Source: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
DISSEMINATION OF THE EVIDENCE-BASED SWITCH PROGRAM FOR CHILDHOOD OBESITY PREVENTION
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1005619
Grant No.
2015-68001-23242
Cumulative Award Amt.
$2,851,196.00
Proposal No.
2014-08390
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Mar 1, 2015
Project End Date
Feb 28, 2021
Grant Year
2018
Program Code
[A2101]- Childhood Obesity Prevention: Integrated Research, Education, and Extension to Prevent Childhood Obesity
Recipient Organization
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
2229 Lincoln Way
AMES,IA 50011
Performing Department
Kinesiology
Non Technical Summary
The increasing prevalence of obesity in children is a major public health problem in society. Parents want to be able to help children adopt and maintain healthy lifestyles but the nature of our society and the competing demands for sedentary activities and high calorie foods makes it challenging to do. Comprehensive obesity prevention can only be achieved with coordinated approaches that reach and influence children in a positive and motivational way at multiple levels (school, home and the community).The SWITCH program has proven effectiveness for helping children to "Switch what they Do, View and Chew". The online program provides a way to effectively distribute it to parents but a key need is to determine how to effectively integrate it into existing school wellness and education programming. Schools provide an ideal setting for childhood obesity prevention programming since they can directly influence both children and parents but many programs have been too challenging for schools to adopt or maintain. The present project will build and evaluate school training hubs that will help schools to effectively incorporate SWITCH programming into normal school activities in the classroom, gym and the lunch room. With an integrated approach, children will receive the same information at school and at home and also have supportive and encouraging environments that make healthier choices easier to make.The goal in the project is to refine the evidence-based SWITCH programming over time and learn more effective ways to share and disseminate the program to schools on a larger scale. We will compare schools with different types of programming to test whether the enhanced school components have bigger effects than a standard program that doesn't have the supplemental programming. Once refined, it will be possible to incorporate all of the features into a more comprehensive SWITCH program. Because the program is online it can be widely disseminated in a cost effective manner and have a significant impact on reducing the prevelance of obesity in children.
Animal Health Component
50%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
50%
Applied
50%
Developmental
0%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
72460203020100%
Knowledge Area
724 - Healthy Lifestyle;

Subject Of Investigation
6020 - The family and its members;

Field Of Science
3020 - Education;
Goals / Objectives
The proposed Integrated Project will advance obesity prevention research by developing and evaluating methods to support school-based implementation of the evidence-based SWITCH® program through school-wellness coalitions. SWITCH® is a multicomponent, ecologically-based, web-enabled intervention designed to work through schools to reach families. The strategy capitalizes on the coordinating structure and motivation provided through a school-based program while also minimizing the burden on teachers and schools. The program targets three distinct behaviors known to impact childhood obesity (i.e., physical activity, screen time and eating habits) in a creative way by challenging children to "switch what they do, view, and chew" (i.e., physical activity, screen time, and diet).
Project Methods
Based on Social Cognitive Theory [38] and an ecological developmental systems approach, the SWITCH+ intervention is designed to target the development of the skills and efficacy of teachers and school wellness staff to plan and coordinated the delivery of the SWITCH obesity prevention program. The effective deployment of the program through schools would then facilitate the utilization of the program by the parents and children. Thus, we will work through schools to facilitate reach to parents.The intervention model used to impact our target audience (i.e. Efforts) is an extension of established school training models developed through the Healthy Youth Places project and the subsequent USDA funded HOP'N after school project by our collaborators from Kansas State University. These projects took a novel approach to promoting physical activity and healthful eating in schools by directly building the capacity of existing after-school programs to create healthy environments. In the present study our SWITCH Expert Team (Research Team and Consulting Groups) will work with Team Nutrition leaders and eXtension partners to refine the existing online SWITCH curriculum and build the training modules used for the intervention. The Expert team will then train teams that will serve as a "School/Community Hub" to facilitate coordination of SWITCH Teams in the participating schools. The SWITCH team will have direct access to (and support from) the SWITCH Training Hub, but the goal of the school training is to build capacity for the participating schools to plan, coordinate and lead their own SWITCH program. The trainings will be reinforced with an online learning network that will involve both pre-service and in-service training of teachers. Building capacity for schools to carry out multilevel obesity prevention practices will increase the likelihood that the intervention can be adopted and sustained with limited supplemental resources.The proposed Extension Evaluation will capitalize on the participatory nature of the project and allow us to evaluate the effectiveness of the school-modules (and training) in facilitating the adoption and utilization of the SWITCH obesity prevention programming. The proposed Research Evaluation will evaluate the effectiveness of the supplemental school modules and determine the school-based factors needed for successful adoption, implementation and maintenance of the programming. Separate Process and Outcome measures will be obtained from the parents, the child and the teachers/leaders to ensure that we can evaluate programs at both the individual level (HOME) and organizational level (SCHOOL). Process measures include web clicks (parents), completion of online trackers (children) and fidelity checklists (teachers). Outcome measures include an online version of the Family Nutrition and Physical Activity screening tool (parents), an online version of the Youth Activity Profile (children) and a school environmental change audit and plate waste evaluations (school/teachers). A multilevel (School, Parent, and Child) generalized mixed model analyses of variance will be used to test differences in outcome measures between treatment and control schools after controlling for school clustering and other covariates that could impact outcomes (e.g., school size, socioeconomic status).

