakeholders: the general public, organic gardeners, beekeepers, industry, and academic researchers via public talks. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? During the grant period, we have conducted the proposed immune priming (IP) experiments to address goals 1 (larval IP), 2 (adult IP), and 3 (field colony IP). We now show that IP is effective when fed to larvae reared in vitro , fed to larvae reared in vivo, fed to newly emerged bees in cages, and fed to newly emerged bees introduced to whole colonies. For each of the following experiments, we had four treatments: 0-0 (control), 0-40 (not primed but inoculated with 40,000 spores), IP-0 (primed, not inoculated) and IP-40 (primed and inoculated with 40,000 spores). The bees were then tested for infection levels (spore loads) and Toll pathway immune gene expression based upon genes that are known to be upregulated by bees in response to N. ceranae infection. Goal 1. For larvae treated in vivo (fed the IP treatment and then returned to the colony), IP treatment significantly reduced mean spores counts in bees subsequently fed live spores by 45% in comparison with bees not given the IP treatment and then fed live spores (0-40 treatment). The Toll pathway gene, abaecin and defensin were upregulated by IP. This was the Master's thesis research of Alex Neskovic in the Nieh lab. Goal 2. For adults treated upon emergence, we found that IP significantly reduced infection levels when they were subsequently challenged adults by 34% as compared to the control (0-40 treatment). In this study, IP significantly increased expression of the Toll pathway genes, abaecin, apidaecin, defensin, and hymenoptaecin. This was the Master's thesis research of Andrey Rubanov in the Nieh lab. Goal 3. Zachary Huang's lab conducted field trials with IP bees returned to field colonies. His result show that IP treatment can reduce the proportion of infected by 60% and mean spore load per bee by 56%. Interestingly, compared to 0-40 bees, IP-40 bees lived significantly longer (increase of 1.4 days). Lastly, immune priming significantly upregulated the Toll gene, defensin, at day 7 and day 15 after the immune priming treatment. Conclusion. Immune priming against N. ceranae infection is evidently a viable option for controlling a disease that is showing increasing antibiotic resistance. By harnessing the natural immune system of honey bees, we provide a new tool for managing this widespread disease and suggest a new path for research into the management of multiple other bee diseases.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Awaiting Publication Year Published: 2019 Citation: Endler, M., Neskovic A., Huang, Z., and Nieh, J.C. Immune priming of honey bees protects against a major microsporidian pathogen. In prep
  • Type: Other Status: Other Year Published: 2018 Citation: Invited talk. Nieh JC. CMG Symposium talk. The milkmaid strategy: Using immune priming to activate honey bee immunity against a common microsporidian pathogen. University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Type: Theses/Dissertations Status: Published Year Published: 2017 Citation: Thesis. Andrey Rubanov (Masters Thesis) Autoclaved Nosema ceranae spores immune prime adult Apis mellifera against future infection.
  • Type: Other Status: Other Year Published: 2016 Citation: Invited talk. Nieh JC. Using immune priming to activate honey bee immunity against Nosema ceranae infection. California State Beekeepers Association Annual Convention 2016, San Diego, California, USA. 2016
  • Type: Other Status: Other Year Published: 2019 Citation: Invited talk. Nieh JC. A new hope for bee health: immune priming. Chiang Mai University, Thailand. 2019
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: Conference presentation. Alexander S Neskovic, Andrey Rubanov, Longhong Li, Zachary Huang, and Nieh, JC. (2019) Immune priming reduces Nosema ceranae infection in Apis mellifera. American Bee Research Conference, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
  • Type: Other Status: Other Year Published: 2018 Citation: Invited talk. Nieh JC. Honey bee health: a new approach, immune priming, in an increasingly antibiotic-resistant world. Beijing Bee Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.


