Recipient Organization
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
BOZEMAN,MT 59717
Performing Department
Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology
Non Technical Summary
Over the past two decades, clean-up and reuse of post-industrial landscapes has been widely implemented as a way to address cultural and biophysical sustainability in both urban and rural places. Advances in clean-up technologies and expanded knowledge in the theory and practice of brownfield regeneration has led to many innovative projects around the world that have incorporated ecological landscape design strategies as key elements. Now, more integrated, nuanced understanding is needed on how specific brownfield regeneration activities can best be implemented in order to minimize long-term environmental and human health risks, as well as create thriving community places and people. The overarching goal of the proposed work is to improve the quality of brownfield regeneration work for project longevity and community liveability.The proposed work will investigate design strategies for the cleanup and reuse of brownfield landscapes that best regenerate healthy ecosystems and people, and assess how to best align natural and cultural design elements within brownfield regeneration projects. More specifically, the proposed research will focus on these three areas: a) how people perceive landscape characteristics of remediation methods and reuse strategies; b) review of landscape and planting design related to remediation (clean-up); and c) principles for the integration of ecological landscape design and landscape performance in brownfield regeneration.The primary research methods employed to explore these topics will include correlational strategies (photo-surveys, alternative future modeling), classification schemes (collection, typology), and descriptive strategies (observation, interview, and case study). The research undertaken will result in expanded knowledge of design principles for ecological landscape design strategies and planting in brownfield regeneration. Findings and design recommendations produced will be valuable for land planners, managers, design professionals, and others involved in the brownfield regeneration.
Animal Health Component
30%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
40%
Applied
30%
Developmental
30%
Goals / Objectives
1) Study perception of ecological landscape design approaches and remediation methods in brownfield regeneration.1a. This project will study landscape perception in Butte, MT. The work will be in partnership with Butte-Silver Bow County Planning Department, in particular, the Reclamation Manager, Tom Malloy. One goal is to build additional collaborations with those working on reclamation projects in the County, for example, US-EPA personnel, Montana DEQ, and faculty at Montana Tech researching the use of native plants in remediation.1b. Build an understanding of how planting and landscape projects are used in reclamation work throughout Butte-Silver Bow Country through reviewing EPA, MT-DEQ, and community technical and media resources, on-site observations, meetings with partners, and GIS mapping analysis (exploratory).1c. Develop an integrated approach and master plan for utilizing urban ecological landscape services and landscape aesthetics to inform future planting and landscape design work for brownfields within Butte, and mine reclamation sites more broadly (building theoretical framework).1d. Test perception of landscape design approaches (test exploratory, theoretical work) on brownfield sites.1e. Communicate findings to organizations working on reclamation and design.2) Examine planting typology in brownfield regeneration2a. Explore existing primary resources on brownfield remediation and redevelopment plans to investigate planting strategies used in clean-up and site programming and design.2b. Develop classification approach based on data analysis of the use of plants in site regeneration.2c. A goal of this study is to create a review article that illustrates the breadth and complexities of designing planting strategies for clean-up and redevelopment of brownfield sites.2d. Develop case study on utilizing ecological landscape design strategies in brownfield regeneration. Objectives in the first two projects will lay the groundwork for developing a case study project in Butte, MT at the end of this grant cycle, in preparation for future research.Timeline of Objectives (refer to .pdf file of final submitted proposal to see formatted timeline of studies and objectives.
Project Methods
1) Landscape Perception of Ecological Landscape Design & Brownfield Regeneration. Exploratory research will develop principles to build a theoretical framework for integrating ecological landscape design strategies with reclamation work in Butte-Silver Bow County. Following, photo-survey instruments would consist of photo-simulations illustrating ecological landscape design strategies or alternatives (outlined in the master plan described above) to analyze relationships among design theory for brownfields, remediation methods, and user preferences and understanding (Kaplan 1985; Nassauer 1983).Ecological landscape design principles for reclamation will be developed using ArcGIS mapping and analysis of geographic data.Photo-simulations will be generated using existing site photographs along with digital manipulation using primarily Adobe Photoshop.Survey participants will be targeted toward both professionals and laypeople, who work on or live in the Butte area.Surveys will also include questions on demographic information as well as knowledge of topic areas (plants, remediation, ecology).Quantitative analyses will include factor analysis, multiple correlations, and other statistical methods to understand the ways in which remediation and landscape characteristics significantly impacts people's perception and preferences.2) Remediation and Planting Design. The typological research methods used for this study seek to classify planting design schemes as they relate to remediation and redevelopment strategies.Data collection will draw on primary sources to catalog remediation strategies and design documents that outline remediation and planting design plans or built projects. Examples of primary data sources include: EPA Superfund Site Remedial Design / Remedial Action Plan documents, design and construction drawings for exemplary (ASLA Professional Award Winners) brownfield redevelopment projects completed in the United States.Secondary data sources, including descriptive technical publications and materials may be used for collection of plant species information, in particular, for phytoremediation strategies research. For example, EPA Regional or Superfund Site-specific approved planting lists and remediation texts.Categories for the typology will be generated through analysis of the primary and secondary sources.Developing a typology of planting design within brownfield regeneration will also combine descriptive methodologies to analyze and evaluate the generated categories on the impact of remediation on landscape composition and user preferences. (Deming and Swaffield 2011, p. 79).3) Ecological Landscape Design in Brownfield Regeneration. Specific methods for this study will be informed by outcomes of the first two studies. Likely methods include descriptive research, including interviews, archival documents related to remediation and planning work, and biophysical and cultural data analysis (Deming and Swaffield 2011, p. 79). This area of research may also include simulation modeling to evaluate the impacts of alternative ecological landscape design strategies.The case study site selection will be based on research in objective (a) on landscape perception and brownfield regeneration, which would include Butte, MT, and potentially other locations of reclamation and planning projects in Butte-Silver Bow County.Geographic data analysis (weighted overlay analysis) would be performed using ArcGISAny simulations or design alternatives would be generated using visual modeling software such as SketchUp and Adobe Photoshop, utilizing normative scenarios methodology (Steinitz et al. 2003; Nassauer and Corry 2004).