Source: UNIV OF WISCONSIN submitted to NRP
INTERACTIONS AND COMMUNITY DYNAMICS IN MULTI-SPECIES COMMUNITIES OF SOIL BACTERIA
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1006261
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
May 1, 2015
Project End Date
Aug 31, 2017
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
UNIV OF WISCONSIN
21 N PARK ST STE 6401
MADISON,WI 53715-1218
Performing Department
Bacteriology
Non Technical Summary
Manipulation of soil microbial communities is an exciting frontier with the potential to substantially reduce the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, to expand the types of soils and climates suitable for agriculture, and to counter the gradual decrease in soil quality associated with intensive agriculture. While knowledge about plant beneficial microbes and plant pathogens is increasing, manipulations of soil microbial communities aimed at establishing beneficial microbes or suppressing pathogenic ones is currently unreliable and impractical. This is true in multi-species communities, since the success and failure of beneficial strains and pathogens are determined by their interactions with the microbial community.The proposed work will investigate how microbial interactions affect the fate of microbes in laboratory multi-species communities composed of soil bacteria. In particular, the extent to which secretion of antibiotics by microbes helps them get established in a community will be determined. To accomplish these goals, a novel methodology for quantifying interaction networks and community dynamics will be developed. This work will improve our ability to predict dynamics in microbial communities and to manipulate microbial communities.
Animal Health Component
(N/A)
Research Effort Categories
Basic
100%
Applied
(N/A)
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
10201101100100%
Knowledge Area
102 - Soil, Plant, Water, Nutrient Relationships;

Subject Of Investigation
0110 - Soil;

Field Of Science
1100 - Bacteriology;
Goals / Objectives
A major goal of the project is to improve our ability to predict the dynamics in multi-species microbial communities based on properties of their pairwise interactions. For a panel of soil bacteria from the genus Streptomyces, two types of network properties will be measured: the ability of one species to invade another, and the ability of one species to inhibit the growth of another. It will be determined whether antibiotic inhibition aids species in invading communities dominated by other species or in resisting invasions. Many communities composed of several species exhibiting diverse interaction motifs will be propagated in the lab. It will be determined whether the outcomes in multi-species communities can be determined based on interactions, and interaction motifs that lead to stable coexistence will be identified.
Project Methods
The project will utilize a previously assembled collection of soil isolates form the genus Streptomyces. Antibiotic interactions within the panel will be determined using previously developed methods. A novel method will be utilized to propagate many multi-species communities in parallel on solid media (agar). The species abundance dynamics of these communities will be determined with high-throughput amplicon sequencing.

