Progress 11/04/15 to 09/30/16
Outputs Target Audience:The target audience includes (but is not limited to)the public, the veterinarycommunity, and scientists around the world that deal with equine recurrent laryngeal neuropathy. Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The project provided the opportunity to Drs.Santiago Gutierrez (PI) and Erica Secor (equine surgery resident and graduate student) to perform numeroussurgical laryngoplasty constructs and become familiar with the airflow chamber built for the study. The data obtained with this investigation will be included in Dr. Secor's MS thesis. In addition, theairflow chamber built and used for the studywillallow us to continue totestmultiple novel surgical techniques for horses with airway obstruction. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The results from the study will be published in the American Journal of Veterinary Researchand presented at the International Annual Symposium of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons next year. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?
Nothing Reported
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
The main objective of the study was to determine if a modifiedlaryngoplasty technique is superior to the standardlaryngoplasty technique to restore normal airway function. Therefore, the testing model was slightly changed from the originally proposed one (one cycle-to-failure and cyclictesting model). The new objective wastocompare the effects of two laryngoplasty(standard and modified) techniques(performed in cadaveric equine larynges)on translaryngeal flow, pressure, and impedance using the airflow chamber described by Cheetham(Equine Veterinary Journal 2008). The in vitro laryngeal model used canmimicthe airflow and pressures experienced by horses at maximal exertion. For both surgicaltechniques the prosthetic suture was passed through the cricoid cartilage and through either the muscular process (standard) or the muscular process and body (modified) of botharytenoid cartilages. Each larynx was positioned in a flow chamber after placement of the standard laryngoplasty and modified laryngoplasty andsubjected to cyclic airflow. Tracheal flow, translaryngeal pressure, translaryngeal impedances, right to left quotient abduction angles and internal rima glottidis cross-sectional areas were determined and compared for both techniques.Thedata obtanied had normal distributions.Internal rima glottidis cross-sectional area, right to left abduction angle quotient, tracheal airflow, translaryngeal pressure difference, and translaryngeal impedance were compared between LP techniques using a paired-t test. The right to left abduction angle quotient and internal rima glottidis cross-sectional areas were similar (P=0.460 and P= 0.266, respectively) between laryngoplasties indicating that comparable degree of left arytenoid cartilage abduction was achieved with bothtechniques.At maximal cyclic airflow (53 L/s), the surgicalconstructs had similar (P=0.307) translaryngeal pressures (standard= 15.81± 4.68 mmHg and modified=14.84 ±2.84 mmHg, respectively) and translaryngeal impedance (standard= 0.23± 0.09 mmHg/L/s and modified=0.28± 0.05 mmHg/L/s, respectively). Based on these results it appearsthat amodified laryngoplasty technique is comparable to the standard technique to improve airflow in cadaveric larynges. This information along with previous research that showed that the modifiedlaryngoplasty technique canprevent failure of the suture anchor point in the cartilage provides preliminary data that support future investiagation of the modified laryngoplasty technique in live horses.
Publications
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2016
Citation:
No Publications To List
|
|