Progress 03/01/15 to 02/28/21

Outputs
Target Audience:Our research team has most directly reached and impacted school leaders. We have continued to enroll schools into the project and conducted our annual SWITCH school wellness conference to initiate training and programming. We have nearly doubled enrollment in each iteration of SWITCH and have worked with approximately 50 schools in our most recent iterations. The intentional transition to dissemination through 4H will enable us to continue to support schools over time since they have incorporated the delivery of SWITCH into their overall programming. While children are the ultimate target of the SWITCH intervention, we work through extension leaders to build capacity in school leaders since they can influence youth more directly. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The project supported training and professional development for both students mentored by our research team as well as for Extension 4-H leaders involved in the dissemination effort. We will provide an overview of the training and implementation process first followed by a summary of the students that received triaining through the project. Overview: An established training and implementation model developed by a member of our team (Dzewaltowski) provided a guide for the training and implementation model used in the project. However, adaptations and refinement were needed prior to broad dissemination efforts with the project. After developing and refining the modules and methods, we conducted a series of implementation studies in three subsequent iterations of SWITCH (2016-2018) to sequentially test and refine various aspects of the implementation model, the web-based platform used to engage the students and the integrated assessment tools used to evaluate school capacity and environments. These studies collectively documented the feasibility and utility of the capacity-building process for schools. However, a final step in the progression of our work was to build capacity in training hubs that could serve and support schools across the state. To ensure sustainability, a formalized partnership was established with the 4H Youth Development program which is coordinated across the state through the university-based Extension and Outreach network. The mission of 4H ("engaging youth to reach their fullest potential while advancing the field of youth development") was a natural match for the focus of SWITCH since they already supported a specific line of healthy living initiatives. The 4H program emphasis on positive youth development and family engagement was also consistent with goals of SWITCH which emphasize working through schools to also reach the home environment. Most importantly, the 4H group provided a way to more effectively disseminate SWITCH since there are County Youth Coordinators (CYC) in each of the 99 counties that support 4H programming. The county-based 4H network is supported by an integrated team of Youth Program Specialists (YPS) on a regional level and by state leaders affiliated with the University so communication channels were already established for this partnership. However, it was important to build interest and involvement over time since the county-based extension leaders are supervised and paid by their local County Extension Council and not through the University. Thus, the degree of engagement with SWITCH was contingent on how SWITCH programming fit with each counties' needs, interests and resources. In the final phases of our SWITCH project (2019 and 2020 - extensions), we focused our work on transdisciplinary approaches to promote interest and engagement in the distributed county-based 4H Extension network. Transdisciplinarity in this context captures the synergies and reciprocal relationships between the state 4H network and the regional / county staff since engagement at the county level was purely voluntary. We conducted a robust process evaluation to document the degree of engagement of state 4H staff in the optional training opportunities and then evaluated the impact of involvement from the perspective of both the 4H staff and the school leaders running SWITCH. The published paper on the transdisciplinary partnerships and engagement of county-based 4-H extension leaders in the dissemination of SWITCH provides an effective summary of our work on SWITCH since it documents the process that we followed to ensure good coordination and communication through this distributed network over time. Student Training Outcomes The project has been managed by the same team of 7 Ph.D. level faculty investigators but several have moved to new institutions. There are now 4 from Iowa State University (Greg Welk, Lorraine Lanningham-Foster, Douglas Gentile and Spyridoula Vazou), one from Louisiana State University (Senlin Chen), one from Kansas State University (Ric Rosenkranz) and one from the University of Nebraska Medical Center (David Dzewaltowski). The faculty individually and collectively oversee a team of graduate students that work on various subcommittees to help faculty coordinators carry out the tasks on the project. The compiled summary of students that have made major contributions to the project and/or completed research through SWITCH are summarized below: Undergraduate Honor Students Andi Luth (Evaluation of the Youth Activity Profile tool) M.S. Students Kim Klimesh (Validation of Nutrition YAP items) Tara Weber (Development of Video Materials) Rachel Lukowski (Evaluation of Motivational Interviewing) Katherine Long (Evaluation of Classroom Activities) Ivy Lou (Evaluation of Plate Waste) Rebecca Harken (Evaluation of Community of Practice) Kyle Braun - KSU (Evaluation of the Youth Activity Profile) Ph.D. Students Maren Wolff, M.S. RDN, LD (Evaluation of the FNPA tool) Joey Lee M.S. (Development of School Wellness Audit Tool) Yaunying Lou (Ivy), M.S. (Evaluation of Plate Waste) Post Doc Students Gabriella McLoughlin How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?We have published our research findings in scientific (peer-reviewed) journals and have also presented our work at a number of scientific meetings. However, we also took steps to ensure that the results of our work could be more accessible to other stakeholders. Thus, we developed a series of simple 1 page "Research Briefs" that are available on our website. The briefs summarize the outcomes and explain the importance of the specific studies to the overall project. The main outcomes of papers and presentations are summarized below: Published Papers: McLoughlin, G. M., Candal, P., Vazou, S., Lee, J. A., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Rosenkranz, R. R., Lanningham-Foster, L., Gentile, D.A., Liechty, L., Chen, S. & Welk, G. J. (2021). Evaluating the Implementation of the SWITCH® School Wellness Intervention and Capacity-Building Process through Multiple Methods. Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. McLoughlin, G. M., Vazou, S., Liechty, L., Torbert, A., Lanningham-Foster, L., Rosenkranz, R. R., Dzewaltowski, D. A., and Welk, G. J. (2021) Transdisciplinary Approaches for the Dissemination of the SWITCH School Wellness Initiative through a Distributed 4-H / Extension Network. Child and Youth Care Forum. Lee, J. A., McLoughlin, G. M., & Welk, G. J. (2020). School Wellness Environments: Perceptions Versus Realities. The Journal of School Nursing, 1059840520924453. McLoughlin, G. M., Rosenkranz, R. R., Lee, J. A., Wolff, M. M., Chen, S., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Vazou, S., Lanningham-Foster, Gentile, D.A., Rosen, M.S. & Welk, G. J. (2019). The Importance of Self-Monitoring for Behavior Change in Youth: Findings from the SWITCH® School Wellness Feasibility Study. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(20), 3806. Chen, S., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Rosenkranz, R.R., Lanningham-Foster, L., Vazou, S., Gentile, D. A., Lee, J. A., Braun, K. J., Wolff, M. M., & Welk, G. J. (2018). Feasibility study of the SWITCH implementation process for enhancing school wellness. BMC Public Health, 18:1119. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-6024-2. Welk, G., Chen, S., Nam, Y., & Webber, T. (2015). A formative evaluation of the SWITCH program: The print versus online versions. BMC Obesity, 2, 20. doi:10.1186/s40608-015-0049-1. Conference Presentations Rosenkranz RR, Dixon P, Dzewaltowski DA, McLoughlin G, Lee JA, Chen S, Vazou S, Lanningham-Foster L, Gentile DA, Welk GJ (2021). A cluster-randomized trial assessing comparative effectiveness of two SWITCH implementation processes for school wellness programming. Presentation proposed for the 2021 ISBNPA Meeting. Welk, G.J. and McLoughlin, G.M. (2020). Implementation and scaling of SWITCH (School Wellness Integration Targeting Child Health). Presentation for a research symposium at the International Society for Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (online presentation) McLoughlin, G.M, Candal, P., Vazou, S., Lee, J.A., Rosenkranz, R.R., Dzewaltowski, D.A., Lanningham-Foster, L., Gentile, D.A., Dixon, P., Chen, S., Welk, G.J. (2020). Evaluation of School Wellness Integration Targeting Child Health (SWITCH®) Program Dissemination and Implementation through a Mixed Methods Approach. International Society for Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (online presentation). McLoughlin, G., Welk, G. How do we achieve systems-level change to promote physical activity and health behavior in schools? Insights from dissemination of the SWITCH® program. Presentation at Integrated Public Health-Aligned Physical Education (IPHPE), 2019 meeting, Columbia SC. Lee, J. A., Lanningham-Foster, L. M., S., Vazou, S., Wolff, M. M., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Rosenkranz, R. R., Gentile, D. A., Chen, S., Liechty, L., Torbert, A., Welk, G. J. (2019). Effect of School- and Staff-Level Capacity on Wellness Program Implementation. Paper to be presented at the 2019 SHAPE America Annual meeting in Tampa, FL. McLoughlin, G. M., Lee, J. A., Lanningham-Foster, L. M., Gentile, D. A., Chen, S., Vazou, S., Wolff, M. M., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Rosenkranz, R. R., Liechty, L., Torbert, A., Welk, G. J. (2019). School Wellness Integration Targeting Child Health (SWITCH): A Model for Training and Dissemination. Paper to be presented at the 2019 SHAPE America Annual meeting in Tampa, FL. Lou, Y., Wu, H., Welk, G., Vazou, S., Chen, S., Gentile, D., Rosenkranz, R., Dzewaltowski, D., & Lanningham-Foster, L. (2019). Changes in energy and nutrient selection in school lunches: Findings from the SWITCH intervention. ISBNPA annual meeting, Prague, Czech Republic. McLoughlin, G. M., Lee, J. A., Lanningham-Foster, L., Gentile, D. A., Chen, S., Vazou, S., Wolff, M. M., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Rosenkranz, R. R., Liechty, L., Torbert, A., & Welk, G. J. (2019). School Wellness Integration Targeting Child Health (SWITCH): Process evaluation of implementation using mixed methods. ISBNPA annual meeting, Prague, Czech Republic. Rosenkranz, R., McLoughlin, G. M., Dzewaltowski, D., Lee, J., Wolff, M., Rosen, M., Chen, S., Vazou, S., Lanningham-Foster, L., Gentile, D., & Welk, G. (2019). Self-monitoring of physical activity and sedentary behavior within a whole-of-school intervention: Findings from the SWITCH Feasibility Study. ISBNPA annual meeting, Prague, Czech Republic. Lou, Y., Wu, H., Welk, G., Vazou, S., Chen, S., Gentile, D. A., Rosenkranz, R., Dzewaltowski, D., & Lanningham-Foster, L. (2018). The SWITCH® Implementation Process on School Lunch Consumption Patterns and Plate Waste. Paper presented at the 2018 Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior (SNEB) 51st Annual Conference, Minneapolis, MN (Abstract published in Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 50 (7), S167-‌S168, 2018). Welk, G. J., Lanningham-Foster, L., Vazou, S., Gentile, D., Chen, S., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Rosenkranz, R. R., Lee, J., Wolff, M., Braun, K. J. (2018). Feasibility of the SWITCH Implementation Framework for Enhancing School Wellness. Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior Annual Conference, Minneapolis, MN. (Abstract published in Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 50 (7), S115-‌S116, 2018). Chen, S., Welk, G. J., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Gentile, D. A., Lanningham-Foster, L., Rosenkranz, R. R., Vazou, S., Lee, J. A., Wolff, M., & Lukowski, R. (2018). Process Evaluation of the SWITCH Training Model for Enhancing School Wellness. International Society for Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity Annual Meeting, Hong Kong, China. Chen, S., Welk, G., Lee, J., Wolff, M., & Liu, Y. (2017). Learning energy balance knowledge in Switch Physical Education lessons. SHAPE America national convention, Boston, MA. Chen, S., Welk, G., Vazou, S., Lanningham-Foster, L., Gentile, D. A., Lee, J., Wolff, M., Dzewaltowski, D., & Rosenkranz, R. (2017). Description and evaluation of CSPAP training modules in the Switch. SHAPE America national convention, Boston, MA. Welk, G., Chen, S., Vazou, S., Lanningham-Foster, L., Gentile, D., Rosenkranz, R., & Dzewaltowski, D. (2016). Process evaluation of school modules designed to enhance the evidence-based SWITCH obesity prevention program. Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior. Washington, DC. (Abstract published in Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 48(7), S133). Nam, Y.H., Weber, T., Chen, S., & Welk, G.J. (2014). Formative evaluation of an online youth obesity prevention program: SWITCH. ACSM national convention, Orlando, FL. (Abstract published in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 46(5), S394). What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? The project has focused on the dissemination of the evidence-based SWITCH program. Over the course of the project, we have gradually transitioned the coordination of training and implementation to facilitate dissemination through the 4H Youth Development arm of the ISU Extension and Outreach program. An overall summary of the project is provided first followed by sections describing specific accomplishments for the triumvirate and intersecting goals of education, extension and research. Overview / Summary: We designed the enhanced version of SWITCH (School Wellness Integration Targeting Child Health) with dissemination in mind. Consistent with marketing and management recommendations for dissemination research, we re-branded switch as a 'process' instead of a 'program'. The underlying principles and themes were retained, but the focus of the rebranded "SWITCH" (School Wellness Integration Targeting Child Health) shifted the focus to helping schools to more effectively operationalize and sustain their own school wellness programming. Thus, through the project, we transformed Switch from an evidence-based intervention conducted through schools to an evidence-based process (SWITCH) developed to build capacity in schools. Specific Accomplishments for Each Objective: The Education components focused on building innovative curricular models that engaged teachers and school leaders in the process of running and sustaining their own programming. Modules were developed to assist schools in creating healthy environments, but the broader educational goals focused on building capacity for teams of school leaders to plan and lead school wellness programming on their own. Two specific accomplishments are highlighted below to document the tangible facets of our educational process. Integrated Web-Based Implementation System: A key to the success of the project was the development of a robust content-management system that allowed school leaders to use the system to run their own programming. The system integrated the curricular modules but also provided a hub for youth to learn self-monitoring skills through the online tracker tool. As depicted in the figure at right, the website system provided a robust communication tool to also facilitate communication between the school and the home environment. Development of Audit Tools: To build capacity within the schools, we utilized audit tools that helped schools learn to collect and use their own data over time. We developed and validated a new school wellness audit tool called the 'School Wellness Environment Profile' (SWEP) that enables schools assess their school wellness environment. We have also trained them to use the 'Youth Activity Profile' (YAP) to understand the needs of students. The assessments are built into the integrated web platform and customized reports are provided to assist in using the information. The integrated assessments in SWITCH are central to the long-term sustainability of our programming. Schools receive reports to assist with planning but we also utilize the outcomes as part of broader evaluation effort. The Extension components of the project were aimed at developing and evaluating innovative school-modules that will enable teachers and school wellness coalitions to take coordinated actions in creating healthier school environments as part of SWITCH programming. In early iterations of SWITCH, the members of the SWITCH expert team coordinated all of the training; however, we gradually evolved the model to enable it to be led more directly by our partners from the state 4H program run through ISU Extension. Two specific accomplishments related to this extension objective are summarized below. Collaborative Learning Environment: The focus of our project has been on building capacity for school wellness programming. We initiate training on SWITCH through our annual statewide school wellness conference that includes other leaders in wellness programming across the state. Through the project, we have created a collaborative learning environment that enables shared learning and continuous quality improvement for both schools (and for our project team). We promote communication across the network using the online 'community of practice' as well as through Facebook and other social media platforms. We have formalized the training experience so that teachers can now receive continuing education credits for completing SWITCH training. Formalized Collaboration with ISU 4-H Youth Development Program: The progression toward management and coordination by 4H evolved over the last 2-3 years of the project. Our leadership team is managed jointly by members from our research group and by 4H leaders and we have established a formal Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to enable collaborative project management and coordination of SWITCH over time. We have refined and operationalized the implementation process so that can be sustained over time and in ways that are consistent the mission, goals and objectives of 4-H. The revised implementation framework depicts the shared responsibility and coordination from the SWITCH expert team and the 4H Extension team and the specific strategies used to build capacity in school systems for sustained wellness programming over time. The Research components of the project have focused on determining the school-based factors needed for successful adoption, implementation, and maintenance of the programming. Through the training, schools were provided with guidelines for effective implementation (Quality Elements) as well as recommendations for impacting different settings in the school (Best Practices). However, school leaders were given flexibility in how to carry out and implement the programming in their own school. Implementation was facilitated with the use of a customized, web-based platform that allowed kids to complete online tracking of their behaviors. Teachers also had access to resources to complement programming but had latitude in how they were used. The standardized training process ensured that the approach can be systematically evaluated while the flexible implementation enables the programming to be tailored and customized to fit local needs and interests. Two specific accomplishments related to this research objective are summarized below. Dissemination of Research Findings: We followed a sequential series of implementation science studies that allowed us to test different assumptions or components of the project over time. Insights from the annual cycles of SWITCH implementation have allowed us to systematically refine the resources, training and assessment methods to help ensure effective dissemination across the state. We have published a number of prominent papers in peer-reviewed journals and have also shared our work at national meetings (e.g. Society for Nutrition Education Behavior - SNEB) and international conferences (e.g. International Society for Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity - ISBNPA) to ensure that the results also inform work by other researchers. Lists of published papers and presentations are summarized below. Preparation and Sharing of Research Briefs with Stakeholders: A barrier that potentially limits the translation of research to practice is the lack of communication of research findings with key stakeholders and program leaders. Extension leaders, public health leaders and school leaders may not have the access to publications in scientific journals. They also may not have the background or training to interpret and apply the information. To address this gap in research communication, we developed a series of research briefs that provide short summaries of research findings with each iteration of SWITCH. The briefs are available on our website (www.iowaswitch.org) to enable these reports to be broadly disseminated.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Accepted Year Published: 2021 Citation: 1. McLoughlin, G. M., Candal, P., Vazou, S., Lee, J. A., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Rosenkranz, R. R., Lanningham-Foster, L., Gentile, D.A., Liechty, L., Chen, S. & Welk, G. J. (2021). Evaluating the Implementation of the SWITCH� School Wellness Intervention and Capacity-Building Process through Multiple Methods. Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Accepted Year Published: 2021 Citation: 2. McLoughlin, G. M., Vazou, S., Liechty, L., Torbert, A., Lanningham-Foster, L., Rosenkranz, R. R., Dzewaltowski, D. A., and Welk, G. J. (2021) Transdisciplinary Approaches for the Dissemination of the SWITCH School Wellness Initiative through a Distributed 4-H / Extension Network. Child and Youth Care Forum.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: 3. Lee, J. A., McLoughlin, G. M., & Welk, G. J. (2020). School Wellness Environments: Perceptions Versus Realities. The Journal of School Nursing, 1059840520924453.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: 4. McLoughlin, G. M., Rosenkranz, R. R., Lee, J. A., Wolff, M. M., Chen, S., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Vazou, S., Lanningham-Foster, Gentile, D.A., Rosen, M.S. & Welk, G. J. (2019). The Importance of Self-Monitoring for Behavior Change in Youth: Findings from the SWITCH� School Wellness Feasibility Study. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(20), 3806.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2018 Citation: 5. Chen, S., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Rosenkranz, R.R., Lanningham-Foster, L., Vazou, S., Gentile, D. A., Lee, J. A., Braun, K. J., Wolff, M. M., & Welk, G. J. (2018). Feasibility study of the SWITCH implementation process for enhancing school wellness. BMC Public Health, 18:1119. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-6024-2.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2015 Citation: 6. Welk, G., Chen, S., Nam, Y., & Webber, T. (2015). A formative evaluation of the SWITCH program: The print versus online versions. BMC Obesity, 2, 20. doi:10.1186/s40608-015-0049-1.