Progress 05/01/15 to 08/31/17

Outputs
Target Audience:Scientists interested in microbial interactions and their effect on the functioning of complex microbial communities such as those in soil. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?One graduate student was trained. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Results were disseminated through publications and scientific presentations. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Manipulation of soil microbial communities is an exciting frontier with the potential to substantially reduce the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, to expand the types of soils and climates suitable for agriculture, and to counter the gradual decrease in soil quality associated with intensive agriculture. To advance our understanding of how microbial communities assemble and our ability to manipulate communities, we established a platform for systematically studying the relationship between ecological interactions and dynamics in multi-species communities of soil bacteria. We performed a tournament between soil bacteria in which bacteria from different species try to defend their territory against invaders or invade territory dominated by bacteria from another species. To date, little has been empirically determined about the structure of natural competitive networks, and our findings differ markedly from long-standing assumptions. Conventional wisdom is that species can be ordered according to their competitive ability if they occupy the same ecological niche, coexist if they occupy different niches, or perhaps enter into relationships of cyclic dominance, such as paper-scissor-rock-games, if they participate in niche construction activities. In sharp contrast, we found that: 1. It is impossible to rank species based on their competitive ability (aka survival of the fittest) even when they are competing in simple well-defined environments, while at the same time loops of cyclic dominance are extremely rare. 2. There is a strong tendency for species that are already abundant in the environment to hold their ground (aka-survival of the common), which results in alternative stable states for even the simplest two-species microbial communities. Instead of a single winner, our tournament resulted in multiple dominant species that could exclude each other depending on their initial abundances. These findings have several immediate implications for how we view the assembly, structuring and diversity of microbial communities. They indicate that pairwise interactions inherently predispose communities toward multiple stable states. This makes microbial communities intrinsically sensitive to initial conditions during community assembly but, at the same time, makes them more resistant to change once they are established. These results suggest that high inocula would be typically needed to establish a novel beneficial microbe in soil, but a successful treatment would not have to be repeated every year. In addition, we measured the antibiotic interactions within the panel of microbial strains. We determined that antibiotic interactions promote the bistability that we observed. These results were published in Nature Communications. Monitoring community dynamics relied on multiplexing hundreds of samples in a single Illumina run. An unexpected technical limitation we encountered was the high level of cross-talk between different multiplexed samples. In view of the widespread use of multiplexing by researchers, we performed dedicated experiments investigating cross-talk errors and came up with an effective solution, which was submitted for publication. Elimination of cross-talk overcomes a major obstacle to obtaining accurate quantitative information on effective ecological interactions and community dynamics in a scalable fashion. Finally, DNA-barcoded streptomyces strains were used to quantify and analyze the population dynamics of streptomyces strains that germinate and colonize a habitat. We found a very strong variance in reporductive success between different individuals from the same strain. The distribution of descendants that arise from individual bacteria is heavy-tailed, with a few cells effectively "winning the jackpot" to become a disproportionately large fraction of the population. The implication of these results is that in soil systems with feast and famine cycles in which microbes form spores and germinate, beneficial mutations will be much easier to spread in the population relative to the predictions of classical population genetics. This results can help us understand the fast evolution of microbes in soil. Our work also provides a general, scalable methodology for quantifying genetic drift in soil communities.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Under Review Year Published: 2018 Citation: Erik S. Wright and Kalin Vetsigian. Stochastic exits from dormancy give rise to heavy-tailed distributions of descendants in bacterial populations. In review in eLife. Available as pre-print at: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/01/11/246629 .


Progress 10/01/15 to 09/30/16

Outputs
Target Audience:Scientists interested in microbial interactions and their affect on the functioning of complex microbial communities such as those in soil. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?This project contributed to the training and professional development of a graduate student and an undergraduate student. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The main findings were submitted to Nature Communications and a Methodology developed was submitted to BMC Genomics. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We will finish our study of communities containing more than two species and test if the ecological dynamics in the multi-species communities can be predicted based on the pairwise interactions.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Manipulation of soil microbial communities is an exciting frontier with the potential to substantially reduce the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, to expand the types of soils and climates suitable for agriculture, and to counter the gradual decrease in soil quality associated with intensive agriculture. To advance our understanding of how microbial communities assemble and our ability to manipulate communities, we established a platform for systematically studying the relationship between ecological interactions and dynamics in multi-species communities of soil bacteria. We performed a tournament between soil bacteria in which bacteria from different species try to defend their territory against invaders or invade territory dominated by bacteria from another species. To date, little has been empirically determined about the structure of natural competitive networks, and our findings differ markedly from long-standing assumptions. Conventional wisdom is that species can be ordered according to their competitive ability if they occupy the same ecological niche, coexist if they occupy different niches, or perhaps enter into relationships of cyclic dominance, such as paper-scissor-rock-games, if they participate in niche construction activities. In sharp contrast, we found that: 1. It is impossible to rank species based on their competitive ability (aka survival of the fittest) even when they are competing in simple well-defined environments, while at the same time loops of cyclic dominance are extremely rare. 2. There is a strong tendency for species that are already abundant in the environment to hold their ground (aka-survival of the common), which results in alternative stable states for even the simplest two-species microbial communities. Instead of a single winner, our tournament resulted in multiple dominant species that could exclude each other depending on their initial abundances. These findings have several immediate implications for how we view the assembly, structuring and diversity of microbial communities. They indicate that pairwise interactions inherently predispose communities toward multiple stable states. This makes microbial communities intrinsically sensitive to initial conditions during community assembly but, at the same time, makes them more resistant to change once they are established. These results suggest that high inocula would be typically needed to establish a novel beneficial microbe in soil, but a successful treatment would not have to be repeated every year. In addition, we measured the antibiotic interactions within the panel of microbial strains. We determined that antibiotic interactions promote the bistability that we observed. These results were published in Nature Communications. Monitoring community dynamics relied on multiplexing hundreds of samples in a single Illumina run. An unexpected technical limitation we encountered was the high level of cross-talk between different multiplexed samples. In view of the widespread use of multiplexing by researchers, we performed dedicated experiments investigating cross-talk errors and came up with an effective solution, which was submitted for publication. Elimination of cross-talk overcomes a major obstacle to obtaining accurate quantitative information on effective ecological interactions and community dynamics in a scalable fashion. Lastly, we started performing experiments with multi-species communities that will be submitted for publication in 2017.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2016 Citation: Erik S. Wright and Kalin Vetsigian. Inhibitory interactions promote frequent bistability among competing bacteria. Nature Communications 7, Article number: 11274 (2016).