Progress 01/15/17 to 01/14/18

Outputs
Target Audience:During this reporting period, our target audience has been industry, beekeepers, organic gardeners, and researchers. James Nieh therefore gave five invited talks about this research on immune priming. Changes/Problems:Because the adult treatments are effective, but the in vivo immune priming treatments are not, we are focusing on the adult treatments, which is actually a more practical application of immune priming, and our whole colony tests. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The project has provided research training and professional development for two MS/BS students at UCSD: Alex Neskovic and Andrey Rubanov. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?These results have been disseminated to the following stakeholders: the general public, organic gardeners, beekeepers, industry, and academic researchers via public talks. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We will continue our analyses of data from experiments conducted to address goals 1 and 2. We will also conduct one more field season of immune priming of entire colonies, completing goal 3.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? During the reporting period, we have conducted immune priming (IP) experiments to address goals 1 (larval IP), 2 (adult IP), and 3 (field colony IP). For goal 1 (Alex Neskovic, MS student), we have now completed our measurements and data collection and are now analyzing the data. Our preliminary results suggest that in vivo IP is not effective at protecting against adult Nosema infection, perhaps because of hygienic behavior by nurse bees that may remove immune primed larvae or because the IP treatment fed to larvae is not effectively consumed by them in vivo. For goal 2 (Andrey Rubanov, MS student), we have tested the immune priming of adults upon emergence. We found that IP significantly reduced infection levels in subsequently challenged adults by 37%. This is a promising result. We continue to analyze the Toll data from this study. For goal 3, Zachary Huang's lab has conducted field trials with full colonies fed sugar solution with heat-killed spores. His preliminary results are promising and shown that IP treatment can reduce subsequent spore infection levels by 50%. Moreover, this treatment appears to upregulate the Toll gene, defensin, at day 7 and day 15 after the immune priming treatment. We plan to collect another season's worth of data with this whole colony treatment approach, which is the most practical for beekeepers.

Publications

  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Accepted Year Published: 2018 Citation: (Jan 19, 2018) Nieh JC. CMG Symposium talk. The milkmaid strategy: Using immune priming to activate honey bee immunity against a common microsporidian pathogen. University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Type: Theses/Dissertations Status: Other Year Published: 2017 Citation: (August 25, 2017) Rubanov, Andrey, Autoclaved Nosema ceranae spores immune prime adult Apis mellifera against future infection.


Progress 01/15/16 to 01/14/17

Outputs
Target Audience:During this reporting period, our target audience has been industry, beekeepers, and researchers. James Nieh therefore gave an invited talk about this research on immune priming, presenting our recent preliminary results:"Using immune priming to activate honey bee immunity against Nosema ceranae infection."California State Beekeepers Association Annual Convention 2016, San Diego, California, USA. Changes/Problems:Based upon our preliminary analyses of the in vivo immune priming data, we have some concerns that this approach may not be effective. If this turns out to be true, we will focus on the adult immune priming, which is actually a more practical application of immune priming, and our whole colony tests. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The project has provided research training and professional development for two MS/BS students at UCSD: Alex Neskovic and Andrey Rubanov. At MSU, the project has helped to support a postdoctoral-level scholar, Canning Xie. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?James Nieh gave a talk "Using immune priming to activate honey bee immunity against Nosema ceranae infection" to theCalifornia State Beekeepers Association Annual Convention 2016 inSan Diego, California, USA on November 15, 2016. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We will continue to work on our in vivo immune priming and adult immune priming. Beginning in April 2017, we will begin our whole-colony trials.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? In the past 90 days, we have conducted experiments to address goals 1 and 2. For goal 1 (Alex Neskovic, MS student), we have now conducted over 5 trials of larvae that have been immune-primed in vivo and harvested bees for spore counting to determine infection levels and for immune gene analysis. We currently still analyzing this data. For goal 2 (Andrey Rubanov, MS student), we have tested the immune priming of adults upon emergence. Our preliminary data show a significant effect (P<0.01) of immune priming on adults subsequently immune challenged with live spores. Essentially, immune priming reduced subsequent infection levels by >50%. This is a promising result. We continue to analyze this data as well.

Publications