Progress 03/01/15 to 02/25/21

Outputs
Target Audience:Our research team has most directly reached and impacted school leaders. We have continued to enroll schools into the project and conducted our annual SWITCH school wellness conference to initiate training and programming. We have nearly doubled enrollment in each iteration of SWITCH and have worked with approximately 50 schools in our most recent iterations. The intentional transition to dissemination through 4H will enable us to continue to support schools over time since they have incorporated the delivery of SWITCH into their overall programming. While children are the ultimate target of the SWITCH intervention, we work through extension leaders to build capacity in school leaders since they can influence youth more directly. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The project supported training and professional development for both students mentored by our research team as well as for Extension 4-H leaders involved in the dissemination effort. We will provide an overview of the training and implementation process first followed by a summary of the students that received triaining through the project. Overview: An established training and implementation model developed by a member of our team (Dzewaltowski) provided a guide for the training and implementation model used in the project. However, adaptations and refinement were needed prior to broad dissemination efforts with the project. After developing and refining the modules and methods, we conducted a series of implementation studies in three subsequent iterations of SWITCH (2016-2018) to sequentially test and refine various aspects of the implementation model, the web-based platform used to engage the students and the integrated assessment tools used to evaluate school capacity and environments. These studies collectively documented the feasibility and utility of the capacity-building process for schools. However, a final step in the progression of our work was to build capacity in training hubs that could serve and support schools across the state. To ensure sustainability, a formalized partnership was established with the 4H Youth Development program which is coordinated across the state through the university-based Extension and Outreach network. The mission of 4H ("engaging youth to reach their fullest potential while advancing the field of youth development") was a natural match for the focus of SWITCH since they already supported a specific line of healthy living initiatives. The 4H program emphasis on positive youth development and family engagement was also consistent with goals of SWITCH which emphasize working through schools to also reach the home environment. Most importantly, the 4H group provided a way to more effectively disseminate SWITCH since there are County Youth Coordinators (CYC) in each of the 99 counties that support 4H programming. The county-based 4H network is supported by an integrated team of Youth Program Specialists (YPS) on a regional level and by state leaders affiliated with the University so communication channels were already established for this partnership. However, it was important to build interest and involvement over time since the county-based extension leaders are supervised and paid by their local County Extension Council and not through the University. Thus, the degree of engagement with SWITCH was contingent on how SWITCH programming fit with each counties' needs, interests and resources. In the final phases of our SWITCH project (2019 and 2020 - extensions), we focused our work on transdisciplinary approaches to promote interest and engagement in the distributed county-based 4H Extension network. Transdisciplinarity in this context captures the synergies and reciprocal relationships between the state 4H network and the regional / county staff since engagement at the county level was purely voluntary. We conducted a robust process evaluation to document the degree of engagement of state 4H staff in the optional training opportunities and then evaluated the impact of involvement from the perspective of both the 4H staff and the school leaders running SWITCH. The published paper on the transdisciplinary partnerships and engagement of county-based 4-H extension leaders in the dissemination of SWITCH provides an effective summary of our work on SWITCH since it documents the process that we followed to ensure good coordination and communication through this distributed network over time. Student Training Outcomes The project has been managed by the same team of 7 Ph.D. level faculty investigators but several have moved to new institutions. There are now 4 from Iowa State University (Greg Welk, Lorraine Lanningham-Foster, Douglas Gentile and Spyridoula Vazou), one from Louisiana State University (Senlin Chen), one from Kansas State University (Ric Rosenkranz) and one from the University of Nebraska Medical Center (David Dzewaltowski). The faculty individually and collectively oversee a team of graduate students that work on various subcommittees to help faculty coordinators carry out the tasks on the project. The compiled summary of students that have made major contributions to the project and/or completed research through SWITCH are summarized below: Undergraduate Honor Students Andi Luth (Evaluation of the Youth Activity Profile tool) M.S. Students Kim Klimesh (Validation of Nutrition YAP items) Tara Weber (Development of Video Materials) Rachel Lukowski (Evaluation of Motivational Interviewing) Katherine Long (Evaluation of Classroom Activities) Ivy Lou (Evaluation of Plate Waste) Rebecca Harken (Evaluation of Community of Practice) Kyle Braun - KSU (Evaluation of the Youth Activity Profile) Ph.D. Students Maren Wolff, M.S. RDN, LD (Evaluation of the FNPA tool) Joey Lee M.S. (Development of School Wellness Audit Tool) Yaunying Lou (Ivy), M.S. (Evaluation of Plate Waste) Post Doc Students Gabriella McLoughlin How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?We have published our research findings in scientific (peer-reviewed) journals and have also presented our work at a number of scientific meetings. However, we also took steps to ensure that the results of our work could be more accessible to other stakeholders. Thus, we developed a series of simple 1 page "Research Briefs" that are available on our website. The briefs summarize the outcomes and explain the importance of the specific studies to the overall project. The main outcomes of papers and presentations are summarized below: Published Papers: McLoughlin, G. M., Candal, P., Vazou, S., Lee, J. A., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Rosenkranz, R. R., Lanningham-Foster, L., Gentile, D.A., Liechty, L., Chen, S. & Welk, G. J. (2021). Evaluating the Implementation of the SWITCH® School Wellness Intervention and Capacity-Building Process through Multiple Methods. Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. McLoughlin, G. M., Vazou, S., Liechty, L., Torbert, A., Lanningham-Foster, L., Rosenkranz, R. R., Dzewaltowski, D. A., and Welk, G. J. (2021) Transdisciplinary Approaches for the Dissemination of the SWITCH School Wellness Initiative through a Distributed 4-H / Extension Network. Child and Youth Care Forum. Lee, J. A., McLoughlin, G. M., & Welk, G. J. (2020). School Wellness Environments: Perceptions Versus Realities. The Journal of School Nursing, 1059840520924453. McLoughlin, G. M., Rosenkranz, R. R., Lee, J. A., Wolff, M. M., Chen, S., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Vazou, S., Lanningham-Foster, Gentile, D.A., Rosen, M.S. & Welk, G. J. (2019). The Importance of Self-Monitoring for Behavior Change in Youth: Findings from the SWITCH® School Wellness Feasibility Study. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(20), 3806. Chen, S., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Rosenkranz, R.R., Lanningham-Foster, L., Vazou, S., Gentile, D. A., Lee, J. A., Braun, K. J., Wolff, M. M., & Welk, G. J. (2018). Feasibility study of the SWITCH implementation process for enhancing school wellness. BMC Public Health, 18:1119. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-6024-2. Welk, G., Chen, S., Nam, Y., & Webber, T. (2015). A formative evaluation of the SWITCH program: The print versus online versions. BMC Obesity, 2, 20. doi:10.1186/s40608-015-0049-1. Conference Presentations Rosenkranz RR, Dixon P, Dzewaltowski DA, McLoughlin G, Lee JA, Chen S, Vazou S, Lanningham-Foster L, Gentile DA, Welk GJ (2021). A cluster-randomized trial assessing comparative effectiveness of two SWITCH implementation processes for school wellness programming. Presentation proposed for the 2021 ISBNPA Meeting. Welk, G.J. and McLoughlin, G.M. (2020). Implementation and scaling of SWITCH (School Wellness Integration Targeting Child Health). Presentation for a research symposium at the International Society for Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (online presentation) McLoughlin, G.M, Candal, P., Vazou, S., Lee, J.A., Rosenkranz, R.R., Dzewaltowski, D.A., Lanningham-Foster, L., Gentile, D.A., Dixon, P., Chen, S., Welk, G.J. (2020). Evaluation of School Wellness Integration Targeting Child Health (SWITCH®) Program Dissemination and Implementation through a Mixed Methods Approach. International Society for Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (online presentation). McLoughlin, G., Welk, G. How do we achieve systems-level change to promote physical activity and health behavior in schools? Insights from dissemination of the SWITCH® program. Presentation at Integrated Public Health-Aligned Physical Education (IPHPE), 2019 meeting, Columbia SC. Lee, J. A., Lanningham-Foster, L. M., S., Vazou, S., Wolff, M. M., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Rosenkranz, R. R., Gentile, D. A., Chen, S., Liechty, L., Torbert, A., Welk, G. J. (2019). Effect of School- and Staff-Level Capacity on Wellness Program Implementation. Paper to be presented at the 2019 SHAPE America Annual meeting in Tampa, FL. McLoughlin, G. M., Lee, J. A., Lanningham-Foster, L. M., Gentile, D. A., Chen, S., Vazou, S., Wolff, M. M., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Rosenkranz, R. R., Liechty, L., Torbert, A., Welk, G. J. (2019). School Wellness Integration Targeting Child Health (SWITCH): A Model for Training and Dissemination. Paper to be presented at the 2019 SHAPE America Annual meeting in Tampa, FL. Lou, Y., Wu, H., Welk, G., Vazou, S., Chen, S., Gentile, D., Rosenkranz, R., Dzewaltowski, D., & Lanningham-Foster, L. (2019). Changes in energy and nutrient selection in school lunches: Findings from the SWITCH intervention. ISBNPA annual meeting, Prague, Czech Republic. McLoughlin, G. M., Lee, J. A., Lanningham-Foster, L., Gentile, D. A., Chen, S., Vazou, S., Wolff, M. M., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Rosenkranz, R. R., Liechty, L., Torbert, A., & Welk, G. J. (2019). School Wellness Integration Targeting Child Health (SWITCH): Process evaluation of implementation using mixed methods. ISBNPA annual meeting, Prague, Czech Republic. Rosenkranz, R., McLoughlin, G. M., Dzewaltowski, D., Lee, J., Wolff, M., Rosen, M., Chen, S., Vazou, S., Lanningham-Foster, L., Gentile, D., & Welk, G. (2019). Self-monitoring of physical activity and sedentary behavior within a whole-of-school intervention: Findings from the SWITCH Feasibility Study. ISBNPA annual meeting, Prague, Czech Republic. Lou, Y., Wu, H., Welk, G., Vazou, S., Chen, S., Gentile, D. A., Rosenkranz, R., Dzewaltowski, D., & Lanningham-Foster, L. (2018). The SWITCH® Implementation Process on School Lunch Consumption Patterns and Plate Waste. Paper presented at the 2018 Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior (SNEB) 51st Annual Conference, Minneapolis, MN (Abstract published in Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 50 (7), S167-‌S168, 2018). Welk, G. J., Lanningham-Foster, L., Vazou, S., Gentile, D., Chen, S., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Rosenkranz, R. R., Lee, J., Wolff, M., Braun, K. J. (2018). Feasibility of the SWITCH Implementation Framework for Enhancing School Wellness. Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior Annual Conference, Minneapolis, MN. (Abstract published in Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 50 (7), S115-‌S116, 2018). Chen, S., Welk, G. J., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Gentile, D. A., Lanningham-Foster, L., Rosenkranz, R. R., Vazou, S., Lee, J. A., Wolff, M., & Lukowski, R. (2018). Process Evaluation of the SWITCH Training Model for Enhancing School Wellness. International Society for Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity Annual Meeting, Hong Kong, China. Chen, S., Welk, G., Lee, J., Wolff, M., & Liu, Y. (2017). Learning energy balance knowledge in Switch Physical Education lessons. SHAPE America national convention, Boston, MA. Chen, S., Welk, G., Vazou, S., Lanningham-Foster, L., Gentile, D. A., Lee, J., Wolff, M., Dzewaltowski, D., & Rosenkranz, R. (2017). Description and evaluation of CSPAP training modules in the Switch. SHAPE America national convention, Boston, MA. Welk, G., Chen, S., Vazou, S., Lanningham-Foster, L., Gentile, D., Rosenkranz, R., & Dzewaltowski, D. (2016). Process evaluation of school modules designed to enhance the evidence-based SWITCH obesity prevention program. Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior. Washington, DC. (Abstract published in Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 48(7), S133). Nam, Y.H., Weber, T., Chen, S., & Welk, G.J. (2014). Formative evaluation of an online youth obesity prevention program: SWITCH. ACSM national convention, Orlando, FL. (Abstract published in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 46(5), S394). What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? The project has focused on the dissemination of the evidence-based SWITCH program. Over the course of the project, we have gradually transitioned the coordination of training and implementation to facilitate dissemination through the 4H Youth Development arm of the ISU Extension and Outreach program. An overall summary of the project is provided first followed by sections describing specific accomplishments for the triumvirate and intersecting goals of education, extension and research. Overview / Summary: We designed the enhanced version of SWITCH (School Wellness Integration Targeting Child Health) with dissemination in mind. Consistent with marketing and management recommendations for dissemination research, we re-branded switch as a 'process' instead of a 'program'. The underlying principles and themes were retained, but the focus of the rebranded "SWITCH" (School Wellness Integration Targeting Child Health) shifted the focus to helping schools to more effectively operationalize and sustain their own school wellness programming. Thus, through the project, we transformed Switch from an evidence-based intervention conducted through schools to an evidence-based process (SWITCH) developed to build capacity in schools. Specific Accomplishments for Each Objective: The Education components focused on building innovative curricular models that engaged teachers and school leaders in the process of running and sustaining their own programming. Modules were developed to assist schools in creating healthy environments, but the broader educational goals focused on building capacity for teams of school leaders to plan and lead school wellness programming on their own. Two specific accomplishments are highlighted below to document the tangible facets of our educational process. Integrated Web-Based Implementation System: A key to the success of the project was the development of a robust content-management system that allowed school leaders to use the system to run their own programming. The system integrated the curricular modules but also provided a hub for youth to learn self-monitoring skills through the online tracker tool. As depicted in the figure at right, the website system provided a robust communication tool to also facilitate communication between the school and the home environment. Development of Audit Tools: To build capacity within the schools, we utilized audit tools that helped schools learn to collect and use their own data over time. We developed and validated a new school wellness audit tool called the 'School Wellness Environment Profile' (SWEP) that enables schools assess their school wellness environment. We have also trained them to use the 'Youth Activity Profile' (YAP) to understand the needs of students. The assessments are built into the integrated web platform and customized reports are provided to assist in using the information. The integrated assessments in SWITCH are central to the long-term sustainability of our programming. Schools receive reports to assist with planning but we also utilize the outcomes as part of broader evaluation effort. The Extension components of the project were aimed at developing and evaluating innovative school-modules that will enable teachers and school wellness coalitions to take coordinated actions in creating healthier school environments as part of SWITCH programming. In early iterations of SWITCH, the members of the SWITCH expert team coordinated all of the training; however, we gradually evolved the model to enable it to be led more directly by our partners from the state 4H program run through ISU Extension. Two specific accomplishments related to this extension objective are summarized below. Collaborative Learning Environment: The focus of our project has been on building capacity for school wellness programming. We initiate training on SWITCH through our annual statewide school wellness conference that includes other leaders in wellness programming across the state. Through the project, we have created a collaborative learning environment that enables shared learning and continuous quality improvement for both schools (and for our project team). We promote communication across the network using the online 'community of practice' as well as through Facebook and other social media platforms. We have formalized the training experience so that teachers can now receive continuing education credits for completing SWITCH training. Formalized Collaboration with ISU 4-H Youth Development Program: The progression toward management and coordination by 4H evolved over the last 2-3 years of the project. Our leadership team is managed jointly by members from our research group and by 4H leaders and we have established a formal Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to enable collaborative project management and coordination of SWITCH over time. We have refined and operationalized the implementation process so that can be sustained over time and in ways that are consistent the mission, goals and objectives of 4-H. The revised implementation framework depicts the shared responsibility and coordination from the SWITCH expert team and the 4H Extension team and the specific strategies used to build capacity in school systems for sustained wellness programming over time. The Research components of the project have focused on determining the school-based factors needed for successful adoption, implementation, and maintenance of the programming. Through the training, schools were provided with guidelines for effective implementation (Quality Elements) as well as recommendations for impacting different settings in the school (Best Practices). However, school leaders were given flexibility in how to carry out and implement the programming in their own school. Implementation was facilitated with the use of a customized, web-based platform that allowed kids to complete online tracking of their behaviors. Teachers also had access to resources to complement programming but had latitude in how they were used. The standardized training process ensured that the approach can be systematically evaluated while the flexible implementation enables the programming to be tailored and customized to fit local needs and interests. Two specific accomplishments related to this research objective are summarized below. Dissemination of Research Findings: We followed a sequential series of implementation science studies that allowed us to test different assumptions or components of the project over time. Insights from the annual cycles of SWITCH implementation have allowed us to systematically refine the resources, training and assessment methods to help ensure effective dissemination across the state. We have published a number of prominent papers in peer-reviewed journals and have also shared our work at national meetings (e.g. Society for Nutrition Education Behavior - SNEB) and international conferences (e.g. International Society for Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity - ISBNPA) to ensure that the results also inform work by other researchers. Lists of published papers and presentations are summarized below. Preparation and Sharing of Research Briefs with Stakeholders: A barrier that potentially limits the translation of research to practice is the lack of communication of research findings with key stakeholders and program leaders. Extension leaders, public health leaders and school leaders may not have the access to publications in scientific journals. They also may not have the background or training to interpret and apply the information. To address this gap in research communication, we developed a series of research briefs that provide short summaries of research findings with each iteration of SWITCH. The briefs are available on our website (www.iowaswitch.org) to enable these reports to be broadly disseminated.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2018 Citation: 5. Chen, S., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Rosenkranz, R.R., Lanningham-Foster, L., Vazou, S., Gentile, D. A., Lee, J. A., Braun, K. J., Wolff, M. M., & Welk, G. J. (2018). Feasibility study of the SWITCH implementation process for enhancing school wellness. BMC Public Health, 18:1119. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-6024-2.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Accepted Year Published: 2021 Citation: 1. McLoughlin, G. M., Candal, P., Vazou, S., Lee, J. A., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Rosenkranz, R. R., Lanningham-Foster, L., Gentile, D.A., Liechty, L., Chen, S. & Welk, G. J. (2021). Evaluating the Implementation of the SWITCH� School Wellness Intervention and Capacity-Building Process through Multiple Methods. Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Accepted Year Published: 2021 Citation: 2. McLoughlin, G. M., Vazou, S., Liechty, L., Torbert, A., Lanningham-Foster, L., Rosenkranz, R. R., Dzewaltowski, D. A., and Welk, G. J. (2021) Transdisciplinary Approaches for the Dissemination of the SWITCH School Wellness Initiative through a Distributed 4-H / Extension Network. Child and Youth Care Forum.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2020 Citation: 3. Lee, J. A., McLoughlin, G. M., & Welk, G. J. (2020). School Wellness Environments: Perceptions Versus Realities. The Journal of School Nursing, 1059840520924453.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2015 Citation: 6. Welk, G., Chen, S., Nam, Y., & Webber, T. (2015). A formative evaluation of the SWITCH program: The print versus online versions. BMC Obesity, 2, 20. doi:10.1186/s40608-015-0049-1.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: 4. McLoughlin, G. M., Rosenkranz, R. R., Lee, J. A., Wolff, M. M., Chen, S., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Vazou, S., Lanningham-Foster, Gentile, D.A., Rosen, M.S. & Welk, G. J. (2019). The Importance of Self-Monitoring for Behavior Change in Youth: Findings from the SWITCH� School Wellness Feasibility Study. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(20), 3806.