Progress 05/01/15 to 09/30/15

Outputs
Target Audience:Scientists interested in microbial interactions and their affect on the functioning of complex microbial communities such as those in soil. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?This project contributed to the training and professional development of a graduate student. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Methodology we developed was published in the journal of Bioinformatics.The mainfindings have been submitted as a seperate publication (see Products section). What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Antibiotic interactions among the panel ofmicrobial strains will be characterizedto determine their role inshaping the microbial competitive networks and promoting the bistability (survival of the common) that we identified. We will then proceed to study communities of more than two species.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Manipulation of soil microbial communities is an exciting frontier with the potential to substantially reduce the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, to expand the types of soils and climates suitable for agriculture, and to counter the gradual decrease in soil quality associated with intensive agriculture. To advance our understanding of how microbial communities assemble and our ability to manipulate communities, we established a platform for systematically studying the relationship between ecological interactions and dynamics in multi-species communities of soil bacteria. We performed a tournament between soil bacteria in which bacteria from different species try to defend their territory against invaders or invade territory dominated by bacteria from another species. To date, little has been empirically determined about the structure of natural competitive networks, and our findings differ markedly from long-standing assumptions. Conventional wisdom is that species can be ordered according to their competitive ability if they occupy the same ecological niche, coexist if they occupy different niches, or perhaps enter into relationships of cyclic dominance, such as paper-scissor-rock-games, if they participate in niche construction activities. In sharp contrast, we found that: 1. It is impossible to rank species based on their competitive ability (aka survival of the fittest) even when they are competing in simple well-defined environments, while at the same time loops of cyclic dominance are extremely rare. 2. There is a strong tendency for species that are already abundant in the environment to hold their ground (aka-survival of the common), which results in alternative stable states for even the simplest two-species microbial communities. Instead of a single winner, our tournament resulted in multiple dominant species that could exclude each other depending on their initial abundances. These findings have several immediate implications for how we view the assembly, structuring and diversity of microbial communities. They indicate that pairwise interactions inherently predispose communities toward multiple stable states. This makes microbial communities intrinsically sensitive to initial conditions during community assembly but, at the same time, makes them more resistant to change once they are established. These results suggest that high inocula would be typically needed to establish a novel beneficial microbe in soil, but a successful treatment would not have to be repeated every year. To accomplish these goals, we also developed a novel methodology for quickly and cheaply determining the type of a bacterial strains. This methodology (described in DesignSignatures: a tool for designing primers that yield amplicons with distinct signatures, Erik S. Wright, Kalin H. Vetsigian, Bioinformatics 2016) can be useful for many different applications, and can potentially be harnessed to monitor pathogens in food and thus improve food safety.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2016 Citation: DesignSignatures: a tool for designing primers that yield amplicons with distinct signatures Erik S. Wright; Kalin H. Vetsigian Bioinformatics 2016; doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw047
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Submitted Year Published: 2016 Citation: Erik S. Wright; Kalin H. Vestigial. Inhibitory interactions promote frequent bistability among competing bacteria