Progress 03/01/19 to 02/29/20

Outputs
Target Audience:Our research team has continued to work to facilitate the ongoing dissemination of SWITCH. We have continued to enroll schools into the project and conducted our annual SWITCH school wellness conference to initiate training and programming. We have nearly doubled enrollment in each iteration of SWITCH and enrolled 39 schools in the 2019 iteration. The intentional transition to dissemination through 4H will enable us to continue to reach more schools with each subsequent year and to sustain it over time. We are currently working with over 50 schools in the 2020 iteration. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The project has proceeded as planned and we have been moving systematically towards structures to promote long term sustainability. We have fully integrated the project within the 4H youth development program managed by ISU Extension. We have provided funding to support the transition and have signed a formal Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that documents the long-term commitment of 4H to sustain the SWITCH project. The agreement will enable us to fully transition the responsibilities of programming to 4H after the project is completed but it is important to retain the strong evaluation component and ensure that the results from the work can be summarized and published. The evidence-base of the original Switch program was one of the strengths of our original proposal so it is important to maintain the evidence-base that now supports the dissemination of the training model that we have developed. Our research team will continue to work collaboratively on the project and we will continue to oversee education, extension and research goals but this partnership will help to ensure long-term sustainability. It will also facilitate broader dissemination since Extension has connections across the state. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Our research team has continued to work to facilitate the ongoing dissemination of SWITCH. We have continued to enroll schools into the project and conducted our annual SWITCH school wellness conference to initiate training and programming. We have nearly doubled enrollment in each iteration of SWITCH and enrolled 39 schools in the 2019 iteration. The intentional transition to dissemination through 4H will enable us to continue to reach more schools with each subsequent year and to sustain it over time. We are currently working with over 50 schools in the 2020 iteration. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?This year, we will continue to transition the project toward broader dissemination. We are working to submit a proposal to allow us study the multi-state dissemination of SWITCH so continued funding would help to keep our team engaged and focused in this work. We have a number of papers to finish writing so we will also be finalizing papers.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? The focus of the project was on the dissemination of an evidence-based obesity prevention program called Switch ®. The original program, based on social-ecological principles, worked through schools and families to help youth to "Switch what they Do, View and Chew" (Eisenmann et al., 2008; Gentile et al., 2009). While effective in concept, the original print-based program was too costly for broader adoption. A formative evaluation demonstrated similar utility compared with the original resource-intensive program (Welk et al., 2014) but it also demonstrated that highly engaged teachers were more successful in influencing parent / child recruitment and participation in the Switch program. Therefore, the focus of our dissemination project was on developing and evaluating training methods needed to engage and support school wellness leaders in managing the program on their own. The omnibus hypothesis of the project was that the Switch program can be enhanced, and be more readily sustained, when school-based modules and training are provided to more directly engage school personnel in the coordination of the project. SWITCH (School Wellness Integration Targeting Child Health) was designed from the beginning with dissemination in mind. Consistent with marketing and management recommendations for dissemination (Kreuter et al. 2015), we re-branded switch as a 'process' instead of a 'program'. The underlying principles and themes were retained, but the focus of the rebranded "SWITCH" (School Wellness Integration Targeting Child Health) shifted the focus to helping schools to more effectively operationalize and sustain their own school wellness programming. Thus, through the project, we transformed Switch from an evidence-based intervention conducted through schools to an evidence-based process (SWITCH) developed to build capacity in schools. An established training and implementation model developed by a member of our team (Dzewaltowski) provided a guide for this transition, but adaptations and refinement were needed prior to broad dissemination efforts with the project. After developing and refining the modules and methods, we conducted a series of implementation studies in three subsequent iterations of SWITCH (2016-2018) to sequentially test and refine various aspects of the implementation model, the web-based platform used to engage the students and the integrated assessment tools used to evaluate school capacity and environments. These studies collectively document the feasibility and utility of the capacity-building process for schools. However, a final step in the progression of our work was to build capacity in training hubs that could serve and support schools across the state. To ensure sustainability, a formalized partnership was established with the 4H Youth Development program which is coordinated across the state through the university-based Extension and Outreach network. The mission of 4H ("engaging youth to reach their fullest potential while advancing the field of youth development") was a natural match for the focus of SWITCH since they already supported a specific line of healthy living initiatives. The 4H program emphasis on positive youth development and family engagement was also consistent with goals of SWITCH which emphasize working through schools to also reach the home environment. Most importantly, the 4H group provided a way to more effectively disseminate SWITCH since there are County Youth Coordinators (CYC) in each of the 99 counties that support 4H programming. The county-based 4H network is supported by an integrated team of Youth Program Specialists (YPS) on a regional level and by state leaders affiliated with the University so communication channels were already established for this partnership. However, it was important to build interest and involvement over time since the county-based extension leaders are supervised and paid by their local County Extension Council and not through the University. Thus, the degree of engagement with SWITCH was contingent on how SWITCH programming fit with each counties' needs, interests and resources. In our most recent iteration of SWITCH (Spring 2019), we focused our work on evaluating the transdisciplinary, capacitybuilding approaches used to promote interest and engagement in the distributed county-based 4H Extension network. Transdisciplinarity in this context captures the synergies and reciprocal relationships between the state 4H network and the regional / county staff since engagement at the county level was purely voluntary. We conducted a robust process evaluation to document the degree of engagement of state 4H staff in the optional training opportunities and then evaluated the impact of involvement from the perspective of both the 4H staff and the school leaders running SWITCH. The results have supported the importance of 4H involvement and we have continued to work with the 4H leaders to ensure good coordination and communication through this distributed network over time.

Publications


    Progress 03/01/18 to 02/28/19

    Outputs
    Target Audience:The project has focused on the dissemination of the evidence-based SWITCH program. Over the past year, we continued to transition the coordination of training and implementation process to enable ongoing dissemination through the 4H Youth Development arm of the ISU Extension and Outreach program. We focused the most recent evaluation effort on specifically evaluating the impact of Extension involvement in supporting the school-based, wellness programmingeach. Reports on this round of research are still being finalized for publication but we have successfully accomplished the triumvirate and intersecting research, extension and educational goals of the original project. We are working to continue transferring roles to Extension and will be finalizing analyses and manuscripts.. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The project has proceeded as planned and we have been moving systematically towards structures to promote long term sustainability. We have fully integrated the project within the 4H youth development program managed by ISU Extension. We have provided funding to support the transition and have signed a formal Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that documents the long-term commitment of 4H to sustain the SWITCH project. The agreement will enable us to fully transition the responsibilities of programming to 4H after the project is completed but it is important to retain the strong evaluation component and ensure that the results from the work can be summarized and published. The evidence-base of the original Switch program was one of the strengths of our original proposal so it is important to maintain the evidence-base that now supports the dissemination of the training model that we have developed. Our research team will continue to work collaboratively on the project and we will continue to oversee education, extension and research goals but this partnership will help to ensure long-term sustainability. It will also facilitate broader dissemination since Extension has connections across the state. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Our research team has continued to work to facilitate the ongoing dissemination of SWITCH. We have continued to enroll schools into the project and conducted our annual SWITCH school wellness conference to initiate training and programming. We have nearly doubled enrollment in each iteration of SWITCH and enrolled 39 schools in the 2019 iteration. The intentional transition to dissemination through 4H will enable us to continue to reach more schools with each subsequent year and to sustain it over time. We are currently working with over 50 schools in the 2020 iteration. ? What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?This year, we will continue to transition the project toward broader dissemination. We are working to submit a proposal to allow us study the multi-state dissemination of SWITCH so continued funding would help to keep our team engaged and focused in this work. We have a number of papers to finish writing so we will also be finalizing papers.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? The focus of the project was on the dissemination of an evidence-based obesity prevention program called Switch ®. The original program, based on social-ecological principles, worked through schools and families to help youth to "Switch what they Do, View and Chew" (Eisenmann et al., 2008; Gentile et al., 2009). While effective in concept, the original print-based program was too costly for broader adoption. A formative evaluation demonstrated similar utility compared with the original resource-intensive program (Welk et al., 2014) but it also demonstrated that highly engaged teachers were more successful in influencing parent / child recruitment and participation in the Switch program. Therefore, the focus of our dissemination project was on developing and evaluating training methods needed to engage and support school wellness leaders in managing the program on their own. The omnibus hypothesis of the project was that the Switch program can be enhanced, and be more readily sustained, when school-based modules and training are provided to more directly engage school personnel in the coordination of the project. SWITCH (School Wellness Integration Targeting Child Health) was designed from the beginning with dissemination in mind. Consistent with marketing and management recommendations for dissemination (Kreuter et al. 2015), we re-branded switch as a 'process' instead of a 'program'. The underlying principles and themes were retained, but the focus of the rebranded "SWITCH" (School Wellness Integration Targeting Child Health) shifted the focus to helping schools to more effectively operationalize and sustain their own school wellness programming. Thus, through the project, we transformed Switch from an evidence-based intervention conducted through schools to an evidence-based process (SWITCH) developed to build capacity in schools. An established training and implementation model developed by a member of our team (Dzewaltowski) provided a guide for this transition, but adaptations and refinement were needed prior to broad dissemination efforts with the project. After developing and refining the modules and methods, we conducted a series of implementation studies in three subsequent iterations of SWITCH (2016-2018) to sequentially test and refine various aspects of the implementation model, the web-based platform used to engage the students and the integrated assessment tools used to evaluate school capacity and environments. These studies collectively document the feasibility and utility of the capacity-building process for schools. However, a final step in the progression of our work was to build capacity in training hubs that could serve and support schools across the state. To ensure sustainability, a formalized partnership was established with the 4H Youth Development program which is coordinated across the state through the university-based Extension and Outreach network. The mission of 4H ("engaging youth to reach their fullest potential while advancing the field of youth development") was a natural match for the focus of SWITCH since they already supported a specific line of healthy living initiatives. The 4H program emphasis on positive youth development and family engagement was also consistent with goals of SWITCH which emphasize working through schools to also reach the home environment. Most importantly, the 4H group provided a way to more effectively disseminate SWITCH since there are County Youth Coordinators (CYC) in each of the 99 counties that support 4H programming. The county-based 4H network is supported by an integrated team of Youth Program Specialists (YPS) on a regional level and by state leaders affiliated with the University so communication channels were already established for this partnership. However, it was important to build interest and involvement over time since the county-based extension leaders are supervised and paid by their local County Extension Council and not through the University. Thus, the degree of engagement with SWITCH was contingent on how SWITCH programming fit with each counties' needs, interests and resources. In our most recent iteration of SWITCH (Spring 2019), we focused our work on evaluating the transdisciplinary, capacity-building approaches used to promote interest and engagement in the distributed county-based 4H Extension network. Transdisciplinarity in this context captures the synergies and reciprocal relationships between the state 4H network and the regional / county staff since engagement at the county level was purely voluntary. We conducted a robust process evaluation to document the degree of engagement of state 4H staff in the optional training opportunities and then evaluated the impact of involvement from the perspective of both the 4H staff and the school leaders running SWITCH. The results have supported the importance of 4H involvement and we have continued to work with the 4H leaders to ensure good coordination and communication through this distributed network over time.

    Publications

    • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: 1. Lee, J. A., Lanningham-Foster, L. M., S., Vazou, S., Wolff, M. M., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Rosenkranz, R. R., Gentile, D. A., Chen, S., Liechty, L., Torbert, A., Welk, G. J. (2019). Effect of School- and Staff-Level Capacity on Wellness Program Implementation. Paper presented at the 2019 SHAPE America Annual meeting in Tampa, FL.
    • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: 2. McLoughlin, G. M., Lee, J. A., Lanningham-Foster, L. M., Gentile, D. A., Chen, S., Vazou, S., Wolff, M. M., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Rosenkranz, R. R., Liechty, L., Torbert, A., Welk, G. J. (2019). School Wellness Integration Targeting Child Health (SWITCH): A Model for Training and Dissemination. Paper presented at the 2019 SHAPE America Annual meeting in Tampa, FL.
    • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: 3. Lou, Y., Wu, H., Welk, G., Vazou, S., Chen, S., Gentile, D., Rosenkranz, R., Dzewaltowski, D., & Lanningham-Foster, L. (2019). Changes in energy and nutrient selection in school lunches: Findings from the SWITCH intervention. Paper presented at the 2019 ISBNPA annual meeting at Prague, Czech Republic.
    • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: 4. McLoughlin, G. M., Lee, J. A., Lanningham-Foster, L., Gentile, D. A., Chen, S., Vazou, S., Wolff, M. M., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Rosenkranz, R. R., Liechty, L., Torbert, A., & Welk, G. J. (2019). School Wellness Integration Targeting Child Health (SWITCH): Process evaluation of implementation using mixed methods. Paper presented at the 2019 ISBNPA annual meeting at Prague, Czech Republic.
    • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: 5. Rosenkranz, R., McLoughlin, G. M., Dzewaltowski, D., Lee, J., Wolff, M., Rosen, M., Chen, S., Vazou, S., Lanningham-Foster, L., Gentile, D., & Welk, G. (2019). Self-monitoring of physical activity and sedentary behavior within a whole-of-school intervention: Findings from the SWITCH Feasibility Study. Paper presented at the 2019 ISBNPA annual meeting at Prague, Czech Republic.
    • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2018 Citation: " Chen, S., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Rosenkranz, R. R., Lanningham-Foster, L., Vazou, S., Gentile, D. A., & Welk, G. J. (2018). Feasibility study of the SWITCH implementation process for enhancing school wellness. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 1119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6024-2
    • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2019 Citation: " McLoughlin, G. M., Rosenkranz, R. R., Lee, J. A., Wolff, M. M., Chen, S., Dzewaltowski, D. A., & Welk, G. J. (2019). The Importance of self-monitoring for behavior change in youth: Findings from the SWITCH� school wellness feasibility study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(20), 3806.
    • Type: Journal Articles Status: Accepted Year Published: 2020 Citation: McLoughlin, G. M., Vazou, S., Liechty, L., Torbert, A., Lanningham-Foster, L., Rosenkranz, R. R., Dzewaltowski, D. A., and Welk, G. J. Transdisciplinary approaches for the dissemination of the SWITCH school wellness initiative through a distributed 4-H / extension network. Child & Youth Care Forum.


    Progress 03/01/17 to 02/28/18

    Outputs
    Target Audience:The target audience in SWITCH is young, elementary school children (grades 4 and 5); the more proximal target of our programming continues to be school wellness leaders since we are focused on developing training and support mechanisms to facilitate sustainable school wellness programming. Thus, the focus of our work (as a dissemination-based study) is to evaluate factors that influence the successful adoption, implementation and maintenance of the SWITCH programming in schools. The focus this past year was on refining our training model and methods prior to the full evaluation of our project in 2018. A total of 8 new schools participated in the pilot study in 2017 and the results were summarized in our final report. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?We have had good feedback from the school wellness conferences we have hosted to promote and launch SWITCH and have now formally integrated the conference into our annual cycle of programming. The conference provides schools with a chance to receive updated information on school wellness policies and requirements through our partnership with Team Nutrition. It also provides opportunities for us to share the SWITCH approach with school leaders and to promote broader adoption of the programming across the state. Schools with prior experience with SWITCH are also invited to share their experiences with SWITCH to promote peer-education and sharing. This type of sharing will be expanded as our base of "SWITCH" schools grows. We plan to continue to offer the conference every Fall to kick off the subsequent launch of the Spring SWITCH program in the state. This past November, we hosted teams from 24 schools and these schools are now being trained to implement SWITCH this coming Spring in the 2018 implementation cycle. We have also enhanced the structure and plans for the online 'community of practice' network and this will be more formally evaluated in the 2018 version of SWITCH. We envision providing CEU (Continuing Education Units) credits for teachers to further solidify the educational outcomes from our project. We are also building pre-service education into our project to provide experience with research and school wellness to undergraduate and graduate students. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?This past year, we established a formalized partnership with the state 4H program run through ISU Extension and Outreach and have worked to initiate training of 4H leaders across the state. Extension leaders have from ISU have been fully integrated into our project team and we have worked with them to facilitate training of regional and county extension leaders to facilitate the broader dissemination plan. Extension leaders handled the recruitment of the schools for 2018 and they are handling the training of school leaders for our 2018 model. A separate website has been developed to provide exposure to County Youth Coordinators to assist them in promoting SWITCH more locally within each county. Plans are in place to develop regular blogs and to build a social media presence so that we can build visibility in local communities. Thus, we are now transitioning to the intended dissemination model in which training and dissemination will occur through an Extension-based training hub. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?The pilot testing from 2017 provided valuable insights that have helped us further refine our training methods and our methods to evaluate change. We are now positioned to conduct a more formalized evaluation in 2018 that will compare two different training methods. Details are below: The planned study in 2018 will adopt a "Hybrid 3 Design" which will allow us to refine methods while also evaluating outcomes. We will use a clustered randomized design to allow us to specifically test the additive benefits from 4H engagement in SWITCH programming. All schools will receive the same standardized training on SWITCH and all will have support from their local county 4H leader, but half of the schools will be guided to launch school-based 4H clubs to help supplement and enhance SWITCH engagement in schools. The measures used in the evaluation will capture data at multiple levels (school, class and student) to enable us to understand the impact of the training on the school wellness system as well as the moderating influence from extension involvement. We also will capture data on the home environment to understand the moderating influence from parent engagement. The planned evaluation for 2018 will enable our team to answer a number of new research questions that will enhance our understanding of factors needed to facilitate effective dissemination of the programming through our 4H-based training model. A list of specific research questions planned for the coming year are summarized below: Does 4H support enhance implementation/outcomes? Does county youth extension engagement moderate effectiveness Does school environment moderate successful implementation of SWITCH? Does engagement (school, class, student) influence SWITCH outcomes?\ The 2018 project will provide a primary test of our research objectives. However, a value of our evaluation model is that we can expand the work and study the same outcomes as we expand the scope and reach of SWITCH programming.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? The emphasis this past year has been on developing and evaluating training models to facilitate the effective dissemination of the evidence-based SWITCH program. The previous iteration of SWITCH (Spring 2016) provided valuable insights into how program delivery and implementation can be further enhanced. The website was a limiting factor so we worked with our internal web-development group on campus to build a more comprehensive content management system (CMS) to help enhance school programming. We also learned that we needed to more effectively engage and motivate schools to take action (i.e. the school wellness team needed to be the agents of change). Therefore, the focus of the Spring 2017 pilot was on developing and testing methods to enable schools to run SWITCH on their own. We refined the modules to make them more concise, simpler, and easier to use. We also further refined the training model to promote more effective coordination in schools. One key change in the approach is that we stipulated that schools would be required to enroll a "team" of 3 school leaders to qualify for the study (instead of a single coordinator). Another key change is that we focused on building capacity and promoting autonomy within the school team. Capacity was built by guiding the schools to collect, interpret and use data on their school wellness environment and student lifestyle behaviors. Autonomy was intentionally promoted through the use of motivational interviewing (MI) principles during our feedback sessions with the schools. Schools were provided with guidelines and best practices for running and evaluating SWITCH but were given freedom to run programming in ways that worked best for them. A total of 8 schools participated in the Spring 2017 pilot and results supported the utility of the revised model. The process evaluation\ demonstrate that we can effectively train schools to conduct SWITCH on their own. The evaluation also demonstrated that schools can enroll students through the online CMS system and help students use the online Youth Activity Profile assessments needed for the primary outcomes. The documented ability to train schools to capture and use this data with our proposed analytic models is an important outcome since it demonstrates that we can efficiently obtain the needed data to continue program evaluation over time (even as more schools enroll). Thus, the 2017 project provides a strong foundation for our next 2018 project phase.

    Publications


      Progress 03/01/16 to 02/28/17

      Outputs
      Target Audience:The target audience in SWITCH is young, elementary school children but we have now directly targeted grades 4 and 5 (instead of 3 as in our original work) since these grades were emphasized as a need by our Team Nutrition colleaugues. While students are the distal target, the more proximal target of our programming is school wellness leaders since we are focused on developing training and support mechanisms to facilitate sustainable school wellness programming. Thus, the broader goal (as a dissemination study) is to test models for successful dissemination of the SWITCH obesity prevention program. The focus this past year was on testing school modules that were designed to facilitate the integration of schol wellness programming in SWITCH. A total of 6 schools participated in the pilot study and the results were summarized in our final report. Changes/Problems:The pilot testing provided valuable insights that have led to some refinements in our training methods and our methods to evaluate change. The pilot results led us specifically toward a focus on promoting school 'system change' and this led to some minor changes in our evaluation plan. We will still accomplish the same goals but progress the work across two successive years instead of simply training new cohorts of schools in the same way. This will enable us to further refine the training method and then in the subsequent year to directly evaluate outcomes in schools that receive the training compared to those that don't. Details are below: In Spring 17, we will use a "Hybrid 2 Design" to further refine methods for implementation of school wellness change. Key goals will be to develop and refine a series of Audit tools that will be used to provide feedback to schools as well as to evaluate school environments and dynamics. Another key goal is to better understand school wellness system change (district vs school). The pilot study revealed different dynamics in schools from large districts versus more independent schools. Therefore, we plan to directly compare outcomes in a balanced sample of urban/suburban schools and smaller rural schools. All schools will receive the same facilitated system change training (In Person Training (1), Webinars (2-3), and Continuous Support with phone / email). Research questions will focus on evaluating feasibility of school technical support and training, evaluating possible differences in urban/rural school system changeability, and evaluating the utility of audit tools. The developmental work in 2017 will pave the way for the final evaluation in the project. In Spring 18 we will use a "Hybrid 3 Implementation Design" to directly evaluate the utility of the refined training method. The key goal will be to evaluate the additive benefit of school wellness training focused on promoting team building and collaboration. We will use a clustered randomized design for this evaluation to directly compare the new SWITCH System Intervention model versus standard practice). This will enable us to determine the additive benefits of this type of training. If it proves to provide significant advantages for school wellness programming we will incorporate it into final dissemination models to be implemented by our ISU Extension and Outreach program that is positioned to handle long term dissemination. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?A key advance in our programming is the continuation of the Fall training session we used to recruit schools into our Spring Pilot. The original training session was conducted in partnership with Team Nutrition but we replicated the training in Fall of 2016 to recruit new cohorts of schools for 2017. We have had very favorable reviews from school leaders about the value of this training - particularly in light of the questions schools have about complying with the new USDA school wellness policies. We have modified our training plan and overall design to enable us to repeat this training each fall so that we can reach and influence a larger number of schools. We have built in opportunities for other schools to share their experiences with SWITCH and plan to continue to expand this as well. The continuation of the training course will provide continued opportunities for teams of school leaders to receive training on school wellness programming and to get information about implementation of SWITCH. We anticipate also obtaining approval to offer CEUs so that teachers can receive credit for taking part in training on school wellness. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?We participated in several state level meetings and conferences focused on school wellness and healthy lifestyles in order to promote interest and awareness about SWITCH. No other formal communications have been provided but we anticipate sharing more details on programming when next year as we move into the dissemination phase of our programming. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?The pilot provided new insights about important ways to more effectively engage and influence school leaders to adopt school wellness programming. We have re-conceptualized SWITCH with the new acronym of 'School Wellness Integration Targeting Child Health' to reflect the focus on helping schools integrate programming across the school. The program is conceptualized as a standardized process to facilitate changes in school wellness programming than that promotion of a packaged set of intervention materials and modules. Our goal has remained the same (i.e. to guide and support school wellness teams to collaborate in making environmental and programming changes that support healthy lifestyles in students). However, we have made modifications in HOW we carry out the training. Three specific phases have been incorporated into our refined training model and these will be piloted in our 2017 implementation cycle. The refinement of the methods and approaches are key to ensure that we have a sound training model prior to the full dissemination phase in 2018. Details of the revised training model are outlined below: School system change process will be initiated through the use of a sequential series of audit tools that will task school leaders to work together to evaluate needs and make plans. The completion of the audit tools will build capacity within the team and provide tangible outcomes to spur on collective action within the school. School system change will be facilitated through the adoption of a continuous quality improvement framework developed specifically for SWITCH. School teams will be tasked with planning programming and messages in monthly cycles that correspond with the cyclical nature of SWITCH (Do, View, Chew) themes. The flow will enable programming to be adjusted, enhanced, or varied over time to meet the specific needs of the school staff and to promote/sustain interests of the students. A novel aspect of this phase is that our team will utilize principles of 'motivational interviewing' to help empower the school teams to make change on their own School system change process will be sustained through guided reflection and training on program evaluation. Teams will be tasked with repeating the audit tools to examine potential changes in the nature of their network, their environment/practices and associated changes in behaviors. Teams will celebrate successes and internalize lessons learned to facilitate sustainability and continuity over time.

      Impacts
      What was accomplished under these goals? This past year, focus was on evaluating the utility of the new school modules developed by the team to enhance school engagement in SWITCH. Another key goal was to build capacity in the team for conducting distributed training to schools across the state. The SWITCH training model was piloted with a sample of 6 schools in Iowa to evaluate factors influencing the fidelity of implementation. Schools were encouraged to form a SWITCH School Wellness Team (SSWT) and to identify a primary liason or "SWITCH Coordinator" to lead the program implementation within the school. Defining elements of the SWITCH program (Quality Elements) were described in a preliminary training session and schools were provided with curricular modules and resources to carry out SWITCH in their individual schools. The project accomplished the intended goals of evaluating the utility of the modules and enabling our team to pilot the training methods and verify the utility of the online assessment tools. The results provided specific insights about the modules and also revealed needs for refinement. For example, teachers indicated the need for the materials to be simpler and easier to use so that is a key priority for the next round. The results also revealed differential outcomes in small versus large schools and this was attributed to more cohesion and integration in the school teams in these smaller schools. This outcome helped to refine our methods which will now focus on building capacity in school teams to help the teams promote integration and cohesion around the school wellness programming.

      Publications


        Progress 03/01/15 to 02/29/16

        Outputs
        Target Audience:The target audience is young, elementary school children (grade 3). However, we adopt a social-ecological framework by working to promote links between the home (parents) and schools (teachers) so that children receive an integrated and complementary message about how to be active, to eat healthier and to be less sedentary. We hypothesize that the supplementary school based components will lead to stronger outcomes for the youth / parents. The proposed project will directly impact parents and youth in a sample of schools, but the broader goal (as a dissemination study) is to test models for successful dissemination of the SWITCH obesity prevention program. Thus, the teachers and the schools are also key targets of the intervention. The insights from the school / teacher evaluation and the efforts to build training models for teachers will help to ensure better sustainability of the programming over time. Changes/Problems:The project has proceeded as planned but we have had to make some modifications in our timelines due to some delays in the refinement of the website. We are completing pilot testing of the website and expect to be able to complete the preliminary evaluation of the school-based modules. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?A key goal in the Fall of 2015 was to begin recruiting / training schools. In partnership with the Iowa Team Nutrition group, we held a training workshop in November for over 100 school leaders from 30-40 different schools. Our team provided an overview of the Switch program and demonstrated how some of the planned school modules could be used to facilitate and enhance school wellness programming. We shared handouts and information to explain how schools can enroll in the Switch program in the Spring of 2016. We have been in active communication with a number of schools and districts and expect to be able to recruit the needed number of schools for the evaluation. The feedback from the program was very favorable (See Attached Workshop Evaluation) and we will likely replicate the training on an annual / bi-annual basis. Over time, we expect that this process will enable us to continue working with schools to enhance their school wellness programming. We would expect that we be able to attract new schools into the programming over time while continuing to support (and learn from) other schools that are already using Switch. Our team also submitted an internal grant to facilitate the development of a more coordinated inservice/preservice training program to assist in dissemination information about how to set up and manage Comprehensive School Physical Activity Programming (CSPAP). There has been considerable public health interest in CSPAP models and the Switch program provides an ideal implementation model since it integrates school programming and provides a way to reach and motivate parents to be involved in school wellness programming. We did not receive the supplemental internal funding through our University for this curricular development but plan to continue working to develop this class. Our plan would be to create a pre-service course for ISU students interested in physical education / elementary education so that students could get academic credit for the course. A parallel track would be developed for inservice training to provide opportunities for Iowa teachers to get continuing education credit and/or earn credits towards a masters degree. Our team is actively working on this plan and will be including this development over the course of the work on the project. This training will facilitate the long term sustainability of the programming while also advancing the use of best-practices in school wellness programming. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?We have distributed handouts and flyers to schools to provide information about the Switch program and the options for enrollment. We have also released video demonstrations of how the Switch programming works to make it easier for schools to understand the goals of the program and how it would work in schools. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?The focus of the upcoming year is to pilot the refined school modules and the ability of schools to utilize the new web-based tools. We had planned to run a randomized controlled trial on 20 schools in this first year (10 running the base Switch program and 10 running the enhanced Switch + program). We have had considerable interest from a number of schools and will be working to carry out the planned year 1 evaluation in the Spring of 2016. The timing may necessitate that we run a smaller or shorter pilot in the spring to ensure that the website works as planned. While this will limit the sample size for our preliminary comparisons we are confident that we will have sufficient power to complete the needed evaluation of the modules. Our overall goal in this early evaluation was to refine the enhanced Switch + program before broader dissemination in year 2 and 3 so the reduced size of the year 1 evaluation will not detract from the main outcomes to be evaluated in the study.

        Impacts
        What was accomplished under these goals? Consistent with our timeline, the focus of work this first year has been focused on refine the web-based content management system (CMS) website needed to run the program. We had a primitive version that served the program well for the past 3 years but determined that a more robust and innovative tool was needed to make it easier for schools to manage and promote the Switch program on their own. We contracted with a new web developer with expertise in media and web programming. The development process has led to a number of exciting enhancements and features including the inclusion of avatars and badges to reward and motivate students that track their progress and make behavioral "switches". Parallel tracking of school-level "switches" will provide similar prompts and nudges to maintain engagement of the school staff. We have used established game-theory and behavioral economics principles in developing these student / school components. These features will increase motivation and help to increase engagement in the program over time. The development process has taken longer than expected and this may necessitate running a shorter evaluation in the Spring of 2016. We have already determined that a 12 week program would be more attractive to parents and schools (compared to the previous 16 week version used in the past). Therefore, active consideration is being given to the most appropriate timing and length of the program.

        Publications